Analysis on the sustainable realization path of natural resource asset value
Vol 5, Issue 2, 2022
VIEWS - 392 (Abstract) 232 (PDF)
Abstract
Based on Marx’s labor theory of value, this paper explains the connotation of the new era of the theory of “two mountains” and its value to the assets of natural resources. The present path carries on the theoretical analysis, uses the case analysis method, the qualitative research method, analyzes the path to realize the value of natural resource assets and the problems faced in the operation process of the “forest ecological bank” operation mode, probes into the natural resources asset value sustainable realization path. The results show that the operation mode of “forest ecological bank” is based on ecological resources, through accurate investigation, on the premise of defining the property rights of ecological resources, using economic methods to calculate its value, directly or indirectly using ownership transactions, ecological service transactions, industrialization and other ways to monetize ecological products. Therefore, we should establish the property right system of market-oriented ecological factors, introduce the main body of market management to develop ecological industry, and establish a “public-private partnership” ecological product trading system, so as to promote the sustainable realization of the value of natural resources assets.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Zhang W, Zhang X. Capitalization of ecological resources: a framework statement. Reform 2019; (1): 122131.
2. Li G, Liu S. 40 years of ecological compensation in China: Policy evolution and theoretical logic. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences) 2018; 38(6): 101112.
3. Miao X, Zhao Z. Impact of transfer payment in eco-functional areas on eco-environmental improvement: Capital compensation or institutional incentives? Finance Research 2019; (5): 1732.
4. Cai J, Yang W. A comparative study on the regional effects of government purchase of ecological public services—Empirical analysis of commercial forests redeeming in key ecological areas in Fujian. Forestry Economics 2020; 42(2): 6982.
5. Hu Y, Wu J, Hu R. Internal logic and development path of the “two mountains” theory for ecological civilization construction. China Engineering Science 2019; (5): 151158.
6. Adhikari RK, Kindu M, Pokharel R, et al. Financial compensation for biodiversity conservation in Ba Be National Park of Northern Vietnam. Journal for Nature Conservation 2017; 35(2): 92100.
7. Li W, Wang Y, Liu X. Study on the eco-compensation standard of forest ecosystem—Exampled by Yichun forestry administration as an example. Issues of Forestry Economics 2012; 32(5): 427432.
8. Wang J, Zeng Z, Li Y. Quyu shengtai buchang jizhi goujian de lilun fanshi yu shijian jinlu fujiansheng zhongdian shengtai quwei shangpinlin shumai gaige anli fenxi (Chinese) [The theoretical paradigm and practice of the construction of regional ecological compensation mechanism a case study on the redemption reform of key ecological location commodity forest in Fujian Province]. Fujian Tribune (the Humanities & Social Sciences Monthly) 2019; (11): 185193.
9. Zhang D, Xue Q. Research on the classification of forestry PPP projects and payment mechanism. Forestry economics 2018; 40(5): 9196.
10. Zou F, Chen Q. Research on the construction of “forestry-tourism” ecological industry chain. Issues of Forestry Economics 2019; 39(6): 590598.
11. Yang G, Chen Y. Study on the construction and risk prevention of forestry carbon emissions trading market in China. Forestry economics 2017; 39(9): 8893.
12. Li N, Yuan J. The Chinese sample of forestry carbon voluntary trade—Set up carbon trade system and monetize ecological products. Forest resources management 2015; (5): 17.
13. Xiao Z, Chen Y. China’s emissions trading status and subsequent market development ideas. Forestry economics 2012; (3): 8184.
14. Anand PB. Right to water and access to water: An assessment. Journal of International Development 2010; 19(4): 511526.
15. Shen D, Zhang M. Building and application of water resources use development path. Journal of Natural Resources 2016; 31(12): 20602073.
16. Liu M. China’s energy-consuming right trading scheme: From the dimension of institutional linkage. China Population, Resources and Environment 2017; 27(10): 217224.
17. Liu Y. Problems and countermeasures of China’s green finance. China Forestry Economics 2020; (2): 127129.
18. Qiu S, Jin L. International experience and reference of value realization of ecological goods. Reform of Economic System 2019; (3): 157162.
19. Hu Y, Gu S. Research trends and analysis of natural resource assets. Resources Science 2018; 40(6): 10951105.
20. Qiu S, Pang J, Jin L. Value realization mechanism of ecological goods in natural resources: An analytical framework of the regime complex. China Land Science 2021; 35(1): 1017, 25.
21. Marx KH. Das Kapital, Volume I. The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin Compilation Bureau (translator). Beijing: People’s Publishing House; 2004. p. 4760.
22. Ma X, He R, Hong J. Shengtai chanpin jiazhi shixian lujing tanxi: Jiyu makesi zhuyi jiaozhilun de xinshidai tuozhan (Chinese) [An analysis of the path to realize the value of ecological products: The expansion of the new era based on Marxist theory of value]. Study and Practice 2020; (3): 2835.
23. Yang Y. Ziran ziyuan jiazhilun: Laodong jiazhilun jiaodu de jieshi jiqi yiyi (Chinese) [The theory of natural resources value: The explanation and significance of labor theory of value]. Economic Review 2002; (1): 5255.
24. Hou Y. Ecological implications of Marx’s Labor Theory of Value. Study and Exploration 2019; (11): 3339.
25. Wang H, Jiang X, Chen J, et al. A theoretical explanation for the relationships between “green hills” and “golden hills”. Chinese Rural Economy 2017; (4): 212.
26. Ke S, Zhu L, Yuan H, et al. An economic interpretation and policy enlightenment of the “two mountains” theory: An analysis based on the example of complete cessation of commercial logging of natural forests. Chinese Rural Economy 2018; (12): 5266.
27. Zhang L. The logical Integrity of Marx’s Labor Theory of Value. Teaching and Research 2018; (4): 511.
28. Yi X, Huang X, Yin C. et al. Estimation and realization path of agricultural resource values in Fujian Province. Strategic Study of CAE 2019; 21(5): 137143.
29. Xu S. A study on the optimal institutional arrangement of ecological property rights based on separation of property rights. Journal of Finance and Economics 2017; 43(1): 6374.
30. Li Y. Theoretical exploration on the constructing property rights trading mechanism of forest ecological resources. Issues of Forestry Economics 2020; 40(2): 181188.
31. Cui L, Li X, Cheng Z. Ziran ziyuan zibenhua shixian jizhi yanjiu—Yi nanpingshi shengtai yinhang weili (Chinese) [Study on the realization mechanism of natural resources capitalization—Taking Nanping “ecological bank” as an example]. Management World 2019; 35(9): 95100.
32. Huang Y, Wen T, Fan Y, et al. Economies of scale, multi-incentives and realization of Ecological products value: Summary of experience of “forest eco-bank” in Nanping, Fujian. Issues of Forestry Economics 2020; 40(5): 499509.
33. Luo B. The new institutional economics. Taiyuan: Shanxi Economic Publishing House; 2005. p. 244253.
34. Xiong D, Zhang M. Study on realization mechanism of the economic value of the ecological resources—Based on the historical changes of tea industry in Guizhou Province. Forestry economics 2020; 42(2): 5158.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/nrcr.v5i2.1581
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Shuiguang Chen, Zijie Lan, Shipeng Su
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.