Quantification of the distortion present in the postero-anterior skull radiograph

Janneth Rocío Zúñiga Prado, Elizabeth Peña Tobar, Gloria Patricia Baena-Caldas

Article ID: 1733
Vol 4, Issue 1, 2021

VIEWS - 3484 (Abstract) 2479 (PDF)

Abstract


Introduction: It is universally accepted that the posteroanterior skull radiograph shows a lower degree of distortion than other radiographic images, so that measurements on it are considered reliable. Objective: To determine the percentage of distortion in the different facial regions of the postero-anterior skull radiograph. Methods: Thirty human skulls with their jaws were divided by three horizontal and four vertical planes into fifteen quadrants; there were ten in the skull and five in the jaw. On each of them a steel wire was placed in vertical and horizontal positions and their length (actual measurement) was measured. Each set was X-rayed in posteroanterior projection and the length of the wires was measured in the image (radiographic measurement). Results: It was not possible to measure in the lateral quadrants of the skull. The horizontal measurement in the right and left lower intermediate quadrants of the skull and in the intermediate and lateral quadrants of both sides of the mandible is not reliable; in the median quadrant of the mandible it is minimized; in the right and left upper intermediate and median quadrants of the skull and in the median of the mandible it is magnified. Vertical measurements in all quadrants are reliable; in the right and left upper intermediate and left upper and middle quadrants of the skull and in the right and left middle and lateral quadrants of the mandible it is magnified; in the lower intermediate and upper and lower middle quadrants of the skull and median of the mandible it is minimized. The least distortion for both measurements occurs in the upper median quadrant of the skull. Percentages of distortion are reported for each quadrant. Conclusions: Distortion is present in the posteroanterior skull radiograph and varies from one region of the face to another.


Keywords


Dental Radiography; Radiographic Magnification; Cephalometry; Skull

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Méndez JA. Evaluación de la distorsión en las radiografías laterales cefalométricas tomadas en nuestro medio (Spanish) [Evaluation of distortion in cephalometric lateral radiographs taken in our environment]. Revista Odonto Ciencia 2002; 11: 15–30.

2. Kim JY, Jung HD, Jung YS, et al. A simple classification of facial asymmetry by TML system. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 2014; 42(4): 313–320.

3. Perez I, Chavez AK, Ponce D. Applicability of the Ricketts’ postero-anterior cephalometry for sex de-termination using logistic regression analysis in Hispano American Peruvians. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences 2016; 8(2): 111.

4. Verma K, Nahar P, Singh MP, et al. Use of frontal sinus and nasal septum pattern as an aid in personal identification and determination of gender: A ra-diographic study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2017; 11(1): ZC71–ZC74.

5. Verma P, Verma K, Khosa R, et al. Combined use of frontal sinus and nasal septum patterns as an aid in forensics: A digital radiographic study. North American Journal of Medical Sciences 2015; 7(2): 47–52.

6. Su N, van Wijk A, Berkhout E, et al. Predictive value of panoramic radiography for injury of inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular third molar surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2017; 75(4): 663–679.

7. Sanders DA, Chandhoke TK, Uribe FA, et al. Quantification of skeletal asymmetries in normal ado-lescents: Cone-beam computed tomography analysis. Progress in Orthodontics 2014; 15(1): 26.

8. Baena G, Zúñiga J, Peña E. Distorsión en imágenes obtenidas mediante tomografía computarizada de cono (Spanish) [Distortion in images obtained by cone computed tomography]. Revista Española de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial 2013; 35(2): 51–58.

9. Pittayapat P, Bornstein MM, Imada TSN, et al. Accuracy of linear measurements using three imaging modalities: Two lateral cephalograms and one 3D model from CBCT data. European Journal of Or-thodontics 2014; 37(2): 202–208.

10. Lee HJ, Lee S, Lee EJ, et al. A comparative study of the deviation of the chin on postero-anterior cephalograms and three-dimensional computed tomog-raphy. Imaging Science in Dentistry 2016; 46(1): 33–38.

11. Park HY, Lee JS, Cho JH, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional cephalograms generated using a biplanar imaging system. Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2018; 48(5): 292–303.

12. Choi SH, Kim JS, Kim CS, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography for the assessment of root-crown ratios of the maxillary and mandibular incisors in a Korean population. Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2016; 47(1): 39–49.

13. Carranza N, Bonta H, Gualtieri AF, et al. Alveolar dimensional changes relevant to implant placement after minimally traumatic tooth extraction with primary closure. Acta Odontologica Latinoameri-cana 2016; 29(2): 105–114.

14. Shaikh SA, Lekha K, Mathur G. Relationship be-tween occlusal plane and three levels of ala tragus line in edentulous and partially edentulous patients in different age groups: A pilot study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2015; 9(2): ZC39–42.

15. Huh YJ, Huh KH, Kim HK, et al. Constancy of the angle between the Frankfort horizontal plane and the sella-nasion line: A nine-year longitudinal study. Angle Orthodontist 2014; 84(2): 286–291.

16. Ghorai L, Asha M, Lekshmy J, et al. Orbital aperture morphometry in Indian population: A digital radiographic study. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences 2017; 9(2): 61–64.

17. Gaddam R, Shashikumar HC, Lokesh NK, et al. Assessment of image distortion from head rotation in lateral cephalometry. Journal of International Oral Health 2015; 7(6): 35–40.

18. Shokri A, Miresmaeili A, Farhadian N, et al. Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2017; 46(5): 1–12.

19. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Ren Y. Evaluation and comparison of posteroanterior cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography images for the detection of mandibular asymmetry. European Journal of Orthodontics 2013; 35(1): 45–50.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/irr.v4i1.1733

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.