Analysis of main botanical characters of 56 Momordica charantia varieties

Ziyang Min, Yongqi Li, Xiaoxia Han, Zhuqing Zhang, Zuhua Yuan, Xinjun Hu

Article ID: 1811
Vol 5, Issue 1, 2022

VIEWS - 378 (Abstract) 291 (PDF)

Abstract


In order to scientifically evaluate the germplasm resources of Momordica charantia in southern China, the diversity, correlation and cluster analysis were carried out on the main botanical characters of 56 Momordica charantia varieties, such as melon length, melon transverse diameter, single melon weight, internode length, stem diameter, leaf length and leaf width. The results showed that the variation coefficients of 7 agronomic characters of 56 Momordica charantia varieties ranged from 8.81% to 19.44%, the average variation coefficient was 14.21%, the maximum variation coefficient of single melon weight was 19.44%, and the minimum variation coefficient of melon cross diameter was 8.81%. The correlation analysis showed that there were correlations among the agronomic traits. The positive correlation coefficient between leaf length and leaf width was up to 0.978, and the negative correlation coefficient between single melon weight and internode length was up to 0.451. The 56 varieties were divided into 3 groups by cluster analysis, of which 92.86% of the materials were concentrated in the first and second groups, and there were only 4 materials in the third group. The results can provide a reference for the cultivation, utilization and genetic improvement of Momordica charantia resources in southern China.


Keywords


Momordica charantia; Botanical Characters; Diversity Analysis; Correlation Analysis; Cluster Analysis; Genetic Markers; Genetic Relationship

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Wang Z, Yu S. Kugua de youxiao chengfen he yaoyong jiazhi (Chinese) [Active ingredients and medicinal value of bitter gourd]. Zhejiang Journal of Traditional Chinese medicine 2003; (10): 448–450.

2. Meng S, Zheng X, Liu Y, et al. Diversity analysis of morphological traits in Chinese cabbage germplasm resources. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 2005; 20(4): 57–61.

3. Liu Z, Xiong Q, Long M, et al. Cluster analysis of variety resources in bitter gourd. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 2009; 25(6): 179–182.

4. Wu S, Li H, Huang H, et al. Analysis of field characters and quality of different germplasm resources of Momordica charantia. Chinese Vegetables 2018; (3): 59–62.

5. Zhang Y, Yang Y, Tian L, et al. Evaluation and genetic diversity of bitter gourd varieties based on phenotypic traits. Molecular Plant Breeding 2016; 14(1): 239–250.

6. Liu Z, Niu Y, Zhu J, et al. Study on genetic diversity of agronomic traits and genetic relationships among core collections of bitter gourd. Agricultural Science & Technology 2016; 17(5): 1134–1138.

7. Gao H, Sun J, Zhang F, et al. Identification and evaluation of twenty-four characteristics of Momordica cahrantia L. Northern Horticulture 2018; (15): 13–17.

8. Huang Y, Wan X, Zhang J, et al. Evaluation and genetic diversity analysis of bitter gourd based on major phenotypic character. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Agricultural Science Edition) 2016; (2): 47–52, 79.

9. Zhang Y, Yang Y, Tian L, et al. Multiple statistics analysis of the quality traits of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Molecular Plant Breeding 2015; (9): 2001–2010.

10. Tan S, Cheng J, Cui J, et al. Genetic Analysis on Single Fruit Seed Numbers and Seed Coat Color of Bitter Melona. Chinese Vegetables 2013; (18): 48–52.

11. Li G, Zheng Y, Li X, et al. Genetic diversity of bitter gourd germplasm resources revealed by SSR analysis. Molecular Plant Breeding 2016; (7): 1914–1922.

12. Zhou K, Zhang C, Luo J, et al. SRAP analysis on genetic diversity of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Guangdong Agricultural Science 2013; (21): 136–140.

13. Zhao X, Song J, Hu K, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of bitter gourd germplasm resources based on SRAP markers. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 2013; (1): 78–84.

14. Wang G, Xu Y, Huang M. Identification and genetic relationship analysis of bitter gourd varieties based on SSR and SPAP. Molecular Plant Breeding 2016; (2): 501–510.

15. Wang G, Huang M. Analysis on genetic relationship of new breeding combinations based on SSR and SRAP markers in Momordica charantia L. Molecular Plant Breeding 2015; 13(9): 1993–2000.

16. Wang Y, Bai L, Shan F, et al. Hulu zhongzhi ziyuan yichuan duoyangxing fenxi (Chinese) [Genetic diversity analysis of gourd germplasm resources]. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Science 2018; 64(8): 62–66.

17. Wan X, Chen X, Miao N, et al. Present situation and prospect of studies on Momordica charantia in China. Acta Agricultural Jiangxi 2002; 14(3): 46–50.

18. Zhang F, Chen C, Hu Z, et al. Analysis on the diversity of morphological traits and nutritional contents in bitter gourd germplasm resources. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 2011; 27(4): 183–188.

19. Huang R, Sun D, Zhang M, et al. Genetic diversity of Momordica charantia and its cluster analysis based on morphological traits. Guangxi Agricultural Science 2008; 39(3): 351–356.

20. Li D, Wen Q, Kang J, et al. Correlation and path analysis of main agronomic traits of balsam pear. Journal of South China University of Tropical Agricultural 2007; 13(3): 9–12.

21. Wang G, Liu Z, Fan H, et al. Correlation analysis on agronomic traits of new breeding combinations in Momordica charantia L. Northern Horticulture 2015; (14): 22–27.

22. Han X, Hu X, Su J, et al. The main botanical character analysis of 41 meat used old cucurbita moschata varieties. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 2015; 31(4): 80–85.

23. Li Q, Geng Z, Yang Q, et al. Effects of different planting patterns on yield and agronomic traits of soybean. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 2017; 33(36): 36–40.

24. Pei Y, Li N, Ding H, et al. Influence of soil fertility on yield and agronomic characters of wheat varieties released. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 2018; 34 (4): 1–8.

25. Zhang H. Path analysis of wheat yield and main agronomic traits under different years. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 2016; 32(27): 24–28.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/th.v5i1.1811

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.