Growth, yield and chemical composition of eggplant ‘Ciça’ under potassium fertigation
Vol 3, Issue 1, 2020
VIEWS - 651 (Abstract) 549 (PDF)
Abstract
The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of potassium concentrations applied via fertigation on the growth, yield and chemical composition of eggplant ‘Ciça’ in a distroferric red Latosol. The treatments were composed of five concentrations of K2O (0, 36, 72, 108 and 144 kg ha-1 supplied via fertigation), using potassium chloride as a source, divided into six applications. The irrigation system was of the drip type and irrigation management was done via a “Class A” evaporometer tank. Harvest started at 62 days after transplanting (DAT) and lasted for five months. The variables evaluated were: plant height, number of leaves, fresh fruit mass, number of fruits per plant, yield per plant, productivity and classification of the fruits according to their length and diameter. At 85 DAT, fruit were collected for characterization as to the percentage of lipids, proteins and fibers. Although the potassium fertigation in cover provided a reduction in the production and productivity, the concentrations of 36 kg ha-1 and 72 kg ha-1 of K2O applied via fertigation, increased the physical-chemical characteristics of the fruits.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Filgueira FAR. Solanáceas: Agrotecnologia moderna na produção de tomate, batata, pimentão, pimenta, berinjela, e jiló (Portuguese) [Solanaceae: Modern agrotechnology in the production of tomatoes, potatoes, peppers, eggplant, and eggplant]. Lavras: UFLA; 2003. p. 333.
2. Malavolta E, Pimentel-Gomes F, Alcarde JC. Adubos e adubações (Portuguese) [Fertilizers and fertilizing]. São Paulo: Nobel; 2002. p. 200.
3. Dinnes DL, Karlen DL, Jaynes DB, et al. Nitrogen management strategies to reduce nitrate leaching in tile-drained Midwestern soils. Agronomy Journal 2002; 94(1): 153–171. doi:10.2134/agronj2002.0153.
4. Factor TL, Araújo JAC, Vilella Júnior VE. Pepper production in substrates using fertigation with biological reactor effluent. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 2008; 12(2): 143–149. doi: 10.1590/s1415-43662008000200006.
5. Nannetti DC, Souza RJ, Faquin V. Efeito da aplicação de nitrogen e potássio via fertirrigação, na cultura do pimentão (Portuguese) [Effect of nitrogen and potassium application via fertigation on sweet pepper crop]. Horticultura Brasileira 2000; 18(1): 843–845.
6. De Oliveira AB, Hernandez FFF, Assis Júnior RN. Green coconut coir fiber, an alternative substrate to eggplant seedling. Revista Ciencia Agronomica 2008; 39(1): 39–44.
7. Koppen W. Climatologia: Con un estudio de los climas de la tierra (Spanish) [Climatology: With a study of the climates of the earth]. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica; 1948. p. 478.
8. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA). Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos (Portuguese) [Brazilian system of soil classification]. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério da Agricultura e do Abastecimento; 2006. p. 306.
9. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA). Manual de métodos de análises de solo (Spanish) [Solo analysis methods manual]. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério da Agricultura e do Abastecimento; 1997. p. 212.
10. Martinez EPM, Carvalho JG, Souza RB. Diagnose foliar. In: Ribeiro AC, Guimarães PTG, Alvarez VH (editors). Recomendações para o uso de corretivos e fertilizantes em Minas Gerais: 5a aproximação (Portuguese) [Recommendations for the use of correctives and fertilizers in Minas Gerais: 5th approach]. Viçosa: CFSEMG; 1999. p. 143–168.
11. Bernardo S, Soares AA, Mantovani EC. Manual de Irrigação (Portuguese) [Irrigation manual]. 7th ed. Viçosa: Editora UFV; 2005. p. 611.
12. Doorenbos J, Kassam AH. Yields response to water. Rome: FAO; 1979. p. 306.
13. Malavolta E. ABC da adubação (Portuguese) [ABC of fertilization]. 5th ed. São Paulo: Agronómica Ceres; 1989. p. 292.
14. Swiader JM, Moore A. SPAD-chlorophyll response to nitrogen fertilization and evaluation of nitrogen status in dryland and irrigated pumpkins. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2002; 25(5): 1089–1100. doi:10.1081/pln-120003941.
15. Luengo RFA, Calbo AG, Lana MM, et al. Classificação de hortaliças (Portuguese) [Classification of vegetables]. Brasília: Embrapa Hortaliças; 1999. p. 27–33.
16. Adolfo Lutz Institute. Normas analíticas do Instituto Adolfo Lutz: Métodos químicos e físicos para análises de alimentos (Portuguese) [Analytical standards of the Adolfo Lutz Institute: Chemical and physical methods for food analysis]. 4th ed. São Paulo: Instituto Adolfo Lutz; 2008. p. 1020.
17. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis of AOAC international.16. Rockville: Gaithersburg ed. AOAC international; 1997. p. 1141.
18. Antonini ACC, Robles WGR, Tessarioli Neto J, et al. Yield potential of eggplant cultivars. Horticultura Brasileira 2002; 20(4): 646–648.
19. doi: 10.1590/s0102-05362002000400027.
20. Filgueira FAR. Novo manual de olericultura: Agrotecnologia modern ana produção e comercialização de hortaliças (Portuguese) [New horticulture manual: Modern agrotechnology in the production and marketing of vegetables]. Viçosa: EditoraUFV; 2008. p. 421.
21. Marcussi FFN, Godoy LJG, Bóas RL. Nitrogen and potassium fertilization in sweet pepper culture based on N and K accumulation by plants. Brazilian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 2004; 9(1): 41–51.
22. Santos KA, Karam LM, Freitas RJS, et al. Composição química da berinjela (Solanum melongena L.) (Portuguese) [Chemical composition of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.)]. BCEPPA 2002; 20(2): 247–256. doi:10.5380/cep.v20i2.1250.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/th.v3i1.1781
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.