This contribution aims to appraise, analyze and evaluate the literature relating to the interaction of electromagnetic fields (EMF) with matter and the resulting thermal effects. This relates to the wanted thermal effects via the application of fields as well as those uninvited resulting from exposure to the field. In the paper, the most popular EMF heating technologies are analyzed. This involves on the one hand high frequency induction heating (HFIH) and on the other hand microwave heating (MWH), including microwave ovens and hyperthermia medical treatment. Then, the problem of EMF exposure is examined and the resulting biological thermal effects are illuminated. Thus, the two most common cases of wireless EMF devices, namely digital communication tools and inductive power transfer appliances are analyzed and evaluated. The last part of the paper concerns the determination of the different thermal effects, which are studied and discussed, by considering the governing EMF and heat transfer (or bio heat) equations and their solution methodologies.

1. Joshi MS, Joshi GR. Analysis of SAR induced in human head due to the exposure of non-ionizing radiation. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) 2016; 5(2): 364–367. doi: IJERTV5IS020466.

2. Sallomi AH, Hashim SA, Wali MH. SAR and thermal effect prediction in human head exposed to cell phone radiations. Science International. (Lahore) 2018; 30(4): 653–656.

3. Hamed T, Maqsood M. SAR calculation & temperature response of human body exposure to electromagnetic radiations at 28, 40 and 60 GHz mm wave frequencies. Progress in Electromagnetics Research M 2018; 73: 47–59. doi: 10.2528/PIERM18061102.

4. Baker-Jarvis J, Kim S. The interaction of radio frequency fields with dielectric materials at macroscopic to mesoscopic scales. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 2012; 117: 1–60. doi: 10.6028/jres.117.001.

5. Lin JC. Safety of wireless power transfer. IEEE Access 2021; 9: 125342–125347. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3108966.

6. Ding P, Bernard L, Pichon L, et al. Evaluation of electromagnetic fields in human body exposed to wireless inductive charging system. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2014; 50(2): 1037–1040. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2013.2284245.

7. Wang Q, Li W, Kang J, et al. Electromagnetic safety evaluation and protection methods for a wireless charging system in an electric vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility 2019; 61: 1913–1925. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2018.2875903.

8. Maxwell JC. A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 1865; 155: 459–512. doi: 10.5479/sil.423156.39088007130693.

9. Lozinskii MG. Industrial applications of induction heating. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press Publications; 1969.

10. Mühlbauer A. History of induction heating and melting. Essen, Germany: Vulkan-Verlag Publications; 2008.

11. Watanabe T, Nagaya S, Hirano N, et al. Elemental development of metal melting by electromagnetic induction heating using superconductor coils. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 2016; 26: 1–4. doi: 10.1109/TASC.2016.2524651.

12. Hu Q, He Y, Wang F, et al. Microwave technology: A novel approach to the transformation of natural metabolites. Chinese Medicine 2021; 16(1): 87. doi: 10.1186/s13020-021-00500-8.

13. Kumar C, Karim MA. Microwave-convective drying of food materials: A critical review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2019; 59(3): 379–394. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2017.1373269.

14. Razek A. Assessment and categorization of biological effects and atypical symptoms owing to exposure to rf fields from wireless energy devices. Applied Sciences 2023; 13(3): 1265. doi: 10.3390/app13031265.

15. Razek A. Coupled models in electromagnetic and energy conversion systems from smart theories paradigm to that of complex events: A review. Applied Sciences 2022; 12(9): 4675. doi: 10.3390/app12094675.

16. Watanabe T, Nagaya S, Hirano N, et al. Development of conduction-cooled superconducting split coil for metal melting by DC induction heating. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 2018; 28(3): 1–4. doi: 10.1109/TASC.2017.2783891.

17. Plumed E, Lope I, Acero J. Induction heating adaptation of a different-sized load with matching secondary inductor to achieve uniform heating and enhance vertical displacement. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 2021; 36: 6929–6942. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2020.3033833.

18. Biswal SK, Pal S. Numerical investigation of the dimension factor of hairpin coil for sustainable induction heating. In: Recent advances in manufacturing modelling and optimization: Select proceedings of RAM 2021. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2022. p. 11–19.

19. Zhu G, Liu X, Li L, et al. A novel nonlinearity marginalization technique for effective solution of induction heating problems by cell method. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2020; 53(24): 245502. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab7f72.

20. Vishnuram P, Ramachandiran G, Sudhakar Babu T, et al. Induction heating in domestic cooking and industrial melting applications: A systematic review on modelling, converter topologies and control schemes. Energies 2021; 14(20): 6634. doi: 10.3390/en14206634.

21. Yu SH, Park DJ, Kim KC. Heat source analysis of an induction heater for an electric vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2017; 53(6): 1–4. doi: 10.1109/CEFC.2016.7816082.

22. Lucía O, Maussion P, Dede EJ, et al. Induction heating technology and its applications: Past developments, current technology, and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2014; 61(5): 2509–2520. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2013.2281162.

23. Acero J, Lope I, Burdío JM, et al. Performance evaluation of graphite thin slabs for induction heating domestic applications. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 2015; 51: 2398–2404. doi: 10.1109/TIA.2014.2369824.

24. Villa J, Navarro D, Dominguez A, et al. Vessel recognition in induction heating appliances—A deep-learning approach. IEEE Access 2021; 9: 16053–16061. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3052864.

25. Oh H, Jeong G, Park C, et al. A study on high-frequency induction heating system for railway turnout. In: 2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS); 2019 Jul 9–12; Toulouse, France. New Jersey: IEEE; 2020. p. 1–4.

26. Mevec D, Raninger P, Prevedel P, et al. A posteriori reconstruction of the temperature distribution in surface hardened tempering steel. Scientific Reports 2020; 10(1): 7481. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63328-6.

27. Dong H, Zhao Y, Yuan H. Effect of coil width on deformed shape and processing efficiency during ship hull forming by induction heating. Applied Sciences 2018; 8(9): 1585. doi: 10.3390/app8091585.

28. Apostolidis P, Liu X, Kasbergen C, et al. Toward the design of an induction heating system for asphalt pavements with the finite element method. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2017; 2633(1): 136–146. doi: 10.3141/2633-16.

29. Bui HT, Hwang SJ. Modeling a working coil coupled with magnetic flux concentrators for barrel induction heating in an injection molding machine. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 2015; 86: 16–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.02.057.

30. Sekkak A, Pichon L, Razek A. 3-D FEM magneto-thermal analysis in microwave ovens. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 1994; 30(5): 3347–3350. doi: 10.1109/20.312655.

31. Ge C, Duan B, Lou S, et al. On improving convergence characterization to solve the electromagnetic–thermal model. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 2021; 69(8): 3624–3634. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2021.3076211.

32. Rodrigues DB, Ellsworth J, Turner P. Feasibility of heating brain tumors using a 915 MHz annular phased-array. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 2021; 20(4): 423–427. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2021.3050142.

33. Zastrow E, Hagness SC, Van Veen, BD, et al. Time-multiplexed beamforming for noninvasive microwave hyperthermia treatment. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2011; 58(6): 1574–1584. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2103943.

34. Redr J, Pokorny T, Drizdal T, et al. Microwave hyperthermia of brain tumors: A 2D assessment parametric numerical study. Sensors 2022; 22(16): 6115. doi: 10.3390/s22166115.

35. Rittersdorf IM, Hoff BW, Richardson AS, et al. A 1-D model for the millimeter-wave absorption and heating of dielectric materials in power beaming applications. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 2021; 49(2): 695–702. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2021.3051108.

36. Sekkak A, Kanellopoulos VN, Pichon L, et al. A thermal and electromagnetic analysis in biological objects using 3D finite elements and absorbing boundary conditions. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 1995; 31(3): 1865–1868. doi: 10.1109/20.376401.

37. Bellizzi GG, Drizdal T, van Rhoon GC, et al. The potential of constrained SAR focusing for hyperthermia treatment planning: Analysis for the head & neck region. Physics in Medicine & Biology 2019; 64(1): 015013. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaf0c4.

38. International Commission on Non‐Ionizing Radiation Protection. Guide‐lines for limiting exposure to time‐varying electric and magnetic fields for low frequencies (1 Hz–100 kHz). Health Physics 2010; 99(6): 818–836. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181f06c86.

39. International Commission on Non‐Ionizing Radiation Protection. Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Physics 2020; 118(5): 483–524. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001210.

40. C95.1-2009 - IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz. New York: IEEE; 2019. doi: 10.1109/IEEESTD.2019.8859679.

41. Pennes HH. Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm. Journal of Applied Physiology 1998; 85(1): 5–34. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.1.5.

42. Cirimele V, Freschi F, Giaccone L, et al. Human exposure assessment in dynamic inductive power transfer for automotive applications. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2017; 53(6): 5000304. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2017.2658955.

43. Hariri H, Bernard Y, Razek A. Dual piezoelectric beam robot: The effect of piezoelectric patches positions. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 2015; 26: 2577–2590. doi: 10.1177/1045389X15572013.

44. Nunes A, Daniel L, Hage-Hassan M, et al. Modeling of the magnetic behavior of permanent magnets including ageing effects. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 2020; 512: 166930. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166930.

45. Ren Z, Razek A. New technique for solving three‐dimensional multiply connected eddy‐current problems. IEE Proceedings A (Physical Science, Measurement and Instrumentation, Management and Education, Reviews) 1990; 137(3): 135–140. doi: 10.1049/ip-a-2.1990.0021.

46. Jiao D, Jin JM. An effective algorithm for implementing perfectly matched layers in time‐domain finite‐element simulation of open‐region EM problems. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 2002; 50(11): 1615–1623. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2002.803987.

47. Sun Q, Zhang R, Zhan Q, Liu QH. 3‐D implicit–explicit hybrid finite difference/spectral element/finite element time domain method without a buffer zone. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 2019; 67(8): 5469–5476. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2019.2913740.

48. Harris LR, Zhadobov M, Chahat N, et al. Electromagnetic dosimetry for adult and child models within a car: Multi-exposure scenarios. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 2011; 3(6): 707–715. doi: 10.1017/S1759078711001000.

49. Barchanski A, Steiner T, De Gersem H, et al. Local grid refinement for low-frequency current computations in 3-D human anatomy models. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2006; 42(4): 1371–1374. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2006.871449.

50. Gabriel C, Gabriel S, Corthout E. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. Physics in Medicine & Biology 1996; 41: 2251–2269. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/11/002.

51. Kim JH, Lee JK, Kim HG, et al. Possible effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on central nerve system. Biomolecules & Therapeutics 2019; 27(3): 265–275. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2018.152.

52. Wust P, Kortüm B, Strauss U, et al. Non-thermal effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Scientific Reports 2020; 10(1): 13488. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69561-3.