Photocatalytic performance of carbon nanotubes/activated carbon composite carrier carrying cadmium sulfide
Vol 5, Issue 1, 2022
VIEWS - 370 (Abstract) 265 (PDF)
Abstract
The in-situ reaction process was used to prepare composite materials loaded with cadmium sulfide, which were respectively loaded by carbon nanotubes, activated carbon, and carbon nanotube/activated carbon composites for the study of photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange. The results show that when carbon nanotubes and activated carbon are used as carriers, the photocatalytic degradation reaction rate constants are 3.6 times and 8.8 times higher than those without a carrier. The photocatalytic performance of the carbon nanotube/activated carbon composite carrier with a mass ratio of 20: 80 to support cadmium sulfide is significantly higher than that of cadmium sulfide supported by carbon nanotubes and activated carbon respectively, and its photocatalytic degradation reaction rate constant is 30% – 40% higher than that under the condition of activated carbon alone as carrier. It shows that when the modified activated carbon is used as a photocatalyst carrier, carbon nanotubes have a significant effect in improving the efficiency of degrading organic matter.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Arunachalam P, Nagai K, Amer MS, et al. Recent developments in the use of heterogeneous semiconductor photocatalyst based materials for a visible-light-induced water-splitting system-a brief review. Catalysts 2021; 11(2): 1–27.
2. Sharma S, Dutta V, Raizada P, et al. Tailoring cadmium sulfide-based photocatalytic nano-materials for water decontamination: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 2021; 19(1): 271–306.
3. Li B, Wu S, Gao X. Theoretical calculation of a TiO2-based photocatalyst in the field of water splitting: A review. Nanotechnology Reviews 2020; 9(1): 1080–1103.
4. Shaba EY, Jacob JO, Tijani JO, et al. A critical review of synthesis parameters affecting the properties of zinc oxide nanoparticle and its ap-plication in wastewater treatment. Applied Water Science 2021; 11(2): 1–41.
5. Puma GL, Bono A, Krishnaiah D, et al. Preparation of titanium dioxide photocatalyst loaded onto activated carbon support using chemical vapor deposition: A review paper. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2008; 157(2-3): 209–219.
6. Zhang Q, Huang J, Qian W, et al. The road for nanomaterials industry: A review of carbon nanotube production, post-treatment, and bulk applications for composites and energy storage. Small 2013; 9(8): 1237–1265.
7. Kandasamy SK, Kandasamy K. Recent advances in electrochemical performances of graphene composite (graphene-polyaniline/polypyrrole/activated carbon/carbon nanotube) electrode materials for supercapacitor: A review. Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Mmaterials 2018; 28(3): 559–584.
8. Barsan MM, Ghica ME, Brett CMA. Electro-chemical sensors and biosensors based on redox polymer/carbon nanotube modified electrodes: A review. Analytica Chimica Acta 2015; 881: 1–23.
9. Liang Z, Ma Y, Song J, et al. Study on preparation of B/P/N/O codoped carbon nanofibers and its properties for supercapacitors. Journal of Engineering of Heilongjiang University 2020; 11(2): 38–43.
10. Esteves LM, Oliveira HA, Passos FB. Carbon nanotubes as catalyst support in chemical vapor deposition reaction: A review. Journal of Indus-trial and Engineering Chemistry 2018; 65: 1–12.
11. Kumar R, Kumar G, Umar A. Zinc oxide nano-materials for photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange: A review. Nanoscience and Nano-technology Letters 2014; 6(8): 631–650.
12. Shivashankarappa A, Sanjay KR. Escherichia coli-based synthesis of cadmium sulfide nano-particles, characterization, antimicrobial and cytotoxicity studies. Brazilian Journal of Microbi-ology 2020; 51(3): 939–948.
13. Lv X, Zhang T, Luo Y, et al. Study on carbon nanotubes and activated carbon hybrids by pyrolysis of coal. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2020; 146: 104717.
14. Gu WT, Yushin G. Review of nanostructured carbon materials for electrochemical capacitor applications: Advantages and limitations of activated carbon, carbide-derived carbon, zeolite-templated carbon, carbon aerogels, carbon nanotubes, onion-like carbon, and grapheme. WIREs: Energy and Environment 2014; 3(5): 424–473.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/ace.v5i1.1405
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.