Scanning electron microscopic and morphological studies on in-vitro derived callus of low-chill peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch)

T. S. Bisht, Laxmi Rawat, P. N. Singh, B. Chakraborty, A. Visen

Article ID: 5530
Vol 7, Issue 2, 2024

VIEWS - 105 (Abstract) 45 (PDF)

Abstract


In this investigation the effect of collection seasons of explants (winter, spring and summer), type of explants (leaf disc and intermodal segments) and length of explants (0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 cm) for callusing in low-chill peach were standardized. The maximum callus induction (97.78%) in the low-chill peach was obtained from the intermodal segments of 0.5 cm in length used as an explant collected during spring season. The structural changes on the surface of the callus (5–7 weeks old yellowish green compact callus) during the progress of somatic embryogenesis of low-chill peach from the both intermodal segment as well as leaf disc derived callus were also examined with the use of scanning electron microscope (SEM). The SEM studies indicated that callus derived from internodal segment explant had the highest frequency of somatic embryos than callus from leaf discs. The SEM investigation, also demonstrated the sequential events/steps leading to low-chill peach somatic embryogenesis which was originating from somatic embryo mother cells through one unicellular pathway. Two types of calli were morphologically distinguished in both leaf disc and intermodal segment generated callus and these were the compact, well organized yellowish green embryogenic callus, containing large number of small, rich cytoplasmic, starch containing meristematic cells and soft and unorganized non-embryogenic callus containing sparsely cytoplasmic, vacuolated, and large cells devoid of metabolic reserves. The present SEM studies clearly demonstrated that somatic cells from peach explants generated callus could develop into fully differentiated somatic embryos through the characteristic embryological patterns of differentiation.


Keywords


callus; scanning electron microscopy; MS basal medium; embryogenic; non-embryogenic

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Abbott AG, Arús P, Scorza R. Genetic engineering and genomics. The peach: Botany, production and uses. Published online 2008: 85-105. doi: 10.1079/9781845933869.0085

2. Chawla HS. Plant Biotechnology, Laboratory manual for Plant Biotechnology. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi; 2003.

3. Salvi ND, Singh H, Tivarekar S, et al. Plant regeneration from different explants of neem. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture. 2001; 65: 159-162.

4. Baskaran P, Raja-Rajeswari B, Jayabalan N. A simple approach to improve plant regeneration from callus culture of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench for crop improvement. Journal of Agriculture Science and Technology. 2005; 1: 179-192.

5. López-Pérez AJ, Carreño J, Martínez-Cutillas A, et al. High embryogenic ability and plant regeneration of table grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) induced by activated charcoal. Vitis. 2005; 44: 79-85.

6. Gentile A, Monticelli S, Damiano C. Adventitious shoot regeneration in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]. Plant Cell Reports. 2002; 20(11): 1011-1016. doi: 10.1007/s00299-002-0451-2

7. Pérez-Clemente R, Gómez-Cadenas A. In vitro tissue culture, a tool for the study and breeding of plants subjected to abiotic stress conditions. In: Annarita L, Laura MR (editors). Recent Advances in Plant In vitro Culture. INTECH Publisher, European Union; 2012.

8. Pérez-Jiménez M, López-Soto MB, Cos-Terrer J. In vitro callus induction from adult tissues of peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology—Plant. 2012; 49(1): 79-84. doi: 10.1007/s11627-012-9466-8

9. Bourgaud F, Gravot A, Milesi S, et al. Production of plant secondary metabolites: A historical perspective. Plant Science. 2001; 161: 839-851.

10. Bradley DE, Bai Y, Tallury SP, et al. Scanning electron microscopic study on in vitro somatic embryogenesis of perennial ryegrass and tall fescue. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal. 2001; 9: 146-151.

11. Maciel SA, Fermino CP, Silva RA, et al. Morpho-anatomical characterization of embryogenic calluses from immature zygotic embryo of peach palm during somatic embryogenesis. Acta Scientific Agriculture. 2010; 32: 263-267.

12. Bisht TS, Singh PN, Rawat L. Effect of explant type and surface sterilants on asepsis and survival culture for callus induction in peach. Journal of Hill Agriculture. 2016; 7(1): 36-40. doi: 10.5958/2230-7338.2016.00001.x

13. Bisht TS, Singh PN, Rawat L. Effect of collection season, type and length of explants on callus induction and survival in peach. Journal of Hill Agriculture. 2016; 7(2): 215-221. doi: 10.5958/2230-7338.2016.00033.1

14. Mc-Cown DD. Tissue culture as a plant production system for horticultural crops. In: Zimmerman RH, Griesbach RJ, Hammerschlag FA, et al. (editors). Plug Systems for Micropropagules. Maritinus Ni Jhoff, Publisher, Dordrecht; 1986.

15. Bhojwani SS, Razdan MK. Plant Tissue Culture: Theory and Practices. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., New York, USA; 1992.

16. Heuser CW. Response of callus cultures of Prunus persica, P. tomentosa, and P. besseyi to cyanide. Canadian Journal of Botany. 1972; 50(11): 2149-2152. doi: 10.1139/b72-279

17. Chen CS, Jonard R. Acquisition of friable calli from stems and establishment of cell suspension cultures of Prunus armeniaca L. cv. Canino and Luizet. Journal of Plant Research Environment. 1995; 3: 22-26.

18. Schiavone FM, Wisniewski ME. Callus and Cell Suspension Cultures from Dormant Stems of Peach. HortScience. 1990; 25(4): 483. doi: 10.21273/hortsci.25.4.483

19. Svircev AM, Biggs AR, Miles NW. Peach regeneration from callus derived from embryos of selected cultivars. Fruit Variety Journal. 1993; 47: 13-16.

20. Zhou H, Li M, Zhao X, et al. Plant regeneration from in vitro leaves of the peach rootstock ‘Nemaguard’ (Prunus persica × P. davidiana). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 2010; 101(1): 79-87. doi: 10.1007/s11240-010-9666-z

21. Sharma G, Nautiyal AR. Influence of explants type and plant growth regulators on In vitro multiple shoots regeneration of a Laurel from Himalaya. Nature and Science. 2009; 7: 1-7.

22. Rout GR, Samantaray S, Das P. In vitro selection and biochemical characterisation of zinc and manganese adapted callus lines in Brassica spp. Plant Science. 1999; 137: 89-100.

23. Mayer KF, Schoof H, Haecker A, et al. Role of WUSCHEL in regulating stem cell fate in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Cell. 1998; 95: 805-815.

24. Karp A. Somaclonal variation as a tool for crop improvement. Euphytica. 1995; 85(1-3): 295-302. doi: 10.1007/bf00023959

25. Ozias-Akins P, Vasil IK. Plant regeneration from cultured immature embryos and inflorescences of Triticum aestivum L. (wheat): Evidence for somatic embryogenesis. Protoplasma. 1982; 110(2): 95-105. doi: 10.1007/bf01281535

26. Chaudhury A, Qu R. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of turf type Bermuda grass: Effect of 6-benzyladenine in callus induction medium. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture. 2000; 60: 113-120.

27. Popielarska M, Slesak H, Goralski G. Histological and SEM studies on organogenesis in endosperm-derived callus of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa cv. Hayward). Acta Biologica Cracovinensia s. Botanica. 2006; 48: 97-104.

28. Atta R, Laurens L, Boucheron‐Dubuisson E, et al. Pluripotency of Arabidopsis xylem pericycle underlies shoot regeneration from root and hypocotyl explants grown in vitro. The Plant Journal. 2009; 57(4): 626-644. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03715.x

29. Sugimoto K, Jiao Y, Meyerowitz EM. Arabidopsis Regeneration from Multiple Tissues Occurs via a Root Development Pathway. Developmental Cell. 2010; 18(3): 463-471. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.02.004

30. Steinmacher DA, Guerra MP, Saare-Surminski K, et al. A temporary immersion system improves in vitro regeneration of peach palm through secondary somatic embryogenesis. Annals of Botany. 2011; 108(8): 1463-1475. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr033

31. Termignoni RR, Wang PJ, Hu CY. Somatic embryo induction in Eucalyptus dunnii. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 1996; 45(2): 129-132. doi: 10.1007/bf00048755

32. Van-Le B, Thao DMN, Gendy C, et al. Somatic embryogenesis on thin cell layers of a C4 species, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture. 1997; 49: 201-208.

33. Kim SW, Byung WM, Liu JR. High frequency plant regeneration from immature ovule-derived embryogenic cell suspension cultures of Chelidonium majus var. asiaticum. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture. 1999; 56: 125-129.

34. Gleddie S, Keller W, Setterfield G. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf explants and cell suspensions of Solanum melongena (eggplant). Canadian Journal of Botany. 1983; 61(3): 656-666. doi: 10.1139/b83-074

35. Vasil V, Vasil IK. The Ontogeny of Somatic Embryos of Pennisetum americanum (L.) K. Schum. I. In Cultured Immature Embryos. Botanical Gazette. 1982; 143(4): 454-465. doi: 10.1086/337321

36. Dias GMG, Rodrigues FA, Soares JDR, et al. Embryogenic induction of Torch Ginger (Etlingera elatior) callus. Agrociencia. 2014; 48: 173-184.

37. Silveira V, de Vita AM, Macedo AF, et al. Morphological and polyamine content changes in embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus of sugarcane. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 2013; 114(3): 351-364. doi: 10.1007/s11240-013-0330-2

38. Oka S. Histological Observations on Initiation and Morphogenesis in Immature and Mature Embryo Derived Callus of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Annals of Botany. 1995; 76(5): 487-492. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1995.1124

39. Jualang AG, Rozalia1 MG, Suraya1 E, et al. Induction and microscopic characterization of globular callus from stem explant of Labisia pumila var. Alata. J Advanced Research in Materials Science. 2015; 9: 1-12.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/th.v7i2.5530

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.