.jpg)
_.jpg)
Study on the hydrothermal recovery characteristics of nano-ceramic membranes on regenerative gas
Vol 5, Issue 1, 2022
VIEWS - 305 (Abstract) 191 (pdf)
Abstract
In view of the large energy consumption of the regeneration process in the chemical absorption decarburization process, on the basis of the enrichment classification flow process, the nanoscale ceramic film is used as a new heat exchanger between the enriched liquid and the regeneration gas. The porous ceramic film is capable of coupling thermal-mass transfer to effectively recover part of the water vapor and the heat carried in the regeneration gas, so as to reduce the regenerative energy consumption of the system. The effects of parameters such as regeneration temperature, flow rate, molar fraction of water vapor, and MEA enrichment temperature, flow rate, and MEA concentration of shunt on the hydrothermal recovery effect of ceramic membranes of different pore sizes and lengths were studied by using the heat recovery flux and water recovery rate as the indicators. The results show that the hydrothermal recovery performance of the ceramic membrane increases with the increase of MEA enrichment flow, but decreases significantly with the increase of the enrichment temperature. At the same time, with the increase of regenerative gas velocity and the molar fraction of water vapor in the regenerative gas, the heat recovery flux will increase. The heat recovery performance of the 10 nm ceramic membrane is better than that of the 20 nm ceramic membrane.
Keywords
Full Text:
pdfReferences
1. Huang B, Xu S, Gao S, et al. Industrial test of CO2 capture in Huaneng Beijing coal-fired power sta-tion. Proceedings of the CSEE 2009; 29(17): 14–20.
2. Kanniche M, Gros-Bonnivard R, Jaud P, et al. Pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxy-combustion in thermal power plant for CO2 capture. Applied Thermal Engineering 2010; 30(1): 53–62.
3. Rao AB, Rubin ES. A technical, economic, and environmental assessment of amine-based CO2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control. Environmental Science and Technology 2002; 36(20): 4467–4475.
4. Li K, Leigh W, Feron P, et al. Systematic study of aqueous mono-ethanolamine (MEA)-based CO2 capture process: Techno-economic assessment of the MEA process and its improvements. Applied Energy 2016; 165: 648–659.
5. Lin Y, Madan T, Rochelle GT. Regeneration with rich bypass of aqueous piperazine and mono-ethanolamine for CO2 capture. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2014; 53(10): 4067–4074.
6. Cousins A, Wardhaugh LT, Feron PHM. Preliminary analysis of process flow sheet modifications for energy efficient CO2 capture from flue gases using chemical absorption. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 2011; 89(8): 1237–1251.
7. Cousins A, Cottrell A, Lawson A, et al. Model verification and evaluation of the rich-split process modification at an Australian—Based post combustion CO2 capture pilot plant. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology 2012; 2(5): 329–345.
8. Zhang Y, Wang R. Novel method for incorporating hydrophobic silica nanoparticles on polyetherimide hollow fiber membranes for CO2 absorp-tion in a gas–liquid membrane contactor. Journal of Membrane Science 2014; 452: 379–389.
9. Scholes CA, Qader A, Stevens GW, et al. Membrane gas-solvent contactor pilot plant trials of CO2 absorption from flue gas. Separation Science and Technology 2014; 49(16): 2449–2458.
10. Wang Z, Fang M, Yu H, et al. Experimental and modeling study of trace CO2 removal in a hol-low-fiber membrane contactor, using CO2-loaded monoethanolamine. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2013; 52(50): 18059–18070.
11. Yan S, Zhao S, Wardhaugh L, et al. Innovative use of membrane contactor as condenser for heat recovery in carbon capture. Environmental Science & Technology 2015; 49(4): 2532–2540.
12. Cai Y, Wang Y, Chen X, et al. Modified colloidal sol–gel process for fabrication of titania nanofiltration membranes with organic additives. Journal of Membrane Science 2015; 476: 432–441.
13. Bao A, Wang D, Lin C. Nanoporous membrane tube condensing heat transfer enhancement study. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 2015; 84: 456–462.
14. Soleimanikutanaei S, Lin C, Wang D. Modeling and simulation of cross-flow transport membrane condenser heat exchangers. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 2018; 95: 92–97.
15. Yue M, Zhao S, Feron PHM, et al. Multichannel tubular ceramic membrane for water and heat recovery from waste gas streams. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2016; 55(9): 2615–2622.
16. Lin C, Wang D, Bao A. Numerical modeling and simulation of condensation heat transfer of a flue gas in a bundle of transport membrane tubes. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 2013; 60: 41–50.
17. Zhao S, Yan S, Wang D, et al. Simultaneous heat and water recovery from flue gas by membrane condensation: Experimental investigation. Applied Thermal Engineering 2017; 113: 843–850.
18. Wang T, Yue M, Qi H, et al. Transport membrane condenser for water and heat recovery from gase-ous streams: Performance evaluation. Journal of Membrane Science 2015; 484: 10–17.
19.
20. Chen H, Zhou Y, Cao S, et al. Heat exchange and water recovery experiments of flue gas with using nanoporous ceramic membranes. Applied Thermal Engineering 2017; 110: 686–694.
21. Horikawa T, Do DD, Nicholson D. Capillary condensation of adsorbates in porous materials. Ad-vances in Colloid and Interface Science 2011; 169(1): 40–58.
22. Chen H, Yang B. Experiment and simulation method to investigate the flow within porous ceramic membrane. Journal of the Australian Ce-ramic Society 2018; 54(3): 575–586.
23. Hu H, Tang G, Niu D. Wettability modified nanoporous ceramic membrane for simultaneous residual heat and condensate recovery. Scientific Reports 2016; 6(1): 1–10.
24.
25. Yan S, Chen J, Ai P, et al. CO2 removal from biogas by using membrane absorption technology. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 2012; 28(11): 196–204.
26. Xiao J, Wei J. Diffusion mechanism of hydrocar-bons in zeolites—II. Analysis of experimental observations. Chemical Engineering Science 1992; 47(5): 1143–1159.
27.
28. Saracco G, Specchia V. Catalytic inorganic-membrane reactors: present experience and future opportunities. Catalysis Reviews—Science and Engineering 1994; 36(2): 305–384.
29. Neimark AV, Ravikovitch PI, Vishnyakov A. Bridging scales from molecular simulations to classical thermodynamics: Density functional theory of capillary condensation in nanopores. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2003; 15(3): 347–365.
30. Ravikovitch PI, Neimark AV. Density functional theory of adsorption in spherical cavities and pore size characterization of templated nanoporous silicas with cubic and three-dimensional hexagonal structures. Langmuir 2002; 18(5): 1550–1560.
31. LI W, Xu X. Mss transfer model of porous ceramic membrane capillary condensation separation. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering 1999; 50(3): 380–385.
32. Rhim H, Hwang ST. Transport of capillary con-densate. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 1975; 52(1): 174–181.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/tse.v5i1.1530
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.