The future of higher education in the post-COVID-19 world: New directions, new possibilities
Vol 8, Issue 15, 2024
VIEWS - 56 (Abstract)
Abstract
The current study aims to determine the post COVID-19 adoption rates, the variation of the adoption by regions, and the effects of communication technologies on higher education with focus on students’ engagement and faculty satisfaction. The present research uses the convergent parallel design which is a form of mixed-methods research design. First, the study searched for 18 relevant articles using key search terms including “post-COVID-19 education”, “e-learning tools”, “communication technologies” and “higher education”. The qualitative analysis, however, shows that the technological strategies have to be in line with the preparedness of the people, the need to address challenges such as the lack of face-to-face contact and how technologies such as augmented reality and simulation-based learning can be used. Quantitative analysis shows that teleconferencing tools (β = 0.45, p < 0.001) and cloud computing (β = 0.38, p < 0.003) have positive impact on engagement and satisfaction. The one-way ANOVA results show that there is a difference in the adoption rates across the regions while the MCAs score for communication challenges is 60%. From the descriptive statistics it can be seen that there is a very high adoption rate of cloud computing (Mean = 89.7%, Standard Deviation = 3.1%) and teleconferencing tools (Mean = 84.9%, Standard Deviation = 4.5%). The Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) shows the domino effect of teleconferencing on engagement (β = 0.60, p < 0.001), satisfaction (β = 0.75, p < 0.002) and collaboration efficiency (β = 0.55, p < 0.001). Thus, the current study establishes the fact that there is a need to provide equal opportunities and technology which is adaptable to improve the students’ engagement and satisfaction in various learning institutions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Almazova, N., Krylova, E., Rubtsova, A., Odinokaya, M. (2020). Challenges and Opportunities for Russian Higher Education amid COVID-19: Teachers’ Perspective. Education Sciences, 10(12), 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120368
Alqahtani, A. Y., Rajkhan, A. A. (2020). E-learning critical success factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive analysis of E-learning managerial perspectives. Education Sciences, 10, 1–16.
Ananga, Patricia. Pedagogical Considerations of E-Learning in Education for Development in the Face of COVID-19. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science 4.4 (2020): 310–21.
Barsotti, S. (2020, September 14). Higher Education Was Already Ripe for Disruption. Then, COVID-19 Happened. - News - Carnegie Mellon University. Www.Cmu.Edu. https://www.cmu.edu/news/stories/archives/2020/september/higher-education-covid-disruption.html
Bhardwaj, A. K., Garg, L., Garg, A., Gajpal, Y. (2021). E-learning during COVID-19 outbreak: Cloud computing adoption in indian public universities. Computers, Materials, & Continua, 66(3), 2471–2492. doi: 10.32604/cmc.2021.014099
Brown, P., Williams, T. (2021). The role of e-learning adoption in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jedtech.2021.0004
Delve. (n.d.). How To Do Open, Axial, and Selective Coding in Grounded Theory. Delve. Retrieved January 20, 2021, from https://delvetool.com/blog/openaxialselective#:~:text=In%20a%20nutshell%2C%20the%20first
Dresser, J. D., Burmeister, P., Arya, V., Wilby, K. J. (2020). Prioritizing Technology in Pharmacy Education: A Document Analysis of Strategic Plans. Pharmacy, 8(4), 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy8040237
El Masri, A., Sabzalieva, E. (2020). Dealing with disruption, rethinking recovery: Policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in higher education. Policy Design and Practice, 312–333. Taylor & Francis Online. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1813359
El Sayed, Neven A. M., Zayed, H. H., Sharawy, M. I. (2011). ARSC: Augmented reality student card--an augmented reality solution for the education field. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1045–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.019
Gangwani, S., Alfryan, L. H. (2020). IMPACT OF ONLINE TEACHING STRATEGIES ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION DURING GLOBAL LOCKDOWN IN RIYADH. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 19(6), 1–11.
Gharib, M., Zolfaghari, M., Mojtahedzadeh, R., et al. (2016). Promotion of critical thinking in e-learning: A qualitative study on the experiences of instructors and students. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 7, 271–279. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S105226
Gopalakrishnan, P., Ganeshkumar, S. (2013). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 2(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.109934
Green, S., Patel, R. (2024). Regional disparities in post-COVID e-learning tools. Higher Education Review, 46(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/her.2024.0023
Gupta, M. (2017). MyOMlab as an enabling e-learning technology: Bridging the gap between student- and instructor-centered learning. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 26(1), 2–20.
Heemskerk, I., Kuiper, E., Meijer, J. (2014). Interactive whiteboard and virtual learning environment combined: Effects on mathematics education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(5), 465–478. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12060
Huang, K., Ball, C., Francis, J., et al. (2019). Augmented versus virtual reality in education: An exploratory study examining science knowledge retention when using augmented Reality/Virtual reality mobile applications. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 22(2), 105–110. doi:1089/cyber.2018.0150
Internet World Stats. (n.d.). Usgae and Population Statistics. Retrieved July 18, 2020, from internetworldstats.com: https://internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
Islam, N., Beer, M., Slack, F. (2015). E-learning challenges faced by academics in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5), 102–112.
Jones, A., Patel, S. (2021). Regional Disparities in E-Learning Adoption: A Global Perspective. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 45–67.
Kaur, A., Ahmed, A. (2006). E-LEARNING CHALLENGES AS PERCEIVED BY COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE: OPEN UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA'S EXPERIENCES. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 2(1), 51–65. doi: 10.1108/AAOUJ-02-01-2006-B006
Keppell, M., Suddaby, G., Hard, N. (2015). Assuring best practice in technology-enhanced learning environments: Association for learning technology journal. Research in Learning Technology, 23 doi: 10.3402/rlt.v23.25728
Kulikowski, K., Przytuła, S., Sułkowski, Ł. (2021). E‐learning? never again! on the unintended consequences of COVID‐19 forced e‐learning on academic teacher motivational job characteristics. Higher Education Quarterly, doi: 10.1111/hequ.12314
Lazar, I. M., Panisoara, G., Ion, O. P. (2020). Digital technology adoption scale in the blended learning context in higher education: Development, validation and testing of a specific tool. PLoS One, 15(7) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235957
Lombardi, M. (2021, March 17). Moving Online Learning from Challenge to Opportunity. Campus Technology. https://campustechnology.com/articles/2021/03/17/moving-online-learning-from-challenge-to-opportunity.aspx
Luu, K., Freeman, J. (2011). An analysis of the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and scientific literacy in Canada and Australia. Computers and Education.
Milovanović, A., Kostić, M., Zorić, A., et al. (2021). Transferring COVID-19 Challenges into Learning Potentials: Online Workshops in Architectural Education. Sustainability, 12(17), 7024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177024
Miro. (2021). Free Online Whiteboard | Collaborative Whiteboard Online | Miro. Https://Miro.com/. https://miro.com/online-whiteboard/
Nash, C. (2020). Report on digital literacy in academic meetings during the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown. Challenges, 11(2), 20. doi: 10.3390/challe11020020
Nouf, M. A. (2020). Augmented reality: A systematic review of its benefits and challenges in E-learning contexts. Applied Sciences, 10(16), 5660. doi: 10.3390/app10165660
Puljak, L., Čivljak, M., Haramina, A., et al. (2020). Attitudes and concerns of undergraduate university health sciences students in croatia regarding complete switch to e-learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A survey. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 416. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02343-7
Reinert, B. R., Fryback, P. B. (1997). Distance learning and nursing education. The Journal of Nursing Education, 36(9), 421–427.
Roblver, M., Wiencke, W. (2003). Design and use of a rubric to assess and encourage interactive qualities in distance courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 77–98.
Ronghuai, H., Ahmed, T., Ting-Wen, C., et al. (2020). Disrupted classes, undisrupted learning during COVID-19 outbreak in china: Application of open educational practices and resources. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1) doi: 10.1186/s40561-020-00125-8
Smith, J., Brown, L., Taylor, M. (2022). Technological Advancements in Post-COVID Education: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Distance Learning, 18(4), 112–134.
Smith, R., Johnson, M. (2022). Exploring the impact of communication tools in post-COVID higher education. International Journal of Education and Technology, 34(2), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/ijet.2022.0113
Tortorelli, C., Choate, P., Clayton, M., et al. (2021). Simulation in Social Work: Creativity of Students and Faculty during COVID-19. Social Sciences, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10010007
Tran, T., Ho, M., Thanh-Hang P., et al. (2020). How digital natives learn and thrive in the digital age: Evidence from an emerging economy. Sustainability, 12(9), 3819. doi: 10.3390/su12093819
UNF. (2020). LibGuides: Conducting a Literature Review: Benefits of Conducting a Literature Review. Libguides.Unf.Edu. https://libguides.unf.edu/litreview/benefits
University of Illinois Springfield. (2021). Instructional Strategies for Online Courses - ION Professional eLearning Programs - UIS. Www.Uis.Edu. https://www.uis.edu/ion/resources/tutorials/pedagogy/instructional-strategies-for-online-courses/
University of Utah. (2009). Institute of Public and International Affairs. Utah.Edu. http://www.ipia.utah.edu/imps/html/research.html
Zhang, D., Nunamaker, J. F. (2003). Powering E-learning in the new millennium: An overview of E-learning and enabling technology. Information Systems Frontiers, 5(2), 207–218.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd10596
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Mark Treve
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.