Experimental hybrid cabotia pumpkin physical-chemical and technological quality

Thayanara Mayara de Lima, Adrielle Borges de Almeida, Railany Vieira Santana, Estenio Moreira Alves, Mariana Buranelo Egea

Article ID: 1835
Vol 6, Issue 1, 2023

VIEWS - 515 (Abstract) 290 (PDF)

Abstract


The objective of the work was to evaluate and compare the physicochemical characteristics of an experimental cabotiá hybrid with the commercial hybrid Tetsukabuto. The genotypes were divided according to mass (kg), and were evaluated for quality. The color parameters evaluated showed no significant difference, although visually the hybrid was different from the commercial variety. It was possible to conclude that the size of the fruits does not influence the concentration of the compounds, and also, an inferiority of HC05 was observed with respect to the relevant quality characteristics in pumpkins, such as soluble solids content, carotenoids and vitamin C.


Keywords


Conventional Breeding; Cucurbita Maxima; Cucurbita Moschata; Tetsukabuto

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Alexandre VP, Martins BB, da Silva Harold CA. Empowering sustainable human development by supporting local markets in a municipality of goiás in Brazil. Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional 2018; 25(3): 17–28.

2. Neves CVB, Tonelli É, Hurtado GFS, et al. Gastronomy culture rescue under perception from residents from Ouro Preto and districts. Brazilian Applied Science Review 2019; 3(1): 659–683.

3. IBGE. Indicadores de desenvolvimento sustentável: Brasil: 2017 (Portuguese) [Indicators of sustainable development: Brazil: 2017]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2017. p. 352.

4. Heiden G, Barbieri RL, Neitzke RS. Chave para a identificação das espécies de abóboras (Cucurbita, Cucurbitaceae) cultivadas no Brasil (Portuguese) [Key for the identification of species of pumpkins (Cucurbita, Cucurbitaceae) cultivated in Brazil]. Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado; 2007. p. 37.

5. Nascimento WM, Pessoa HBSV, da Silva PP, et al. Produção de sementes híbridas de abóbora do tipo Tetsukabuto (Portuguese) [Production of hybrid pumpkin seeds of the Tetsukabuto type] [Internet]. Porto Alegre: EMPRAPA; 2011. Available from: https: //www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/bitstream/doc/911280/4/palestra16CursoSementesHortalicas11.pdf.

6. Faleiro FG, Farias Neto, Ribeiro Júnior WQ. Pré-melhoramento, melhoramento e pós-melhoramento: Estratégias e desafios (Portuguese) [Pre-improvement, improvement and post-improvement: Strategies and challenges]. Planaltina: Embrapa Cerrado; 2008.

7. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (MAPA), Serviço Nacional de Proteção de Cultivares (SNPC). Importação de sementes de abóbora (Portuguese) [Importation of pumpkin seeds]. Brazil: MAPA, SNPC; 2007.

8. Silva PC. Genetic variability of pumpkins in the metropolitan region of Manaus, Amazonas state [Master’s thesis]. Brazil: Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA); 2017.

9. Borges RME, de Lima MAC, Neto ISL, et al. Prediction of genetic and selection parameters in pumpkin (‘Cucurbita moschata’ Duch.) progenies for morphoagonomic characteristics and pulp quality. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2019; 13: 199–207.

10. Martínez-Valdivieso D, Gómez P, Font R, et al. Physical and chemical characterization in fruit from 22 summer squash (Cucurbitapepo L.) cultivars. LWT- Food Science and Technology 2015; 64: 1225–1233.

11. Alves EM, dos Santos LJ, Batista GS, et al. Characteristics and productivity of experimental hybrid of Japanese pumpkin in Iporá - Brazil. Pubvet 2017; 11(7): 662–669.

12. CEASA-GO. Centrais de Abastecimento de Goiás S/A [Internet]. Goiás: CEASA-GO; 2007. Available from: http://www.ceasa.goias.gov.br

13. Instituto Adolfo Lutz (IAL). Métodos físico-químicos para análise de alimentos (Portuguese) [Physical-chemical methods for food analysis]. 4th ed. São Paulo: IAL; 2008.

14. Gross J. Pigments in vegetables: Hlorophylls and carotenoids. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1991.

15. Willian S. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 14th ed. Arlington: AOAC; 1984.

16. Toledo Benassi M, Antunes A. A comparison of metaphosphoric and oxalic acids as extractant solutions for the determination of vitamin C in selected vegetables. Arquivos de Biologia e Tecnologia 1988; 31(4): 507–513.

17. Silva FAS, Azevedo CAV. The Assistat Software Version 7.7 and its use in the analysis of experimental data. African Journal Agricultural Research 2016; 11(39): 3733–3740.

18. Amaro GB, Silva GO, Boiteux LS, et al. Agronomic performance of pumpkin type Tetsukabuto hybrids for fruits traits. Horticultura Brasileira 2017; 35(2): 180–185.

19. Amariz A, de Lima MAC, Alves RE, et al. Physical characteristics of fruits of pumpkin accessions collected in Piauí and Maranhão State, Brazil. Horticultura Brasileira 2010; 28(2).

20. Amaro GB, Resende FV, Carvalho ADF,et al.Performance of hybrids of Japanese-type pumpkin in organic growing. Brasília: Embrapa Hortaliças; 2018. p. 22.

21. Corrêa AD, Del-Vechio G, de Abreu CMP, et al. (editors). Pumpkin: Fractions yield obtained with the pre-preparation [Internet]. Brazil: Congresso Brasileiro De Olericultura (CBO); 2003. Available from: http://www.abhorticultura.com.br/bibliotec a/files/Download/Library/olpc4035c.pdf.

22. Nascimento WM, Coimbra KG, Freitas RA, et al. Efficiency of Cucurbita maxima accessions as pollinators in the commercial production of pumpkin (“Tetsukabuto” type). Horticultura Brasileira 2008; 26: 540–542.

23. Coelho LM, Wosiacki G. Sensory evaluation of bakery products with the addition of apple pomace flour. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos 2010; 30(3): 582–588.

24. Costa APD, Rossatto E, de Oliveira Rios A, et al. (editors). Subprodutos de abóbora como fonte de carotenoides e antioxidantes (Portuguese) [Pumpkin by-products as a source of carotenoids and antioxidants] [Internet]. Brazil: Congresso Brasileiro De Engenharia QuÍmica; 2014. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/300655173_SUBPRODUTOS_DE_ABOBORA_COMO_SOURCE_FOR_CAROTENOIDES_AND_ANTIOXIDANTS.

25. Chitarra MIF, Chitarra AB. Pós-colheita de frutas e hortaliças: Fisiologia e manuseio (Portuguese) [Postharvest of fruits and vegetables: Physiology and handling]. 2nd ed. Lavras: UFLA; 2005.

26. Paula NRF, Vilas Boas EVB, Rodrigues LJ, et al. Quality of fresh-cut produce commercialized on supermarket shelves in the cities of Lavras-MG, Brasília-DF, and São Paulo-SP. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 2009; 33(1): 219–227.

27. Carmo GA. Growth, nutrition, and yield of cucurbits cultivated under irrigation with water of different salinity levels and nitrogen fertilization doses [PhD thesis]. Mossoró: Universidade Federal Rural do Semiárido; 2009.

28. Grangeiro LC, Pedrosa JF, Neto FB, et al. Quality of yellow melon hybrids in different plant densities. Horticultura Brasileira 1999; 17(2): 110–113.

29. Anzaldúa-Morales A. La evaluación sensorial de los alimentos en la teoría y la práctica (Spanish) [Sensory evaluation of food in theory and practice]. Zaragoza: Acribia; 1994. p. 198.

30. Vilas Boas AAC. Qualidade pós-colheita de frutos de tomateiro em função de fontes de cálcio (Portuguese) [Postharvest quality of tomato fruits as a function of calcium sources] [Master’s thesis]. Lavras: Universidade Federal de Lavras; 2014.

31. Lima Neto IS. Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.) pre-breeding for carotenoid biofortification [PhD thesis]. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa; 2013.

32. Faustino RMEB. Predição de parâmetros genéticos e incremento da qualidade em frutos de progênies de aboboreira (Cucurbita moschata Duch.) (Portuguese) [Prediction of genetic parameters and quality increment in fruits of zucchini (Cucurbita moschata Duch.) progenies] [PhD thesis]. Feira de Santana: Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana; 2017.

33. de Carvalho LMJ, Gomes PB, de Oliveira Godoy RL, et al. Total carotenoid content, α-carotene and β-carotene, of landrace pumpkins (Cucurbita moschata Duch): A preliminary study. Food Research International 2012; 47(2): 337–340.

34. Rodríguez-Amaya DB, Kimura M, Godoy HT, et al. Update Brazilian database on food carotenoids: Factors affecting carotenoid composition. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 2008; 21: 445–463.

35. Gajewski M, Radzanowska J, Danilcenko H, et al. Quality of pumpkin cultivars in relation to sensory characteristics. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 2008; 36: 73–79.

36. Alves JA, Vilas Boas EVB, Vilas Boas BM, et al. Maintenance of the quality of fresh-cut products made up of pumpkin, carrot, chayote, and arracacha (peruvian carrot). Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos 2010; 30(3): 625–634.

37. Foo YZ, Simmons LW, Rhodes G, et al. Predictors of facial attractiveness and health in humans. Scientific Reports 2017; 7: 1–12.

38. Custódio AM, Lopes IA, Alves EM, et al. Productive performance of Japanese pumpkin cultivars in Novo São Joaquim, Mato Grosso. Revista da Universidade Vale do Rio Verde 2018; 16(2): 1–11.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/th.v6i1.1835

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.