Under the concept of green development, enterprises will face more environmental constraints. Whether government environmental regulation (ER) can effectively promote corporate environmental performance (CEP) has not yet been unified among scholars, and few studies have conducted bibliometric analysis on ER and CEP. Based on the above, this study has three purposes: first, to fill the research gap by analyzing and visualizing 72 articles on ER and CEP through Biblioshiny and VOSviewer; second, to help scholars easily understand the research development and quickly find promising research directions; and lastly, to enable the government and corporate managers gain a more comprehensive view of ER’s impacts on CEP, which can assist in policy making and business management. The research found that: (a) the number of articles and citations in the field is on the rise. China is the most academically influential country in terms of publications, citations, and collaborations. Journal of Cleaner Production is the top-ranked journal. Ramanathan R, Testa F, and Zhang Y are the top three authors. Environmental management, sustainability, and China are the most popular keywords. Collaboration between authors, institutions, and countries is relatively weak and isolated. (b) ER and CEP have three emerging clusters: Climate Change, FDI, as well as Environmental Awareness, and three core clusters: Environmental Management, Data Envelopment Analysis, and Economic Analysis. The evolution of themes shows a trend from decentralized to centralized and then back to decentralized. (c) Future research can take the Regulatory Framework, Green Technological Innovation, and Environmental Management System as breaking points.

1. Aksnes, D. W., & Sivertsen, G. (2019). A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2019-0001
2. Albrizio, S., Kozluk, T., & Zipperer, V. (2017). Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 81, 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.06.002
3. An, J., Yang, B., Liu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Environmental regulation, green technology and environmental governance performance. Statistics & Decision, 38(13), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2022.13.037
4. Aragòn-Correa, J. A., Marcus, A. A., & Vogel, D. (2020). The Effects of Mandatory and Voluntary Regulatory Pressures on Firms’ Environmental Strategies: A Review and Recommendations for Future Research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 339–365. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0014
5. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
6. Arslan, H. M., Chengang, Y., Bilal, Siddique, M., & Yahya, Y. (2022). Influence of Senior Executives Characteristics on Corporate Environmental Disclosures: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(3), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15030136
7. Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2019). Innovation and technology for sustainable mining activity: A worldwide research assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 221, 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.243
8. Bashir, M. F. (2022). Discovering the evolution of Pollution Haven Hypothesis: A literature review and future research agenda. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(32), 48210–48232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20782-1
9. Bashir, M. F., MA, B., Bilal, Komal, B., & Bashir, M. A. (2021). Analysis of environmental taxes publications: a bibliometric and systematic literature review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(16), 20700–20716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12123-x
10. Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental Performance and Executive Compensation: An Integrated Agency-Institutional Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.36461950
11. Borsatto, J. M. L. S., & Bazani, C. L. (2023). Green innovation and environmental and financial performance: trends and challenges for future research. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 17(1/2), 152. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijisd.2023.127951
12. Bosi, M. K., Lajuni, N., Wellfren, A. C., & Lim, T. S. (2022). Sustainability Reporting through Environmental, Social, and Governance: A Bibliometric Review. Sustainability, 14(19), 12071. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912071
13. Camisón, C. (2010). Effects of coercive regulation versus voluntary and cooperative auto-regulation on environmental adaptation and performance: Empirical evidence in Spain. European Management Journal, 28(5), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2010.03.001
14. Cao, S., Nie, L., Sun, H., Sun, W., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2021). Digital finance, green technological innovation and energy-environmental performance: Evidence from China’s regional economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 327, 129458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129458
15. Caviggioli, F., & Ughetto, E. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of the research dealing with the impact of additive manufacturing on industry, business and society. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.022
16. Chan, H. K., Yee, R. W. Y., Dai, J., & Lim, M. K. (2016). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.12.006
17. Chelly, A., Nouira, I., Hadj-Alouane, A. B., & Frein, Y. (2021). A comparative study of progressive carbon taxation strategies: impact on firms’ economic and environmental performances. International Journal of Production Research, 60(11), 3476–3500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1924410
18. Chen, F., Ngniatedema, T., & Li, S. (2018). A cross-country comparison of green initiatives, green performance and financial performance. Management Decision, 56(5), 1008–1032. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-08-2017-0761
19. Chhtrapati, D., Trivedi, D., Chaudhari, S. P., Sharma, A., & Bhatt, A. (2023). Global research performance on social media security: a bibliometric visualization analysis. Information Discovery and Delivery. https://doi.org/10.1108/idd-04-2022-0029
20. Chowdhury, S. B., DasGupta, R., Choudhury, B. K., & Sen, N. (2023). Evolving alliance between corporate environmental performance and financial performance: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Business and Society Review, 128(1), 95–131. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12301
21. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. D. (2004). The Market Valuation of Environmental Capital Expenditures by Pulp and Paper Companies. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 329–353. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.329
22. Dai, Y., Peng, W., Song, H., & Liu, Z. (2021). Research on the Relationship between Government Environmental Regulation, Green Behavior of Enterprises and Enterprise Performance. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science), 35(12), 72–82.
23. Dechezleprêtre, A., Koźluk, T., Kruse, T., Nachtigall, D., & de Serres, A. (2019). Do Environmental and Economic Performance Go Together? A Review of Micro-level Empirical Evidence from the Past Decade or So. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 13(1–2), 1–118. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000106
24. Delmas, M. A., Nairn-Birch, N., & Lim, J. (2015). Dynamics of Environmental and Financial Performance. Organization & Environment, 28(4), 374–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615620238
25. Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 209–222. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.409
26. Dhiaf, M. M., Atayah, O. F., Nasrallah, N., & Frederico, G. F. (2021). Thirteen years of Operations Management Research (OMR) journal: a bibliometric analysis and future research directions. Operations Management Research, 14(3–4), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00199-8
27. Dong, M., Liang, Y., & Li, G. (2011). The Impact of Environmental Regulations on China’s Export Competitiveness—An Analysis Based on Input-Output Tables. China Industrial Economics, 03, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2011.03.006
28. Dong, Y., Wang, X., Jin, J., Qiao, Y., & Shi, L. (2014). Effects of eco-innovation typology on its performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese enterprises. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 34, 78–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.11.001
29. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
30. Doshi, A. R., Dowell, G. W. S., & Toffel, M. W. (2013). How firms respond to mandatory information disclosure. Strategic Management Journal, 34(10), 1209–1231. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2055
31. Esfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y., Watson, G., & Zhang, T. (2017). Governance pressures and performance outcomes of sustainable supply chain management—An empirical analysis of UK manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.098
32. Farrukh, M., Raza, A., Meng, F., & Wu, Y. (2021). CMS at 13: a retrospective of the journey. Chinese Management Studies, 16(1), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-07-2020-0291
33. Gao, S., Meng, F., Gu, Z., Liu, Z., & Farrukh, M. (2021). Mapping and Clustering Analysis on Environmental, Social and Governance Field a Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus. Sustainability, 13(13), 7304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137304
34. Garfield, E., & Sher, I. H. (1993). KeyWords Plus™—algorithmic derivative indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(5), 298–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199306)44:5<298:aid-asi5>3.0.co;2-a
35. Graafland, J., & Smid, H. (2017). Reconsidering the relevance of social license pressure and government regulation for environmental performance of European SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 967–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.171
36. Green, D., & Cookson, R. (2012). Publishing and communication strategies. Academic and Professional Publishing, 99–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-84334-669-2.50005-6
37. Gu, Z., Meng, F., & Farrukh, M. (2021). Mapping the Research on Knowledge Transfer: A Scientometrics Approach. IEEE Access, 9, 34647–34659. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3061576
38. Gusmerotti, N. M., Testa, F., Amirante, D., & Frey, M. (2012). The role of negotiating tools in the environmental policy mix instruments: determinants and effects of the Environmental Agreement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.036
39. Hao, Y., Deng, Y., Lu, Z.-N., & Chen, H. (2018). Is environmental regulation effective in China? Evidence from city-level panel data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 966–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.003
40. Harsanto, B., & Firmansyah, E. A. (2023). A twenty years bibliometric analysis (2002 – 2021) of business economics research in ASEAN. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2194467
41. Hart, S. L. (1995). A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986. https://doi.org/10.2307/258963
42. He, D., Ren, S., & Zeng, H. (2021). Environmental labeling certification and firm environmental and financial performance: A resource management perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 751–767. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2915
43. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1996). The Determinants of an Environmentally Responsive Firm: An Empirical Approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0026
44. Jaffe, A., Peterson, S., Portney, P., & Stavins, R. (1995). Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), 132–163.
45. Janssens, A. C. J. W., Gwinn, M., Brockman, J. E., Powell, K., & Goodman, M. (2020). Novel citation-based search method for scientific literature: a validation study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-0907-5
46. Jin, J., Du, J., Long, X., & Boamah, K. B. (2019). Positive mechanism of foreign direct investment enterprises on China’s environment: Analysis of host country regulation and parent company management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.143
47. Joo, H. Y., Seo, Y. W., & Min, H. (2018). Examining the effects of government intervention on the firm’s environmental and technological innovation capabilities and export performance. International Journal of Production Research, 56(18), 6090–6111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1430902
48. Kanashiro, P., & Rivera, J. (2017). Do Chief Sustainability Officers Make Companies Greener? The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressures. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(3), 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3461-2
49. Karagiannopoulou, S., Sariannidis, N., Ragazou, K., Passas, I., & Garefalakis, A. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Strategy That Promotes Energy Environmental Transition and Combats Volatility in the Post-Pandemic World. Energies, 16(3), 1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031102
50. Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2006). Stakeholder Pressures And Environmental Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20785799
51. Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
52. Khan, A., Goodell, J. W., Hassan, M. K., & Paltrinieri, A. (2022). A bibliometric review of finance bibliometric papers. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102520
53. Khanna, M., & Damon, L. A. (1999). EPA’s Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1998.1057
54. King, A. A., Lenox, M. J., & Terlaak, A. (2005). The Strategic Use of Decentralized Institutions: Exploring Certification With the ISO 14001 Management Standard. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1091–1106. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573111
55. Lanoie, P., Laurent‐Lucchetti, J., Johnstone, N., & Ambec, S. (2011). Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(3), 803–842. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2011.00301.x
56. Lazzini, S., Occhipinti, Z., Parenti, A., & Verona, R. (2021). Disentangling economic crisis effects from environmental regulation effects: Implications for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2332–2353. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2749
57. Lei, J., Lin, S., Khan, M. R., et al. (2022). Research Trends of Board Characteristics and Firms’ Environmental Performance: Research Directions and Agenda. Sustainability, 14(21), 14296. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114296
58. Li, H., Arslan, H. M., Mousa, G. A., et al. (2023). Exploring sustainability disclosures in family firms: a bibliometric analysis. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2023.2188238
59. Li, H., & Zhang, Y. J. (2022). Environmental Performance of Carbon Emissions Trading Policy: Evidence From a New Comprehensive Analysis Model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2022.3216570
60. Li, M., Wang, X., Wang, Z., et al. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of the Research on the Impact of Environmental Regulation on Green Technology Innovation Based on CiteSpace. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13273. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013273
61. Li, R., & Ramanathan, R. (2018). Exploring the relationships between different types of environmental regulations and environmental performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 1329–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.132
62. Lima, C. O., & Bonetti, J. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production on coastal communities’ social vulnerability to climate change and to the impact of extreme events. Natural Hazards, 102(3), 1589–1610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03974-1
63. Liu, M., Chen, L., & Liao, J. (2020). A Study on the Impact of Environmental Regulation Tools on Regional Industrial Structure Upgrading—An Empirical Test Based on Provincial Panel Data in China. Ecological Economy, 36(02), 152–159.
64. Long, W., Luo, L., Sun, H., & Zhong, Q. (2022). Does going abroad lead to going green? Firm outward foreign direct investment and domestic environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 484–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3156
65. Ma, X., Fan, D., Zhou, Y., & Yang, C. H. (2021). The impact of inspection on the sustainable production strategy: Environmental violation and abatement in emerging markets. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 150, 102294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102294
66. Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2015). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
67. Ngo, Q. H. (2021). The impact of environmental regulation on environmental performance: A focus on third party logistics service providers in an emerging country. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 9(4), 857–866. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2021.8.003
68. Niesten, E., Jolink, A., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Chappin, M., & Lozano, R. (2017). Sustainable collaboration: The impact of governance and institutions on sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.085
69. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill.
70. Ohlan, R., Ohlan, A., & Chhikara, S. (2022). Scholarly Research of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis. Serials Review, 48(1–2), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2022.2101756
71. José de Oliveira, O., Francisco da Silva, F., Juliani, F., César Ferreira Motta Barbosa, L., & Vieira Nunhes, T. (2019). Bibliometric Method for Mapping the State-of-the-Art and Identifying Research Gaps and Trends in Literature: An Essential Instrument to Support the Development of Scientific Projects. Scientometrics Recent Advances. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85856
72. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
73. Peng, B., Sheng, X., & Wei, G. (2020). Does environmental protection promote economic development? From the perspective of coupling coordination between environmental protection and economic development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(31), 39135–39148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09871-1
74. Pham-Duc, B., Tran, T., Huu Hoang, D., & Bao Do, C. (2022). Global scientific literature on human resource development: a bibliometric analysis using Scopus database. European Journal of Training and Development, 47(7/8), 846–861. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-01-2022-0004
75. Phan Tan, L. (2022). Bibliometrics of social entrepreneurship research: Cocitation and bibliographic coupling analyses. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2124594
76. Porter, M. E. (1991). America’s Green Strategy. Scientific American, 264(4), 168–168. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0491-168
77. Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. van der. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
78. Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
79. Ramanathan, R., Poomkaew, B., & Nath, P. (2014). The impact of organizational pressures on environmental performance of firms. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12042
80. Rocio, H. G., Jaime, O. C., & Cinta, P. C. (2023). The Role of Management in Sustainable Tourism: A Bibliometric Analysis Approach. Sustainability, 15(12), 9712. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129712
81. Saeed, A., Jun, Y., Nubuor, S., Priyankara, H., & Jayasuriya, M. (2018). Institutional Pressures, Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Environmental and Economic Performance: A Two Theory View. Sustainability, 10(5), 1517. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051517
82. Sardana, V., & Singhania, S. (2022). Fifty Years of Research in Deposit Insurance: A Bibliometric Analysis and Review. FIIB Business Review, 231971452211164. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145221116455
83. Setiawan, D., Rahmawati, I. P., & Santoso, A. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of evolving trends in climate change and accounting research. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2267233
84. Shevchenko, A. (2020). Do financial penalties for environmental violations facilitate improvements in corporate environmental performance? An empirical investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1723–1734. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2711
85. Singhania, S., Singh, J., & Aggrawal, D. (2022). Gender diversity on board and corporate sustainability: a quantitative review based on bibliometric mapping. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 14(1), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-022-01789-w
86. Sutherland, J. W., Richter, J. S., Hutchins, M. J., et al. (2016). The role of manufacturing in affecting the social dimension of sustainability. CIRP Annals, 65(2), 689–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.003
87. Tan, B. (2016). The antinomial approach to environmental regulation. Peking University Law Journal, 28(6), 1512–1535.
88. Testa, F., Daddi, T., De Giacomo, M. R., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2014). The effect of Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control regulation on facility performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.003
89. Testa, F., Styles, D., & Iraldo, F. (2012). Case study evidence that direct regulation remains the main driver of industrial pollution avoidance and may benefit operational efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 21(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.002
90. Ullah, R., Asghar, I., & Griffiths, M. G. (2022). An Integrated Methodology for Bibliometric Analysis: A Case Study of Internet of Things in Healthcare Applications. Sensors, 23(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010067
91. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
92. Wan, G., Dawod, A. Y., Chanaim, S., & Ramasamy, S. S. (2023). Hotspots and trends of environmental, social and governance (ESG) research: a bibliometric analysis. Data Science and Management, 6(2), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2023.03.001
93. Wang, L., Shang, Y., & Li, C. (2023). How to improve the initiative and effectiveness of enterprises to implement environmental management system certification? Journal of Cleaner Production, 404, 137013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137013
94. Wang, M., Cheng, Z., Li, Y., Li, J., & Guan, K. (2020). Impact of market regulation on economic and environmental performance: A game model of endogenous green technological innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, 123969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123969
95. Wang, R., Wijen, F., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2018). Government’s green grip: Multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2), 403–428. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2714
96. Wang, Y., Liu, J., Hansson, L., Zhang, K., & Wang, R. (2011). Implementing stricter environmental regulation to enhance eco-efficiency and sustainability: A case study of Shandong Province’s pulp and paper industry, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(4), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.11.006
97. Xu, L., Mathiyazhagan, K., Govindan, K., et al. (2013). Multiple comparative studies of Green Supply Chain Management: Pressures analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 78, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.05.005
98. Yu, B., Zeng, S., Chen, H., Meng, X., & Tam, C. (2020). Doing more and doing better are two different entities: Different patterns of family control and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 1–20. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2605
99. Yu, W., Ramanathan, R., & Nath, P. (2017). Environmental pressures and performance: An analysis of the roles of environmental innovation strategy and marketing capability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.005
100. Zhang, J. (2016). Research on the differences in environmental performance of major urban agglomerations in China and their causes. Reform of Economic System, 1, 57–62.
101. Zhang, Y., & Song, Y. (2021). Environmental regulations, energy and environment efficiency of China’s metal industries: A provincial panel data analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124437
102. Zhang, Y., Zhang, R., & Zhang, C. (2022). Insight into the driving force of environmental performance improvement: Environmental regulation or media coverage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, 132024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132024
103. Zhou, K., Jin, X., Li, X., & Tao, Y. (2023). Enhancing sustainable development through effective disclosure: Corporate environmental performance and readability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2569
104. Zhuo, W. (2023). Environmental regulation and corporate sustainability: Evidence from green innovation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 1723–1737. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2449
105. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2014). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. doi: 10.1177/1094428114562629