The article examines the issues of application and improvement of the methodology for evaluating industrial enterprises as recipients of state support within the framework of the implementation of industrial policy. The authors considered approaches to the content of industrial policy, investigated the factors influencing its efficiency, identified aspects of its imperfections that arise when applying an incomplete list of important parameters of economic development and ambiguity in the interpretation of previously applied estimates. The article presents proposals to improve the methodology for assessing potential recipients of state support based on the development of a comprehensive indicator for assessing enterprises (recipients of support), taking into account not only the classical parameters of the economic efficiency of industrial enterprises applying for state financial assistance, but also such aspects as the development of budgetary funds, belonging to priority sectors of the economy, characteristics of sustainable development and export and innovation potential. Combining the results of a comprehensive assessment of the recipient of state support with a map of the business demography of the territory allows making a decision not only about the fact of support and its efficiency, but also to predict the assessment of the life cycle of the enterprise and its subsequent development.

Adeniran, A. O., Muraina, J. M., Ilugbami, J. O., & Adeniran, A. A. (2023). Government policy: meaning, types, manifestations, theories, and policy cycles. Insights into Regional Development, 5(2), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2023.5.2(6).

Bochkarev, A. M. (2023). Development of Methodological Tools for Evaluating the Processes of Digital Transformation of Industry [PhD thesis]. Perm, 258 p.

Bodrunov, S. D. (2018). Russian industry against the background of the world (Russian). Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 211(3), 29–35.

Castelli, I., Mamika, L., & Lee, K. (2023). New Perspectives and Challenges in Industrial Policy for Sustainable Development: From Development and Entrepreneurship to the State of the Environment. Review of Evol Polit Econ, 4, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-023-00100-2.

Damayati, A., Nuryakin, Ch., Yudhistira, M. H., & Dartanto, T. (2024). Industrial location policy, exporting activity, and firms’ collusive behavior: scrutinizing the unintended effect of industrial location policy in Indonesia. Economia e Politica Industriale. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-023-00294-w.

Ermolaev, D. V. (2018). Methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of industrial enterprises (Russian). In: Barkhatov, V. I., Pletnev, D. A., & Benz, D. S. (eds.). Competitiveness and Development of Socio-Economic Systems: Collection of Abstracts of Reports of the Second All-Russian Scientific Conference in Memory of Academician A. I. Tatarkin; Chelyabinsk; April 10–11 2018; Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk, pp. 25–26.

Galyavov, R. A. (2011). Improving the Effectiveness of Industrial Policy Based on Clustering of Intersectoral Production Programs [Abstract of PhD thesis]. (Russian). Kazan, 21 p.

Garbuzov, A. M., Kirillova, O. Y., & Gladysheva, I. V. (2024). Improving the approach to managing measures of state support for enterprises in the course of implementing industrial policy (Russian). Scientific Result. Business and Service Technologies, 10(3), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9346-2024-10-3-0-5.

Ge, P., Zhu, R., Chen, Y., & Huang, X. (2024). Selective industrial policy and overcapacity: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Economic Systems, 101191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2024.101191.

Grega, M., & Nečas, P. (2022). Implementation of effective solutions to the crisis tasks and its regional management. Insights into Regional Development, 4(4), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2022.4.4(2).

Jafarov, N., Nahmatova, N., & Nuralizade, E. (2024). Analyzing the relationship between industrial policy and entrepreneurial ecosystem. People: International Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2024.101.121133.

Kremlin (2022). Meeting of the Council for Strategic Development and National Projects. Available online: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/70086 (accessed on 08 July 2024).

Kremlin (2024). Meeting with Members of the Government. August 8, 2024. Available online: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/74717 (accessed on 10 September 2024).

Kushbokova, R. H., Kushbokov, A. A., Kushbokov A. A. (2022). The need for a multi-criteria approach to assessing the effectiveness of industrial policy in the region (Russian). Financial Business, 4(226), 30–32.

Laipanov, A. I. (2022). Methodological tools for evaluating the effectiveness of industrial policy (Russian). In: Priority Directions of Economic Development in the Context of Digitalization: Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference; In 2 parts; Belgorod; 14–18 March 2022; Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law, Belgorod, pp. 150–157.

Molica, F. (2024). Reassessing Cohesion Policy Through the Lens of the New EU Industrial Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13616.

Obolenskaya, L. V. (2020). Identification of criteria for a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of sectoral industrial policy (Russian). Drucker’s Bulletin, 4(36), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.17213/2312-6469-2020-4-88-100.

Palash, S. V. (2022). Evaluation of the effectiveness of management of the development of industrial systems (Russian). In: Management of Sustainable Development of Economic Systems in the Digital Age. POLYTECHNIC PRESS, St. Petersburg, pp. 172–189. https://doi.org/10.18720/IEP/2022.5/7.

Rosstat (2014). Official statistical methodology for the formation of business demography indicators (in terms of legal entities), Approved by Rosstat Order No. 541 dated August 29, 2014. Available online: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/metodika_bizn-dem.pdf (accessed on 05 August 2024).

Rosstat (2024). Information for monitoring the social and economic situation of the territorial entities of the Russian Federation. Available online: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/11109/document/13259 (accessed on 10 September 2024).

Shih, W. (2024). Government intervention in industrial policy: how businesses should respond. The Business & Management Collection, 7, e1008312. https://doi.org/10.69645/chng4701.

Shirokova, E. S. (2015). Formation of Innovative Industrial Policy of Sustainable Development in the Context of Socio-Economic Transformation [Abstract of PhD thesis] (Russian). Moscow, 22 p.

Simachev, Yu. V., Fedyunina, A. A., & Kuzyk, M. G. (2022). New contours of industrial policy (Russian). In: Reports to the 23rd Yasinskaya (April) International Scientific Conference on Problems of Economic and Social Development, National Research University of Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 73 p.

Smirnov, S. A. (2022). Modern industrial policy in the Russian Federation and key directions of its transformation (Russian). Innovative Science, 12(1).

Starikov, E. N. (2023). On the issue of the effectiveness of industrial policy (Russian). Discussion, 5(120), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.46320/2077-7639-2022-5-120-26-35.

Strizhakova, E. N. (2018). Efficiency of industrial policy: problems of measurement (Russian). Bulletin of the Volga State University of Service. Series: Economics, 1(51), 20–24.

Struzhko, N. S. (2023). Economic Policy of Industrial Development of the Region [Abstract of PhD thesis]. Donetsk, 26 p.

Suzdaleva, N. N. (2023). Industrial policy of the state and its effectiveness at the present stage (Russian). Economic Sciences, 219, 138–144. https://doi.org/10.14451/1.219.138.

Terebova, S. V. (2018). Increasing the Innovative Activity of Russian Industrial Enterprises in Modern Conditions: Factors, Problems and Mechanisms [Abstract of PhD thesis] (Russian). Moscow, 49 p.

Tobisova, A., Seňová, A., & Rozenberg, R. (2023). Risk factors’ prediction model for the investment evaluation. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 11(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2023.11.2(11).

UNIDO (2023). UNIDO Industrial Development Report for 2024. Turning challenges into sustainable solutions: a new era of industrial policy. Review. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna. Available online: https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/unido-publications/2023-11/IDR24-OVERVIEW_1.pdf (accessed on 15 September 2024).

Vasiľková, A. (2023). Role of ideology in social and political development (extremism and pacifism). Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 11(2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2023.11.2(10).

Voronin, S. M. (2018). Models of industrial policy(Russian). Repository of the Belarusian National Technical University, BNTU, Minsk. Available online: https://rep.bntu.by/bitstream/handle/data/46675/Modeli_promyshlennoj_politiki.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 05 July 2024).

Voynikov, V. V. (2022). EU Anti-Russian Sanctions (Restrictive Measures): Compliance with International Law. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci., 92 (7), 636–642.

Wismansyah, A. R., Kadir, A. R., Baja, S., & Amar, M. Yu. (2024). Dynamic capabilities and competitiveness: Relationship among industrial policy, structural transformation, and economic growth in Indonesian regional industries. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(5), 3773. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i5.3773.

Yakovlev, A. A., Freinkman, L. M., Ershova, N. V., & Agalyan, A. A. (2023). Evaluation of the effectiveness of industrial policy instruments in Russia: new approaches (Russian). ECO, 2(584), 60–83. https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2023-2-60-83.

Yeo, H., & Mah, Ja. S. (2024). Industrial policy and diversification in the economic development of Kazakhstan. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, 11(2), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.20448/ajssms.v11i2.5704.