Public-private partnership as remedy for crumbling infrastructure: Is this hope looking for reason?

Richard E. Wagner

Article ID: 1152
Vol 3, Issue 2, 2019

VIEWS - 551 (Abstract) 334 (PDF)

Abstract


It has become commonplace to describe publicly provided infrastructure as being in a sorry state and to advance public-private partnership as a possible remedy. This essay adopts a skeptical but not a cynical posture toward those claims. The paper starts by reviewing the comparative properties of markets and politics within a theory of budgeting where the options are construction and maintenance. This analytical point of departure explains how incongruities between political and market action can favor construction over maintenance. In short, political entities can engage in an implicit form of public debt by reducing maintenance spending to support other budgetary items. This implicit form of public debt does not manifest in higher interest rates but rather manifests in crumbling bridges and other infrastructure due to the transfer of maintenance into other budgetary activities.


Keywords


public-private partnership; dyadic vs. triadic partnerships; construction vs. maintenance; budgetary politics; implicit public debt

Full Text:

PDF


References


Brancato K and Wagner RE (2004). Inefficient market pricing: An illusory economic box. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 22: 3–13.

Buchanan JM (1968). The Demand and Supply of Public Goods. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

_________ (1969). Cost and Choice. Chicago, IL: Markham.

Buchanan JM and Wagner RE (1977). Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Ekelund RB Jr. (1968). Jules Dupuit and the early theory of marginal cost pricing. Journal of Political Economy, 76(3): 462–471. https://doi.org/10.1086/259416.

Eusepi G and Wagner RE (2017). Public Debt: An Illusion of Democratic Political Economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786438041.

Fama EG (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2): 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1086/260866

Jacobs J (1992). Systems of Survival. New York, NY: Random House.

Jensen MC and Meckling WH (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.

Koppl R (2018). Expert Failure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481400.

Kydland FE and Prescott EC (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy, 85(3): 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1086/260580.

Patrick M and Wagner RE (2015). From mixed economy to entangled political economy: A Paretian social-theoretic orientation. Public Choice, 164(1–2): 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0273-8.

Podemska-Mikluch M and Wagner RE (2013). Dyads, triads, and the theory of exchange: Between liberty and coercion. The Review of Austrian Economics, 26(2): 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-012-0180-x.

_________ (2012). Deficits, Debt, and Democracy: Wrestling with Tragedy on the Fiscal Commons. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

_________ (2015). Welfare economics and second-best theory: Filling imaginary economic boxes. Cato Journal, 35(1): 133–146.

_________ (2016). Politics as a Peculiar Business: Insights from a Theory of Entangled Political Economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v3i2.1152

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Richard E. Wagner

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.