Modeling of leadership behavior framework for road usage charge management in Vietnam
Vol 8, Issue 16, 2024
VIEWS - 0 (Abstract) 0 (PDF)
Abstract
Leadership behavior is a critical component of effective management, significantly influencing organizational success. While extensive research has examined key success factors in road management, the specific role of leadership behaviors in road usage charging (RUC) management remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by identifying and analyzing leadership behavior dimensions and their impact on management performance within the RUC context. Using a mixed-methods approach, focus group discussions with industry practitioners were conducted to define eight leadership behavior dimensions: Central-Level Leadership Guidance (LE1), Local-Level Leadership Guidance (LE2), Central-Level Leadership Commitment (LE3), Local-Level Leadership Commitment (LE4), Subordinate Understanding from Central-Level Leadership (LE5), Subordinate Understanding from Local-Level Leadership (LE6), Work Motivation (LE7), and Understanding Rights and Obligations (LE8). These dimensions were further validated through a quantitative survey distributed to 138 professionals involved in RUC management in Vietnam, with the data analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) and partial least squares (PLS) estimation. The findings revealed that LE3 (Central-Level Leadership Commitment) had the strongest direct impact on management performance (MP) and mediated the relationships between other leadership dimensions and management outcomes. This study contributes to the theoretical understanding of leadership in RUC management by highlighting the centrality of leadership commitment and offering practical insights for improving leadership practices to enhance organizational performance in infrastructure management.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Atkinson, R. D. (2019). A policymaker’s guide to road user charges. Retrieved from
Badiru, A. B. (2005). Handbook of industrial and systems engineering: CRC Press.
Bergkvist, L., and Rossiter, J. R. (2009). Tailor-made single-item measures of doubly concrete constructs. International Journal of Advertising, 28(4), 607–621.
Bolderdijk, J. W., Knockaert, J., Steg, E., Verhoef, E. T., and Prevention. (2011). Effects of Pay-As-You-Drive vehicle insurance on young drivers’ speed choice: Results of a Dutch field experiment. Accident Analysis Prevention, 43(3), 1181–1186.
Cottingham, D. N., Beresford, A. R., and Harle, R. K. (2007). Survey of Technologies for the Implementation of National‐scale Road User Charging. Transport Reviews, 27(4), 499–523.
Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., and Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449.
Eun, O. J., Vukanovic, S., and Bennett, C. R. (2009). Planning and implementation of road use charging: options and guidelines.
Field, A. P. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows: advanced techniques for the beginner. London: Sage Publications.
Grinerud, K., Aarseth, W., and Robertsen, R. (2021). Leadership strategies, management decisions and safety culture in road transport organizations. In.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5): Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Hair, J., Joseph, F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): Sage publications.
Halpin, A. W., and Winer, B. J. (1957). A factorial study of the leader behavior descriptions. Leader behavior: Its description measurement, 39–51.
Hennink, M. M. (2013). Focus group discussions: Oxford University Press.
Henseler, J. (2010). On the convergence of the partial least squares path modeling algorithm. Computational statistics, 25(1), 107–120.
Kirkpatick, S. A., and Locke, E. A. (1991). Leadership: do traits matter? Academy of management perspectives, 5(2), 48–60.
Kramer, M. R., and Porter, M. E. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business review, 84(12), 78–92.
Levinson, D. (2010). Equity effects of road pricing: A review. Transport Reviews, 30(1), 33–57.
Nguyen, L. H. (2019). Relationships between critical factors related to team behaviors and client satisfaction in construction project organizations. Journal of Construction Engineering Management, 145(3), 04019002.
Nguyen, L. H. (2022). The impact modeling of project management function behaviors on construction labor productivity. International Journal of Productivity Performance Management, 71(7), 2991–3008.
Nguyen, L. H. (2024a). The Impact of Leadership Behaviour on Management Effectiveness in Public Construction Project Organizations. Public Works Management Policy, 30(1), 58–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X241237
Nguyen, L. H. (2024b). The influence of management functions on the productivity of yard cargo handling equipment in container terminals. Maritime Business Review, 9(2), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/MABR-06-2023-0046
Nguyen, L. H. (2024c). The influence of management functions on the productivity of yard cargo handling equipment in container terminals. Maritime Business Review.
Nguyen, L. H., and Ann, T. N. (2023). Modeling of planning function management in Vietnam’s public construction works. Built Environment Project Asset Management, 13(2), 201–216.
Nguyen, L. H., Watanabe, T., and Le, T. T. (2016). An investigation of the relationship between project organizational culture and procurement approach of construction project organizations. Internet Journal of Society for Social Management Systems, 1(10), 50–61.
Ochieng, W. Y., Quddus, M. A., North, R. J., and Noland, R. B. (2010). Technologies to measure indicators for road user charging. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport.
Oehry, B. (2010). Critical success factors for implementing road charging systems. Retrieved from
Pollack, J., Helm, J., and Adler, D. (2018). What is the Iron Triangle, and how has it changed? International journal of managing projects in business, 11(2), 527–547.
Santa, R., Ferrer, M., and Hyland, W. (2006). System Effectiveness and Operational Effectiveness: Can an Optimal Balance be Obtained. Paper presented at the at The 20th ANZAM (Australian New Zealand Academy of Management) Conference on Management: Pragmatism, Philosophy, Priorities. Central Queensland University, Rochampton, Australia.
Shenhar, A., and Dvir, D. (2008). Project management research-the challenge and opportunity. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 2(36), 112–121.
Stogdill, R. M., and Coons, A. E. (1957). Leader behavior: Its description and measurement: Ohio State University.
Sugiarto, S., Miwa, T., Sato, H., and Morikawa, T. (2017). Explaining differences in acceptance determinants toward congestion charging policies in Indonesia and Japan. Journal of Urban Planning Development, 143(2), 04016033.
Verhoef, E. T., and Rouwendal, J. (2004). Pricing, capacity choice, and financing in transportation networks. Journal of Regional Science, 44(3), 405–435.
Walker, R. M., Damanpour, F., and Devece, C. A. (2011). Management innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of performance management. Journal of public administration research theory, 21(2), 367–386.
Williams, C. (2017). Mgmt: Cengage Learning.
Yukl, G., and Lepsinger, R. (2005). Why integrating the leading and managing roles is essential for organizational effectiveness. Organizational dynamics, 34(4), 361–375.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd10464
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Van Thuan Do, Luong Hai Nguyen
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.