This study aimed to analyze government policies in education during the Covid-19 pandemic and how teachers exercised discretion in dealing with limitations in policy implementation. This research work used the desk review method to obtain data on government policies in the field of education during the Covid-19 pandemic. In addition, interviews were conducted to determine the discretion taken in implementing the learning-from-home policy. There were three learning models during the pandemic: face-to-face learning in turns (shifts), online learning, and home visits. Online learning policies did not work well at the pandemic’s beginning due to limited infrastructure and human resources. To overcome various limitations, the government provided internet quota assistance and curriculum adjustments and improved online learning infrastructure. The discretion taken by the teachers in implementing the learning-from-home policy was very dependent on the student’s condition and the availability of the internet network. The practical implication of this research is that street-level bureaucrats need to pay attention to discretionary standards when deciding to provide satisfaction to the people they serve.

Astuti SJW (2009). “Diskresi Birokrasi [Bureaucratic Discretion]”. In: Wibawa S (Ed.), Administrasi Negara: Isu-Isu Kontemporer [State Administration: Contemporary Issues], pp. 29–36. Graha Ilmu.

Baldwin M (2000). Care Management and Community Care: Social Work Discretion and the Construction of the Policy. Ashgate Publishing.

Batley R and Mcloughlin C (2015). “The politics of public services: A service characteristics approach”. World Development, 74: 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.018

Bauhr M and Carlitz R (2019). Transparency and the Quality of Local Public Service Provision: Street-Level Discretion in Education, Health, and Infrastructure (Working Paper Series 2019:5). The Quality of Government Institute, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg.

Dwiyanto A and Kusumasari B (2001). Diskresi Dalam Pemberian Pelayanan Publik [Discretion in Providing Public Services] (Policy Brief No. 3). Center for Population and Policy Studies, Gadjah Mada University.

Evans T (2010). Professional Discretion in Welfare Services: Beyond Street-Level Bureaucracy. Ashgate Publishing.

______ (2011). “Professionals, managers, and discretion: Critiquing street-level bureaucracy”. The British Journal of Social Work, 41(2): 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq074

______ (2015). “Street-level bureaucracy, management, and the corrupted world of service”. European Journal of Social Work, 19(5): 602–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2015.1084274

Fauzi M (2020, June 26). “3 model pembelajaran di masa pandemi [3 learning models during pandemic]”. Kumparan.com.

Gambrill E (2010). “Evidence-based practice and the ethics of discretion”. Journal of Social Work, 11(1): 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017310381306

Gauri V (2013). “Redressing grievances and complaints regarding basic service delivery”. World Development, 41: 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.027

Guidotti R, Chmielewski H, Unnikrishnan V, et al. (2016). “Modeling the resilience of critical infrastructure: The role of network dependencies”. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 1(3–4): 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2016.1254999

Harris C (2019, Feburary 1). “Administrative discretion and the future of the new public service”. PA TIMES Online.

Hooper E, Peters S and Pintus PA (2018). “To what extent can long-term investments in infrastructure reduce inequality?” Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 2(2): 193–225. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v2i2.858

Hudson B (1989). “Michael Lipsky and street-level bureaucracy: A neglected perspective”. In: Barton L (Ed.), Disability and Dependency, pp. 41–52. Falmer Press.

Howe D (1991). “Knowledge, power, and the shape of social work practice”. In: Davies M (Ed.), The Sociology of Social Work, pp. 202–220. Routledge.

Hupe P and Hill M (2007). “Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability”. Public Administration, 85(2): 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x

Indonesia’s Universal Service Obligation Fund (2020). https://digitalregulation.org/indonesias-universal-service-obligation-fund/

Kharas H (2021). “Global development cooperation in a Covid-19 world”. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 5(1): Art. 1245. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v5i1.1245

Lipsky M (1971). “Street-level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform”. Urban Affairs Review, 6(4): 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808747100600401

_______ (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russel Sage Foundation.

_______ (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. 30th Anniversary Expanded Edition. The Russell Sage Foundation.

Maravelias C (2003). “Post-bureaucracy—Control through professional freedom”. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(5): 547–566. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810310494937

Mastura and Santaria R (2020). “Dampak pandemi Covid-19 terhadap proses pengajaran bagi guru dan siswa [Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on the teaching process for teachers and students]”. Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, 3(2): 289–295.

Osborne D and Gaebler T (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Penguin Press.

Ridwan (2021). “Diskresi pemerintah di era birokrasi digital [Government discretion in the era of digital bureaucracy]”. Prosiding Webinar Nasional Hukum Administrasi Negara [Proceedings of the National Webinar on State Administrative Law].

Sari RP, Tusyantari NB and Suswandari M (2020). “Dampak pembelajaran daring bagi siswa sekolah dasar selama Covid-19 [Impact of online learning for elementary school students during Covid-19]”. Prima Magistra: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 2(1): 9–15. https://doi.org/10.37478/jpm.v2i1.732

Sevä M (2015). The Decisive Role of Street-Level Bureaucrats in Environmental Management [Doctorate Thesis, Luleå University of Technology]. DiVA Portal.

Stewart-Weeks M and Kastelle T (2015). “Innovation in public sector”. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(1): 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12129

Subadi S and Toersina TO (2018). “Perkembangan konsep atau pemikiran teoritik tentang diskresi berbasis investasi di daerah [Development of concepts or theoretical thinking on regional investment based on discretion]”. Mimbar Hukum, 30(1): 18–31. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.29222

Subagio B (2020). “Pengaruh partisipasi dan diskresi terhadap kualitas pelayanan publik pada dinas penanaman modal dan pelayanan perizinan terpadu satu pintu Kabupaten Bandung Barat (Studi pelayanan izin lokasi dan izin mendirikan bangunan) [Effect of participation and discression on the quality of public services in the capital investment service and integrated door licensing services West Bandung District (Study of location permission services and establishment permissions)]”. Jurnal Wacana Kinerja, 23(1): 85–100. http://doi.org/10.31845/jwk.v23i1.195

Sullivan FR (2009). “Risk and responsibility: A self-study of teaching in second life”. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(3): 337–357.

Taylor I and Kelly J (2006). “Professionals, discretion and public sector reform in the UK: Re-visiting Lipsky”. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(7): 629–642.

The Number of Covid-19 Cases Is Rising (2020). https://covid19.go.id/id/p/berita/jumlah-kasus-positif-covid-19-naik-1574-meninggal-76-dan-sembuh-1295-orang

Tummers L and Bekkers V (2014). “Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion”. Public Management Review, 16(4): 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841978

Vaishnav S and Marwaha H (2015). “Judiciary: A ladder between inevitable administrative discretion and good governance”. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies, 2(2): 63–72.

Vinzant J and Crothers L (1998). Street-Level Leadership: Discretion and Legitimacy in Frontline Public Service. Georgetown University Press.

Yilmaz S and Guner AA (2013). “Local government discretion and accountability in Turkey”. Public Administration and Development, 33(2): 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1646

Zacka B (2017). When the State Meets the Street: Public Service and Moral Agency. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674981423