Increasing levels of everyday cycling has many benefits for both individuals and for cities. Reduced traffic congestion, improved air quality and safer spaces for all vulnerable road users are among the significant benefits for urban developments. Despite this, public opposition to cycling infrastructure is common, particularly when it involves reprioritising road space for cycles instead of vehicles. The purpose of the research was to examine various stakeholders’ perspectives on proposed cycle infrastructure projects. This study utilised an innovative data collection approach through detailed content analysis of 322 public consultation submissions on a proposed active travel scheme in Limerick City, Ireland. By categorising submissions into support, opposition, and proposals, the study reveals the nuanced public perceptions that influence behavioural adaptation and acceptance of sustainable transport infrastructure. Supportive submissions, which outnumbered opposition-related submissions by approximately 2:1, emphasised the need for dedicated cycling infrastructure, enhanced cyclist safety, and potential improvements in environmental conditions. In contrast, opposition submissions focused on concerns over car parking removal, decreased accessibility for residents, and safety issues for vulnerable populations, particularly the elderly. Proposal submissions suggested design modifications, including enhanced safety features, provisions for convenient car parking, and alternative cycle routes. This paper highlights the value of structured public consultation data in uncovering behavioural determinants and barriers to cycling infrastructure adoption, offering policymakers essential insights into managing public opposition and fostering support. The methodology demonstrates how qualitative data from consultations can be effectively used to inform policy by capturing community-specific needs and enhancing the design of sustainable urban mobility systems. These findings underscore the need for innovative, inclusive data collection methods that reveal public sentiment, facilitating evidence-based transport policies that support climate-neutral mobility.

1. Aldred, R., Watson, T., Lovelace, R., & Woodcock, J. (2019). Barriers to investing in cycling: Stakeholder views from England. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 128, 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.11.003
2. Anciaes, P., & Jones, P. (2022). Pedestrian priority in street design - how can it improve sustainable mobility? Transportation Research Procedia, 60, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.029
3. Ann Ganza, L., S. Bentley, S., Salvo, D., P. Durand, C., Anderson, A., Emamian, A., & M. Hoelscher, D. (2022). Incorporating equity into active commuting to school infrastructure projects: A case study. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 112, 103493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103493
4. Arancibia, D., Farber, S., Savan, B., Verlinden, Y., Smith Lea, N., Allen, J., & Vernich, L. (2019). Measuring the Local Economic Impacts of Replacing On-Street Parking With Bike Lanes. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(4), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1638816
5. Braimah, J. A., Atuoye, K. N., Vercillo, S., Warring, C., & Luginaah, I. (2017). Debated agronomy: public discourse and the future of biotechnology policy in Ghana. Global Bioethics, 28(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2016.1261604
6. Burke, C. (2022, February 15). Galway councillors revoke plans for temporary cycleway in Salthill. TheJournal.ie. https://www.thejournal.ie/galway-council-revoke-cycle-project-5683331-Feb2022/
7. Butt, M. H., & Singh, J. G. (2023). Factors Affecting Electric Vehicle Acceptance, Energy Demand and CO2 Emissions in Pakistan. Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation, 100081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geits.2023.100081
8. Buys, L., Snow, S., van Megen, K., & Miller, E. (2012). Transportation behaviours of older adults: An investigation into car dependency in urban Australia. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 31(3), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.2011.00567.x
9. Carroll, P., Caulfield, B., & Ahern, A. (2019). Modelling the potential benefits of increased active travel. Transport Policy, 79, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.04.020
10. Census 2022. (2023, June 29). Population Distribution - CSO - Central Statistics Office. Www.cso.ie. https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-cpp1/censusofpopulation2022profile1-populationdistributionandmovements/populationdistribution/
11. Central Bureau Statistics, Netherlands. (2021). Population counter. Statistics Netherlands. https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/visualisations/dashboard-population/population-counter
12. Central Statistics Office. (2019). Road Traffic Volumes - CSO - Central Statistics Office. Www.cso.ie. https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-tranom/transportomnibus2019/roadtrafficvolumes/
13. Central Statistics Office. (2023, June 29). Population Distribution - CSO - Central Statistics Office. Www.cso.ie. https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-cpp1/censusofpopulation2022profile1-populationdistributionandmovements/populationdistribution/
14. Cork County Council. (2021). Cork County Council Carrigaline Transportation and Public Realm Plan Public Consultation Report Stage 4. https://www.corkcoco.ie/sites/default/files/2022-05/appendix-e-carrigaline-tprep-public-consultation-report-stage-4-pdf.pdf
15. Creutzig, F., Roy, J., Devine-Wright, P., et al. (2023). SPM 503 5 Demand, Services and Social Aspects of Mitigation Coordinating Lead Authors: Lead Authors: Contributing Authors. In IPCC. IPCC. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.007
16. Cruz, A., Elkins, Z., Gardner, R., Martin, M., & Moran, A. (2023). Measuring constitutional preferences: A new method for analyzing public consultation data. PLOS ONE, 18(12), e0295396–e0295396. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295396
17. Delicado, A., Mónica Truninger, Figueiredo, E., Luis F.O. Silva, & Horta, A. (2017). A Blot on the Landscape: Consensus and Controversies on Wind Farms in Rural Portugal. 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1057-192220170000024009
18. Doni, F., Bianchi Martini, S., Corvino, A., & Mazzoni, M. (2019). Voluntary versus mandatory non-financial disclosure. Meditari Accountancy Research, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-12-2018-0423
19. Donohoe, A. (2024, January 10). “Nightmare” for residents on Deansgrange Road as they lose parking outside their homes. Irish Independent. https://www.independent.ie/regionals/dublin/dublin-news/nightmare-for-residents-on-deansgrange-road-as-they-lose-parking-outside-their-homes/a1612142694.html
20. Egan, R., & Caulfield, B. (2024a). Driving as essential, cycling as conditional: how automobility is politically sustained in discourses of everyday mobility. Mobilities, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2024.2325370
21. Egan, R., & Caulfield, B. (2024b). There’s no such thing as cycle traffic: A critical discourse analysis of public opposition to pro-cycle planning. Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research, 2, 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmr.2024.100014
22. European Commission. (2020). The European Green Deal. European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
23. Ferster, C., Laberee, K., Nelson, T., Thigpen, C., Simeone, M., & Winters, M. (2020). From advocacy to acceptance: Social media discussions of protected bike lane installations. Urban Studies, 58(5), 941–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020938252
24. Field, A., Wild, K., Woodward, A., Macmillan, A., & Mackie, H. (2018). Encountering bikelash: Experiences and lessons from New Zealand communities. Journal of Transport & Health, 11, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.10.003
25. Franz, C. (2021, October 21). Content Analysis - Sustainability Methods. Sustainabilitymethods.org. https://sustainabilitymethods.org/index.php/Content_Analysis
26. Fraser, S. D. S., & Lock, K. (2010). Cycling for transport and public health: a systematic review of the effect of the environment on cycling. European Journal of Public Health, 21(6), 738–743. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckq145
27. Frelih‐Larsen, A., Chivers, C., Herb, I., Mills, J., & Reed, M. (2023). The role of public consultations in decision-making on future agricultural pesticide use: insights from European Union’s Farm to Fork Strategy public consultation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 25(4), 476–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2023.2212369
28. Gajevic, W.-S., Lewis -Prof, J., & Kitzinger, J. (2009). UK National Newspaper Coverage of Hybrid Embryos: Source strategies and struggles. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/18448/1/hybridembryosreport.pdf
29. Garyfallia Katsavounidou, Apostolos Papagiannakis, Iordanis Christakidis, & Mavros, O. (2023). Emergent Bicycle Infrastructure During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure, 714–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23721-8_60
30. Ginty, C. (2023a, July 21). Cycle route funding used to remove cycle lane to widen traffic lane in Galway, says Councillors -. IrishCycle.com. https://irishcycle.com/2023/07/21/cycle-route-funding-used-to-remove-cycle-lane-to-widen-traffic-lane-in-galway-says-councillors/
31. Ginty, C. (2023b, December 31). 2023 Year in Review: Another year where the potential for cycling is undermined by slow progress and poor quality routes -. IrishCycle.com. https://irishcycle.com/2023/12/31/2023-year-in-review-another-year-where-the-potential-for-cycling-is-undermined-by-slow-progress-and-poor-quality-routes/
32. Gössling, S., & McRae, S. (2022). Subjectively safe cycling infrastructure: New insights for urban designs. Journal of Transport Geography, 101, 103340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103340
33. Government of Ireland. (2021, November 4). Climate Action Plan 2021. Www.gov.ie; Department of the Environment, Climate and Communications. https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/6223e-climate-action-plan-2021/
34. Government of Ireland. (2022, April). National Sustainable Mobility Policy. Www.gov.ie. https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/848df-national-sustainable-mobility-policy/
35. Government of Ireland. (2023). Climate Action Plan 2023. Www.gov.ie. https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/7bd8c-climate-action-plan-2023/
36. Government of Ireland. (2024). PDF.js viewer. Www.gov.ie. https://www.gov.ie/pdf/?file=https://assets.gov.ie/284675/70922dc5-1480-4c2e-830e-295afd0b5356.pdf#page=null
37. Government of United Kingdom. (2023). The second cycling and walking investment strategy (CWIS2). GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-second-cycling-and-walking-investment-strategy/the-second-cycling-and-walking-investment-strategy-cwis2
38. Hamill, R. (2024, February 7). A record €1 billion investment by Government since 2020 to prioritise safe walking and cycling for people. Transport for Ireland. https://www.transportforireland.ie/news/a-record-e1-billion-investment-by-government-since-2020-to-prioritise-safe-walking-and-cycling-for-people/
39. Hardinghaus, M., & Papantoniou, P. (2020). Evaluating Cyclists’ Route Preferences with Respect to Infrastructure. Sustainability, 12(8), 3375. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083375
40. Higgins, R., & Ahern, A. (2021). Students’ and Parents’ Perceptions of Barriers to Cycling to School—An Analysis by Gender. Sustainability, 13(23), 13213. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313213
41. Higgins, R., & Ahern, A. (2023). Exploring why girls don’t cycle to school: Student and parent/guardian focus group findings on barriers to cycling. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2023.2278790
42. Inci, E. (2015). A review of the economics of parking. Economics of Transportation, 4(1-2), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2014.11.001
43. IPCC. (2023). Synthesis report of the IPCC sixth assessment report (AR6) summary for policymakers. In IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_SPM.pdf
44. Jami, A. A. N., & Walsh, P. R. (2014). The role of public participation in identifying stakeholder synergies in wind power project development: The case study of Ontario, Canada. Renewable Energy, 68, 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.004
45. Joseph, K., & McNally, M. B. (2023). Framing Issues: Public Participation in Canadian Wireless Spectrum Consultations. Canadian Journal of Communication, 48(2), 307–342. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjc.2022-0022
46. Kärmeniemi, M., Lankila, T., Ikäheimo, T., Koivumaa-Honkanen, H., & Korpelainen, R. (2018). The Built Environment as a Determinant of Physical Activity: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies and Natural Experiments. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 52(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kax043
47. Kelleher, E. (2022, October 24). Opposition to cycle lane in Ballyphehane. Echo Live. https://www.echolive.ie/corknews/arid-40990445.html
48. Küster, F. (2019). Practitioner briefing: cycling supporting and encouraging cycling in sustainable urban mobility planning. https://urban-mobility-observatory.transport.ec.europa.eu/document/download/ea316d2f-7155-4297-b673-11a514726d53_en?filename=supporting_and_encouraging_cycling_in_sumps.pdf&prefLang=et
49. Limerick City & County Council. (2022a, May). Limerick Development Plan 2022-2028. Www.limerick.ie. https://www.limerick.ie/council/services/planning-and-placemaking/development-plan-strategies/limerick-development-plan-0
50. Limerick City & County Council. (2022b, September). Chapter 4 - Surveys and Additional Reports | Limerick City & County Council’s Online Consultation, Survey and Application Form Portal. Mypoint.limerick.ie. https://mypoint.limerick.ie/ga/consultation/part-8-south-circular-road-city-centre-active-travel-scheme/chapter/chapter-4-surveys-and-additional-reports
51. Loyola, M., Nelson, J. D., Clifton, G., & Levinson, D. (2023). The influence of cycle lanes on road users’ perception of road space. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2023.2195894
52. Lu, W., Zhang, C., Ni, X., & Liu, H. (2020). Do the Elderly Need Wider Parking Spaces? Evidence from Experimental and Questionnaire Surveys. Sustainability, 12(9), 3800. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093800
53. Luo, A., Xin, Z., Yuan, Y., Wen, T., Xie, W., Zhong, Z., Peng, X., Ouyang, W., Hu, C., Liu, F., Chen, Y., & He, H. (2020). Multidimensional Feature Classification of the Health Information Needs of Patients With Hypertension in an Online Health Community Through Analysis of 1000 Patient Question Records: Observational Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(5), e17349. https://doi.org/10.2196/17349
54. Manaugh, K., Boisjoly, G., & El-Geneidy, A. (2017). Overcoming barriers to cycling: understanding frequency of cycling in a University setting and the factors preventing commuters from cycling on a regular basis. Transportation, 44(4), 871–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9682-x
55. Marqués, R., Hernández-Herrador, V., Calvo-Salazar, M., & García-Cebrián, J. A. (2015). How infrastructure can promote cycling in cities: Lessons from Seville. Research in Transportation Economics, 53, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2015.10.017
56. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. In Google Books. SAGE. https://books.google.ie/books?hl=en&lr=&id=U4lU_-wJ5QEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR12&ots=kGSI0KSZ-N&sig=GfE3KBUxHOzqfQX4cFnYXcysk84&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
57. Moura, R. A. de, Bastos, H. A. D., Brandt, K. C. de O., Ronca, D. B., & Ginani, V. C. (2022). Public consultation in the construction of the District Food and Nutrition Policy. Saúde Em Debate, 46, 803–818. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104202213415I
58. Nairn, A., & Rossi, R. (2021). Keep Up! The Big Problem of Regulating Social Media Advertising for Esports Gambling. Gaming Law Review. https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2021.0015
59. National Transport Authority. (2022, November). Limerick Shannon Metropolitan Area Transport Strategy (LSMATS). National Transport. https://www.nationaltransport.ie/planning-and-investment/strategic-planning/regional-metropolitan-area-transport-strategies/limerick-shannon-metropolitan-area-transport-strategy-lsmats/
60. National Transport Authority. (2023). Active Travel Investment Programme. National Transport Authority. https://www.nationaltransport.ie/planning-and-investment/transport-investment/active-travel-investment-programme/#:~:text=By%202025%2C%20the%20NTA%20aims
61. Panter, J., Guell, C., Humphreys, D., & Ogilvie, D. (2019). Title: Can changing the physical environment promote walking and cycling? A systematic review of what works and how. Health & Place, 58, 102161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102161
62. Paul Partnership. (2024). Population in Limerick City A first glance at Census 2022. https://www.paulpartnership.ie/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Census-2022-Briefing-Note-1-Limerick-Population.pdf
63. Please add these references to our list:
64. Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2010). Walking and Cycling for Healthy Cities. Built Environment, 36(4), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.36.4.391
65. Robartes, E., Chen, E., Chen, T. D., & Ohlms, P. B. (2021). Assessment of local, state, and federal barriers to implementing bicycle infrastructure: A Virginia case study. Case Studies on Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.02.004
66. Roy, J., Creutzig, F., Devine-Wright, P., et al. (2022). SPM 503 5 Demand, Services and Social Aspects of Mitigation Coordinating Lead Authors: Lead Authors: Contributing Authors. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.007
67. Shoup, D. (2018). Parking and the City. In Google Books. Routledge. https://books.google.ie/books?hl=en&lr=&id=yR9WDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT17&dq=How+Important+Is+A+Property%27s+Parking+Space&ots=HrWxI1NB9H&sig=XDANduYVz0oAS4C8i-eYxnLbscw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=How%20Important%20Is%20A%20Property
68. Siemiatycki, M., Smith, M., & Walks, A. (2014). The politics of bicycle lane implementation: The case of Vancouver’s Burrard Street Bridge. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(3), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2014.890767
69. Statista. (2019). Motorization rate in Ireland. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/452019/ireland-number-of-cars-per-thousand-inhabitants/#:~:text=Ireland%3A%20number%20of%20cars%20per%201%2C000%20inhabitants%201990%2D2021&text=The%20motorization%20rate%20in%20Ireland
70. Stautz, K., Bignardi, G., Hollands, G. J., & Marteau, T. M. (2017). Reactions on Twitter to updated alcohol guidelines in the UK: a content analysis. BMJ Open, 7(2), e015493. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015493
71. Tennant, C. (2022). Cycling nation: The secret to the Netherlands’ biking success. Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/next/2022/09/17/the-worlds-cycling-nation-how-the-netherlands-redesigned-itself-as-a-country-fit-for-bikes
72. UNEP. (2023). Broken Record. Emissions Gap Report 2023. https://doi.org/10.59117/20.500.11822/43922
73. United Nations Climate Change. (2015). The Paris Agreement. United Nations Climate Change; United Nations. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
74. Valentini, D. M., Wangel, J., & Holmgren, S. (2023). Representations of urban cycling in sustainability transitions research: a review. European Transport Research Review, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-023-00603-3
75. Van Cauwenberg, J., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Clarys, P., De Geus, B., & Deforche, B. (2019). Older adults’ environmental preferences for transportation cycling. Journal of Transport & Health, 13, 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.03.014
76. Vijayakumar, N., & Burda, C. (2015). Cycle Cities Supporting cycling in Canadian cities. https://www.pembina.org/reports/cycle-cities-full-report-rev.pdf
77. von Stülpnagel, R., & Binnig, N. (2022). How safe do you feel? – A large-scale survey concerning the subjective safety associated with different kinds of cycling lanes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 167, 106577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106577
78. Vreugdenhil, R., & Williams, S. (2013). White line fever: a sociotechnical perspective on the contested implementation of an urban bike lane network. Area, 45(3), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12029
79. Wang, L. (2018). Barriers to Implementing Pro-Cycling Policies: A Case Study of Hamburg. Sustainability, 10(11), 4196. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114196
80. Wenande, C. (2022, June 28). 2022 Tour de France: In the home of cycling - The Copenhagen Post. The Copenhagen Post. https://cphpost.dk/2022-06-28/things-to-do/in-the-home-of-cycling/
81. Widmer, H., Guinard, N., & Rérat, P. (2023). Tactical Urbanism to Develop Cycling Infrastructures: The Implementation of COVID Cycle Lanes in Switzerland. The Urban Book Series, 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45308-3_5
82. Wild, K., Woodward, A., Field, A., & Macmillan, A. (2017). Beyond “bikelash”: engaging with community opposition to cycle lanes. Mobilities, 13(4), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2017.1408950
83. Willis, D. P., Manaugh, K., & El-Geneidy, A. (2014). Cycling Under Influence: Summarizing the Influence of Perceptions, Attitudes, Habits, and Social Environments on Cycling for Transportation. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9(8), 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2013.827285
84. Wilson, A., & Mitra, R. (2020). Implementing cycling infrastructure in a politicized space: Lessons from Toronto, Canada. Journal of Transport Geography, 86, 102760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102760
85. Winters, M., Buehler, R., & Götschi, T. (2017). Policies to Promote Active Travel: Evidence from Reviews of the Literature. Current Environmental Health Reports, 4(3), 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-017-0148-x
86. World Bank. (2021). Germany - Place Explorer - Data Commons. Datacommons.org. https://datacommons.org/place/country/DEU?utm_medium=explore&mprop=count&popt=Person&hl=en
87. World Bank. (2022a). Denmark - Place Explorer - Data Commons. Datacommons.org. https://datacommons.org/place/country/DNK?utm_medium=explore&mprop=count&popt=Person&hl=en
88. World Bank. (2022b). Ireland - Place Explorer - Data Commons. Datacommons.org. https://datacommons.org/place/country/IRL?utm_medium=explore&mprop=count&popt=Person&hl=en
89. Zeitler, E., & Buys, L. (2014). Mobility and out-of-home activities of older people living in suburban environments: “Because I’m a driver, I don’t have a problem.” Ageing and Society, 35(4), 785–808. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x13001086