The emission trading scheme (ETS) is arguably one of the most effective approaches for encouraging industries to transition to a low-carbon economy and, as a result, assisting nations in meeting their goals under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to mitigate the challenge of climate change. ETS is gaining popularity as more governments throughout the world contemplate implementing it, particularly in developing countries. Much of the existing research has concentrated on debates concerning ETS operations in developed nations. This study is to give a discourse of the success criteria for ETS implementation that have been identified in the literature and then cross-referenced in the context of Malaysia. For this, the research used an integrated approach of scoping review of existing literature and in-depth interviews with Malaysian stakeholders. Using Narassimhan et al. (2018)’s ETS assessment framework, the scoping review identified five major attributes that lead to successful ETS implementation in a global context that are environmental effectiveness, economic efficiency, market management, stakeholder engagement, and revenue management. In-depth interviews with several groups of discovered stakeholder engagement as an essential attribute that would play a critical role in advancing ETS implementation in Malaysia. The study concludes by proposing a complete strategy based on empirical information and first-hand narratives, providing useful insights for politicians, industry players, and environmental activists. The recommendation is especially important as Malaysia strives to improve its commitment to sustainable and responsible development in light of the challenges posed by climate change.

Afroz R, Tudin R, Morshed MN, et al. (2019). Developing a shariah-compliant equity-based crowdfunding model towards a Malaysian low-carbon consumer society. Malaysian Journal of Consumer and Family Economics 22: 185–202.

Abbasi MA, Amran A, Sahar NE (2022). Assessing the impact of corporate environmental irresponsibility on workplace deviant behavior of generation Z and millennials: A multigroup analysis. International Journal of Ethics and Systems. doi: 10.1108/IJOES-05-2022-0099

Amran A, Zainuddin Z, Zailani SHM (2013). Carbon trading in Malaysia: Review of policies and practices. Sustainable Development 21(3): 183–192. doi: 10.1002/sd.1549

Arksey H, O’Malley L (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8(1): 19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616

Boemare C, Quirion P, Sorrell S (2003). The evolution of emissions trading in the EU: Tensions between national trading schemes and the proposed EU directive. Climate Policy 3(sup2): S105–S124.

Bouchard JP, Pretorius TB, Kramers-Olen AL, et al. (2023). Global warming and psychotraumatology of natural disasters: The case of the deadly rains and floods of April 2022 in South Africa. Annales Médico-Psychologiques, Revue Psychiatrique 181(3): 234–239. doi: 10.1016/j.amp.2022.07.004

Carey JW, Morgan M, Oxtoby MJ (1996). Intercoder agreement in analysis of responses to open-ended interview questions: Examples from tuberculosis research. CAM Journal 8(3): 1–5. doi: 10.1177/1525822x960080030101

Chachuli FSM, Ludin NA, Jedi MAM, Hamid NH (2021). Transition of renewable energy policies in Malaysia: Benchmarking with data envelopment analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 150: 111456. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111456

Cheng L, Abraham J, Trenberth KE, et al. (2023). Another year of record heat for the oceans. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 40(6): 963–974. doi: 10.1007/s00376-023-2385-2

Creswell JW (2014). A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications.

Egenhofer C (2007). The making of the EU emissions trading scheme: Status, prospects and implications for business. European Management Journal 25(6): 453–463. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2007.07.004

Fernando Y, Tseng ML, Wahyuni-TD IS, et al. (2023). Blockchain technology adoption for carbon trading and energy efficiency: ISO manufacturing firms in Malaysia. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 26(11): 1556–1577. doi: 10.1080/13675567.2022.2090527

Friedlingstein P, Jones MW, O’Sullivan M, et al. (2022). Global carbon budget 2021. Earth System Science Data 14(4): 1917–2005. doi: 10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022

Han Y (2020). Impact of environmental regulation policy on environmental regulation level: A quasi-natural experiment based on carbon emission trading pilot. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27(19): 23602–23615. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08658-8

Hussain J, Lee C (2022). A green path towards sustainable development: optimal behavior of the duopoly game model with carbon neutrality instruments. Sustainable Development 30(6): 1523–1541. doi: 10.1002/sd.2325

ICDM Pulse (2021). Available online: https://pulse.icdm.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Twelfth-Plan-Document_compressed-1.pdf (accessed on 4 April 2023).

Leining C, Kerr S, Bruce-Brand B (2020). The New Zealand emissions trading scheme: Critical review and future outlook for three design innovations. Climate Policy 20(2): 246–264. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1699773

Li W, Jia Z (2017). Carbon tax, emission trading, or the mixed policy: Which is the most effective strategy for climate change mitigation in China? Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 20(2): 246–264. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1699773

Liu Y, Liu S, Shao X, He Y (2022). Policy spillover effect and action mechanism for environmental rights trading on green innovation: Evidence from China’s carbon emissions trading policy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 153: 111779. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111779

Liu Z, Abu Hatab A (2022). Assessing stakeholder engagement in public spending, green finance and sustainable economic recovery in the highest emitting economies. Economic Change and Restructuring 56(5): 3015–3040. doi: 10.1007/s10644-022-09414-3

Meng Y, Wang L, Wei Y, et al. (2022). Time-frequency dynamics, co-movement and causality among returns of global carbon emissions trading schemes (ETSs): A tale of four markets. Journal of Cleaner Production 363: 132564. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132564

Narassimhan E, Gallagher KS, Koester S, Alejo JR (2018). Carbon pricing in practice: A review of existing emissions trading systems. Climate Policy 18(8): 967–991. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1467827

Nguyen DB, Nong D, Siriwardana M, Pham HT (2023). Insights from ASEAN-wide emissions trading schemes (ETSs): A general equilibrium assessment. Energy Policy 178: 113583. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113583

Oh TH, Chua SC (2010). Energy efficiency and carbon trading potential in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14(7): 2095–2103. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.029

Ooi SK, Amran A, Zainuddin Z (2013). Success factors for clean development mechanism implementation in Malaysia. Issues in Social & Environmental Accounting 7(3): 185–200.

Paschoalotto MAC, Lazzari EA, Rocha R, et al. (2023). Health systems resilience: Is it time to revisit resilience after COVID-19? Social Science & Medicine 320: 115716. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115716

Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, et al. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods 5(4): 371–385. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1123

Raihan A, Begum RA, Said MNM, Pereira JJ (2022). Relationship between economic growth, renewable energy use, technological innovation, and carbon emission toward achieving Malaysia’s Paris agreement. Environment Systems and Decisions 42(4): 586–607. doi: 10.1007/s10669-022-09848-0

Ranson M, Stavins RN (2016). Linkage of greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: Learning from experience. Climate Policy 16(3): 284–300. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.997658

Shehzad K (2023). Extreme flood in Pakistan: Is Pakistan paying the cost of climate change? A Short Communication. Science of The Total Environment 880: 162973. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162973

Stevens D (2022). The political economy of regulation: An analysis of the mexican emission trading system. In: Lucatello S (editor). Towards an Emissions Trading System in Mexico: Rationale, Design and Connections with the Global Climate Agenda: Outlook on the first ETS in Latin-America and Exploration of the Way Forward. Springer. pp. 49–64.

Sun L, Fang S, Iqbal S, Bilal AR (2022). Financial stability role on climate risks, and climate change mitigation: Implications for green economic recovery. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29(22): 33063–33074. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17439-w

Tassone SJ, Besterman AF, Buelo CD, et al. (2023). Increasing heatwave frequency in streams and rivers of the United States. Limnology and Oceanography Letters 8(2): 295–304. doi: 10.1002/lol2.10284

Tengku Hamzah TAA, Zainuddin Z, Mohd Yusoff M, et al. (2019). The conundrum of carbon trading projects towards sustainable development: A review from the palm oil industry in Malaysia. Energies 12(18): 3530. doi: 10.3390/en12183530

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine 169(7): 467–473. doi: 10.7326/m18-0850

Tripathy KP, Mishra AK (2023). How unusual is the 2022 European Compound Drought and Heatwave Event? Geophysical Research Letters 50(15). doi: 10.1029/2023gl105453

UNFCCC (2022). Available online: https://unfccc.int/documents/624776 (accessed on 3 June 2023)

Wiese C, Cowart R, Rosenow J (2020). The strategic use of auctioning revenues to foster energy efficiency: Status quo and potential within the European Union Emissions Trading System. Energy Efficiency 13(8): 1677–1688. doi: 10.1007/s12053-020-09894-0

Xiao Y, Huang H, Qian XM, Chen L (2023). Can carbon emission trading pilot facilitate green development performance? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 400: 136755. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136755

Yin SL (2022). National climate strategy: A balanced approach. Available online: https://www.krinstitute.org/assets/contentMS/img/template/editor/Working%20Paper%200422%20-%20National%20Climate%20Strategy%20A%20Balanced%20Approach.pdf (accessed on 4 February 2023).

Yu Y, You Q, Zuo Z, et al (2023). Compound climate extremes in China: Trends, causes, and projections. Atmospheric Research 286: 106675. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106675

Yuriev A, Dahmen M, Paillé P, et al. (2020). Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: A scoping review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 155: 104660. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104660

Zainuddin Z, Hamzah TAAT (2023). Carbon trading and sustainable development goal 13: The Malaysia perspectives. In: Filho WL, Kovaleva M, Alves F, Abubakar IR (editors). Climate Change Strategies: Handling the Challenges of Adapting to a Changing Climate. Springer. pp. 289–305.

Zainuddin ZB, Zailani S, Govindan K, et al. (2017). Determinants and outcome of a clean development mechanism in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production 142: 1979–1986. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.086

Zakaria N, Cogburn DL, Khadapkar PS, Louis C (2012). Examining cultural effects on distributed decision-making processes using keyword analysis and data mining techniques. International Journal of Business and Systems Research 6(3): 313. doi: 10.1504/ijbsr.2012.047929

Zhou Y, Jiang J, Ye B, et al. (2020). Addressing climate change through a market mechanism: A comparative study of the pilot emission trading schemes in China. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 42(3): 745–767. doi: 10.1007/s10653-019-00258-x

Zhu H, Duan L, Guo Y, Yu K (2016). The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: Evidence from panel quantile regression. Economic Modelling 58: 237–248. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.05.003