Study on liquidity risk of commercial banks

Nadia Mansour

Article ID: 2299
Vol 7, Issue 3, 2023

VIEWS - 290 (Abstract) 184 (PDF)


China’s banking system, a product of its planned economy, is a means for China to implement its economic and financial development and consolidate its role in the global economy. Recently, this system has been decentralised by adapting specific regulations to international standards. Against this backdrop, the development of inter-bank activities has played a vital role in the rapid expansion of Chinese banking sector’s assets. This study, uses data from 34 listed commercial banks between 2010 and 2018, to analyse the effect of interbank activities on commercial banks’ liquidity risk using a panel data model. This determines whether the effects are the same for different commercial banks. The study concludes that the expansion of interbank activities has increased commercial banks' liquidity risk, and that this effect is more significant in joint-stock banks than in urban commercial banks. Therefore, commercial banks should sensibly position their interbank development model, conduct their interbank business prudently and rationally, and continuously strengthen their risk control measures. The supervisory authorities must continue to strengthen supervision of interbank activities and prevent funds from being de-realised.


commercial banks; interbank business; liquidity risk, China, panel data

Full Text:



Berrospide JM (2012). Liquidity hoarding and the financial crisis: An empirical evaluation. FEDS Working Paper No. 2013-03.

Chen TH, Chou HH, Chang Y, Fang Y (2015). The effect of excess lending on bank liquidity: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance 36: 54–68. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2014.11.007

Hai J, Yuan C, Lin Z (2023). Interbank liquidity transmission and the credit channel of monetary policy in China. Research in International Business and Finance 66: 102016. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102016

Han AS (2021). Chinese fintech companies and their “going out” strategies. Journal of Internet and Digital Economics 1(1): 47–63. doi: 10.1108/JIDE-07-2021-0003

Hausman J, Hall BH, Griliches Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the Patents-R & D relationship. Econometrica 52(4): 1984: 909–38. doi: 10.2307/1911191

Hu L, Gan Y, Wen H (2023). Do we need to consider multiple inter-bank linkages for systemic risk in China’s banking industry? Analysis based on the multilayer network. Finance Research Letters 51: 103433. doi: 10.1016/

Jan K, Sun R (2019). Macroprudential policy, central banks and financial stability: Evidence from China. Journal of International Money and Finance 93: 19–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2018.12.015

Jiang S, Fan H (2021). Systemic risk in the interbank market with overlapping portfolios and cross-ownership of the subordinated debts. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 562: 125355. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.125355

Jigeer S, Koroleva E (2023). The determinants of profitability in the city commercial banks: Case of China. Risks 11(3): 53. doi: 10.3390/risks11030053

Koroleva E, Jigeer S, Miao A, Skhvediani A (2021). Determinants affecting profitability of state-owned commercial banks: Case study of China. Risks 9(8): 150. doi: 10.3390/risks9080150

Le VPM, Matthews K, Meenagh D, et al. (2022). Regulatory arbitrage, shadow banking and monetary policy in China. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 80: 101640. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101640

Lee CC, Hsieh MF (2013). The impact of bank capital on profitability and risk in Asian banking. Journal of International Money and Finance 32: 251–281. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.04.013

Li F, Yang T, Du M, Huang M (2023). The development fit index of digital currency electronic payment between China and the one belt one road countries. Research in International Business and Finance 64: 101838. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101838

Li Q (2019). The impact of liquidity risk of commercial banks on systematic risk of banking industry: Study of 16 listed commercial banks. Modern Economy 10(3): 645–665. doi: 10.4236/me.2019.103044

Li Y (2020). Analyzing efficiencies of cty commercial banks in China: An application of the bootstrapped DEA approach. Pacific Basin Finance Journal 62: 101372. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101372

Liao W, Tapsoba MSJA. (2014). Monetary policy and interest rate liberalization: Lessons from international experiences prepared. IMF Working Paper No. 2014/075.

Liu J, Guo K, Tang F, et al. (2023). The effect of the disposal of non-performing loans on interbank liquidity risk in China: A cash flow network-based analysis. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 89: 105–119. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2023.03.005

Love I (2013). Role of trade finance. The Evidence and Impact of Financial Globalization. Academic Press.

Mansour N, E Zouari (2018). Banking interaction and financial stability: MENA countries. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: C Finance 18(8): 11–24.

Qi M, Shi D, Feng S, et al. (2022). Assessing the interconnectedness and systemic risk contagion in the Chinese banking network. International Journal of Emerging Markets 17(3): 889–913. doi: 10.1108/IJOEM-08-2021-1331

Ramlall I (2018). Financial stability reports. In: Understanding Financial Stability. Emerald Publishing Limited.

Salem SB, Labidi M, Mansour N (2020). Empirical evidence on Non-Performing Loans and credit frictions: banking sector in Tunisia. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management 2(3): 171–183. doi: 10.35912/ijfam.v2i3.191

Schnabel I, Shin HS (2004). Liquidity and contagion: The crisis of 1763. Journal of the European Economic Association December 2(6): 929–968. doi: 10.1162/1542476042813887

Shen B, Perfilev AA, Bufetova LP, Li X (2023). Bank profitability analysis in China: Stochastic frontier approach. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 16(4): 243. doi: 10.3390/jrfm16040243

Sheytanova T (2015). The Accuracy of the Hausman Test in Panel Data: A Monte Carlo Study [Master’s thesis]. Örebro University.

Shi Q, Sun X, Jiang Y (2022). Concentrated commonalities and systemic risk in China’s banking system: A contagion network approach. International Review of Financial Analysis 83: 102253. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102253

Shi Z, Qin S, Chiu YH, et al. (2021). The impact of gross domestic product on the financing and investment efficiency of China’s commercial banks. Financial Innovation. doi: 10.1186/s40854-021-00251-3

Shin HS (2009). Reflections on Northern Rock: The bank run that heralded the global financial crisis. Journal of Economic Perspectives 23(1): 101–119. doi: 10.1257/jep.23.1.101

Sifat I, Zarei A, HosseiniS, Bouri E (2022). Interbank liquidity risk transmission to large emerging markets in crisis periods. International Review of Financial Analysis 82: 102200. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102200

Sun G (2019). China’s shadow banking: Banks’ shadow and traditional shadow banking. BIS Working Papers, No 822.

Tran TKO, Duong DK, Nguyen NTN (2022). Innovations and liquidity risks: Evidence from commercial banks in Vietnam. Journal of International Studies 15(3): 145–157.

Van Rixtel AA, Gasperini G (2013). Financial crises and bank funding: Recent experience in the Euro area. BIS Working Papers No. 406.

Wang C (2017). Analyze the impact of MPA system on current commercial banks. Modern Economy 8(4): 494-506.

Xu Z (2017). Does the expansion of interbank business diminish the liquidity of banks in China? Chinese Studies. doi: 10.4236/chnstd.2017.61002

Yang S, Shi B, Yang F (2023).Macroeconomic impact of the Sino—US trade frictions: Based on a two-country, two-sector DSGE model. Research in International Business and Finance 65: 101956. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.101956

Zhao J, Li X, Yu CH, et al. (2022). Riding the FinTech innovation wave: FinTech, patents and bank performance. Journal of International Money and Finance 122: 102552. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2021.102552

Zheng C, Cheung AWK, Cronje T (2023). Social capital and bank liquidity hoarding. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 80: 101653 doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101653



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2023 Nadia Mansour

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.