The paper demonstrates the importance of subnational data on housing to be systematically reported and added to country typologies. We asked which national and local level characteristics of housing regimes can serve as benchmarks for reasonable country groupings. The aim of this paper is to (1) develop a methodological tool enabling the comparison of conditions for housing policy implementation on national and subnational levels and (2) identify the group of countries where conditions for housing policy implementation on national and subnational levels tend to be comparable. This country classification can be used as a practical instrument for comparative analyses and policy learning. As a conceptual framework, we used the international comparative Housing research 2.0 launched by Hoekstra in 2020. For our analysis, we selected 15 basic factors that were tested in 24 European countries. We have identified three key factors having an impact on housing policy implementation: decentralisation level in housing, local budget housing expenditure and the information on which governance level has core competencies within housing. The numeric database has been run through a k-means cluster analysis. Five distinct types of countries with similarities in conditions for housing policy implementation on national and subnational level have been identified and described.

Aalbers, B. A. (2016). The Financialization of Housing: A political economy approach. Routledge.

Angel, S. (2000). Housing Policy Matters: A Global Analysis. Oxford University Press.

Arundel, R., Doling, J. (2017). The end of mass homeownership? Changes in labour markets and housing tenure opportunities across Europe. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 32(4): 649–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-017-9551-8

Basolo. V., (2000). City Spending on Economic Development versus Affordable Housing: Does Inter-City Competition or Local Politics Drive Decisions? Journal of Urban Affairs 22(3): 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2166.00059

Blackwell. T, Kohl, S. (2018). Historicizing housing typologies: beyond welfare state regimes and varieties of residential capitalism. Housing Studies 34(2): 298-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2018.1487037

Debrunner, G., Hartmann, T., (2020). Strategic use of land policy instruments for affordable housing—Coping with social challenges under scarce land conditions in Swiss cities. Land Use Policy, 99, 104993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104993

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton University Press.

EU (2007). Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities. Available online: https://territorialagenda.eu/wp-content/uploads/leipzig_charter_2007.pdf (accessed on 15 October 2023).

Eurofound (2022). European Quality of Life Survey., data collected in 2016. Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/data/european-quality-of-life-survey (accessed on 15 October 2023).

Feather, C. (2019). Municipal finance for housing: local government approaches to financing housing in cities. Commonwealth. Journal of Local Governance, 21, 6517. https://doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.v0i21.6517

Haffner, M., Lennartz. Ch., Dol, K. (2012). Housing. In: Jonker, J (editor). Countries compared on public performance. A study of public sector performance in 28 countries. The Netherlands Institute for Social Research. pp. 241–285.

Hoekstra, J. (2005). Is there a Connection between Welfare State Regime and Dwelling Type? An Exploratory Statistical Analysis. Housing Studies 20(3): 475-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030500062509

Hoekstra, J. (2020). Comparing Local Instead of National Housing Regimes? Towards International Comparative Housing Research 2.0. Critical Housing Analysis 7(1): 74-85. https://doi.org/10.13060/23362839.2020.7.1.505

Horne, R. (2018). Urban Low Carbon Transitions: Housing and Urban Change. In Urban Sustainability Transitions: Australian Cases-International Perspectives. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. pp. 3-18.

Housing Europe (2022). The State of Housing in Europe mid-2022. Available online: https://www.housingeurope.eu/resource-1705/the-state-of-housing-in-europe-2022 (accessed on 22 July 2022).

Hulchanski, J. D. (2004). What factors shape Canadian Housing Policy? In Municipal-Federal Provincial Relations in Canada. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Kadi, J., Musterd, S. (2013). Housing for the poor in a neo-liberalising just city: Still affordable, but increasingly inaccessible. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 106(3): 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12101

Kang, V., Groetelaers, D. A. (2018). Regional governance and public accountability in planning for new housing: A new approach in South Holland, the Netherlands. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36(6): 1027-1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417733748

Kemeny, J. (2001). Comparative housing and welfare: Theorising the relationship. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 16(1): 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011526416064

Lawson, J., Ruonavaara H. (2020). Land policy for affordable and inclusive housing. An international review, RMIT University, University of Turku, Strategic Research, Academy of Finland. Available online: https://smartland.fi/wp-content/uploads/Land-policy-for-affordable-and-inclusive-housingan-international-review.pdf (accessed on 17 May 2022).

Lewis, P. G. (2016). Offering Incentives for New Development: The role of Social Status, Politics, and Local Growth Experience. Journal of Urban Affairs 24(2): 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9906.00119.

Malpezzi, S., Mayo, S. K. (1997). Housing and Urban Development Indicators: A good idea whose time has returned. Real Estate Economics 15(1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00705.

Matznetter, W. (2020). Integrating Varieties of Capitalism, Welfare Regimes, and Housing at Multiple Levels and in the Long Run. Critical Housing Analysis, 7(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.13060/23362839.2020.7.1.504

Murie, A., Musterd, S. (2004). Social Exclusion and Opportunity Structures in European Cities and Neighbourhoods. Urban Studies 41(8): pp 1441-1459. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000226948.

Musterd, S., Bontje, M., Rouwendal, J. (2016). Skills and cities. Regions and Cities. Routledge.

OECD (2020). National Accounts of OECD Countries, General Government Accounts 2020. Available online: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/national-accounts-of-oecd-countries-general-government-accounts-2020_67c17a09-en. (accessed on 23 June 2023).

OECD (2021b). Country snapshots. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/housing/policy-toolkit/country-snapshots/ (accessed on 23 June 2023).

OECD (2021a). Building for a better tomorrow: Policies to make housing more affordable. Employment, Labour and Social Affairs Policy Briefs, OECD, Paris, Available online: http://oe.cd/affordable-housing-2021 (accessed on 22 May 2022).

OECD (2022a). Better Life Index. Available online: https://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/ (accessed on 20 April 2022).

OECD (2022c). OECD Affordable Housing Database. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/housing/data/affordable-housing-database/ (accessed on 20 April 2022).

OECD (2022d). Policies toward Affordable Housing. Affordable Housing Database. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/housing/data/affordable-housing-database/housing-policies.htm (accessed: 20 April 2022).

OECD (2022b). Housing Affordability. Affordable Housing Database. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/housing/data/affordable-housing-database/housing-conditions.htm (accessed on 20 April 2022).

Peverini, M. (2021). Grounding Urban Governance on Housing Affordability: A Conceptual Framework for Policy Analysis. Insights from Vienna. Partezipazione & Conflitto 14(2): 848-869. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v14i2p848

Schwartz, H., Seabrooke, L. (2008). Varieties of Residential Capitalism in the International Political Economy: Old Welfare States and the New Politics of Housing. Comparative European Politics 6: 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2008.10

Statistics Iceland. (2022). Households: Tenure status by dwelling type 2004-2021. Available online: https://px.hagstofa.is/pxen/pxweb/en/Samfelag/Samfelag__lifskjor__4_husnaedismal__0_stadaahusnaedismarkadi/LIF03214.px (accessed on 20 August 2022).

Statistics Norway. (2022). Dwelling and housing conditions. Available online: https://www.ssb.no/en/bygg-bolig-og-eiendom/bolig-og-boforhold (accessed on 20 August 2022).

Stephens, M. (2017). Housing regimes twenty years after Kemeny. Heriot-Watt University. Available online: https://researchportal.hw.ac.uk/en/publications/housing-regimes-twenty-years-after-kemeny (accessed on 15 January 2024).

Stephens, M. (2020a). How Housing Systems are Changing and Why: A Critique of Kemeny’s Theory of Housing Regimes. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(5): 521-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1814404

Stephens, M. (2020b). Towards a Multi-layered Housing Regime Framework: Responses to Commentators. Housing Theory and Society 37(5): 584-596, https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1816573

Stephens, M., Hick, R. (2022). Comparative housing research. To be published In Research Handbook on Housing and society. Edward Elgar Publishing. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359686459_Comparative_housing_research (accessed on 20 May 2022).

Turner, M. A. (2017). Beyond People Versus Place: A Place-Conscious Framework for Investing in Housing and Neighbourhoods. Housing Policy Debate 27(2): 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2016.1164739

UN. (2021). Goal 11: Make cities inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/cities/ (accessed on 27 April 2022).