Accessibility to urban services: influence on pedestrian users of public transit
Vol 4, Issue 1, 2021
VIEWS - 894 (Abstract) 540 (PDF)
Abstract
Several studies in the last two decades have investigated the role of built environment on walking. Studies that investigated the role of built environment on walking to transit analyzed the role of various destinations in proximity to the stations. However, few studies have investigated the role of these destinations on walking trip generation at the origin of the trip. Moreover, none of these studies have investigated the role of availability of public services on walking to transit. This study identifies the urban services at the origin of walking trips of the tri-rail commuters in the West Palm, Broward, and Miami-Dade Counties of South Florida. The number of pedestrian users of tri-rail stations and the available urban service were aggregated per Traffic Analysis Zones and analyzed using standard Poisson regression. Findings indicate that availability of urban services such as public education and public recreation have a positive effect on walking to commuter-rail. Implications of this study include the identification and development of Capital Improvement Projects such as libraries to be located in close proximity to schools and colleges. New and proposed train stations should be located in proximity to urban services such as school, colleges, and libraries to encourage pedestrian users.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Baer WC. Just what is an urban service, anyway. The Journal of Politics 1985; 47(3): 818-898.
2. Banister D. Transport Planning 2002; 2nd edition London: Spon Press.
3. Besser LM, Dannerberg AL. Walking to public transit. steps to help meet physical activity recommendations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005; 29(4):273-280.
4. Brownson RC, Baker EA, Housemann RA et al. Brennan LK et al. Bacak SJ et al. Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the united states. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2001; 91: 995-2003.
5. Brownson RC, Boehmer TK. Patterns and trends in physical activity, occupation, transportation, land use, and sedentary behaviors 2004; Department of community health and prevention research center, school of public health, St. Louis university. Prepared for the committee on physical activity, health, transportation, and land use, June 25.
6. Campbell A, Converse PE, Rogers WL, et al. The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions 1976; New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Increasing Physical Activity. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2001; US Department of Health and Human Services.
8. Cervero R, Gorham R. Commuting in transit versus automobile neighborhoods. Journal of American Planning Association 1995; 61: 210-225.
9. Cervero R. Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American Housing Survey, Transportation Research A 1996; 30: 361-77.
10. Cervero R, Radisch C. Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods. Transport Policy 1996; 3(3): 127-141.
11. Cho CM, Choi YS. The effect of resident-perceived neighborhood boundary on the equity of public parks distribution: using gis, w2gis LNCS 2005; 3833: 296 – 307.
12. Chong, A. Bundling of basic public services and household welfare in developing countries: an empirical exploration for the case of peru, oxford development studies, 2007; 35(3): 329 – 346.
13. Deakin E. Sustainable development and sustainable transportation: strategies for economic prosperity, environmental quality, and equity 2001; Working Paper 2001-03, Institute of urban and regional development, university of california, berkeley, ca.
14. Deakin E. Sustainable transportation: U.S. dilemmas and European experiences, Transportation research record 2002; 1792: 1–11.
15. Dear M. Planning for mental health care: a reconsideration of public facility location theory, international regional science review 1978; 3: 93-111.
16. Field A, Witten K., Robinson E et al. Pledge M et al. Who gets to what? Access to community resources in two new zealand cities, urban policy and research 2004; 22(2): 189-205.
17. Forsyth A, Oakes JM, Scmitz KH et al. Hearst M et al. Does residential density increase walking and other physical activity? urban studies 2007; 44(4), 679-697.
18. Governor’s Action team on energy and climate change (gatecc). 2007; Accessed at www.flclimatechange.us on June 1, 2008.
19. Handy S, Urban form and pedestrian choice: study of Austin neighborhoods, transportation research record 1996; 1552: 135-44.
20. Hero RE. The urban service delivery literature: Some questions & Considerations, polity 1986; 18(4): 659-677.
21. Hess DB. Access to employment for adults in poverty in the buffalo–niagara region, urban studies 2005; 42: 1177–1200.
22. Holtzclaw J. Residential patterns and transit, auto dependence, and costs 1994; San Francisco: Natural Resources Defense Council.
23. Ingram Gregory K. and Yu-Hung Hong. Transportation” chapter 4 evaluating smart growth: state and local policy outcomes, policy focus report, lincoln institute of land policy report code pf020, 2009.
24. Kane R. Determinants of health care priorities and expectations among rural consumers, Health Services Research 1969; 4: 42-51.
25. Kawabata M. Job accessibility by travel mode in U.S. metropolitan areas, Theory and applications of GIS 2003;11(2): 165–172.
26. Kawabata M, Shen Q. Job accessibility as an indicator of auto-oriented urban structure: a comparison of boston and los angeles with tokyo, environment and planning b 2006; 33(1): 115–130.
27. Kawabata M, Shen Q. Commuting Inequality between cars and public transit: the case of the san francisco bay area, 1990–2000, urban studies 2007; 44(9): 1759-1780.
28. Khaleghian P. Decentralization and public services: the case of immunization, Social Science & Medicine 2004; 59: 163-183.
29. Kirby AM. The Politics of Location: An Introduction 1982; New York: Methuen Inc.
30. Kirby AM, Eldred JG. The Provision of Leisure Facilities: An Empirical and Theoretical Evaluation 1983; In Geography and the Urban Environment, ed. Herbert D and Johnston RJ, Chichester: Wiley.
31. Kockelman KM. Travel behavior as function of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance: Evidence from San Francisco Bay area, Transportation research record 1997; 1607: 105-115.
32. Lee C, Moudon AV. Correlated of walking for transportation or recreation purposes, journal of physical activity and health 2006;3(S1): S77-S98.
33. Lee SJ. Policy Type, Bureaucracy, and Urban Policies: Integrating models of urban service distribution, policy studies journal 1994; 22(1):87-108.
34. MacDonald, John M., Robert J. Stokes, Deborah A. Cohen, Aaron Kofner, and Greg K. Ridgeway. “The effect of light rail transit on body mass index and physical activity” American journal of preventive medicine 2010; 39 (2).
35. Maghelal P. Walking to transit: influence of built environment at varying distances. institute of transportation engineers journal 2011; 81(2): 38-43.
36. McLafferty S. Urban structure and geographical access to public services, annals of the association of american geographers 1982; 72(3): 347-354.
37. Meyer MD, Dumbaugh E. Institutional and regulatory factors related to nonmotorized travel and walkable communities 2004; Prepared for the committee on physical activity, health, transportation, and land use.
38. Richardson BC. Sustainable transport: analysis frameworks, Journal of transport geography 2005; 13: 29–39.
39. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures, annual behavior medicine 2003; 25(2): 80-91.
40. Shen Q. Location characteristics of innercity neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers, environment and planning b 1998; 25(3): 345–365.
41. Talen E. School, Community, and Spatial Equity: An empirical investigation of access to elementary schools in west virginia, annals of the association of american geographers 2001; 91(3): 465-486.
42. Wandberg Tom “Apartment Seekers Willing to Pay More to be Near Light Rail” The Denver Post 2010; Article by Margaret Jackson, June 14.
43. Wolch JR. The location of service-dependent households in urban areas economic geography 1981; 57(1): 52-67.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/tm.v1i3.460
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.