Endosulfan (6,7,8,9,10,10-Hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-6,9-methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepine-3-oxide) is an off-patent insecticide used in agricultural farms. Its usage as a pesticide has become highly controversial over the last few decades. This is due to its reported hazardous nature to health and side effects like growth retardation, hydrocephalus, and undesired changes in the male and female hormones leading to complications in sexual maturity. Endosulfan is the main culprit among all pesticide poisoning incidents around the world. Though the usage of this dreaded pesticide is banned by most countries, the high stability of this molecule to withstand degradation for a long period poses a threat to mankind even today. So, it has become highly essential to detect the presence of this poisonous pesticide in the drinking water and milk around these places. It is also advisable to check the presence of this toxic material in the blood of the population living in and around these places so that an early and appropriate management strategy can be adopted. With this aim, we have developed a sensor for endosulfan that displayed high selectivity and sensitivity among all other common analytes in water and biological samples, with a wide linear concentration range (2 fM to 2 mM), a low detection limit (2 fM), and rapid response. A citrate-functionalized cadmium-selenium quantum dot was used for this purpose, which showed a concentration-dependent fluorescence enhancement, enabling easy and sensitive sensing. This sensor was utilized to detect endosulfan in different sources of water, human blood serum, and milk samples with good recoveries. It is also noted that the quantum dot forms a stable complex with endosulfan and is easy to separate from the contaminated source, paving the way for purifying the contaminated water. More detailed tests and validation of the sensor are needed to confirm these observations.

1. Guerrini L, Aliaga AE, Cárcamo J, et al. Functionalization of Ag nanoparticles with the bis-acridinium lucigenin as a chemical assembler in the detection of persistent organic pollutants by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Analytica Chimica Acta 2008; 624(2): 286–293. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.06.038

2. Paul V, Balasubramaniam E, Kazi M. The neurobehavioural toxicity of endosulfan in rats: A serotonergic involvement in learning impairment. European Journal of Pharmacology: Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 1994; 270(1): 1–7. doi: 10.1016/0926-6917(94)90074-4

3. Sinha N, Adhikari N, K. Saxena D. Effect of endosulfan during fetal gonadal differentiation on spermatogenesis in rats. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 2001; 10(1–2): 29–32. doi: 10.1016/s1382-6689(01)00066-7

4. Saiyed H, Dewan A, Bhatnagar V, et al. Effect of endosulfan on male reproductive development. Environmental Health Perspectives 2003; 111(16): 1958–1962. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6271

5. Wilkes PS. Gas-liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric confirmation of endosulfan and endosulfan sulfate in apples and carrots. Journal of AOAC International 1981; 64(5): 1208–1210. doi: 10.1093/jaoac/64.5.1208

6. Ishaq Z, Nawaz MA. Analysis of contaminated milk with organochlorine pesticide residues using gas chromatography. International Journal of Food Properties 2018; 21(1): 879–891. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2018.1460607

7. Siddique T, Zahir ZA, Frankenberger WT. Reversed‐phase liquid chromatographic method for analysis of endosulfan and its major metabolites. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies 2003; 26(7): 1069–1082. doi: 10.1081/jlc-120020094

8. Zhou X, Guan S, Li N, et al. Development of indirect competitive ELISA and colloidal gold immunochromatographic strip for endosulfan detection based on a monoclonal antibody. Foods 2023; 12(4): 736. doi: 10.3390/foods12040736

9. Shah M, Kolhe P, Gandhi S. Nano-assembly of multiwalled carbon nanotubes for sensitive voltammetric responses for the determination of residual levels of endosulfan. Chemosphere 2023; 321: 138148. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138148

10. Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences. Public health statement for endosulfan. Available online: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp41-c1-b.pdf (accessed on 8 January 2024).

11. Nsibande SA, Forbes PBC. Fluorescence detection of pesticides using quantum dot materials—A review. Analytica Chimica Acta 2016; 945: 9–22. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.10.002

12. Priyadarshini E, Pradhan N. Gold nanoparticles as efficient sensors in colorimetric detection of toxic metal ions: A review. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2017; 238: 888–902. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.06.081

13. Saha K, Agasti SS, Kim C, et al. Gold nanoparticles in chemical and biological sensing. Chemical Reviews 2012; 112(5): 2739–2779. doi: 10.1021/cr2001178

14. Eustis S, El-Sayed MA. Why gold nanoparticles are more precious than pretty gold: Noble metal surface plasmon resonance and its enhancement of the radiative and nonradiative properties of nanocrystals of different shapes. Chemical Society Reviews. 2006; 35(3): 209–217. doi: 10.1039/b514191e

15. Nair RV, Nair LV, Govindachar DM, et al. Luminescent gold nanorods to enhance the near‐infrared emission of a photosensitizer for targeted cancer imaging and dual therapy: Experimental and theoretical approach. Chemistry—A European Journal 2020; 26(13): 2826–2836. doi: 10.1002/chem.201904952

16. Nair RV, Radhakrishna Pillai Suma P, Jayasree RS. A dual signal on-off fluorescent nanosensor for the simultaneous detection of copper and creatinine. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2020; 109: 110569. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110569

17. Nair LV, Philips DS, Jayasree RS, et al. A near‐infrared fluorescent nanosensor (AuC@Urease) for the selective detection of blood urea. Small 2013; 9(16): 2673–2677. doi: 10.1002/smll.201300213

18. Nair LakshmiV, Nagaoka Y, Maekawa T, et al. Quantum dot tailored to single wall carbon nanotubes: A multifunctional hybrid nanoconstruct for cellular imaging and targeted photothermal therapy. Small 2014; 10(14): 2771–2775. doi: 10.1002/smll.201400418

19. Suma PRP, Nair RV, Paul W, et al. Vanadium pentoxide nanoplates: Synthesis, characterization and unveiling the intrinsic anti-bacterial activity. Materials Letters 2020; 269: 127673. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.127673

20. Daniel MC, Astruc D. Gold nanoparticles: Assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chemical Reviews 2003; 104(1): 293–346. doi: 10.1021/cr030698+

21. Jibin K, Prasad JS, Saranya G, et al. Optically controlled hybrid metamaterial of plasmonic spiky gold inbuilt graphene sheets for bimodal imaging guided multimodal therapy. Biomaterials Science 2020; 8(12): 3381–3391. doi: 10.1039/d0bm00312c

22. Nair RV, Santhakumar H, Jayasree RS. Gold nanorods decorated with a cancer drug for multimodal imaging and therapy. Faraday Discussions 2018; 207: 423–435. doi: 10.1039/c7fd00185a

23. Santhakumar H, Nair ResmiV, Philips DS, et al. Real time imaging and dynamics of hippocampal Zn2+ under epileptic condition using a ratiometric fluorescent probe. Scientific Reports 2018; 8(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27029-5

24. Nair LV, Nair RV, Shenoy SJ, et al. Blood brain barrier permeable gold nanocluster for targeted brain imaging and therapy: An in vitro and in vivo study. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 2017; 5(42): 8314–8321. doi: 10.1039/c7tb02247f

25. Nair LV, Nazeer SS, Jayasree RS, et al. Fluorescence imaging assisted photodynamic therapy using photosensitizer-linked gold quantum clusters. ACS Nano 2015; 9(6): 5825–5832. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b00406

26. Chan WCW, Nie S. Quantum dot bioconjugates for ultrasensitive nonisotopic detection. Science 1998; 281(5385): 2016–2018. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5385.2016

27. Algar WR, Tavares AJ, Krull UJ. Beyond labels: A review of the application of quantum dots as integrated components of assays, bioprobes, and biosensors utilizing optical transduction. Analytica Chimica Acta 2010; 673(1): 1–25. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.05.026

28. Li M, Chen T, Gooding JJ, et al. Review of carbon and graphene quantum dots for sensing. ACS Sensors 2019; 4(7): 1732–1748. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.9b00514

29. Deepak TS, Shenoy RS, Manonmani HK. Development of fluorescence immunoassay based on cadmium sulphide (cds) quantum dots for the detection of endosulfan. International Journal of Current Advanced Research 2016; 5(4): 744–748.

30. Sreekumaran Nair A, Tom RT, Pradeep T. Detection and extraction of endosulfan by metal nanoparticles. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 2003; 5(2): 363–365. doi: 10.1039/b300107e

31. Bakhsh H, Buledi JA, Khand NH, et al. NiO nanostructures based functional none-enzymatic electrochemical sensor for ultrasensitive determination of endosulfan in vegetables. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization 2021; 15(3): 2695–2704. doi: 10.1007/s11694-021-00860-7

32. Goel P, Arora M. Fabrication of chemical sensor for organochlorine pesticide detection using colloidal gold nanoparticles. MRS Communications 2018; 8(3): 1000–1007. doi: 10.1557/mrc.2018.125

33. Masibi KK, Fayemi OE, Adekunle AS, et al. Electrochemical detection of endosulfan using an AONP-PANI-SWCNT modified glassy carbon electrode. Materials 2021; 14(4): 723. doi: 10.3390/ma14040723

34. Amiri GR, Fatahian S, Mahmoudi S. Preparation and optical properties assessment of CdSe quantum dots. Materials Sciences and Applications 2013; 04(02): 134–137. doi: 10.4236/msa.2013.42015

35. Wang Z, Xiao X, Zou T, et al. Citric acid capped CdS quantum dots for fluorescence detection of copper ions (II) in aqueous solution. Nanomaterials 2018; 9(1): 32. doi: 10.3390/nano9010032