Russian MNCS and international investment paradigm (Before COVID-19)
Vol 8, Issue 6, 2024
VIEWS - 150 (Abstract) 80 (PDF)
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between Russian FDI carried out by large MNCs and investment development path (IDP). Although statistical analysis does not establish a significant relationship between outward FDI and GDP, the behavior of Russian outward FDI contradicts traditional models. Two primary factors contribute to this paradox. First, the complex business environment in Russia, characterized by a combination of both improvements and contradictions, has a significant impact on outward FDI behavior. Secondly, the duality of the Russian economy and society plays a decisive role. This segment resembles a high-income country with ample resources, while most face lower income levels, raising concerns about wealth distribution. Historical factors, including Russia’s transition from a state-controlled to a market-oriented economy, contribute to the internationalization of Russian MNCs. Both state-owned enterprises and privatized firms are influenced by the state, although to varying degrees. Government involvement in international business strategies increases the knowledge and experience of Russian MNCs, but also raises concerns about political influence.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Boudier-Bensebaa F. (2008). FDI-assisted development in the light of the investment development path paradigm: Evidence from Central and Eastern European countries. Transnational Corporations, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp.37–68.
Bulatov, A. S. (2018). Balance of payments of contemporary Russia: Specificities, management, prospects. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 9, 143–157. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-9-143-157
Durán J. and Úbeda F. (2010). The investment development path of newly developed countries. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 12(1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357151042000323076
Satoglu, E. B. (2017). “Emerging” through Foreign Investment: Investment Development Path Estimation of “MINT” Economies. Advances in Economics and Business, 5(5), 256-264.
Grigoryev, Y. (2007). Today or not today: Deregulating the Russian gas sector. Energy Policy, 35(5), 3036–3045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.07.014
Hegedűs, M., Cseh, B., & Fábics, I. (2020). Accounting Aspects of Digitalization and Industry 4.0 in Hungary. Regional and Business Studies, 12(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33568/rbs.2508
Jan, M., Ali, M. & Khan, M. (2019). The Impact of Governance on Foreign Direct Investments: Evidence from Pakistan, India & Bangladesh. International Journal of Management Research and Emerging Sciences, 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.56536/ijmres.v9i1.50
Kalotay, K., & Sulstarova, A. (2010). Modelling Russian outward FDI. Journal of International Management, 16(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2010.03.004
Kalotay, K. (2005). Outward Foreign Direct Investment from Russia in a Global Context. The Haworth Press, Inc.
Kalotay, K. (2008). Russian transnationals and international investment paradigms. Research in International Business and Finance, 22(2), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2006.12.002
Kuznetsov, A. V. (2021). Direct Investment from Russia Abroad: Changes since 2018. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 91(6), 700–707. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331621060162
Liuhto, K. T., & Majuri, S. S. (2014). Outward Foreign Direct Investment from Russia: A Literature Review. Journal of East-West Business, 20(4), 198–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2014.967434
Masca S. G. and Vaiden V. L. (2010). Outward FDI And the Investment Development Path in Romania. Revista Tinerilor Economisti (The Young Economists Journal), University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(15S), pages 27–38.
Michailova, S., & Nechayeva, K. (2014). The Role of Personal Networks in Russian MNCs’ Internationalization. International Finance Review, 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1569-376720140000015004
Ogutu, H., El Archi, Y., & Dénes Dávid, L. (2023). Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 11–45. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.001
Panibratov, A. (2017). International Strategy of Emerging Market Firms. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315696669
Panibratov A., Latukha M. (2014). The Vector of the home government influence upon Russian MNEs: Balancing the control against the interest. Working Paper # 6 (E) –2014. Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University: SPb.
Panibratov, A., & Michailova, S. (2019). The role of state ownership and home government political support in Russian multinationals’ internationalization. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 14(3), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-10-2017-0380
RIA ranking. (2019). Russia’s largest companies by capitalization—results of 2018. Available online: http://www.riarating.ru/infografika/20190129/630115992.html (accessed on 6 July 2023).
Rosneft. (2019). Annual report 2017. Available online: https://www.rosneft.ru/docs/report/2017/en/results/international-projects.html (accessed on 15 May 2023).
Satoglu, E. B. (2017). “Emerging” through Foreign Investment: Investment Development Path.
Sberbank (2019). International Business. Available online: https://www.sberbank.ru/ru/about/affiliated_banks_abroad (accessed on 20 June 2023).
Stoian, C. (2013). Extending Dunning’s Investment Development Path: The role of home country institutional determinants in explaining outward foreign direct investment. International Business Review, 22(3), 615–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.09.003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i6.3725
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Serzhena Tcyrempilova, Can Ertugrul, Mihály Hegedűs, Mohammad Daud Ali, Lóránt Dénes Dávid, Róbert Magda
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.