This paper conducts a comparative analysis of mentoring and metacognition in education, unveiling their intricate connections. Both concepts, though seemingly disparate, prove to be interdependent within the educational landscape. The analysis showcases the dynamic interplay between mentoring and metacognition, emphasizing their reciprocal influence. Metacognition, often perceived as self-awareness and introspection, is found to complement the relational and supportive nature of mentoring. Within this context, metacognitive education within mentoring emerges as a vital component. Practical recommendations are offered for effective metacognitive training, highlighting its role in enhancing cognitive and metacognitive skills. Moreover, the paper introduces the concept of a “mentoring scaffolding system.” This system emphasizes mentor-led gradual independence for mentees, facilitating their professional and personal growth. The necessity of fostering a metacognition culture in education is a central theme. Such a culture promotes improved performance and lifelong learning. The paper suggests integrating metacognition into curricula and empowering learners as essential steps toward achieving this culture. In conclusion, this paper advocates for the integration of metacognition into mentoring and education, fostering self-awareness, independence, and adaptability. These attributes are deemed crucial for individuals navigating the challenges of the information age.

Allen TD, Eby LT, Poteet ML, et al. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for proteges: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 89(1): 127–136. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.127

Anderson NJ (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC digest. Available online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED463659 (accessed on 3 November 2023).

Azevedo R (2020). Reflections on the field of metacognition: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. Metacognition and Learning 15(2): 91–98. doi: 10.1007/s11409-020-09231-x

Bocoş MD (2013). Interactive training. In: Axiological and Methodological Milestones. Polirom Publishing House.

Bocoş MD, Răduţ-Taciu R, Stan C (2021). Dictionary of Pedagogy. Cluj University Press Publishing House.

dos Santos Kawata KH, Ueno Y, Hashimoto R, et al. (2021). Development of metacognition in adolescence: The congruency-based metacognition scale. Frontiers in Psychology 11: 565231. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565231

Fan Y, van der Graaf J, Lim L, et al. (2022). Towards investigating the validity of measurement of self-regulated learning based on trace data. Metacognition and Learning 17(3): 949–987. doi: 10.1007/s11409-022-09291-1

Flavell JH (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34(10): 906–911. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906

Gisbert-Trejo N, Landeta J, Albizu E, Fernández-Ferrín P (2019). Determining effective mentor characteristics in inter-organizational mentoring for managers: An approach based on academics’ and practitioners’ perspectives. Industrial and Commercial Training 51(2): 85–103. doi: 10.1108/ict-06-2018-0051

Hansford B, Ehrich LC (2006). The principalship: how significant is mentoring? Journal of Educational Administration 44(1): 36–52. doi: 10.1108/09578230610642647

Hiver P, Whiteside Z, Sánchez Solarte AC, Kim CJ (2021). Language teacher metacognition: Beyond the mirror. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 15(1): 52–65. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2019.1675666

Huizing RL (2012). Mentoring together: A literature review of group mentoring. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 20(1): 27–55. doi: 10.1080/13611267.2012.645599

Jiang Y, Liu H, Yao Y, et al. (2023). The positive effects of growth mindset on students’ intention toward self-regulated learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A PLS-SEM approach. Sustainability 15(3): 2180. doi: 10.3390/su15032180

Jiang Y, Wang P, Li Q, Li Y (2022). Students’ intention toward self-regulated learning under blended learning setting: PLS-SEM approach. Sustainability 14(16): 10140. doi: 10.3390/su141610140

Kram KE (1985). Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life. Scott Foresman & Co.

Lai ER (2011). Metacognition: A Literature Review. pp. 1–40.

Langdon J, Botnaru DT, Wittenberg M, et al. (2019). Examining the effects of different teaching strategies on metacognition and academic performance. Advances in Physiology Education 43(3): 414–422. doi: 10.1152/advan.00013.2018

Lester AM, Goodloe CL, Johnson HE, Deutsch NL (2019). Understanding mutuality: Unpacking relational processes in youth mentoring relationships. Journal of Community Psychology 47(1): 147–162. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22106

Liu Y, Abi Aad A, Maalouf J, Abou Hamdan O (2021). Self-vs. other-focused mentoring motives in informal mentoring: Conceptualizing the impact of motives on mentoring behaviours and beneficial mentoring outcomes. Human Resource Development International 24(3): 279–303. doi: 10.1080/13678868.2020.1789401

McConnell K, Geesa RL, Lowery K (2019). Self-reflective mentoring: Perspectives of peer mentors in an education doctoral program. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education 8(2): 86–101. doi: 10.1108/IJMCE-07-2018-0043

Morgenroth O, Keck M, Gensicke M (2021). Time will tell: Time perspective as a source for metacognitive emotion-focused coping and its measurement. Personality and Individual Differences 168: 110367. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110367

Mullen CA, Klimaitis CC (2021). Defining mentoring: a literature review of issues, types, and applications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1483(1): 19–35. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14176

Sahin E, Suh JK, Hand B, Fulmer G (2023). Unpacking teachers’ orientations toward a knowledge generation approach: Do we need to go beyond epistemology? Teaching and Teacher Education 132: 104264. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2023.104264

Schriever V, Grainger P (2019). Mentoring an early career researcher: insider perspectives from the mentee and mentor. Reflective Practice 20(2): 720–731. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2019.1674272

Shanks R, Attard Tonna M, Krøjgaard F, et al. (2022). A comparative study of mentoring for new teachers. Professional Development in Education 48(5): 751–765. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2020.1744684

Silistraru N, Gheorghe EC (2021). Metacognition. In: Identities in Globalisation. Intercultural Perspectives. pp. 17–21.

Sulaiman T, Abdul Rahim SS, Kai Yan W, Subramaniam P (2021). Primary science teachers’ perspectives about metacognition in science teaching. European Journal of Educational Research 10(1): 75–84.

Teng F (2019). Tertiary-level students’ English writing performance and metacognitive awareness: A group metacognitive support perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 64(1): 1–18. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2019.1595712

Toh RQE, Koh KK, Lua JK, et al. (2022). The role of mentoring, supervision, coaching, teaching and instruction on professional identity formation: A systematic scoping review. BMC Medical Education 22(1): 531. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03589-z

Vargas-Isidro R, Galas EM, Macada-ag HB, et al. (2023). Evaluating the metacognitive strategies of selected college students in a higher education institution in Cavite, Philippines: A psychological perspective. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities 6(8s): 576–584.

Viana-Sáenz L, Sastre-Riba S, Urraca-Martínez ML (2021). Executive function and metacognition: Relations and measure on high intellectual ability and typical schoolchildren. Sustainability 13(23): 13083. doi: 10.3390/su132313083

Vrugt A, Oort FJ (2008). Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: pathways to achievement. Metacognition and learning 3: 123–146.

Waite LH, Zupec JF, Quinn DH, Poon CY (2020). Revised bloom’s taxonomy as a mentoring framework for successful promotion. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 12(11): 1379–1382. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.06.009

Yao Y, Wang P, Jiang Y, et al. (2022). Innovative online learning strategies for the successful construction of student self-awareness during the COVID-19 pandemic: Merging TAM with TPB. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 7(4): 100252. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100252