Reduction of COD and TOC concentration in pharmaceutical wastewater using Fe2+ catalyzed ozone: Full-scale case study

Camila Pedreros Calvo, Kelly Viviana Valderrama López, Rafael Nikolay Agudelo Valencia, Karina Pérez Cortés, Carlos Enrique Campo

Article ID: 1646
Vol 5, Issue 2, 2022

VIEWS - 293 (Abstract) 237 (PDF)

Abstract


This work was carried out to improve the performance of an ozonation system used for wastewater treatment in a pharmaceutical industry. In order to improve the mineralization of organic matter, ferrous sulfate was applied as a catalyst to the reaction system. After this, the pH of the water was adjusted to 8.5–10, so that the process is carried out under alkaline conditions. Finally, O3 was injected through a Venturi tube in order to improve the mass exchange between gas and water. Preliminary operating data indicate that the treatment system achieves chemical oxygen demand (COD) removals of less than 10%. The tests were conducted at full scale and the water quality variables were analyzed at different reaction times. It was determined that for an ozone dose equal to 10 g/h and 10 mg/L Fe2+ and an initial water pH equal to 9, 4.5 hours were required to achieve a reduction of 30.73% COD and 36.85% total organic carbon (TOC). The results obtained with an initial pH higher than 9.5 indicate that the effectiveness of the process is reduced, a fact that may be caused by the rapid formation of insoluble Fe(OH)3, which decreases the availability of the catalyst for the formation of OH* radicals in the water.


Keywords


Ozone; Advanced Oxidation Processes; Catalyst; COD; TOC; Pharmaceutical Wastewater

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Chandak S, Ghosh PK, Gogate PR. Treatment of real pharmaceutical wastewater using different processes based on ultrasound in combination with oxidants. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2020; 137: 149–157. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.02.025.

2. Lalwani J, Gupta A, Thatikonda S, et al. Oxidative treatment of crude pharmaceutical industry effluent by hydrodynamic cavitation. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2020; 8(5): 104281. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104281.

3. Zaied BK, Rashid M, Nasrullah M, et al. A comprehensive review on contaminants removal from pharmaceutical wastewater by electrocoagulation process. Science of the Total Environment 2020; 726: 138095. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138095.

4. Olvera-Vargas H, Gore-Datar N, Garcia-Rodriguez O, et al. Electro-Fenton treatment of real pharmaceutical wastewater paired with a BDD anode: Reaction mechanisms and respective contribution of homogeneous and heterogeneous [rad]OH. Chemical Engineering Journal 2021; 404: 126524. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126524.

5. Ling L, Liu Y, Pan D, et al. Catalytic detoxification of pharmaceutical wastewater by Fenton-like reaction with activated alumina supported CoMnAl composite metal oxides catalyst. Chemical Engineering Journal 2020; 381(866): 122607. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122607.

6. Başaran-Dindaş G, Çalişkan Y, Çelebi EE, et al. Treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater by combination of electrocoagulation, electrofenton and photocatalytic oxidation processes. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2020; 8(3): 103777. doi: 10.1016/j. jece.2020.103777.

7. Rekhate CV, Srivastava JK. Recent advances in ozone-based advanced oxidation processes for treatment of wastewater. A review. Chemical Engineering Journal Advances 2020; 3: 100031. doi: 10.1016/j.ceja.2020.100031.

8. Wang C, Li A, Shuang C. The effect on ozone catalytic performance of prepared-FeOOH by different precursors. Journal of Environmental Management 2018; 228(163): 158–164. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.103.

9. Wang J, Chen H. Catalytic ozonation for water and wastewater treatment: Recent advances and perspective. Science of the Total Environment 2020; 704: 135249. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135249.

10. Braga WLM, de-Melo DHA, de-Morais D, et al. Optimization of the treatment of sanitary landfill by the ozonization catalysed by modified nanovermiculite in a rotating packed bed. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020; 249: 119395. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119395.

11. Cao Q, Sang L, Tu J, et al. Rapid degradation of refractory organic pollutants by continuous ozonation in a micro-packed bed reactor. Chemosphere 2020; 270: 128621. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128621.

12. Ribeiro AR, Nunes OC, Pereira MFR, et al. An overview on the advanced oxidation processes applied for the treatment of water pollutants defined in the recently launched Directive 2013/39/EU. Environment International 2015; 75: 33–51. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.027.

13. Mainardis M, Buttazzoni M, De-Bortoli N, et al. Evaluation of ozonation applicability to pulp and paper streams for a sustainable wastewater treatment. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020; 258: 120781. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120781.

14. Huang Y, Luo M, Xu Z, et al. Catalytic ozonation of organic contaminants in petrochemical wastewater with iron-nickel foam as catalyst. Separation and Purification Technology 2019; 211: 269–278. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.09.080.

15. Preethi V, Parama-Kalyani KS, Iyappan K, et al. Ozonation of tannery effluent for removal of COD and color. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009; 166(1): 150–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.035.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/ace.v5i2.1646

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.