Phytosociological study of weeds associated with carrot crops in two municipalities of Boyacá
Vol 5, Issue 1, 2022
VIEWS - 344 (Abstract) 275 (PDF)
Abstract
With the purpose of knowing the phytosocilogy of weeds associated to a carrot crop (Daucus carota L.) under conditions of the municipalities of Ventaquemada and Jenesano-Boyacá, one lot per municipality destined to carrot cultivation was selected and a W-shaped layout was made covering an area of 500 m2. Relative density, relative frequency, relative dominance and the importance value index (IVI) were calculated, as well as the Alpha and Beta diversity indices for the sampled areas. A total of 6 families and 11 species were counted, of which 63.64% were represented by annual plants and 36.36% by perennial plants. The class Liliopsida (Monocotyledon) was represented by the Poaceae family. The Magnoliopsida class (Dicotyledon) was represented by the following families: Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Boraginaceae, Leguminosaceae, Polygonaceae, the last one being the one with the highest number of species. The species R. crispus and P. nepalense were the ones with the highest values of Importance Value Index (IVI) with 0.953 and 0.959, respectively. According to the Shannon-Wiener diversity and Simpson’s dominance indices, the evaluated areas presented a low species diversity and a high probability of dominant species. The results obtained can serve as a basis and tool for carrot growers in the evaluated areas to define management plans for the associated weeds and thus optimize yields in this crop.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Poleshi Chaitra A, Manikanta DS, Cholin S. Understanding the genetic variability, heritability and association pattern for the characters related to reproductive phase of carrots (Daucus carota L.) in tropical region. Journal of Applied Horticulture 2018; 20(3): 225–232. doi: 10.37855/JAH.2018.V20I03.39.
2. Resende GM, Yuri JE, Costa ND, et al. Desempenho de cultivares de cenoura em sistema orgânico de cultivo em condições de temperaturas elevadas (Portuguese) [Performance of carrot cultivars in an organic cultivation system under high temperature conditions]. Horticultura Brasileira 2016; 34(1): 121–125. doi: 10.1590/S0102-053620160000100018.
3. Patkowska E. Cover crops and soil-borne fungi dangerous towards the cultivation of daucus carota L. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Hortorum Cultus 2021; 20(2): 3–12. doi: 10.24326/asphc.2021.2.1.
4. Cardenal Rubio CZ, Torres Hernández D, Dotor Robayo MY, et al. Characterization of the active seed bank in carrot crops in the municipallity of Villa Pinzón (Cundinamarca). Revista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica 2016; 19(2): 297–306.
5. Schmid C, Sharma S, Stark TD, et al. Influence of the abiotic stress conditions, waterlogging and drought, on the bitter sensometabolome as well as agronomical traits of six genotypes of daucus carota. Foods 2021; 10(7): 1607. doi: 10.3390/foods10071607.
6. Agronet. Estadisticas Agricolas. Área, producción, rendimiento y participación municipal en el departamento por cultivo (Spanish) [Agricultural Statistics. Area, production, yield and municipal participation in the department by crop]. Estadisticas Agricolas. 2020.
7. Dotor RMY, González Mendoza LA, Morillo CAC. Período crítico de competencia de la Zanahoria (Daucus carota L.) y malezas asociadas al cultivo (Spanish) [Critical period of competition of the Carrot (Daucus carota L.) and weeds associated with the crop]. Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas 2018; 35(1): 5. doi: 10.22267/rcia.183501.78.
8. Vera Ojeda PA, Enciso Garay CR. Critical period of weed interference in carrot crop. Investigación Agraria 2017; 19(2): 77–85. doi: 10.18004/investig.agrar.2017.diciembre.
9. Reginaldo LTRT, Lins HA, Sousa MDF, et al. Weed interference in carrot yield in two localized irrigation systems. Revista Caatinga 2021; 34(1): 119–131. doi: 10.1590/1983-21252021v34n113rc.
10. Coelho M, Bianco S, Carvalho L. Interferência de plantas daninhas na cultura da cenoura (Daucus carota) (Spanish) [Weed interference in carrot (Daucus carota)]. Planta Daninha 2009; 27: 913–920. doi: 10.1590/s0100-83582009000500004.
11. Pitelli RA. Competição e controle das plantas daninhas em áreas agrícolas (Spanish) [Competition and weed control in agricultural areas]. Série Técnica IPEF, Piracicaba 1987; 4(12): 1–24.
12. Kuva MA, Pitelli RA, Salgado TP, et al. Fitossociologia de comunidades de plantas daninhas em agroecossistema cana-crua (Portuguese) [Phytosociology of weed communities in a sugarcane agroecosystem]. Planta Daninha 2007; 25(3): 501–511. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582007000300009.
13. Biffe DF, Constantin J, Oliveira Junior RS de. Interferência das plantas daninhas nas plantas cultivadas (Spanish) [Interference of weeds on cultivated plants] [Internet]. In: Brandão Filho JUT, Freitas PSL, Berian LOS, et al. Hortaliças-fruto. Maringá: EDUEM; 2018. p. 339–355. doi: 10.7476/9786586383010.0012.
14. Cabrera DC, Chaila S, Sobrero MT, et al. Phytosociological survey of sugarcane crop weeds in different agroecological areas in TucumÁn Province, Argentina. Planta Daninha 2019; 37, 31–38. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582019370100027.
15. Carvalho LB, Guzzo CD. Increased beet density in weed management. Planta Daninha 2008; 26(1): 73–82.doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582008000100008.
16. Concenço G, de Farias PM, Quintero NFA, et al. Phytosociological surveys in weed science: Old concept, new approach. In: Yousaf Z (editor). Plant ecology—Traditional approaches to recent trends. IntechOpen; 2017. p. 121–146. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.69083.
17. Quintero-Pertuz I, Carbonó-Delahoz E, Hoyos V, et al. Phytosociology of weeds in banana plantations in the department of Magdalena, Colombia. Caldasia 2021; 43(1): 80–93. doi: 10.15446/caldasia.v43n1.83554.
18. Booth BD, Murphy SD, Swanton CJ. Weed ecology in natural and agricultural systems. CABI Publishing; 2003. p. 313.
19. Prates CJN, Viana AES, Cardoso AD, et al. Weed phytosociology in cassava cultivation in two periods in southwestern Bahia, Brazil. Planta Daninha 2019; 37(019184596): 1–12. doi: 10.1590/s0100-83582019370100107.
20. Fuentes C, Eraso E, Sequeda O, et al. Flora arvense del antiplano Cundiboyacense de Colombia (Spanish) [Weed flora of the Cundiboyacense highlands of Colombia]. In: Bayer CropScience, Universidad Nacional de Colombia (editors). 2011. p. 350.
21. Gámez A, Rojas L, Jaramillo M, et al. Guía ilustrada de plantas arvenses del Centro Agropecuario Marengo (Cam) (Spanish) [Illustrated guide to weed plants of the Marengo Agricultural Center (Cam)]. Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2018. p. 382.
22. López AJG, Hernández M, Díaz R. Caracterización de la flora arvense asociada a un cultivo de maíz bajo riego para producción de jojotos (Spanish) [Characterization of the weed flora associated with a maize crop under irrigation for the production of jojotos]. Agronomía Tropical 2012; 61(2): 133–139.
23. Bastidas J, López G. Caracteres cuantitativos y reconocimientos de malezas en praderas artificiales de clima frio del altiplano de Pasto (Spanish) [Quantitative characters and recognition of weeds in cold climate artificial meadows of the Pasto plateau]. Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas 1972; 4(2): 83–97.
24. Banda SL, Fuentes CL, Chaves B. Producción de semilla de cilantro (Coriandrum sativum L.) bajo la incidencia de malezas y Alternaria Nees (Spanish) [Production of coriander seed (Coriandrum sativum L.) under the incidence of weeds and Alternaria Nees]. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas 2012; 5(2): 251–262.
25. doi: 10.17584/rcch.2011v5i2.1274
26. Plaza GA, Pedraza M. Reconocimiento y caracterización ecológica de la flora arvense asociada al cultivo de uchuva (Spanish) [Recognition and ecological characterization of the weed flora associated with cape gooseberry cultivation]. Agronomia Colombiana 2007; 25(2): 306–313.
27. Poggio SL. Cambios florísticos en comunidades de malezas: Un marco conceptual basado en reglas de ensamblaje (Spansih) [Floristic changes in weed communities: A conceptual framework based on assembly rules]. Ecologia Austral 2012; 22(2): 150–158.
28. Ramírez J, Hoyos V, Plaza G. Fitosociología de malezas asociadas al cultivo de arroz en el departamento del Tolima, Colombia (Spanish) [Phytosociology of weeds associated with rice cultivation in the department of Tolima, Colombia]. Agronomia Colombiana 2015; 33(1): 64–73. doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v33n1.46747.
29. Moreno CE. Métodos para medir la biodiversidad, edición electrónica. M&T – Manuales y Tesis SEA; 2001. p. 84.
30. Concenço G, Silva CJ, Staut LA, et al. Weeds occurrence in areas submitted to distinct winter crops. Planta Daninha 2012; 30(4): 747–755. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582012000400008.
31. Concenço G, Salton J, Secretti M, et al. Effect of long-term agricultural management systems on occurrence and composition of weed species. Planta Daninha 2011; 29(3): 515–522. doi: 10.1590/s0100-83582011000300005.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/th.v5i1.1818
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.