Prioritization for the conservation of Mexico’s cloud forests

LM Ochoa-Ochoa, NR Mejía-Domínguez, J Bezaury-Creel

Article ID: 1550
Vol 4, Issue 1, 2021

VIEWS - 849 (Abstract) 242 (pdf)

Abstract


Cloud forests are ecosystems with a restricted distribution and high biodiversity, but they are highly threatened due to land use change. The objective of this study is to evaluate and prioritize existing cloud forest fragments to achieve their long-term conservation, combining threat levels and the potential response capacity of various conservation instruments in Mexico, through a triage tool. Threat levels were calculated based on human disturbance coverage, estimated specifically for Mexico. The response capacity was estimated using the presence of the different conservation instruments in each fragment. Once the triage level per fragment was obtained, these were analyzed by ecoregion. The results showed that the area of primary cloud forest, has been reduced between 53–73%, and only 31.6% (including primary and secondary forest) is under some protection scheme. We identified a group of fragments on the Pacific slope that require special attention due to the small coverage and their high level of priority. The ecoregions: Sierra Madre del Sur of Guerrero and Oaxaca, Los Altos de Chiapas, Sierra Madre Oriental and Central Mexico corresponding to the largest concentration of cloud forest in the trans-Mexican volcanic belt,70% of which are listed as a priority for emergency protection.


Keywords


Biodiversity; Government Protected Natural Areas; Social Instruments for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity; Montane Mesophyll Forest; Ecoregions

Full Text:

pdf


References


1. CONABIO. El Bosque Mesófilo de Montana en México: Amenazas y oportunidades para su conservación y manejo sostenible (Spanish) [The Montana Mesophilic Forest in Mexico: Threats and opportunities for its conservation and sustainable management]. Mexico: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad; 2010.

2. González-Espinosa M, Meave JA, Ramírez-Marcial N, et al. Los bosques de niebla de México: conservación y restauración de su componente arbóreo (Spanish) [The cloud forests of Mexico: Conservation and restoration of its arboreal component]. Ecosistemas 2012; 21(1–2): 36–52.

3. Ochoa-Ochoa LM, Mejia-Dominguez NR. Fauna de los Bosques Mesófilos de Montaña (Spanish) [Fauna of the mesophilic forests of Montana]. In: Gual-Diaz M, and Rendón-Correa A (editors.). Bosques Mesófilos de Montana de México: Diversidad, Ecología y Manejo. Mexico: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad; 2014. p. 237–247.

4. Rzedowski J. Vegetación de México (Spanish) [Vegetation of Mexico]. Mexico: Limusa; 1978.

5. Luna-Vega I, Velázquez A, Velázquez E. 2001b. Mexico. In: Kappelle M, Brown AD (editors). Bosques nublados del Neotrópico (Spanish) [Neotropical cloud forests]. San José, Costa Rica: Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad; 2001. p. 183–229.

6. Mejía-Domínguez NR, Meave JA, Ruiz-Jiménez CA. Análisis estructural de un bosque mesófilo de montaña en el extremo oriental de la Sierra Madre del Sur (Oaxaca), México (Spanish) [Structural analysis of a montane cloud forest in the eastern end of the Sierra Madre del Sur (Oaxaca), Mexico]. Botanical Sciences 2004; (74): 13–29.

7. Villaseñor JL. El bosque húmedo de montaña en México y sus plantas vasculares: Catálogo florístico-taxonómico (Spanish) [The humid mountain forest in Mexico and its vascular plants: Floristic-taxonomic catalog]. DF, México: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2010.

8. Rzedowski J. El extremo boreal del bosque tropical siempre verde en Norteamérica continental (Spanish) [The boreal edge of tropical evergreen forest in continental North America]. Vegetatio 1963; 11(4): 173–198.

9. Gómez-Pompa A. Ecología de la Vegetación de Veracruz (Spanish) [Vegetation ecology of Veracruz]. A.C., Xalapa: Instituto de Investigaciones sobre Recursos Bióticos; 1982.

10. Beard JS. The classification of tropical American vegetation-types. Ecology 1955; 36(1): 89–100.

11. Hamilton LS, Juvik JO, Scatena FN. The Puerto Rico tropical cloud forest symposium: Introduction and workshop synthesis. Tropical montane cloud forests. New York: Springer; 1995. p. 1–18.

12. Miranda F. Estudios sobre la vegetación de México. V. Rasgos de la vegetación de la Cuenca del Río Balsas (Spanish) [Studies on the vegetation of Mexico. V. Characteristics of the vegetation of the Balsas River Basin]. Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural 1947; 8: 95–114.

13. Rzedowski J, McVaugh R. La vegetación de la Nueva Galicia (Spanish) [The vegetation of Nueva Galicia]. Contributions of the University of Chicago Herbarium 1966; 9: 1–123.

14. Ortega Escalona F, Castillo Campos G. El bosque mesófilo de montaña y su importancia forestall (Spanish) [The mountain mesophyll forest and its forest importance]. Ciencias 1996; (43): 32–39.

15. Rzedowski J, Palacios-Chávez R. El bosque de Engelhardtia (Oreomunnea) mexicana en la región de la Chinantla (Oaxaca, México): Una reliquia del Cenozoico (Spanish) [The Mexican Engelhardtia (Oreomunnea) forest in the Chinantla region (Oaxaca, Mexico): A relic of the Cenozoic]. a)Botanical Sciences 1977; (36): 93–127.

16. Mayorga-Saucedo R, Luna-Vega I, Alcántara-Ayala O. Floristic of the cloud Forest of Molocotlan, Molango-Xochucoatlan, Hidalgo, Mexico. Botanical Sciences 1998; (63): 101–119.

17. Barthlott W, Schmit-Neuerburg V, Nieder J, et al. Diversity and abundance of vascular epiphytes: A comparison of secondary vegetation and primary montane rain forest in the Venezuelan Andes. Plant ecology 2001; 152(2): 145–156.

18. Gonzáalez-Espinosa M, Meave JA, Lorea-Hernáandez FG, et al. The red list of Mexican cloud forest trees [Master’s thesis]. Cambridge, UK: Fauna & Flora International; 2011.

19. Sánchez-ramo SG, Dirzo R, Gual-Díaz M, et al. El bosque mesófilo de montaña: Un ecosistema prioritario amenazado (Spanish) [The montane cloud forest: A threatened priority ecosystem]. In: Gual-Díaz M, and Rendón-Correa A (editors). Bosques Mesófilos de Montaña de México: Diversidad, Ecología y Manejo (Spanish) [Mesophilic mountain forests of Mexico: Diversity, ecology and management]. México: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad; 2014. p. 109–139.

20. Bruijnzeel LA, Proctor J. Hydrology and biogeochemistry of tropical montane cloud forests: What do we really know? Tropical montane cloud forests. , New York: Springer; 1995. p. 38–78.

21. Anchukaitis KJ, Evans MN. Tropical cloud forest climate variability and the demise of the Monteverde golden toad. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010; 107(11): 5036–5040.

22. Mulligan M. Modeling the tropics-wide extent and distribution of cloud forest and cloud forest loss, with implications for conservation priority. Tropical montane cloud forests: Science for conservation and management 2010; 740: 16–38.

23. Rojas-Soto OR, Sosa V, Ornelas JF. Forecasting cloud forest in eastern and southern Mexico: conservation insights under future climate change scenarios. Biodiversity and Conservation 2012; 21(10): 2671–2690.

24. Rzedowski J. Análisis preliminar de la flora vascular de los bosques mesófilos de montaña de México (Spanish) [Preliminary analysis of the vascular flora of the montane cloud forests of Mexico]. Acta Botánica Mexicana 1996; (35): 25–44.

25. Challenger A. Utilización y conservación de los ecosistemas terrestres de México: Pasado, presente y future (Spanish) [Use and conservation of terrestrial ecosystems in Mexico: Past, present and future]. Mexico: Comisión Nacional para el Concimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad; 1998.

26. Luna-Vega I, Morrone JJ, Ayala OA, et al. Biogeographical affinities among Neotropical cloud forests. Plant Systematics and Evolution 2001; 228(3): 229–239.

27. Halffter G, Llorente-Bousquets J, Morrone JJ. La perspectiva biogeográfica histórica, en Capital Natural de México, vol. I: Conocimiento actual de la biodiversidad (Spanish) [The historical biogeographical perspective, in Natural Capital of Mexico. vol. I: Current knowledge of biodiversity]. Mexico: CONABIO; 2008.

28. Ornelas JF, Sosa V, Soltis DE, et al. Comparative phylogeographic analyses illustrate the complex evolutionary history of threatened cloud forests of northern Mesoamerica. PloS One 2013; 8(2): e56283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056283.

29. Rovito SM, Vásquez-Almazán CR, Papenfuss TJ, et al. Biogeography and evolution of Central American cloud forest salamanders (Caudata: Plethodontidae: Cryptotriton), with the description of a new species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 2015; 175(1): 150–166.

30. Watson DM, Peterson AT. Determinants of diversity in a naturally fragmented landscape: humid montane forest avifaunas of Mesoamerica. Ecography 1999; 22(5): 582–589.

31. Marshall CJ, Liebherr JK. Cladistic biogeography of the Mexican transition zone. Journal of Biogeography 2000; 27(1): 203–216.

32. Toledo-Aceves T, Meave JA, González-Espinosa M, et al. Tropical montane cloud forests: Current threats and opportunities for their conservation and sustainable management in Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management 2011; 92(3): 974–981.

33. Rosete-Vergés FA, Pérez-Damián JL, Villalobos-Delgado M, et al. El avance de la deforestación en México 1976–2007 (Spanish) [The advance of deforestation in Mexico]. Madera y Bosques 2014; 20(1): 21–35.

34. Mas JF, Velázquez A, Couturier S. La evaluación de los cambios de cobertura/uso del suelo en la República Mexicana (Spanish) [The evaluation of land cover/use changes in the Mexican Republic]. Investigación Ambiental 2009; 1(1): 23–39.

35. CONABIO-SEMARNAT. Cuarto Informe Nacional de México al Convenio sobre Diversidad Biológica (CDB) (Spanish) [Fourth National Report of Mexico to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)]. México: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad y Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales; 2009.

36. Ochoa-Ochoa LM, Bezaury-Creel JE, Vázquez LB, et al. Choosing the survivors? A GIS-based triage support tool for micro-endemics: Application to data for Mexican amphibians. Biological Conservation 2011; 144(11): 2710–2718.

37. Bezaury-Creel J, Gutiérrez-Carbonell D. Áreas naturales protegidas y desarrollo social en México (Spanish) [Protected natural areas and social development in Mexico]. México: CONABIO; 2009. p. 385–431.

38. INEGI. Conjunto Nacional de Uso de Suelo y Vegetación (1968, 1971–1986) (Spanish) [National set of land use and vegetation (1968, 1971–1986)]. Scale 1:250 000, Series I. Mexico: DGG-INEGI; 1993.

39. INEGI. Conjunto Nacional de Uso de Suelo y Vegetación (1993–1999) (Spanish) [National set of land use and vegetation (1993–1999)]. Scale 1:250 000, Series II. Mexico: DGG-INEGI; 1999.

40. INEGI. Conjunto Nacional de Uso de Suelo y Vegetación (2007–2008) (Spanish) [National set of land use and vegetation (2007–2008)]. Scale 1:250 000, Series IV. Mexico: DGG-INEGI; 2010.

41. INEGI. Conjunto Nacional de Uso de Suelo y Vegetación (2012–2013) (Spanish) [National set of land use and vegetation (2012–2013)]. Scale 1:250 000, Series V. Mexico: DGG-INEGI; 2013.

42. Rzedowski J. Vegetación Potencial (Spanish) [Potential vegetation]. IV.8.2. Atlas Nacional de México. Vol II. Escala 1:4 000 000. México: Instituto de Geografía, UNAM; 1990.

43. INEGI. Conjunto Nacional de Uso de Suelo y Vegetación (2002–2005) (Spanish) [National set of land use and vegetation (2002–2005)]. Scale 1:250 000, Series III. Mexico: DGG-INEGI; 2005.

44. SEMARNAT. Unidades de Manejo para el Aprovechamiento Sustentable de la Vida Silvestre 2016 (Spanish) [Management units for the sustainable use of wildlife 2016]. Scale: 1:0. Edition: 2a. México: Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales; 2016.

45. Bezauri-Creel JE, Torres-Origel JF, Ochoa-Ochoa LM, et al. Áreas naturales protegidas y otros espacios dedicados a la conservación, restauración y uso sustentable de la biodiversidad en México (Spanish) [Protected natural areas and other spaces dedicated to the conservation, restoration and sustainable use of biodiversity in Mexico]. Capas ArcGis [CD-ROM]. México: The Nature Conservacy; 2012.

46. Bezauri-Creel JE, Torres-Origel JF, Ochoa-Ochoa LM. Base de datos geográfica de áreas naturales protegidas federales y áreas bajo manejo de conservación federal en México (Spanish) [Geographic database of federal natural protected areas and areas under federal conservation management in Mexico]. Modified and adapted from CONANP 2016–Version 3.0. Updated 30/12/2016. 8 ArcGIS 9.2 layers + 3 Goggle Earth KMZ layers + 1. Word metadata file.

47. Bezauri-Creel JE, Ochoa-Ochoa LM. Base de Datos Geográfica de la Afectación Humana sobre el Territorio Mexicano (Spanish) [Geographic database of human impact on the Mexican territory]. Version 1.0, 07/2009. 2 raster format layers + 1 Goggle Earth KMZ layer + 1 Word Metadata File.

48. INEGI, CONABIO, INE. Ecorregiones terrestres de México (Spanish) [Terrestrial ecoregions of Mexico]. Scale: 1:1000 000. México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Instituto Nacional de Ecología; 2008.

49. INEGI. Carta de Vegetación Primaria (Tipos de Vegetación) (Spanish) [Primary vegetation chart (types of vegetation)]. Aguascalientes, México: INEGI; 2000.

50. Cayuela L, Golicher JD, Rey JS, et al. Classification of a complex landscape using Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2006; 27(10): 1951–1971.

51. Williams-Linera G. El bosque de niebla del centro de Veracruz: ecología, historia y destino en tiempos de fragmentación y cambio climático (Spanish) [The cloud forest of central Veracruz: Ecology, history and destiny in times of fragmentation and climate change]. AC, CONABIO, Xalapa: Instituto de Ecología; 2007.

52. Ruiz-Jiménez CA, Téllez-Valdés O, Luna-Vega I. Classification of the Mexican cloud forests: Floristic affinities. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 2012; 83(4): 1110–1144.

53. Toledo-Aceves T, García-Franco JG, Williams-Linera G, et al. Significance of remnant cloud forest fragments as reservoirs of tree and epiphytic bromeliad diversity. Tropical Conservation Science 2014; 7(2): 230–243.

54. Bezaury-Creel JE. El valor de los bienes y servicios que las áreas naturales protegidas proveen a los mexicanos (Spanish) [The value of goods and services that protected natural areas provide to Mexicans]. México: The Nature Conservancy; 2009.

55. Williams-Linera G, Toledo-Garibaldi M, Hernández CG. How heterogeneous are the cloud forest communities in the mountains of central Veracruz, Mexico? Plant Ecology 2013; 214(5): 685–701.

56. Bray DB, Merino-Pérez L. La experiencia de las comunidades forestales en México: veinticinco años de silvicultura y constucción de empresas forestales comunitarias (Spanish) [The experience of forest communities in Mexico: Twenty-five years of forestry and the construction of community forestry companies]. México: Instituto Nacional de Ecologíap; 2004.

57. Martin GJ, Camacho-Benavides C, del Campo-Garcia C, et al. Indigenous and community conserved areas in Oaxaca, Mexico. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 2011; 22(2): 250–266.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/nrcr.v4i1.1550

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 LM Ochoa-Ochoa, NR Mejía-Domínguez, J Bezaury-Creel

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.