Riau Province’s land and forest governance: The tendency of budget information transparency among Riau’s 12 regencies

Alexsander Yandra, Serly Novianti, Irawati Irawati, Dian Rianita, Irwan Effendi, Triono Hadi

Article ID: 2979
Vol 8, Issue 5, 2024

VIEWS - 174 (Abstract) 31 (PDF)

Abstract


Information transparency is a basic principle of good governance that few studies in the literature have thoroughly examined. Riau Province in particular has a high record of land and forest conflicts that needs urgent response, yet environmental policies have mostly been scrutinized for its resource extraction and regulation aspects, not their aspect of information transparency. Low proactive disclosure of information from local governments is a recurring issue in Riau Province, so FITRA Riau initiated the Public Information Openness Index (IKIP) to cover the Riau Province and 12 regencies/cities. To address this research gap of governmental public bodies’ information transparency, this study conducted the novel substantive approach critical review to see the extent of local government’s transparency regarding their budgeting for one of Riau’s most prevalent issues, namely land and forest governance (TKHL). From March to September 2019, this study used a triangulation of data collected from information access tests, IKIP evaluation, and focus group discussion involving the Riau Information Commission, the Information Management and Documentation Officers (PPID) of the 12 regencies, and the Governor of Riau Province. After analyzing the four aspects of regulation, institution, budget, and TKHL information, results determined that the most open region in Riau Province is Indragiri Hulu, and the least open region is Kuantan Singingi. Information transparency is still limited in procedural terms, in which all regions have more or less fulfilled the administrative regulation demands but the substance of the public information across all aspects is too generic to truly inform the public of the regions’ TKHL.


Keywords


information transparency; budget transparency; land and forest governance; Riau Province; 12 regencies/cities; Riau information commission

Full Text:

PDF


References


Affandi, O., Kartodihardjo, H., Nugroho, B., & Ekawati, S. (2021). Institutional analysis of forest governance after the implementation of law number 23/2014 in North Sumatra province, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 5(2), 304–325. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i2.8755

Affif, S., & Ibie, B. F. (2011). Assessment of Parties Associated with Efforts to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Central Kalimantan (Indonesian).

Agustina, T., Nurhikmah, N., Jaya, F. P., et al. (2023). Human Resources of Government Apparatus and Public Service Professionalism. Apollo: Journal of Tourism and Business, 1(3), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.58905/apollo.v1i3.50

Ardhian, D., Adiwibowo, S., & Wahyuni, E. S. (2016). NGO’s Roles and Strategies in the Environmental Politic Arena. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 4(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v4i3.14429

Ariyanto K. (2023). Rural Development Research Trends: Bibliometric Analysis Using Publish or Perish and Vosviewer. Athena: Journal of Social, Culture and Society, 1(4), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.58905/athena.v1i4.121

Arizona, Y. (2013). The Constitutional Court and forestry tenure reform (Indonesian). Konferensi Nasional Tata Kelola Hutan Dan Lahan, 17–20.

Bearfield, D. A., & Bowman, A. O. (2017). Can You Find It on the Web? An Assessment of Municipal E-Government Transparency: The American Review of Public Administration, 47(2), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015627694

Berliani, H., Suwito, Waluyo, J., et al. (2016). Strengthening the Moratorium on Licensing Policy in Primary Natural Forests and Peatlands (Indonesian).

Burstein, P. (2020). The Determinants of Public Policy: What Matters and How Much. Policy Studies Journal, 48(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12243

Cannon, C. (2020). Examining Rural Environmental Injustice: An Analysis of Ruralness, Class, Race, and Gender On the Presence of Landfills Across the United States. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 15(1).

Davis, E. J., Abrams, J., White, E. M., & Moseley, C. (2018). Current Challenges and Realities For Forest-based Businesses Adjacent to Public Lands in the United States. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 13(1).

Dharmiasih, W. (2020). Cultural Landscapes in the Asia-Pacific: Re-focusing UNESCO Designation on Community Participation. Forest and Society, 4(2), 271–27. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v4i2.10028

Eryan, A. (2020). Dari Inpres Moratorium Sawit Hingga Kebijakan Tata Kelola Industri Sawit Presiden Jokowi: Studi Kasus Penerbitan SK Pelepasan Kawasan Hutan PT Hardaya Inti Plantations di Buol, Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v6i1.122

Fitiawan, E., & Nasiwan, N. (2023). Government Policy on Jatijajar Cave as a Community Economic Empowerment through Participation in Bapak Village, Jatijajar Subdistrict, Kebumen Regency. Athena: Journal of Social, Culture and Society, 1(4), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.58905/athena.v1i4.166

Ginoga, K. L., Parlinah, N., Djaenudin, D., et al. (2012). Payment, Funding and Distribution of Payments for REDD+ (Indonesian).

Hadiyan, Y., Yuliah, Y., & Pambudi, H. (2017). Memahami dan Membangun Pendekatan Penyelesaian Deforestasi dan Degradasi Hutan di Region Sumatera dan Kalimantan. Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning, 14(1), 166–169.

Haeda, N., Cangara, A. R., Culla, A. S., et al. (2020). Indonesia-Norway cooperation in reducing emission from deforestation and degradation framework: A case study of Central Kalimantan forest. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 575(1), 012155. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/575/1/012155

Handayani, M. M., Fajrini, R., & Subagiyo, H. (2019). Forest and land governance index 2019: Endline study of land and forest governance in 12 provinces.

Hendrati, R. L., & Hadiyan, Y. (2014). Tree species adaptation under extreme conditions and adaptation in planting to anticipate climatic changes. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Mitigasi Dan Adaptasi Perubahan Iklim Menuju Tata Kelola Hutan Dan Lahan Lestari.

Herawati, N. (2017). The Role of Communication in the Implementation of Forest and Land Management Policies as a Conservation District in Kapuas Hulu District (Indonesian). Universitas Negeri Padang.

Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia (2013). On Postponing the Granting of New Licenses and Improving the Governance of Primary Natural Forests and Peatlands (Indonesian).

Jaya, N. S., Hidayati, N., Suhadi, Z., et al. (2015). Policy Analysis on Postponing the Granting of New Licenses and Improving Governance of Primary Natural Forests and Peatlands.

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., et al. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/bjast/2015/14975

Kristiansen, S. (2006). Government Budget Transparency (Indonesian). Rineka Cipta.

Kristiansen, S., Dwiyanto, A., Pramusinto, A., & Putranto, E. A. (2009). Public Sector Reforms and Financial Transparency: Experiences from Indonesian Districts. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 31(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs31-1c

Kurnain, A. (2014). Parameter Development of the Fraction of Carbon Lost Due to Peatland Subsidence: Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Toward Sustainable Forest and Land Governance (Indonesian).

Mardiyah, S., & Tarmizi, M. I. (2016). Uncovering the Interests behind REDD+ Program Incentives and Accountability (Indonesian).

Muhdar, M. (2015). Legal Aspects of Coal Mining Reclamation in Forest Areas in East Kalimantan (Indonesian). Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 27(3), 472–486. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15883

Muhdar, M., Nasir, M., & Rosdiana, R. (2015). Legal Implications of Borrowing Forest Area for Coal Mining Activities (Indonesian). Hasanuddin Law Review, 1(3), 430–451. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1i3.120

Muna, A., Ausat, A., Velmurugan, R., et al. (2023). Utilisation of Natural Resources as a Source of Inspiration and Innovation in SME Development. Apollo: Journal of Tourism and Business, 1(3), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.58905/APOLLO.V1I3.103

Nugraheni, & Khaerunisa, L. (2016). Analysis of the E-budgeting Process of DKI Jakarta Provincial Government (Indonesian). Bakrie University.

Ott, K., Bronić, M., Stanić, B., et al. (2019). Determinants of Online Local Budget Transparency in Croatia and Slovenia. Central European Public Administration Review, 17(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2019.2.08

Pratama, R. N. (2020). Communication Campaign of Jaringan Kerja Penyelamat Hutan Riau (Jikalahari) in Saving Forest and Land after Forest and Land Fire 2015 (Indonesian). Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.

Prayitno, H., Taufik, A., Fitriyani, R., et al. (2013). Measuring Commitment: an Analysis of National Budget and Planning Policies on Land and Forest Governance in Indonesia.

Rahman, M., & Prihatini, E. S. (2019). Political Parties in Indonesia and the Internet: A comparative analysis. Journal of International Relations, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.33021/aegis.v3i2.711

Rahman, Y., Hartati, C., Maulana, M., et al. (2013). Land and Forest Governance Index (LFGI): the Performance of District Governments in Land and Forest Governance in Indonesia (a Case Study of 9 Districts).

Rama, M. N., & Amin, R. M. (2017). Pembinaan dan Pengendalian Kawasan Hutan di Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Riau (JOM FISIP UNRI), 4(1), 1–15.

Raybould, B., Cheung, W. M., Connor, C., et al. (2020). An investigation into UK government policy and legislation to renewable energy and greenhouse gas reduction commitments. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 22(2), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01786-x

Roslinda, E., Munir, A., Haryono, A., & Ansyari, A. (2020). Economic Value of the Sylva Arboretum of the Tanjungpura University Pontianak. Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 8(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl1842-53

Ruyen, D., Idris, A., & Amin, J. (2014). Analysis of Public Service Quality and Forest Governance (Study at the Forestry and Plantation Service of Nunukan Regency) (Indonesian). Journal Administrative Reform, 2(3), 1878–1890.

Safarov, I. (2019). Institutional Dimensions of Open Government Data Implementation: Evidence from the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(2), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1438296

Santosa, M. A., & Quina, M. (2014). The Indonesian Environmental Law Reform Movement and the Realization of Good Environmental Governance in a Democratic State (Indonesian). Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, 1(1), 23–54. https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v1i1.164

Sanudin, S., Sadono, R., & Purwanto, R. H. (2016). Progress of community forest in Lampung Province. Jurnal Manusia Dan Lingkungan, 23(2), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.22146/jml.725

Sedmihradská, L. (2015). Budget Transparency in Czech Local Government. Procedia. Economics and Finance, 25, 598–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00774-1

Setiawan, R., Samin, R., & Mahadiansar, M. (2018). The Impact of Decentralization on the Capability of Regional Heads (Case Study of Riau Governors for the 2008-2013 Period) (Indonesian). Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara (JUAN), 6(2), 15–24.

Solihin, O. (2021). Implementation of Big Data on Social Media as a Government Crisis Communication Strategy (Indonesian). Jurnal Common, 5(1), 56–66.

Suci, A., Maryanti, S., Van FC, L. L., & Yandra, A. (2020). Ex-Officio Dilemma Related to Corruption Prevention and Quality Assurance in Private Universities (Indonesian). Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v6i1.1169

Suryadi, M., Putranti, I. R., & Paramasatya, S. (2017). Efforts to Handle Environmental Crimes of Forest and Peatland Burning in Sumatra 2004-2015 (Indonesian). Journal of International Relations, 3(2), 75–82.

Tavares, A. F., & Cruz, N. F. da. (2017). Explaining the transparency of local government websites through a political market framework. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.005

Tohom, A. (2016). The Role of Internal Control in Avoiding the Curse of Natural Resources (Indonesian). Liquidity, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.32546/lq.v5i1.59

Wahyunto, W., & Dariah, A. (2014). Land degradation in Indonesia: existing conditions, characteristics, and uniform definitions supporting the movement towards a single pet (Indonesian). Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.2018/jsdl.v8i2.6470

Wibowo, L. R., Race, D., & Curtis, A. (2013). Communicating REDD+ Issues at Local Level: Creating Latent and Manifest Conflict. Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research, 10(2), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.20886/ijfr.2013.10.2.67-78

Wicaksono, D. A., & Yurista, A. P. (2013). Best Practices in Central Kalimantan Province as a Redd+1 Pilot Province (Indonesian).

Winata, M. R., & Sinaga, E. M. C. (2019). Transparency of Land Use Rights Supports Land Redistribution Based on the Constitutional Right to Information (Indonesian). Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 8(3), 421. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v8i3.341

Yandra, A., Setiawan, H., Sella, N., et al. (2020). Evaluation of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in Rumbai Sub-district, Pekanbaru City (Indonesian). Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 19(20), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v19i2.119

Yandra, A., Utami, B. C., & Husna, K. (2020). Distortion of Government Policy Orientation in Public-Private Partnership (PPP). Policy & Governance Review, 4(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v4i1.172

Yuntho, E., Munandar, A., & Isa, M. (2013). Draft Regional Regulation of West Kalimantan Provincial Spatial Plan (Indonesian).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i5.2979

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Alexsander Yandra, Serly Novianti, Irawati Irawati, Dian Rianita, Irwan Effendi, Triono Hadi

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.