Cross-border infrastructure projects offer significant economic and social benefits for the Asia-Pacific region. If the required investment of $8 trillion in pan-Asian connectivity was made in the region’s infrastructure during 2010–2020, the total net income gains for developing Asia could reach about $12.98 trillion (in 2008 US dollars) during 2010–2020 and beyond, of which more than $4.43 trillion would be gained during 2010–2020 and nearly $8.55 trillion after 2020. Indeed, infrastructure connectivity helps improve regional productivity and competitiveness by facilitating the movement of goods, services and human resources, producing economies of scale, promoting trade and foreign direct investments, creating new business opportunities, stimulating inclusive industrialization and narrowing development gaps between communities, countries or sub-regions. Unfortunately, due to limited financing, progress in the development of cross-border infrastructure in the region is low.

This paper examines the key challenges faced in financing cross-border projects and discusses the roles that different stakeholders—national governments, state-owned enterprises, private sector, regional entities, development financing institutions (DFIs), affected people and civil society organizations—can play in facilitating the development of cross-border infrastructure in the region. In particular, this paper highlights the major risks that deter private sector investments and FDIs and provides recommendations to address these risks.

ASEAN (2002a). ASEAN Memorandum of Understanding on the Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipeline Project. Jakarta, Indonesia: ASEAN Secretariat. Available at https://asean.org/?static_post=the-asean-memorandum-of-understanding-mou-on-the-trans-asean-gas-pipeline-tagp.

_____ (2002b). ASEAN Tourism Agreement. Jakarta, Indonesia: ASEAN Secretariat. Available at https://asean.org/?static_post=asean-tourism-agreement.

_____ (2016). Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity 2025. Jakarta, Indonesia: ASEAN Secretariat. Available at https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Master-Plan-on-ASEAN-Connectivity-20251.pdf.

Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2007). Kingdom of Cambodia and Socialist Republic of Viet Nam: Greater Mekong Subregion: Phnom Penh to Ho Chi Minh City Highway Project. Completion Report. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: ADB. Available at https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-document/65385/30316-vie-pcr.pdf.

_____ (2008). Preparing the Ban Sok–Pleiku Power Transmission Project in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Regional Technical Assistance Report. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: ADB. Available at https://www.adb.org/projects/documents/preparing-ban-sok-pleiku-power-transmission-project-greater-mekong-subregion-final-report-tacr.

_____ (2011). Greater Mekong Subregion Cross-Border Transport Facilitation Agreement Instruments and Drafting History. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: ADB. Available at https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/29294/gms-cbta-instruments-history.pdf.

_____ (2012a). Greater Mekong Subregion Power Trade and Interconnection: 2 Decades of Cooperation. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: ADB. Available at https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/29982/gms-power-trade-interconnection.pdf.

_____ (2012b). Ban Sok–Pleiku Power Transmission Project in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Regional Technical Assistance Completion Report. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: ADB. Available at https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-document/154982/41450-012-tcr.pdf.

_____ (2014). Greater Mekong Subregion: Northern Economic Corridor Project in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Performance Evaluation Report. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: ADB. Available at https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/in18-15.pdf.

_____ (2017a). Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal: South Asia Subregional Economic Cooperation (SASEC) Trade Facilitation Program. Completion Report. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: ADB. Available at https://www.adb.org/projects/45260-001/main.

_____ (2017b). Meeting Asia’s Infrastructure Needs. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: ADB. https://doi.org/10.22617/FLS168388-2.

_____ (2018). GMS Transport Sector Strategy 2030. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: ADB. Available at https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/470536/gms-transport-sector-strategy-2030.pdf.

ADB and United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) (2013). Designing and Implementing Trade Facilitation in Asia and the Pacific. Mandaluyong City, Philippines. Available at https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/27530/trade-facilitation-reference-book-2013.pdf.

Bhattacharyay BN, Kawai M and Nag RM (2012). “Introduction”. In: Bhattacharyay BN, Kawai M and Nag RM (Eds.), Infrastructure for Asian Connectivity, pp. 1–18. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781003138.

Brown K (2007). “Are public–private transactions the future of infrastructure finance?” Public Works Management & Policy, 12(1): 320–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X07303680.

Chua DKH, Wang Y and Tan WT (2003). “Impacts of obstacles in East Asian cross-border construction”. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 129(2): 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:2(131).

Gilbert J and Banik N (2012). “Socio-economic impacts of regional transport infrastructure”. In: Bhattacharyay BN, Kawai M and Nag RM (Eds.), Infrastructure for Asian Connectivity, pp. 139–163. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781003138.00013.

Houpis G, Rodriguez JM, Serdarević G and Ovington T (2016). “The impact of network competition in the mobile industry”. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 17(1): 32–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/178359171601700102.

Jandhyala S (2016). International Organizations and Political Risk—The Case of Multilateral Development Banks in Infrastructure Projects. Available at https://ppi.worldbank.org/content/dam/PPI/resources/ppi_publication/theme/The-case-of-multilateral-development-banks-by-Jandhyala2016.pdf.

Joint Committee on Coordination of Commercial Navigation (2015). Agreement on Commercial Navigation on Lancang-Mekong River. Available at https://www.jcccn.org/index.php/rule-and-regulation/15-agreement-on-commercial-navigation-on-lancang-mekong-river-among-the-governments-of-the-people-s-republic-of-China-the-lao-people-s-democratic-republic-the-union-of-myanmar-and-the-kingdom-of-thailand.

Kuroda H (2006). “Infrastructure and regional cooperation”. Paper for Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, 1–30. Tokyo, 29–30 May. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DEC/Resources/84797-1251813753820/6415739-1251814084145/Haruhiko_Kuroda_Infrastructure.pdf.

Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) (2006). Hydropower in Asia: The Nam Theun 2 Project. Nam Theun 2 Brief. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at http://www.miga.org/sites/default/files/archive/Documents/NT206.pdf.

Portugal-Perez A and Wilson JS (2012). “Export performance and trade facilitation reform: Hard and soft infrastructure”. World Development, 40(7): 1295–1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.12.002.

Sachs T, Tiong RLK and Wang SQ (2007). “Analysis of political risks and opportunities in public private partnerships (PPP) in China and selected Asian countries—Survey results”. Chinese Management Studies, 1(2): 126–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506140710758026.

Sawant RJ (2010). “The economics of large-scale infrastructure FDI: The case of project finance”. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(6): 1036–1055. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.63.

Stone SF, Strutt A and Hertel T (2012). “Socio-economic impact of regional transport infrastructure in the Greater Mekong Subregion”. In: Bhattacharyay BN, Kawai M and Nag RM (Eds.), Infrastructure for Asian Connectivity, pp. 95–138. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781003138.00012.

UNESCAP (2016a). Master Plan for the Asia-Pacific Information Superhighway. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCAP. Available at https://www.unescap.org/resources/master-plan-asia-pacific-information-superhighway.

_____ (2016b). Asia-Pacific Information Superhighway Regional Cooperation Framework Document. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCAP. Available at https://www.unescap.org/resources/asia-pacific-information-superhighway-regional-cooperation-framework-document.

Verougstraete M (2018). Public-Private Partnerships for Cross-Border Infrastructure Development. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCAP.

World Bank (2005). “Project appraisal document for the Nam Theun 2 hydroelectric project”. Report No. 3 1764-LA. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank.

_____ (2011). “Regional power integration: Structural and regulatory challenges”. Report No. 58934, Central America Regional Programmatic Study for the Energy Sector. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank.

Zamora CG (2015). ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation 2016–2025. Jakarta, Indonesia: ASEAN Centre for Energy. Available at http://www.aseanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/HighRes-APAEC-online-version-final.pdf.

ZIZABONA Project Implementation Manual (2012). ZIZABONA Transmission Project: Information Memorandum. NamPower, ZESCO, ZESA and BPC.

Zhai F (2012). “Benefits of infrastructure investment: An empirical analysis” In: Bhattacharyay BN, Kawai M and Nag RM (Eds.), Infrastructure for Asian Connectivity, pp. 80–94. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781003138.00011.

Zhang ZX (2011). “Policies and measures to mitigate potential environmental impacts of cross-border infrastructure projects in Asia”. ADBI Working Paper No. 261. Tokyo, Japan: Asian Development Bank Institute. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1738051.