This study explores the impact of online assessments on students’ academic performance and learning outcomes at the University of Technology in South Africa. The research problem addresses the effectiveness and challenges of digital assessment platforms in higher education (HE), particularly their influence on student engagement, feedback quality, and academic integrity. A qualitative case study approach was employed, involving semi-structured interviews with ten undergraduate and postgraduate students from diverse academic backgrounds. The findings reveal that while online assessments provide flexibility and immediate feedback, they also pose challenges related to technical issues, feedback delays, and concerns about long-term knowledge retention. The study highlights the necessity of aligning assessment strategies with constructivist learning principles to enhance critical thinking and student-centered learning. Implications for theory include strengthening the application of constructivist learning in digital environments, while practical recommendations focus on improving assessment design, institutional support, and feedback mechanisms. Policy adjustments should consider inclusive and equitable access to online assessments. Future research should further investigate the long-term impact of digital assessments on professional readiness. This study contributes to ongoing discussions on online education by offering a nuanced understanding of digital assessment challenges and opportunities in higher education.

Abdullah, G., Arifin, A., Saro’i, M., & Uhai, S. (2024). Assessing the influence of learning styles, instructional strategies, and assessment methods on student engagement in college-level science courses. International Education Trend Issues, 2(2), 142-150.

Asad, M. M., Khan Soomro, R. B., Shamsy, A., & Churi, P. (2021). Students’ satisfaction towards e-assessment for academic achievement in ESL at public schools and colleges. Education Research International, 2021, 1-10.

Asy-Syila, A. (2024). Strategies for enhancing student motivation and achievement. Mauve Journal De Leardu, 1(1), 9-15.

Barik, S. (2023). Embracing the transformative dynamics of English teaching and technology in higher education: A posthumanist perspective. Smart Moves Journal IJELLH, 17-31.

Barua, L., & Lockee, B. (2025). Flexible assessment in higher education: A comprehensive review of strategies and implications. TechTrends, 1-9.

Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Weate, P. (2016). Using thematic analysis in sport and exercise research. In: Routledge handbook Of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise. Routledge. pp. 213-227.

Brnieh, M. (2022). How do they perceive it?! A qualitative case study of the impact of English written feedback on students’ perception in the Norwegian classroom [Master’s thesis]. NTNU.

Brown, G., & Desforges, C. (2013). Piaget’s theory. Routledge.

Buehrer, T. E. (2000). An alternative pedagogical paradigm for aural skills: An examination of constructivist learning theory and its potential for implementation into aural skills curricula. Indiana University.

Caulfield, J. (2023). How to design and teach a hybrid course: Achieving student-centered learning through blended classroom, online and experiential activities. Taylor & Francis.

Chen, C. M., Li, M. C., Chang, W. C., & Chen, X. X. (2021). Developing a topic analysis instant feedback system to facilitate asynchronous online discussion effectiveness. Computers & Education, 163, 104095.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Cresswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018) Qualitative Inquiry and Research and Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Curtin, A. L., & Sarju, J. P. (2021). Students as partners: Co-creation of online learning to deliver high-quality, personalized content. In: Advances in Online Chemistry Education. American Chemical Society. pp. 135-163.

El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 53.

Ferrer, J., Ringer, A., Saville, K., et al. (2022). Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education: The importance of attitude to online learning. Higher Education, 83(2), 317-338.

Fitrianto, I. (2024). Critical reasoning skills: Designing an education curriculum relevant to social and economic needs. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 245-258.

Guba, E. G. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Handbook of qualitative research. Sage.

Hill, J., & West, H. (2020). Improving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.

Hutchison, L., & McAlister-Shields, L. (2020). Culturally responsive teaching: Its application in higher education environments. Education Sciences, 10(5), 124.

Karunarathna, I., Gunawardana, K., Rajapaksha, S., et al. (2024). Assessment evolution: Transitioning from traditional. ResearchGate Preprint.

Kelly, K., & Zakrajsek, T. D. (2023). Advancing online teaching: Creating equity-based digital learning environments. Taylor & Francis.

LaDonna, K. A., Cowley, L., Ananny, L., et al. (2023). When feedback is not perceived as feedback: Challenges for regulatory body–mandated peer review. Academic Medicine, 98(11S), S72-S78.

Lauterbach, A. A. (2018). Hermeneutic phenomenological interviewing: Going beyond semi-structured formats to help participants revisit experience. The qualitative report, 23(11), 2883-2898.

Luckner, N., & Purgathofer, P. (2021). Insights from peer reviewing in large university courses. In: Proceedings of the 10th Computer Science Education Research Conference. pp. 86-93.

Molokomme, R. T. (2024). Unveiling challenges with e-learning faced by academic staff at a University of Technology after COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 13(2), 394-404.

Montenegro-Rueda, M., Luque-de la Rosa, A., et al. (2021). Assessment in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(19), 10509.

Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), 3292.

Naidoo, R., & Mabaso, M. (2020). Social constructivist pedagogy in business studies classrooms: Teachers’ experiences and practices. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375765964_Social_constructivist_pedagogy_in_business_studies_classrooms_-teachers%27_experiences_and_practices (accessed on 12 January 2025).

Ndlovu, M. (2010). Revisiting the efficacy of constructivism in mathematics education. Available online: https://www.exeter.ac.uk/research/groups/education/pmej/pome27/Ndlovu%20-%20Revisiting%20the%20Efficacy%20of%20Constructivism.docx (accessed on 24 January 2025).

Nyimbili, F., & Nyimbili, L. (2024). Types of Purposive Sampling Techniques with Their Examples and Application in Qualitative Research Studies. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 5(1), 90-99.

Panadero, E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2022). A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements. Educational Research Review, 35, 100416.

Piaget, J. (1978). Piaget’s theory of intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Pishchukhina, O., & Allen, A. (2021). Supporting learning in large classes: Online formative assessment and automated feedback. In: Proceedings of the 2021 30th Annual Conference of the European Association for Education in Electrical and Information Engineering (EAEEIE). pp. 1-4.

Poort, I., Jansen, E., & Hofman, A. (2022). Does the group matter? Effects of trust, cultural diversity, and group formation on engagement in group work in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 511-526.

Prihatin, Y., & Aflahatun, N. (2020). The use of request strategies of industrial engineering students. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(2), 227-236.

Rababah, L. M., & Al-Shboul, O. K. (2023). Examination of the use of feedback in EFL writing instruction: A case study of Jordan. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(1), 263-268.

Raes, A., Vanneste, P., Pieters, M., et al. (2020). Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes. Computers & Education, 143, 103682.

Rana, S. (2024). Virtual learning frontiers: A documentary analysis of online learning platforms in education. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(1), 248-254.

Sato, S. N., Condes Moreno, E., Rubio-Zarapuz, A., et al. (2023). Navigating the new normal: Adapting online and distance learning in the post-pandemic era. Education Sciences, 14(1), 19.

Schmidt, L. J., & DeSchryver, M. (2022). The role of digital application literacy in online assessment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(3), 356-378.

Schwandt, T. A., Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2007). Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions for evaluation, 2007(114).

Şenel, S., & Şenel, H. C. (2021). Remote assessment in higher education during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(2), 181-199.

Singh, A., Singh, D., & Chhikara, S. (2024). Online learning: Challenges and suggestions to enhance student engagement in higher education institutions. In: Reshaping Entrepreneurial Education Within an Industry 4.0 Context. IGI Global. pp. 59-80.

Solovyeva, N., Tapalova, O., & Smirnov, S. (2023). Specifics of the students’ critical thinking formation within active learning space. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1132525.

Tuah, N. A. A., & Naing, L. (2021). Is online assessment in higher education institutions during COVID-19 pandemic reliable? Siriraj Medical Journal, 73(1), 61-68.

Vahed, A., & Rodriguez, K. (2021). Enriching students’ engaged learning experiences through the collaborative online international learning project. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(5), 596-605.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Sage.