Green knowledge management to achieve corporate sustainable development

Rahmi Widyanti, Ismi Rajiani, Basuki Basuki

Article ID: 2844
Vol 8, Issue 2, 2024

VIEWS - 2352 (Abstract)

Abstract


The mining industry significantly impacts the three pillars of sustainable development: the economy, the environment, and society. Therefore, it is essential to incorporate sustainability principles into operational practices. Organizations can accomplish this through knowledge management activities and diverse knowledge resources. A study of 300 employees from two of the largest mining corporations in South Kalimantan, Indonesia, found that four out of five elements of knowledge management—green knowledge acquisition, green knowledge storage, green knowledge application, and green knowledge creation—have a direct impact on the sustainability of businesses. The calculation was determined using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). However, the study also found that the influence of collectivist cultural norms inhibits the direct effect of green knowledge sharing on corporate sustainable development. The finding suggests that companies operating in collectivist cultures may need to take additional measures to encourage knowledge sharing, such as rewarding employees for sharing their expertise on green initiatives, supportive organizational culture, clear expectations, and opportunities for social interaction.


Keywords


green knowledge management; mining industry; organizational sustainability; collectivist cultures

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Abbas, J., & Khan, S. M. (2022). Green knowledge management and organizational green culture: an interaction for organizational green innovation and green performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(7), 1852–1870. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-03-2022-0156
  2. Ahmadi-Gh, Z., & Bello-Pintado, A. (2022). Why is manufacturing not more sustainable? The effects of different sustainability practices on sustainability outcomes and competitive advantage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 337, 130392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130392
  3. Alam, S., Zhang, J., Khan, N., & Ali, A. (2023). Mechanism of knowledge management process towards minimizing manufacturing risk under green technology implementation: an empirical assessment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(18), 51977–51994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25945-2
  4. Astuti, F. W. (2023). 5 Freeport Indonesia’s Papua Environmental Preservation Commitments (Indonesian). Available online: https://www.idntimes.com/life/inspiration/firda-widi-astuti/pelestarian-lingkungan-oleh-freeport-indonesia-c1c2 (accessed on 12 December 2023).
  5. Azam, W., Khan, I., & Ali, S. A. (2022). Alternative energy and natural resources in determining environmental sustainability: a look at the role of government final consumption expenditures in France. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(1), 1949–1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22334-z
  6. Basuki, B., Rajiani, I., & Widyanti, R. (2021). Boosting sustainability performance through supply chain quality management in the mining industry. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 24(2), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.24.2.03
  7. Bhandari, K. R., Ranta, M., & Salo, J. (2022). The resource‐based view, stakeholder capitalism, ESG, and sustainable competitive advantage: The firm’s embeddedness into ecology, society, and governance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1525–1537. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2967
  8. Bonett, D. G., & Wright, T. A. (2014). Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1960
  9. Borah, P. S., Dogbe, C. S. K., Pomegbe, W. W. K., Bamfo, B. A., & Hornuvo, L. K. (2021). Green market orientation, green innovation capability, green knowledge acquisition and green brand positioning as determinants of new product success. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(2), 364–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-09-2020-0345
  10. Bresciani, S., Rehman, S. U., Giovando, G., & Alam, G. M. (2022). The role of environmental management accounting and environmental knowledge management practices influence on environmental performance: mediated-moderated model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(4), 896–918. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-12-2021-0953
  11. Cai, X., Khan, N. A., & Egorova, O. (2023). Transactional leadership matters in green creative behaviour through workplace learning and green knowledge management: moderating role of social network sites use. Personnel Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-12-2020-0894
  12. Chen, J., Jiskani, I. M., Lin, A., et al. (2022). A hybrid decision model and case study for comprehensive evaluation of green mine construction level. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(4), 3823–3842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02206-9
  13. Chin, T., Shi, Y., Palladino, R., & Faggioni, F. (2022). A Yin-Yang dialectical systems theory of knowledge creation. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-07-2022-0524
  14. Cox, B., Innis, S., Kunz, N. C., & Steen, J. (2022). The mining industry as a net beneficiary of a global tax on carbon emissions. Communications Earth & Environment, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00346-4
  15. de Bem Machado, A., Secinaro, S., Calandra, D., & Lanzalonga, F. (2021). Knowledge management and digital transformation for Industry 4.0: a structured literature review. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 20(2), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2021.2015261
  16. Gómez-Marín, N., Cara-Jiménez, J., Bernardo-Sánchez, A., Álvarez-de-Prado, L., & Ortega-Fernández, F. (2022). Sustainable knowledge management in academia and research organizations in the innovation context. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(1), 100601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100601
  17. Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
  18. Hatane, S. E., Tarigan, J., Kuanda, E. S., & Cornelius, E. (2021). The contributing factors of intellectual capital disclosures in agriculture and mining sectors of Indonesia and Thailand. Accounting Research Journal, 35(2), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-02-2020-0022
  19. Hidayat, A. S., Rajiani, I., & Arisanty, D. (2022). Sustainability of Floodplain Wetland Fisheries of Rural Indonesia: Does Culture Enhance Livelihood Resilience? Sustainability, 14(21), 14461. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114461
  20. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd edition. McGraw Hill Professional.
  21. Huang, W., Chau, K. Y., Kit, I. Y., Nureen, N., Irfan, M., & Dilanchiev, A. (2022). Relating Sustainable Business Development Practices and Information Management in Promoting Digital Green Innovation: Evidence From China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.930138
  22. Jahanmiri, S., Asadizadeh, M., Alipour, A., Nowak, S., & Sherizadeh, T. (2021). Predicting the Contribution of Mining Sector to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Index Utilizing Heuristic Approaches. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 35(15), 1990–2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2021.1997225
  23. Jovanović, V., Stanković, S., & Krstić, V. (2023). Environmental, Social and Economic Sustainability in Mining Companies as a Result of the Interaction between Knowledge Management and Green Innovation—The SEM Approach. Sustainability, 15(16), 12122. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612122
  24. Lai, Y. (2023). PDI-P takes aim at Prabowo-led food estate project. Available online: https://www.thejakartapost.com/indonesia/2023/08/19/pdi-p-takes-aim-at-prabowo-led-food-estate-project.html (accessed on 12 December 2023).
  25. Li, Q., & Qamruzzaman, M. (2023). Innovation-Led Environmental Sustainability in Vietnam—Towards a Green Future. Sustainability, 15(16), 12109. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612109
  26. Lopes, J. M., Gomes, S., Pacheco, R., Monteiro, E., & Santos, C. (2022). Drivers of Sustainable Innovation Strategies for Increased Competition among Companies. Sustainability, 14(9), 5471. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095471
  27. Malik, M., Ali, M., Latan, H., & Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J. (2023). Green project management practices, green knowledge acquisition and sustainable competitive advantage: empirical evidence. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(9), 2350–2375. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-06-2022-0466
  28. Martha, F. P. (2022). Adaro (ADRO) seeks bank support to reduce carbon emissions (Indonesian). Available online: https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20220406/44/1519552/tekan-emisi-karbon-adaro-adro-minta-dukungan-bank (accessed on 12 December 2023).
  29. Mikalauskiene, A., & Atkociuniene, Z. (2019). Knowledge Management Impact on Sustainable Development. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 15(4), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2019.15-4.11
  30. Mohamad, A. A., Ramayah, T., & Lo, M. C. (2020). Sustainable Knowledge Management and Firm Innovativeness: The Contingent Role of Innovative Culture. Sustainability, 12(17), 6910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176910
  31. Nguyen, M., Malik, A., & Sharma, P. (2021). How to motivate employees to engage in online knowledge sharing? Differences between posters and lurkers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(7), 1811–1831. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-08-2020-0649
  32. Olan, F., Ogiemwonyi Arakpogun, E., Suklan, J., Nakpodia, F., Damij, N., & Jayawickrama, U. (2022). Artificial intelligence and knowledge sharing: Contributing factors to organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 145, 605–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.008
  33. Pereira, V., & Mohiya, M. (2021). Share or hide? Investigating positive and negative employee intentions and organizational support in the context of knowledge sharing and hiding. Journal of Business Research, 129, 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.011
  34. Pouresmaieli, M., Ataei, M., & Nouri Qarahasanlou, A. (2023). A scientometrics view on sustainable development in surface mining: Everything from the beginning. Resources Policy, 82, 103410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103410
  35. Raihan, A., Pavel, M. I., Muhtasim, D. A., Farhana, S., Faruk, O., & Paul, A. (2023). The role of renewable energy use, technological innovation, and forest cover toward green development: Evidence from Indonesia. Innovation and Green Development, 2(1), 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100035
  36. Rajiani, I., & Normuslim, N. (2023). Knowledge management and organizational learning to improve the organizational performance of mines in Indonesia. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 7(2), 2227. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v7i2.2227
  37. Rajiani, I., & Kot, S. (2020). Javanese Indonesia: Human Resource Management Issues in a Uniquely Collectivist Culture. Cultural Management: Science and Education, 4(2), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.30819/cmse.4-2.01
  38. Rajiani, I., Prayitno, H. J., Kot, S., Ismail, N., & Iswarani, W. P. (2023). Developing Local Education Content Supplementary Textbook Innovation by Referencing to Women in Floating Market. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 5(2), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v5i2.22005
  39. Ramadhani, P. I. (2022). Bukit Asam prepares three strategies towards net zero emission (Indonesian). Available online: https://www.liputan6.com/saham/read/5093353/bukit-asam-siapkan-tiga-strategi-menuju-net-zero-emission (accessed on 12 December 2023).
  40. Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Cuevas-Romo, A., Chowdhury, S., et al. (2022). The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Mexican SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 248, 108495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108495
  41. Sahoo, S., Kumar, A., & Upadhyay, A. (2022). How do green knowledge management and green technology innovation impact corporate environmental performance? Understanding the role of green knowledge acquisition. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3160
  42. Sanchez‐Planelles, J., Segarra‐Oña, M., & Peiro‐Signes, A. (2022). Identifying different sustainable practices to help companies to contribute to the sustainable development: Holistic sustainability, sustainable business and operations models. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(4), 904–917. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2243


DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i2.2844

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Rahmi Widyanti, Ismi Rajiani, Basuki Basuki

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.