The nexus between the shadow economy and financial development in Uganda
Vol 6, Issue 2, 2023
VIEWS - 27 (Abstract) 21 (PDF)
Abstract
This paper examines the nexus between the shadow economy and financial development in Uganda making use of yearly time series data over the period 1991 to 2017 and autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) method is applied. Findings are quite telling. We find that financial development reduces the shadow economy in a significant manner, in both the long- and short-run. This finding is robust to the use of alternative measures of financial development. Our results have far reaching implications. Firstly, findings indicate that financial structure plays a key role in mitigating the increase of the shadow economy given that the financial sector can provide access to credit that eases financial constraints faced by entrepreneurs. Thus, a well-functioning financial sector could facilitate access to credit by entrepreneurs which reduces their motivation to operate underground. These findings seem to suggest that reforming financial institutions to facilitate improved access to domestic credit could help tackle widespread informality in developing economies. Additionally, minimizing informality also requires reforming the political system, institutional framework and macroeconomic environment to become responsive to the needs of businesses.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Blackburn K, Bose N, Capasso S. Tax evasion, the underground economy and financial development. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2012; 83(2): 243-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.05.019
2. Capasso S, Jappelli T. Financial development and the underground economy. Journal of Development Economics. 2013; 101: 167-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.10.005
3. Berdiev AN, Saunoris JW. Financial development and the shadow economy: A panel VAR analysis. Economic Modelling. 2016; 57: 197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.03.028
4. Bittencourt M, Gupta R, Stander L. Tax evasion, financial development and inflation: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2014; 41: 194-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.01.009
5. Ridwan LI, Ajide KB, Cifuentes-Faura J, et al. Shadow economy implications of financial development in Africa: Do income groups also matter? Emerging Markets Review. 2024; 59: 101107. doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101107
6. Esaku S, Mugoda S. The shadow economy and education in Uganda: Is there a long-run relationship? International Social Sciences Journal. 2023; 73(28): 393-414. doi: 10.1111/issj.12405
7. Mugoda S, Esaku S, Nakimu RK, et al. The portrait of Uganda’s informal sector: What main obstacles do the sector face? Cogent Economics & Finance. 2020; 8(1): 1843255. doi: 10.1080/23322039.2020.1843255
8. Esaku S. Political instability and informality in Uganda: An empirical analysis. The European Journal of Applied Economics. 2021; 18(2): 161-177. doi: 10.5937/ejae18-31159
9. Esaku S. Is informality a barrier to economic growth in Uganda? Empirical analysis. Development Studies Research. 2021; 8(1): 109-121. doi: 10.1080/21665095.2021.1919167
10. Gutiérrez-Romero R. Inequality, persistence of the informal economy, and club convergence. World Development. 2021; 139: 105211. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105211
11. Medina L, Schneider FG. Shedding Light on the Shadow Economy: A Global Database and the Interaction with the Official One. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published online 2019. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3502028
12. Elbahnasawy NG, Ellis MA, Adom AD. Political Instability and the Informal Economy. World Development. 2016; 85: 31-42. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.04.009
13. Esaku S. Does the shadow economy increase income inequality in the short- and long-run? Empirical evidence from Uganda. Cogent Economics & Finance. 2021; 9(1). doi: 10.1080/23322039.2021.1912896
14. Buehn A, Schneider F. Shadow economies around the world: Novel insights, accepted knowledge, and new estiamtes. International Tax and Public Finance. 2012; 19(1): 139-171. doi: 10.101007/s10797-011-9187-7
15. Ledeneva A. Where does informality stop and corruption begin? Informal governance and the public/private crossover in Mexico, Russia and Tanzania. Slavonic and East European Review. 2017; 95(1): 49-75.
16. Teobaldelli D, Schneider F. The influence of direct democracy on the shadow economy. Public Choice. 2013; 157(3-4): 543-567. doi: 10.1007/s11127-013-0098-2
17. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 2001; 16(3): 289-326. doi: 10.1002/jae.616
18. Jalil A, Ma Y. Financial development and economic growth: Time series evidence from Pakistan and China. Journal of Economic Cooperation among Islamic Countries. 2008; 29: 29-68.
19. Tang TC. A Reassessment Of Aggregate Import Demand Function In The Asean-5: A Cointegration Analysis. The International Trade Journal. 2004; 18(3): 239-268. doi: 10.1080/08853900490478131
20. Ali HS, Law SH, Zannah TI. Dynamic impact of urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and trade openness on CO2 emissions in Nigeria. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2016; 23(12): 12435-12443. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6437-3
21. Marques LM, Fuinhas JA, Marques AC. Augmented energy-growth nexus: economic, political and social globalization impacts. Energy Procedia. 2017; 136: 97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.293
22. Enders W. Applied Econometric time series, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
23. Bayar Y, Ozturk OF. Financial Development and the shadow Economy in European Union Transition Economies. Managing Global Transitions. 2016; 14(2): 157-173.
24. Mugoda S, Dyubhele NS. The Portrait of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) and the Main Obstacles Faced by Businesses: Evidence from Bukedi Sub-region of Uganda. African Journal of Business and Economic Research. 2022; 17(3): 239.
25. Dell’Anno R, Davidescu AA, Balele NP. Estimating shadow economy in Tanzania: an analysis with the MIMIC approach. Journal of Economic Studies. 2018; 45(1): 100-113. doi: 10.1108/jes-11-2016-0240
26. Menegaki AN. The ARDL Method in the Energy-Growth Nexus Field; Best Implementation Strategies. Economies. 2019; 7(4): 105. doi: 10.3390/economies7040105
27. The World Bank; World Development Indicators. World Bank, 2020.
28. Cesi C, Keefer P, Scartascini C. New tools in comparative political economy: The Database of Political Institutions. World Bank Economic Review. 2015; 15(1): 165-176.
29. Marshall MG, Gur TR, Jaggers K. Polity IV project Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2018. Center for Systemic Peace; 2018.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/fsj.v6i2.6408
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.