Contingency versus inevitability: a review and reinterpretation of Stephen Jay Gould’s book “Wonderful Life—The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History”
Vol 6, Issue 1, 2023
VIEWS - 279 (Abstract) 289 (PDF)
Abstract
In 1989, Stephen Jay Gould published his Wonderful Life: “High in the Canadian Rockies is a small limestone quarry formed 530 million years ago called the Burgess Shale. It holds the remains of an ancient sea where dozens of strange creatures lived a forgotten corner of evolution preserved in awesome detail. In this book Stephen Jay Gould explores what the Burgess Shale tells us about evolution and the nature of history”. Gould, based upon a reinterpretation of the famous fossils from the Burgess Shale, proposed a conclusion that was revolutionary at the time, because it was centred on the notion of contingency in the course of biological evolution. The very last paragraph displayed in particular the following sentences: “This response does not cite a single law of nature; it embodies no statement about predictable evolutionary pathways, no calculation of probabilities based on general rules of anatomy or ecology. I do not think that any ‘higher’ answer can be given, and I cannot imagine that any resolution could be more fascinating.” In this essay, I intend to criticise Gould’s conclusions and to provide a new reinterpretation of the history of life, based not on contingency but on the inevitability of evolution.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Gould, SJ. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. W. W. Norton; 1989.
2. Lodé T. Neither God nor Darwin, evolutionary ecology (French). Available online: https://monde-libertaire.net/index.php?articlen=&article=Ni_Dieu_Ni_Darwin_lecologie_evolutive_-_2 (accessed on 12 November 2023).
3. Dolgin E. Phylogeny: Rewriting evolution. Nature. 2012, 486(7404): 460-462. doi: 10.1038/486460a
4. Sterelny K, Griffiths PE, Griffiths P. Sex and death: An introduction to philosophy of biology. University of Chicago Press; 1999.
5. Jacquard A. Putting science at risk? Concerns from a geneticist (French). Seuil; 1982.
6. Erwin DH. Evolutionary contingency. Current Biology. 2006, 16(19): R825-R826. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.076
7. Powell R, Mariscal C. Convergent evolution as natural experiment: the tape of life reconsidered. Interface Focus. 2015, 5(6): 20150040. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2015.0040
8. Morris SC. The runes of evolution: how the universe became self-aware. Templeton Press; 2015.
9. Grehan JR, Ainsworth R. Orthogenesis and Evolution. Systematic Zoology. 1985, 34(2): 174. doi: 10.2307/2413325
10. Liu SV. Evolution: An Integrated Theory–Criticisms on Darwinism–Fifteen Years Ago. Pioneer. 2006, 1(1): 10-28.
11. Denton MJ. The Types: A Persistent Structuralist Challenge to Darwinian Pan-Selectionism. BIO-Complexity. 2013, 2013(3): 1–18. doi: 10.5048/bio-c.2013.3
12. Online dictionary of philosophy (French). Available online: https://dicophilo.fr/definition/loi/ (accessed on 12 November 2023).
13. CNRTL. National Centre for Textual and Lexical Resources (French) Available online: https://www.cnrtl.fr/definition/loi (accessed on 12 November 2023).
14. French version of Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia (French). Available online: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loi_naturelle (accessed on 12 November 2023).
15. Alibert P, Claude J, Debat V, et al. Constraints (French). In: Thomas F, Lefèvre T, Raymond M (editors). Evolutionary Biology. De Boeck Université; 2010.
16. Dawkins R. River Out of Eden — A Darwinian View of Life. BasicBooks, New York; 1995.
17. Orgogozo V. Replaying the tape of life in the twenty-first century. Interface Focus. 2015, 5(6): 20150057. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2015.0057
18. Lobkovsky AE, Koonin EV. Replaying the Tape of Life: Quantification of the Predictability of Evolution. Frontiers in Genetics. 2012, 3. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00246
19. Vermeij GJ. Historical contingency and the purported uniqueness of evolutionary innovations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006, 103(6): 1804-1809. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508724103
20. Conway Morris S. The predictability of evolution: glimpses into a post-Darwinian world. Naturwissenschaften. 2009, 96(11): 1313-1337. doi: 10.1007/s00114-009-0607-9
21. Blount ZD, Lenski RE, Losos JB. Contingency and determinism in evolution: Replaying life’s tape. Science. 2018, 362(6415). doi: 10.1126/science.aam5979
22. Chen L, DeVries AL, Cheng CHC. Convergent evolution of antifreeze glycoproteins in Antarctic notothenioid fish and Arctic cod. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1997, 94(8): 3817-3822. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3817
23. He Z, Xu S, Shi S. Adaptive convergence at the genomic level—prevalent, uncommon or very rare? National Science Review. 2020, 7(6): 947-951. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa076
24. Xu S, Wang J, Guo Z, et al. Genomic Convergence in the Adaptation to Extreme Environments. Plant Communications. 2020, 1(6): 100117. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2020.100117
25. Fraser BA, Whiting JR. What can be learned by scanning the genome for molecular convergence in wild populations? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2019, 1476(1): 23-42. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14177
26. Popper, K. (1980). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge.
27. Williams DB. Re-examining the Burgess Shale. Earth — The Science Behind the Headlines. Available online: https://www.earthmagazine.org/article/re-examining-burgess-shale (accessed on 12 November 2023).
28. Briggs DEG. Extraordinary fossils reveal the nature of Cambrian life: a commentary on Whittington (1975) ‘The enigmatic animalOpabinia regalis, Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia.’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2015, 370(1666): 20140313. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0313
29. Denton M. French translation of Evolution: a theory in crisis (French). Champs Sciences; 1985.
30. Moreel JF. Darwinism, the wrong side of the theory (French). François-Xavier de Guibert; 2007.
31. Pigliucci M, Müller GB, eds. Evolution, the Extended Synthesis. Published online March 26, 2010. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262513678.001.0001
32. Raoult D. Beyond Darwin — Evolution as you never imagined it (French). Plon; 2010.
33. Pelt JM. A botanist’s view on evolution (French). Fayard; 2011.
34. Shapiro JA. Evolution — A view from the 21st century. FT Press Science; 2011.
35. Denton M. Evolution: still a theory in crisis. Discovery Institute Press; 2016.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/tge.v6i1.2693
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.