Policy review towards the transitions of regional development of digital governance in China: The case of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay (2013–2023)

Chao-Chen Chung, Kaiqiang Wang, Yujia Zhong

Article ID: 3080
Vol 8, Issue 3, 2024

VIEWS - 2707 (Abstract)

Abstract


The central government of China has intensively guided regional integration and policy coordination towards the development of digital governance in the last ten years. The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay was one of the most important regions of China expected to accelerate regional development through policy coordination and establishment of digital infrastructures. This article adopted the method of content analysis to explore the policy transitions of digital governance in the Greater Bay including policy contents (in terms of policy objectives and instruments) and policy networks. Based on our empirical analysis, we found that top-down guidance from the central government did not necessarily generate regional coordination. Different governments of the same region could start policy coordination from shared policy objectives and policy instruments and establish innovative governance frameworks to achieve consensus. Therefore, regional coordination could be fulfilled.


Keywords


Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area; digital governance; policy networks; policy objectives; policy instruments; policy transitions

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Chen, T., Liang, Z., Yi, H., & Chen, S. (2023). Responsive E-government in China: A way of gaining public support. Government Information Quarterly, 40(3), 101809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101809
  2. Cheng, J., Chen, M., & Tang, S. (2023). Shenzhen—A typical benchmark of Chinese rapid urbanization miracle. Cities, 140, 104421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104421
  3. Chohan, S. R., Hu, G., Khan, A. U., Pasha, A. T., Saleem, F., & Sheikh, M. A. (2021). IoT as societal transformer: Improving citizens’ continuous usage intention in digital society through perceived public value. Library Hi Tech, 41(4), 1214–1237. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-05-2021-0156
  4. Chung, C. S, Kim S. B. (2019). A Comparative Study of Digital Government Policies, Focusing on E-Government Acts in Korea and the United States. Electronics, 8(11), 1362. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8111362
  5. Elo, S., Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.
  6. Gan, T., Zhang, M., & Zhang, Z. (2023). The impact of digital government policy on entrepreneurial activity in China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 79, 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.06.029
  7. He, Z. (2022). When data protection norms meet digital health technology: China’s regulatory approaches to health data protection. Computer Law & Security Review, 47, 105758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105758
  8. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  9. Li, X., Ding, Y. (2020). Holistic Governance for Sustainable Public Services: Reshaping Government–Enterprise Relationships in China’s Digital Government Context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1778. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051778
  10. Meng T. G., Zhang X. J. (2021). The research report on digital government development in China (2021). Economic Science Press. (in Chinese).
  11. Pyroha, I., Tokarchuk, L., Perezhniak, B., et al. (2022). E-democracy: an urgent need or a tribute to fashion? Legal analysis. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 11(51), 240–249. CLOCKSS. https://doi.org/10.34069/ai/2022.51.03.24
  12. Robertson, S. P., Vatrapu, R. K. (2010). Digital government. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44(1), 317–364. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2010.1440440115
  13. Rothwell, R., Zegveld W. (1985). Reindustrialization and Technology. New York: Logman Group Limited. pp. 83–104.
  14. State Council (2019). Outline Development Plan for the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.
  15. Sabatier, P., Mazmanian D. (1979). The Conditions of Effective Implementation: A Guide to Accomplishing Policy Objectives. Policy Analysis, 5.
  16. Spangenberg, J. H. (2004). Reconciling sustainability and growth: criteria, indicators, policies. Sustainable Development, 12(2), 74–86. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.229
  17. Tolbert, C. J., Mossberger, K., & McNeal, R. (2008). Institutions, Policy Innovation, and E-Government in the American States. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 549–563. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00890.x
  18. Vogler, S., Zimmermann, N., & Habimana, K. (2016). Stakeholder preferences about policy objectives and measures of pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement. Health Policy and Technology, 5(3), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2016.03.009
  19. Wang, R., Wang, Q., Shi, R., et al. (2023). How the Digital Economy Enables Regional Sustainable Development Using Big Data Analytics. Sustainability, 15(18), 13610. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813610
  20. Wang, S., Sun, X., & Zhong, S. (2023). Exploring the Multiple Paths to Improve the Construction Level of Digital Government: Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on the WSR Framework. Sustainability, 15(13), 9891. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139891
  21. Wimmer, R. D., Dominick J. R. (2013). Mass media research: an Introduction. United States: Michael Rosenberg.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i3.3080

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Chao-Chen Chung, Kaiqiang Wang, Yujia Zhong

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.