Legal evolution in the financial realm: Propelling auditor accountability in England

James Foster

Article ID: 3319
Vol 8, Issue 6, 2024

VIEWS - 334 (Abstract) 163 (PDF)

Abstract


This article advocates for a fundamental shift in England’s legal approach to professional negligence, particularly within the domains of accounting and audit. English law should move away from its intricate and unclear case law surrounding professional negligence towards a clearly defined test for professional misconduct. Drawing upon a comparative analysis with the legal framework in the United States, where auditors are not shielded from liability under the law, the article highlights the need for a more consistent and accountable legal landscape in England. One of the main aspects that necessitates change is the proximity test, as set out in the Caparo case, which currently prevents auditors from being held liable for negligence to investors (as third parties)—despite investors relying on auditors for their professional skill to audit accounts. As investors rely on audited accounts when making financial decisions, a well-defined test for professional negligence should align English law with international standards and empower victims to seek compensation from the auditors themselves and/or the auditors’ professional indemnity insurance. Such a change would enhance trust and transparency in the financial domain.


Keywords


negligence; comparative law; England; United States; audit; accounting; professional negligence; reform

Full Text:

PDF


References


Ashe, M., QC, Hill-Smith, A., Lynagh, R. (2017). Professional Negligence and Liability.

Baker, C. R., & Prentice, D. (2008). The origins of auditor liability to third parties under United States common law. Accounting History, 13(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1032373207088177

Baker, C. R., & Quick, R. (1996). A comparison of auditors’ legal liability in the USA and selected European countries. European Business Review, 96(3), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555349610116753

Baker, L., & Johnson, M. (2013). Comparative Negligence Liability of Auditors: A Global Perspective. International Journal of Auditing, 17(1), 32–49.

Blanpain, R. M. (2022). The Legal Environment of Auditing in the United Kingdom. European Business Organization Law Review.

Boyle, T., Bhabra, M. F. Z., & Hassall, A. (2020). Auditor Negligence and Fraud Detection: A Simultaneous Equations Approach. Journal of Accounting Research.

House of Lords. (1990). Caparo Industries plc v Dickman. 2 AC 605 House of Lords.

Dhali, M., Hassan, S., Mehar, S. M., et al. (2023). Cryptocurrency in the Darknet: sustainability of the current national legislation. International Journal of Law and Management, 65(3), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-09-2022-0206

United States District Court. (2007). Giles v. General Motors Accept, 494 F.3d 865 (9th Cir. 2007).

Hassan, S., Amuda, Y. J., Dhali, M., et al. (2023). Contract Structure of Production Sharing Agreement by International Oil Company in Exploration of Petroleum Resources in Developing Countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13(3), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.14142

Hassan, S., Dhali, M., Zaman, F., et al. (2021). Big data and predictive analytics in healthcare in Bangladesh: regulatory challenges. Heliyon, 7(6), e07179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07179

Hedley Byrne and Co Ltd v Heller. (2021). Hedley Byrne v Heller-Brief Case Summary. Available online: https://www.lawteacher.net/cases/hedley-byrne-v-heller.php?vref=1 (accessed on 20 January 2024).

IBISWorld. (2023). Accounting & Auditing in the UK-Market Size 2023. IBISWorld. Available online: https://www.ibisworld.com/united-kingdom/number-of-businesses/accounting-auditing/3880/ (accessed on 4 March 2024)

Keay, A., Walton, P. (2010). Auditor Liability to Third Parties. Journal of Business Law, 2010(5), pp. 123–140.

Mazziotta, E. (n.d.). Blockchain Technology and the Future of Audit Profession. Northeastern Association of Business, Economics and Technology. ResearchGate. Unpublished work.

McInnes., Simmons. (2017). Negligence: The Law Explained. Victorian Sentencing Manual ('VSM').

Morris, M. B. (2009). Accountants’ Negligence and Liability. Bloomsbury Professional.

Morris, P. E. (2009). Contractual Limitations on the Auditor’s Liability: An Uneasy Combination of Law and Accounting. The Modern Law Review, 72(4), 607–627. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00759.x

OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (September 25 Version) [Large language model]. ChatGPT by OpenAI.

Owhoso, V. (2020). The Case for Auditors’ Liability. International Journal of Auditing, 2019(3).

Rouas, V. (2022). Achieving Access to Justice in a Business and Human Rights Context. University of London Press. https://doi.org/10.14296/202201.9781911507192

Schwartz, R. (1998). Auditors’ Liability, Vague Due Care, and Auditing Standards. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 11, pp. 183–207. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008220317852

Smith, J. (2009). Auditor Liability: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 17(2), 147–159.

Storey, A. (2012). An evaluation of reforms to auditor liability: necessity or step too far? King’s Student Law Review, 4(2), 4–21

Tomlinson, H., QC, Ryder, M. QC, & Spearman, R. QC. (2015). The Law of Professional-Client Confidentiality: Regulating the Disclosure of Confidential Personal Information. Oxford University Press.

Ultramares Corp. v. Touche, 255 N.Y. 170, 174 N.E. 441 (N.Y. 1931).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i6.3319

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 James Foster

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.