Narrative policy of bureaucratic reform in Indonesia: Rules of narrative in mass media

Bambang Santoso Haryono, Alih Aji Nugroho, Fadillah Putera, Irwan Noor

Article ID: 2842
Vol 8, Issue 1, 2024

VIEWS - 779 (Abstract) 594 (PDF)

Abstract


This paper aims to analyze the narratives that have emerged in the process of bureaucratic reform in Indonesia. The analysis is conducted using the Narrative Policy Framework at the mesa level. Using data from articles published in 6 credible national media about “bureaucratic reform” from 2010 to 2023. The collected data was classified according to the Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) elements in the article: Issue setting, the cause of the issue, plot, character (villain, victim, hero), and recommendations for solutions offered. There were 31 articles analyzed. The result showed that the main plot in the process of bureaucratic reform in Indonesia is based on the corrupt bureaucracy and the slow public service provided. The victims in the plot are the people who will access the services. The villains of the narrative are civil servants who do not improve the required competencies. The heroes of the narrative are several government institutions (Ministry of State Apparatus Utilization and Bureaucratic Reform, Commission of Corruption Eradication, and The Audit Board of The Republic of Indonesia) that are considered to expose the problem.


Keywords


bureaucratic reform; narrative policy framework; mass media narrative; policy process

Full Text:

PDF


References


International Media & Newspapers (2023). Top Newspapers in Indonesia. Available online: https://www.4imn.com/id/ (accessed on 17 October 2023)

Aji Nugroho A, Fitri Azmi I (2021). Alleviating society’s economic crisis: Narrative policy on social safety nets policy process during Covid-19 pandemic. Policy & Governance Review 5(2): 113–127. doi: 10.30589/pgr.v5i2.443

Béland D (2019). Narrative stories, institutional rules, and the politics of pension policy in Canada and the United States. Policy and Society 38(3): 356–372. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2019.1644071

Billore S, Anisimova T, Vrontis D (2023). Self-regulation and goal-directed behavior: A systematic literature review, public policy recommendations, and research agenda. Journal of Business Research 156: 113435. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113435

Boon J, Verhoest K (2018). On the dynamics of reform resistance: Why and how bureaucratic organizations resist shared service center reforms. International Public Management Journal 21(4): 533–557. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2016.1276494

Burt G, Mackay D, Mendibil K (2021). Overcoming multi-stakeholder fragmented narratives in land use, woodland and forestry policy: The role scenario planning and ‘dissociative jolts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 166: 120663. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120663

Esposito G, Clement J, Mora L, Crutzen N (2021). One size does not fit all: Framing smart city policy narratives within regional socio-economic contexts in Brussels and Wallonia. Cities 118: 103329. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103329

Farazmand A, Pinkowski J (2006). Handbook of Globalization, Governance, and Public Administration. Routledge. doi: 10.1201/b13629

Feldt L (2023a). Total devotion in the ancient world: Emotions and narrative in radical religion. Religion 53(1): 1–23. doi: 10.1080/0048721x.2022.2150405

Feldt L (2023b). Training for total devotion: Emotionality and narrativity in Deuteronomy. Religion 53(1): 43–67. doi: 10.1080/0048721x.2022.2150402

Hardiman N, MacCarthaigh M (2017). State retrenchment and administrative reform in Ireland: Probing comparative policy paradigms. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 19(2): 100–118. doi: 10.1080/13876988.2015.1103432

Hourcade R (2021). Emotions, narratives, and the art of making meanings: Nantes’ memorial to the abolition of slavery. Critical Policy Studies 15(3): 292–310. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2020.1818110

Huda J (2019). Policy narratives across two languages: A comparative study using the narrative policy framework. Review of Policy Research 36(4): 523–546. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12344

Huque AS, Jongruck P (2020). Civil service reforms in Hong Kong and Thailand: Similar goals, different paths. Public Administration and Policy: An Asia-Pacific Journal 23(2): 111–123. doi: 10.1108/pap-03-2020-0015

Hwang K (2019). Understanding complexity of administrative reform. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 27(3): 630–643. doi: 10.1108/ijoa-02-2018-1356

Kirkpatrick KJ, Stoutenborough JW (2018). Strategy, narratives, and reading the public: Developing a micro‐level theory of political strategies within the narrative policy framework. Policy Studies Journal 46(4): 949–977. doi: 10.1111/psj.12271

Klinkhammer G (2020). Interreligious dialogue groups and the mass media. Religion 50(3): 336–352. doi: 10.1080/0048721x.2020.1754604

Kompas.com (2016). Bureaucratic reform in the regions has not been maximized (Indonesian). Available online: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2016/05/19/20380631/reformasi.birokrasi.di.daerah.belum.maksimal (accessed on 17 October 2023).

Kompas.com (2017a). State budget wasted Rp 392 trillion per year due to bureaucratic problems (Indonesian). Available online: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/05/10/11504501/apbn.mubazir.rp.392.triliun.per.tahun.karena.masalah.birokrasi (accessed on 17 October 2023).

Kompas.com (2017b). Failure of bureaucratic reform (Indonesian). Available online: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/04/07/17595581/kegagalan.reformasi.birokrasi (accessed on 17 October 2023).

Koran Tempo (2007). Accelerate bureaucratic reform (Indonesian). Available online: https://koran.tempo.co/read/editorial/107389/percepat-reformasi-birokrasi (accessed on 17 October 2023).

Koran Tempo (2012). Bureaucratic reform failed? (Indonesian). Available online: https://koran.tempo.co/read/opini/287380/reformasi-birokrasi-gagal (accessed on 17 October 2023).

Koran Tempo (2014). Ahok and bureaucratic reform (Indonesian). Available online: https://koran.tempo.co/read/editorial/340706/ahok-dan-reformasi-birokrasi (accessed on 17 October 2023).

Koran Tempo (2017). Corruption and the stalling of bureaucratic reform (Indonesian). Available online: https://koran.tempo.co/read/opini/411986/korupsi-dan-macetnya-reformasi-birokrasi (accessed on 17 October 2023).

Lamont M (2018). Addressing recognition gaps: Destigmatization and the reduction of inequality. American Sociological Review 83(3): 419–444. doi: 10.1177/0003122418773775

Lee H (2017). Bureaucracy, regulatory management, and Korean democracy. In: Public Policy and Governance. Emerald Publishing Limited. pp. 83–111. doi: 10.1108/s2053-769720170000028004

Liu S, Cai L, Zhao X (2019). The role of mass media in education policies: A Chinese case study. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 41(2): 186–203. doi: 10.1080/1360080x.2018.1554548

Maschmeyer L, Abrahams A, Pomerantsev P, Yermolenko V (2023). Donetsk don’t tell—‘Hybrid war’ in Ukraine and the limits of social media influence operations. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 2023: 1–16. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2023.2211969

McBeth MK, Lybecker DL (2018). The narrative policy framework, agendas, and sanctuary cities: The construction of a public problem. Policy Studies Journal 46(4): 868–893. doi: 10.1111/psj.12274

Media Indonesia (2020a). Korpri anniversary, president asks for bureaucratic reforms to be accelerated (Indonesian). Available online: https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/364923/hut-korpri-presiden-minta-reformasi-birokrasi-dipercepat (accessed on 17 November 2023).

Media Indonesia (2020b). Bureaucratic simplification is 70% complete (Indonesian). Available online: https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/349244/penyederhanaan-birokrasi-sudah-70 (accessed on 17 October 2023).

Media Indonesia (2020c). Bureaucratic reform to face international competition (Indonesian). Available online: https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/354798/reformasi-birokrasi-hadapi-persaingan-internasional (accessed on 17 October 2023).

Media Indonesia (2021). Government effectiveness index rises, Moeldoko: Bureaucratic reforms continue (Indonesian). Available online: https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/435669/indeks-efektifitas-pemerintah-naik-moeldoko-reformasi-birokrasi-terus-dijalankan (accessed on 17 November 2023).

Media Indonesia (2022). Ministry of home affairs affirms bureaucratic reform is important for Indonesia’s progress (Indonesian). Available online: https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/507659/kemendagri-tegaskan-reformasi-birokrasi-penting-bagi-kemajuan-indonesia (accessed on 17 October 2023).

Miedziński M (2018). Do policy makers tell good stories? Towards a multi-layered framework for mapping and analysing policy narratives embracing futures. Futures 101: 10–25. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2018.05.003

Mintrom M, O’Connor R (2020). The importance of policy narrative: Effective government responses to Covid-19. Policy Design and Practice 3(3): 205–227. doi: 10.1080/25741292.2020.1813358

O’Donovan KT (2018). Does the narrative policy framework apply to local policy issues? Politics & Policy 46(4): 532–570. doi: 10.1111/polp.12265

Poernomo M, Bungin B, Winarno S (2022). The power of mass media in social construction of the reform of Indonesia bureaucracy. Webology 19(1): 2811–2823. doi: 10.14704/web/v19i1/web19187

Pratama M, Manurung L (2022). Bureaucratic reform: Analysis of work from anywhere policy plans for ASN. Jurnal Administrasi Publik 20(2): 263–274.

Republika (2019). Short-term politics still color bureaucratic reforms (Indonesian). Available online: https://www.republika.co.id/berita/q0hpra380/politik-jangka-pendek-masih-warnai-reformasi-birokrasi (accessed on 17 October 2023).

Republika (2020a). Menpan RB: Bureaucratic reform is important during Covid pandemic (Indonesian). Available online: https://news.republika.co.id/berita//qh3e6p354/menpan-rb-reformasi-birokrasi-penting-di-saat-pandemi-covid? (accessed on 18 October 2023).

Republika (2020b). Overmanned, DPR highlights weak bureaucratic reforms (Indonesian). Available online: https://news.republika.co.id/berita//qc6bj9396/kelebihan-tenaga-dpr-soroti-lemahnya-reformasi-birokrasi? (accessed on 18 October 2023).

Republika (2021a). Mahfud MD reminds governors to foster bureaucratic reforms (Indonesian). Available online: https://news.republika.co.id/berita//r3fibo484/mahfud-md-ingatkan-gubernur-bina-reformasi-birokrasi? (accessed on 18 October 2023).

Republika (2021b). Revision of ASN law should not undermine bureaucratic reforms (Indonesian). Available online: https://news.republika.co.id/berita//qzxy12430/revisi-uu-asn-jangan-sampai-lemahkan-reformasi-birokrasi? (accessed on 18 October 2023).

Rigolon A, Yañez E, Aboelata MJ, Bennett R (2022). “A park is not just a park”: Toward counter-narratives to advance equitable green space policy in the United States. Cities 128: 103792. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103792

Schlaufer C, Kuenzler J, Jones MD, Shanahan EA (2022). The narrative policy framework: A traveler’s guide to policy stories. Polit Vierteljahresschr 63(2): 249–273. doi: 10.1007/s11615-022-00379-6

Shanahan EA, Jones MD, McBeth MK (2018). How to conduct a narrative policy framework study. The Social Science Journal 55(3): 332–345. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2017.12.002

Sulistyo PD (2021). Bureaucratic reform in regency/city is still low (Indonesian). Available online: https://www.kompas.id/baca/polhuk/2021/08/18/reformasi-birokrasi-di-kabupaten-kota-masih-rendah (accessed on 18 October 2023).

Suryanto A, Nugroho AA (2020). Improving Public Participation in Innovation Management of Village-Owned Enterprise: Lesson Learned from the Best Village-Owned Enterprise in Indonesia. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology 17(4): 2072–2082.

Suryanto A, Prasetyo AG, Nurdin N, Aswad M. (2023). The Reform of Apparatus Competence Development in Indonesia: Improving the Implementation System and the Implementing Actors. Information Sciences Letters 12(4): 1307–1317. doi:10.18576/isl/120445

Thejakarta Post (2020). Despite reforms, red tape still “main problem” for regional projects. Available online: https://www.thejakartapost.com/business/2023/01/19/despite-reforms-red-tape-still-main-problem-for-regional-projects.html (accessed on 17 October 2023).

Toivonen R, Vihemäki H, Toppinen A (2021). Policy narratives on wooden multi-storey construction and implications for technology innovation system governance. Forest Policy and Economics 125: 102409. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102409

Turner M (2013). Why is it so difficult to reform some Asian bureaucracies? Building theory from cambodian evidence. Public Admin & Development 33(4): 275–285. doi: 10.1002/pad.1655

Turner M, Prasojo E, Sumarwono R (2022). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies 43(2): 333–351. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301

Wallace TC, Bailey RL, Blumberg JB, et al. (2020). Fruits, vegetables, and health: A comprehensive narrative, umbrella review of the science and recommendations for enhanced public policy to improve intake. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 60(13): 2174–2211. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1632258

Wearn A, Shepherd L (2020). The impact of emotion‐based mass media campaigns on stigma toward cervical screening non participation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 50(5): 289–298. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12659

Weiss J (2020). The evolution of reform narratives: A narrative policy framework analysis of German NPM reforms. Critical Policy Studies 14(1): 106–123. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2018.1530605

Whitsel LP, Ajenikoko F, Chase PJ, et al. (2023). Public policy for healthy living: How COVID-19 has changed the landscape. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 76: 49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2023.01.002

Zeng Q (2020). Managed campaign and bureaucratic institutions in China: Evidence from the targeted poverty alleviation program. Journal of Contemporary China 29(123): 400–415. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2019.1645489




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i1.2842

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Bambang Santoso Haryono, Alih Aji Nugroho, Fadillah Putera, Irwan Noor

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.