The progress of a country can be directly related to the education level of its countrymen. Over a time period, the internet has become a game changer for the world of disseminating education. From 2000 onwards, the scale of online courses has increased manyfold. The main reason for this growth in online learning can be attributed to the flexibility in course delivery and scheduling. Through this study, the authors analyzed the challenges in adopting Online degree programs in higher education in management in India. The authors used Focus Group discussions, semi-structured interviews, and in-depth interviews to collect the data from the various stakeholders. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the responses. Considering the challenges and constraints in India, the authors proposed a sustainable model for implementation. Based on the viewpoints of the different stakeholders, the authors find that online degrees can be instrumental in bringing inclusivity in higher education. There are obvious constraints like a lack of IT infrastructure, the inexperience of faculty in online pedagogy, and the need for more expertise in the administration of online programs by existing universities. However, using SWAYAM as a platform can overcome most of these constraints, as it reduces the burden on individual universities. Hence, the authors proposed models where SWAYAM (technology platform) and Universities (academic partners) can come together to provide a sustainable education model.

1. Afuah, A. (2004). Business models: A strategic management approach. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
2. Alexander, S. (2001). E‐learning developments and experiences. Education + Training, 43(4/5), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910110399247
3. Alhabeeb, A., & Rowley, J. (2017). Critical success factors for eLearning in Saudi Arabian universities. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-01-2016-0006
4. Anto, G. (2012). India 2020: Challenges and opportunities in management education. Aweshakar Research Journal, 12(2), 192-206.
5. Baltes, B. (2001). Online-lernen. Schwangau, Huber Verlag.
6. Baltes, B. (2010). Affirming diversity in an online course. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(5), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741011087739
7. Banga Chhokar, K. (2010). Higher education and curriculum innovation for sustainable development in India. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371011031865
8. Barth, M., Godemann, J., Rieckmann, M., et al. (2007). Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(4), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370710823582
9. Boerema, C., Stanley, M., & Westhorp, P. (2007). Educators’ perspective of online course design and delivery. Medical Teacher, 29(8), 758–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701477332
10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
11. Burnard, P. (1991). A method of analyzing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today, 11(6), 461-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-6917(91)90009-Y
12. Chawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2012). Management education through e‐learning in India: an empirical study. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29(5), 380–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741211275134
13. Chebl, C., & El Rayess, M. (2017). Perceptions of online degrees in library science across the Arab world. Information and Learning Science, 118(5/6), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-06-2017-0049
14. Clark, B. R. (1986). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Univ of California Press.
15. Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2009). Business Research: A Practical Guide for Undergraduate & Postgraduate Students. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
16. Dadze-Arthur, A., & Raine, J. W. (2016). Experiential Learning and Teaching at a Distance: How Distinctive an Experience? Developing Public Managers for a Changing World, 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2045-794420160000005008
17. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
18. Dixon, K., Pelliccione, L., & Dixon, R. (2005). Differing student views of online learning modes across two programs in an Australian university. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 22(3), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740510606135
19. Eisenbarth, G. (2003). The online education market. On the Horizon, 11(3), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120310500071
20. Elassy, N. (2015). The concepts of quality, quality assurance and quality enhancement. Quality Assurance in Education, 23(3), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-11-2012-0046
21. Eurich, N. (1981). Systems of higher education in twelve countries: A comparative view. Praeger Publishers.
22. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
23. Han, J.-H., & Sa, H. J. (2021). Acceptance of and satisfaction with online educational classes through the technology acceptance model (TAM): the COVID-19 situation in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(3), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09716-7
24. Jansen, W., Steenbakkers, W., & Jägers, H. (2017). New Business Models for the Knowledge Economy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351152723
25. Keegan, D. J. (1980). On defining distance education. Distance Education, 1(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791800010102
26. Kerka, S. (1996). Distance Learning, the Internet, and the World Wide Web. ERIC Digest.
27. Kinuthia, W. (2005). Planning faculty development for successful implementation of web‐based instruction. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 22(4), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740510617502
28. Langan, T. (1997). Online education: a student’s perspective. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 14(4), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650749710194565
29. Lazim, C. S. L. M., Ismail, N. D. B., & Tazilah, M. D. A. K. (2021). Application of technology acceptance model (TAM) towards online learning during covid-19 pandemic: Accounting students perspective. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 24(1), 13-20.
30. Leilei J., Siqi H., Yuhan S., Vijayaratnam P., et al. (2023). Quality Education: A Study on the Factors Influencing Enjoyment of Learning English among Higher Educational Institution Students. Migration Letters, 20(S3), 54-62
31. Linardopoulos, N. (2012). Employers’ perspectives of online education. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29(3), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741211243201
32. Ly, C. T. M., Vickers, M. H., & Fernandez, S. (2015). Master of Business Administration (MBA) student outcomes in Vietnam. Education + Training, 57(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-08-2013-0104
33. Margalina, V. M., De-Pablos-Heredero, C., & Montes-Botella, J. L. (2015). Achieving quality in e-Learning through relational coordination. Studies in Higher Education, 42(9), 1655–1670. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1113953
34. Martinez, M. (2005). Learning orientation questionnaire: Interpretation manual. Retrieved September, 19, 2006.
35. McPhee, I., & Söderström, T. (2012). Distance, online and campus higher education: reflections on learning outcomes. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29(3), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741211243166
36. Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological Literacy: Education and Transition to a Postmodern World. State University of New York Press.
37. Orr, D. W. (1994). Earth in Mind: On Education, Environment and the Human Prospect. Island Press.
38. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2009). Business model generation. Self-Published.
39. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01601
40. Pappano, L. (2012). The Year of the MOOC. The New York Times, 2(12), 2012.
41. Poole, B. J., & Axmann, M. (2002). Education fact or fiction? Exploring the myths of online learning. ITFORUM.
42. Rabiee, F. (2004). Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63(4), 655–660. https://doi.org/10.1079/pns2004399
43. Rao, P. (2011). E‐learning in India: the role of national culture and strategic implications. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 5(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/17504971111142664
44. Sagadavan, R., John, S. (2019). Learning preferences transformation in tertiary education. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(25), 215-220.
45. Sahney, S., & Thakkar, J. (2016). A comparative assessment of the performance of select higher education institutes in India. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(2), 278–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-02-2015-0006
46. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach. John Wiley & Sons.
47. Sharma, K., Pandit, P., & Pandit, P. (2011). Critical success factors in crafting strategic architecture for e‐learning at HP University. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(5), 423–452. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541111146350
48. Simsin Morris, A., & Sizer, J. (1982). Resources and Higher Education. The Society for Research into Higher Education.
49. Sterling, S. (2009). Towards sustainable education. Environmental Scientist, 19-21.
50. Summers, T. A., & Vlosky, R. P. (2001). Technology in the classroom: the LSU College of Agriculture Faculty perspective. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 18(2), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740110386152
51. Taylor, R. W. (2002). Pros and cons of online learning – a faculty perspective. Journal of European Industrial Training, 26(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590210415876
52. Tian, X., & Martin, B. (2014). Business models for higher education: an Australian perspective. Journal of Management Development, 33(10), 932–948. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-06-2012-0075
53. Zhang, G., Zhao, Y., & Li, N. (2012). Policies and problems of online higher education in China: what we can learn from the development of “internet colleges.” On the Horizon, 20(4), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121211272425