Social innovation potential and economic power: The example of Hungarian districts

Géza Tóth, Krisztina Varga, Kata Feketéné Benkó, Lóránt Dénes Dávid

Article ID: 3042
Vol 8, Issue 3, 2024

VIEWS - 114 (Abstract) 120 (PDF)

Abstract


Our previous research on social innovation examined the process, levels, and stakeholders of social innovation, as well as its relationship with technical and technological innovation. The present study analyzes the spatial image created by the social innovation potential and investigates its relationship with the economic power of the neighborhoods. The most important conclusion of the study is that the basic territorial inequality dimensions are the same in the case of both the social innovation potential and the district’s economic strength. The difference is primarily to be found in concentration, as economic power is much more concentrated in the capital and the most important economic and tourism centers than the social innovation potential. We can therefore state that developments based on social innovation can solve a lot of the highly concentrated spatial structure in Hungary.


Keywords


social innovation; economic power; measurability; Hungary; territorial inequality

Full Text:

PDF


References


Benedek , J., Kocziszky, Gy., Veresné Somosi, M., et al. (2015). Generating regional social innovation through an expert system (Hungarian). Észak-magyarországi Stratégiai Füzetek, 12(2): 4–22.

Borzaga, C., Bodini, R. (2014). What to make of social innovation? Toward a framework for policy development. Euricse Working Paper.

Bulut, C., Eren, H., & Halac, D. S. (2013). Social Innovation and Psychometric Analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.235

Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008

Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Harper & Row, Publishers, New York.

Freeman, C. (1988). Japan: A new national innovation system? In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., et al. (editors). Technology and Economy Theory. London, Printer.

Gábor, D. (1970). Innovations: Scientific, Technological, and Social. Oxford University Press.

Hochgerner, J. (2011). The Analysis of Social Innovation as Social Practice, Bridges.

Howaldt, J., Butzin, A., Domanski, D. & Kaletka, C. (2014). Theoretical approaches to social innovation—A critical literature review. A deliverable of the project: ‘Social Innovation: Driving Force of Social Change’ (SIDRIVE). Dortmund: Sozialforschungsstelle.

Kiss, J. P. (2003). Estimates of the GDP of small regions in 2000 (Hungarian). In: Nemes Nagy, J. (editor). Kistérségi Mozaik. (Regionális Tudományi Tanulmányok 8). Budapest: ELTE Regionális Földrajzi Tanszék—MTA-ELTE Regionális Tudományi Kutatócsoport. pp. 39–54.

Kleverbeck, M., Krlev, G., Mildenberger, G., et al. (2019). Indicators for Measuring Social Innovation. In: Howaldt, J. et al. (editors). Atlas of Social Innovation, 2nd. Volume: A World of New Practices, Oekom Verlag GmbH. pp. 98–101.

Kocziszky Gy., Veresné Somosi, M. & Balaton, K. (2015). Társadalmi innováció mérésének sajátosságai. In: „Mérleg és Kihívások” IX. Nemzetközi Tudományos Konferencia, Konferencia Kiadvány (szerk.: Lipták Katalin), 288–301.

Lőcsei, H. & Nemes Nagy, J. (2003). The economic weight and internal spatial structure of the Balaton Region (Hungarian). In: Nemes Nagy J. (editor). Kistérségi Mozaik. pp. 129–143. (Regionális Tudományi Tanulmányok 8.) Budapest: ELTE Regionális Földrajzi Tanszék-MTA-ELTE Regionális Tudományi Kutatócsoport.

Mikhaylov, A., Mikhaylova, A., Maksimenko, D., et al. (2022). Coastal regions in the geography of innovation activity: A comparative assessment of marine basins. Geographica Pannonica, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.5937/gp26-39439

Nagy, Z. & Tóth, G. (2019). Measuring the social innovation potential using the example of Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén (Hungarian). Észak-magyarországi Stratégiai Füzetek, 16(2), 97–109.

Nemes, G. & Varga, Á. (2015). Social innovation and social learning in rural development—Successes, problems, dilemmas (Hungarian). In: Veresné Somosi, M. (editor). “Balance and Challenges” IX. International Scientific Conference, Conference Publication Miskolc. pp. 434–444.

Payne, R. J. (2016). Global Issues, 5th ed. Boston: Pearson Education Inc. p. 16.

Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K. & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation Stanford Social Innovation Review 6 (4): 34–43. https://doi.org/10.48558/GBJY-GJ47

Pol, E. & Ville, S. (2009). Social Innovation: Buzz Word or Enduring Term? The Journal of Socio-Economics 38 (6): 878–885. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011

Polányi, K. (1945). Origins of Our Time: The Great Transformation. London: Gollancz.

Setiawan. P., Moaaz, K., Vasa, L., et al. (2021). Reviving an Unpopular Tourism Destination through the Placemaking Approach: Case Study of Ngawen Temple, Indonesia, Sustainability, 13(12): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126704

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books. Translated from the 1911 original German, Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung.

Szendi, D. (2018). A társadalmi innovációs potenciál mérésének lokális szintű lehetőségei, Erdélyi Társadalom, 16(1): 31–58.

Tobler, W. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region Economic Geography 46 (Supplement): 234–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/143141

Varga, K. & Tóth, G. (2021). Spatial statistical analysis of the social innovation potential of the settlements of Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg county (Hungarian). In: Sikos TT (editor). Társadalmi innováció-társadalmi jólét. Budapest: Ludovika Kiadó. pp. 11–25.

Varga, K. (2017). Social innovation in the functioning of local governments (Hungarian). In: Lipták K (editor). Társadalmi innováció és felelősségvállalás Észak-Magyarországon. Miskolc. pp. 7–15.

Varga, K., Tóth, G. & Nagy, Z. (2020). Examination of Social Innovation Potential Characteristics in the Example of Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County, Theory, Methodology, Practice: Club of Economics in Miskolc 16(1): 65–76.https://doi.org/10.18096/TMP.2020.01.07

Veresné Somosi, M. & Varga, K. (2018). How does social innovation contribute to solving social problems?—A processoriented framework for measuring social innovation European Journal of Social Sciences, Education and Research 12(1): 68–83. https://doi.org/10.2478/ejser-2018-0007

Veresné Somosi, M. & Varga, K. (2021). Conceptualisation as a tool in understanding social innovation—Methods, case studies, practices. University of Miskolc, Faculty of Economics.

Varga, K., Nagy, Z. & Tóth, G. (2020). Possibilities for measuring social innovation potential: The example of Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County, Theory, Methodology, Practice: Club of Economics in Miskolc 16(1): 65–76. https://doi.org/10.18096/TMP.2020.01.07




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i3.3042

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Géza Tóth, Krisztina Varga, Kata Feketéné Benkó, Lóránt Dénes Dávid

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.