Productivity and nutrient export in cowpea fertilized with chicken manure
Vol 3, Issue 1, 2020
VIEWS - 658 (Abstract) 554 (PDF)
Abstract
The analysis of the accumulation and export of nutrients by the cowpea crop is fundamental for a more sustainable fertilization program, because the definition of the doses of organic fertilizers based only on the estimated maximum yield does not guarantee the maintenance of soil fertility. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of fertilization with chicken manure on the productivity, accumulation and exportation of nutrients by the pods of cowpea. A randomized block design was used, with five doses of chicken manure (0; 5; 10; 20 and 40 t ha-1) and four repetitions. The highest levels of P and Mg were found in the leaves with the application of 40 t ha-1 of manure. The maximum pod length was 14.47 cm, estimated with the dose of 33.33 t ha-1 of manure. The highest values of diameter, number of pods per plant and pod productivity were observed at the highest dose of manure applied. In relative terms, that is, total exported in relation to the total extracted by the aerial part, phosphorus is the nutrient most exported by the pods, on average 58%, followed by N (55%), K (43%), Mg (40%), S (38%) and Ca (17%). At the highest dose, although Ca accumulation occurred in large quantities (31.3 kg ha-1), only 13% of it was exported by the pods. Fertilizing cowpea with chicken manure supplied essential nutrients and increased pod yield from 7.2 (no fertilization) to 16.3 t ha-1 (fertilization with 40 t ha-1 of chicken manure). The plant remains of the cowpea constitute an important source of nutrients, being obtained at the highest dose of manure applied (40 t ha-1) the following amounts of macronutrients (kg ha-1): N (51.4); P (5.1); K (27.6); Ca (27.1); Mg (8.2); S (5.1), which may return to the soil, with the incorporation of the plants.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. IBGE. Censo agropecuário Brasil (Portuguese) [Brazil agricultural census]. Grandes Regiões e Unidades da Federação [Internet]. 2006. Available from: www.ibge.gov.br.
2. CEASAMINAS (Centro de Abastecimento de Minas Gerais). Informações nutricionais e informações de mercado (Portuguese) [Nutritional information and market information] [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.ceasaminas.com.br.
3. Peixoto N, Braz LT, Banzatto DA, et al. Adaptability and stability in pole beans. Horticultura Brasileira 2002; 20: 616–618.
4. Sediyama MAN, Santos IC, Lima PC. Growing vegetables in the organic system. Revista Ceres 2014; 61: 829–837.
5. UBA (União Brasileira de Avicultura). Relatório Annual (Portuguese) [Annual report] [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://www.ubabef.com.br/publicacoes
6. Abreu IMO, Junqueira AMR, Peixoto JR, et al. Microbiological quality and productivity of lettuce under chemical and organic fertilization. Food Science and Technology 2010; 30: 108–118.
7. Oliveira AP, Cardoso MMO, Barbosa LJN, et al. Response of snap bean to P2O5 levels applied in a poorphosphorus sandy soil. Horticultura Brasileira 2005; 23: 128–132.
8. Santos DR, Gatiboni LC, Kaminski J. Factors affecting the phosphorus availability and the fertilization management in no-tillage system. Ciência Rural 2008; 38: 576–586.
9. Rosolem CA, Marubayashi OM. Seja o doutor do seu feijoeiro (Portuguese) [Be your bean doctor]. Informações Agronômicas 1994; 68: 1–16.
10. Brito MMP, Muraoka T, Silva EC. Contribuition of nitrogen from biological nitrogen fixation, nitrogen fertilizer and soil nitrogen on the growth of the common bean and cowpea. Bragantia 2011; 70: 206–215.
11. Souza EFC, Soratto RP, Pagani FA. Nitrogen fertilization and rhizobium inoculation in common bean cultivated after corn intercropped with palisade grass. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 2011; 46: 370–377.
12. Perez AAG, Soratto RP, Manzatto NP, et al. Nutrient extraction and exportation by nitrogen-fertilized common bean grown after different periods of no-tillage system establishment. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 2013; 37: 1276–1287.
13. Santos GM, Oliveira AP, Silva JAL, et al. Characteristics and yield of snap-bean pod in function of sources and levels of organic matter. Horticultura Brasileira 2001; 19: 30–35.
14. Oliveira NG, De-Polli H, Almeida DL, et al. Snap bean planted on living perennial mulch of grass and legume and in tilled soil with organic amendment. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 2006; 41: 1361–1367.
15. Cunha TJF, Blancaneaux P, Calderano Filho B, et al. Influence of the pedological differentiation on the development of rubber-tree cultivation in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 2000; 35: 145–155.
16. Embrapa (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária). Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos (Portuguese) [Brazilian system of soil classification]. 3rd edition. Brasília: Embrapa; 2013. p. 353.
17. Embrapa (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária). Manual de análises químicas de solos, plantas e fertilizantes (Portuguese) [Manual of chemical analysis of soils, plants and fertilizers]. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica; 2009. p. 627.
18. SAEG. SAEG: Sistema para análises estatísticas (Portuguese) [SAEG: System for statistical analysis]. version 9.1. Viçosa: Fundação Arthur Bernardes. CD-ROM; 2007.
19. Raij B Van, Cantarella H, Quaggio JA, et al. Recomendações de adubação e calagem para o Estado de São Paulo (Portuguese) [Fertilization and liming recommendations for the State of São Paulo]. 2nd edition. Campinas: IAC; 1997. p. 285.
20. Malavolta E, Vitti GC, Oliveira AS. Avaliação do estado nutricional das plantas: Princípios e aplicações (Portuguese) [Evaluation of the nutritional status of plants: Principles and applications]. 2nd edition. Piracicaba: Potafos; 1997. p. 319.
21. Brackmann A, Schorr MRW, Pinto JAV, et al. Pre-harvest applications of calcium in post-harvest quality of ‘Fuji’ apples. Ciência Rural 2010; 40: 1435–1438.
22. Miranda RS, Suderio FB, Sousa AF, et al. Nutritional deficiency in cowpea seedlings due to omission of macro and micronutrients. Revista Ciência Agronômica 2010; 41: 326–333.
23. Raij B Van. Fertilidade do solo e adubação (Portuguese) [Soil fertility and fertilization]. Piracicaba: Potafós; 1991. p. 343.
24. Filgueira FAR. Novo Manual de Olericultura: Agrotecnologia moderna na produção e comercialização de hortaliça (Portuguese) [New Horticultural Manual: Modern agrotechnology in the production and commercialization of vegetables]. Viçosa: UFV; 2008. p. 421.
25. Fontes PCR. Nutrição mineral de plantas: Avaliação e diagnose (Portuguese) [Mineral nutrition of plants: Evaluation and diagnosis]. Viçosa: Arka; 2011. p. 296.
26. Oliveira FL, Guerra JGM, Almeida DL, et al. Performance of organically grown taro in relation to poultry litter doses. Horticultura Brasileira 2008; 26: 149–153.
27. Beninni ERY, Takahashi HW, Neves CSVJ. Calcium management in hydroponic lettuce. Horticultura Brasileira 2003; 21: 605–610.
28. Ishimura I, Feitosa CT, Lisbão RS, et al. Influence of different levels of NPK ferttuzers on the yield of pole snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Bragantia 1985; 44: 429–436.
29. Araújo JS, Oliveira AP, Silva JAL, et al. Rendimento do feijão-vagem cultivado com esterco suíno e adubação mineral (Portuguese) [Yield of cowpea cultivated with pig manure and mineral fertilization]. Revista Ceres 2001; 48: 501–510.
30. Oliveira AP, Silva JA, Alves AU, et al. Snap bean yield in function of K2O levels. Horticultura Brasileira 2007; 25: 29–33.
31. Hue NV. Effects of organic acids/anions on phosphorus sorption and phytoavailability in soils with different mineralogies. Soil Science 1991; 152: 463–471.
32. Novais RF, Smyth TJ. Fósforo em solo e planta em condições tropicais (Portuguese) [Phosphorus in soil and plant under tropical conditions]. Viçosa: UFV; 1999. p. 399.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/th.v3i1.1787
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.