Strategic digital city: Concept, model, and research cases

Denis Alcides Rezende

Article ID: 2177
Vol 7, Issue 2, 2023

VIEWS - 909 (Abstract) 272 (PDF)

Abstract


Cities, in addition to being physical, are also digital, requiring the use of information technology resources and strategies, information, and services to make appropriate decisions. The objective is to present the strategic digital city (SDC) concept and project model and its research considering the subprojects: city strategies; city information; public services to citizens; and information technology resources applied in cities. The research methodology comprises approaches mixing techniques in respective phases, including bibliometrics assignment, and model theory applied in SDC cases with more than 11 doctoral, 100 master’s, undergraduate, scientific initiation, and postdoctoral program orientations obtained from more than 300 cities since 2003. The results showed that the SDC can be understood as a social project of public policy and is on the city managers’ agenda, as demonstrated in the 8 cases researched and in the more than 86 publications in different scientific international journals in the recent decade. The conclusion reiterates the importance of the participatory and democratic SDC original project accepted to contribute to the proper city management and the citizens’ quality of life expansion, including infrastructure, policy, and city development. Then, the SDC contemporary concept and model have been maintained regularly over the 10 years.

Keywords


city strategies; city information; public services to citizens; information technology in cities; strategic digital city; urban management

Full Text:

PDF


References


Alizadeh T (2017). Urban digital strategies: Planning in the face of information technology. Journal of Urban Technology 24(2): 35–49. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2017.1285125

Almeida GGF, Rezende DA (2021). Strategic digital city: A decade of research under debate (Portuguese). Revista Espaço Acadêmico 21(230): 1–12.

Bañales-Mallo A, Aguirre-García MS, Santos-Vijande ML (2019). Urban strategic management, city marketing, total quality management and local economic development. urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana 11. doi: 10.1590/2175-3369.011.e20180205

Bauriedl S, Strüver A (2020). Platform urbanism: Technocapitalist production of private and public spaces. Urban Planning 5(4): 267–276. doi: 10.17645/up.v5i4.3414

Bennani KS, Hassine AB, Mazouz B. (2022). Public governance tensions: A managerial artefacts-based view. International Review of Administrative Sciences 88(4): 1050–1067. doi: 10.1177/0020852320988155

Betancur JJ, Brand P (2023). Revisiting Medellin’s governance arrangement after the dust settled. Urban Affairs Review 59(1): 73–98. doi: 10.1177/10780874211047938

Bidandi F, Williams JJ (2020). Understanding urban land, politics, and planning: A critical appraisal of Kampala’s urban sprawl. Cities 106: 102858. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102858

Bjørgen A, Fossheim K, Macharis C (2021). How to build stakeholder participation in collaborative urban freight planning. Cities 112: 103149. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103149

Bloomberg MR, Oliver K, Asher T, et al. (2011). Road map for the digital city: Achieving New York city’s digital future. Available online: https://www.nyc.gov/html/media/media/PDF/90dayreport.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2023).

Brazeau-Béliveau N, Cloutier G (2021). Citizen participation at the micro-community level: The case of the green alley projects in Quebec City. Cities 112: 103065. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103065

Bryson J, George B (2020). Strategic management in public administration. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press.

Bukalova D, Maland E (2023). Mind the gap: Strategies from California on navigating access to public hearings. Public Administration Review 83(2): 435–441. doi: 10.1111/puar.13581

Carlile PR, Christensen CM (2005). The cycles of theory building in management research. Available online: https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/05-057.pdf (accessed on: 2 February 2023).

Carr C, Hesse M (2020). When Alphabet Inc. plans Toronto’s waterfront: New post-political modes of urban governance. Urban Planning 5(1): 69–83. doi: 10.17645/up.v5i1.2519

Chatterton P (2019). Unlocking Sustainable Cities: A Manifesto for Real Change. Pluto Press.

Cheema S (2020). Governance for urban services: Towards political and social inclusion in cities. In: Cheema S (editor). Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements. Springer. pp. 1–30. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-2973-3_1

Cheng YD (2020). Bridging the great divide: Toward a comparative understanding ofcoproduction. Journal of Chinese Governance 5(1): 1–7. doi: 10.1080/23812346.2019.1709325

Cheng YD, Yang LK, Deng S (2022). Nonprofit density and distributional equity in public service provision: Exploring racial/ethnic disparities in public park access across U.S. cities. Public Administration Review 82(3): 473–486. doi: 10.1111/puar.13465

Chiappini L (2020). The urban digital platform: Instances from Milan and Amsterdam. Urban Planning 5(4): 277–288. doi: 10.17645/up.v5i4.3417

Davidson M (2023). Participatory budgeting as democratization? The post-bankruptcy democratization of Vallejo California. City. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2023.2209450

Eijk CV, Steen T (2016). Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence. International Review of Administrative Sciences 82(1): 28–46. doi: 10.1177/0020852314566007

Engin Z, van Dijk J, Lan T, et al. (2020). Data-driven urban management: Mapping the landscape. Journal of Urban Management 9(2): 140–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jum.2019.12.001

England RE, Pelissero JP, Morgan DR (2016). Managing Urban America, 8th ed. CQ Press.

Farr M (2016). Co-production and value co-creation in outcome-based contracting in public services. Public Management Review 18(5): 654–672. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1111661

Ferretti V, Grosso R (2019). Designing successful urban regeneration strategies through a behavioral decision aiding approach. Cities 95: 102386. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.017

Fledderus J, Brandsen T, Honingh M (2014). Restoring trust through the co-production of public services: A theoretical elaboration. Public Management Review 16(3): 424–443. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.848920

Flores CC, Rezende DA (2018). Twitter information for contributing to the strategic digital city: Towards citizens as co-managers. Telematics and Informatics 35(5): 1082–1096. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2018.01.005

Flores CC, Rezende DA (2022). Crowdsourcing framework applied to strategic digital city projects. Journal of Urban Management 11(4): 467–478. doi: 10.1016/j.jum.2022.08.004

Fumagalli LAW, Rezende DA, Guimarães TA (2021). Challenges for public transportation: Consequences and possible alternatives for the Covid-19 pandemic through strategic digital city application. Journal of Urban Management 10(2): 97–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jum.2021.04.002

Fumagalli LAW, Rezende DA, Guimarães TA (2022). Data intelligence in public transportation: Sustainable and equitable solutions to urban modals in strategic digital city subproject. Sustainability 14(8): 4683–4699. doi: 10.3390/su14084683

Gallaugher J (2018). Information Systems: A Manager’s Guide to Harnessing Technology, 6th ed. Flat World Knowledge.

Granda R, Machin-Mastromatteo JD (2017). Recovering troubled cities through public spaces and libraries. Information Development 34(1): 103–107. doi: 10.1177/0266666917741069

Hatuka T, Zur H, Mendoza JA (2021). The urban digital lifestyle: An analytical framework for placing digital practices in a spatial context and for developing applicable policy. Cities 111: 102978. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102978

He AJ, Ma L (2021). Citizen participation, perceived public service performance, and trust in government: Evidence from health policy reforms in Hong Kong. Public Performance & Management Review 44(3): 471–493. doi: 10.1080/15309576.2020.1780138

Heeks R (2022). Digital inequality beyond the digital divide: Conceptualizing adverse digital incorporation in the global South. Information Technology for Development 28(4): 688–704.

doi: 10.1080/02681102.2022.2068492

Kohama H (2016). Public Accounting: Theory and Practice (Portuguese), 15th ed. Atlas.

Kotus J, Sowada T (2017). Behavioural model of collaborative urban management: Extending the concept of Arnstein’s ladder. Cities 65(1): 78–86. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.02.009

Laudon KC, Laudon JP (2022). Management Information Systems, 17th ed. Generic.

Leão P, Santos GGFO, Rocha TN, et al. (2023). The digitalization phenomenon and digital strategies in emerging countries: A semi-systematic review. Revista de Administração Mackenzie 24(3). doi: 10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMR 230059.en

Lee H (2023). Strategic types, implementation, and capabilities: Sustainability policies of local governments. Public Administration. doi: 10.1111/padm.12917

Leonteva LS, Maximov DA, Kurbanov SA, et al. (2018). Information services and development of effective urban management. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology 9(11): 2518–2525.

Li H, Wang Q, Deng Z, et al. (2019). Local public expenditure, public service accessibility, and housing price in Shanghai, China. Urban Affairs Review 55(1): 148–184. doi: 10.1177/1078087417702504

Marom N (2019). Urban visions and divisions in the global south: Comparing strategies for Mumbai and Cape Town. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44(4): 778–793. doi: 10.1111/tran.12309

Masik G, Sagan I, Scott JW (2021). Smart City strategies and new urban development policies in the Polish context. Cities 108: 102970. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102970

Meirelles HL (2020). Brazilian Administrative Law (Portuguese), 44th ed. Juspodivm.

Morel D, Nuamah SA (2020). Who governs? How shifts in political power shape perceptions of local government services. Urban Affairs Review 56(5): 1503–1528. doi: 10.1177/1078087419855675

Morin JF, Olsson C, Atikcan EO (2021) Research Methods in the Social Sciences: An A-Z of Key Concepts. Oxford University Press.

Mouratidis A (2021). Smooth integration of transport infrastructure into urban space. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development 5(2): 1379. doi: 10.24294/jipd.v5i2.1379

Mouratidis K (2021). Urban planning and quality of life: A review of pathways linking the built environment to subjective well-being. Cities 115(1): 103229. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103229

Murphy J, McDowell S, Braniff M, Denyer D (2018). Managing contested spaces: Public managers, obscured mechanisms and the legacy of the past in Northern Ireland. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36(3): 443–459. doi: 10.1177/2399654417714800

Nachmias D, Nachmias CF (2014). Research Methods in the Social Sciences, 8th ed. Worth Publishers.

Navarro-Yáñez CJ, Rodríguez-García MJ (2020). Urban policies as multi-level policy mixes. The comparative urban portfolio analysis to study the strategies of integral urban development initiatives. Cities 102: 102716. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102716

Preiss O, Schroeder RV (2020). The city and the region: Images and realities revisited (Portuguese ). Redes 25(2): 635–651. doi: 10.17058/redes.v25i2.14033

Rahim FU, Shirazi NS (2018). Fiscal decentralization and citizen’s satisfaction from local public service delivery in Pakistan. International Journal of Ethics and Systems 34(1): 122–142. doi: 10.1108/IJOES-04-2017-0066

Rezende DA (2012). Planning Strategies and Municipal Information for Digital City. Guide for Projects in City Halls and Public Organizations (Portuguese). Atlas.

Rezende DA (2016). Digital city projects: Information and public services offered by Chicago (USA) and Curitiba (Brazil). International Journal of Knowledge Society Research 7(3): 16–30. doi: 10.4018/IJKSR.2016070102

Rezende DA (2018). Strategic digital city: Concept and model. In: Proceedings of 15th CONTECSI—International Conference on Information Systems and Technology Management; 23–25 May 2018. doi: 10.5748/9788599693148-15CONTECSI/OS-5217

Rezende DA, Procopiuck M, Figueiredo FC (2015). Public policy and a strategic digital city project: A case study of the Brazilian Municipality of Vinhedo. Journal of Urban Technology 22(2): 63–83. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2014.971536

Ribeiro SS, Rezende DA, Yao J (2019). Toward a model of the municipal evidence-based decision process in the strategic digital city context. Information Polity 24(3): 305–324. doi: 10.3233/IP-190129

Ryzin GGV (2015). Service quality, administrative process, and citizens’ evaluation of local. Public Management Review 17(3): 425–442. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.841456

Shih C, Treija S, Zaleckis K, et al. (2021). Digital placemaking for urban regeneration: Identification of historic heritage values in Taiwan and the Baltic States. Urban Planning 6(4): 257–272. doi: 10.17645/up.v6i4.4406

Stair RM, Reynolds G (2017). Principles of Information System, 13th ed. Cengage Learning.

Tangi L, Benedetti M, Gastaldi L, et al. (2021). Mandatory provisioning of digital public services as a feasible service delivery strategy: Evidence from Italian local governments. Government Information Quarterly 38: 101543. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101543

Teixeira AV, Rezende DA (2023). A multidimensional information management framework for strategic digital cities: A comparative analysis of Canada and Brazil. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management 24(1): 107–121. doi: 10.1007/s40171-022-00325-w

Tomor Z, Meijer A, Michels A, Geertman S (2019). Smart governance for sustainable cities: Findings from a systematic literature review. Journal of Urban Technology 26(4): 3–27.

doi: 10.1080/10630732.2019.1651178

Turban E, Pollard C, Wood G. (2021). Information Technology for Management: Driving Digital Transformation to Increase Local and Global Performance, Growth and Sustainability, 12th ed. Wiley.

Webster CWR, Leleux C (2018) Smart governance: Opportunities for technologically-mediated citizen co-production. Information Polity 23(1): 95–110. doi: 10.3233/IP-170065

Weiss J (2020). Managing performance and strategy: Managerial practices in German local governments. Public Performance & Management Review 43(5): 1129–1149. doi: 10.1080/15309576.2019.1702064

Witesman EM, Walters L, Christensen RK (2023). Creating a public service topology: Mapping public service motivation, public service ethos, and public service values. Public Administration. doi: 10.1111/padm.12939

Wu H, Manoharan AP (2023). Three cities on YouTube: E-government’s evolution through content creation. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age 10(1): 1–22. doi: 10.4018/IJPADA.318126

Wu WN (2020). Does citizens’ 311 system use improve satisfaction with public service encounters? International Journal of Public Administration 44(8): 665–673. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2020.1744644

Wu Y, Sun X, Sun L, Choguill CL (2020). Optimizing the governance model of urban villages based on integration of inclusiveness and urban service boundary (USB): A Chinese case study. Cities 96: 102427. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102427

Yin RK (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. Sage Publications.

Zhou A (2022). Digital infrastructure and economic growth—Evidence for China. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development 6(1): 1397. doi: 10.24294/jipd.v6i1.1397




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v7i2.2177

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Denis Alcides Rezende

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.