Relating alkali release from a wood pellet with combustion progress: A modified random pore model supportive study

Rudolf P. W. J. Struis, Marco Wellinger, Christian Ludwig

Article ID: 8671
Vol 7, Issue 3, 2024

VIEWS - 22 (Abstract) 12 (PDF)

Abstract


This paper concerns a miniature gasifier fed with a constant ambient-pressure flow of air to study the pyrolysis and subsequent combustion stage of a single wood pellet at T = 800 ℃. The alkali release and the concentration of simple gases were recorded simultaneously using an improved alkali surface ionisation detector and a mass spectrometer in time steps of 1 s and 1.2 s, respectively. It showed alkali release during both stages. During combustion, the MS data showed almost complete oxidation of the charred pellet to CO2. The derived alkali release, “O2 consumed”, and “CO2 produced” conversion rates all indicated very similar temporal growth and coalescence features with respect to the varying char pore surface area underlying the original random pore model of Bhatia and Perlmutter. But, also large, rapid signal accelerations near the end and marked peak-tails with O2 and CO2 after that, but not with the alkali release data. The latter features appear indicative of alkali–deprived char attributable to the preceding pyrolysis with flowing air. Except for the peak-tails, all other features were reproduced well with the modified model equations of Struis et al. and the parameter values resembled closely those reported for fir charcoal gasified with CO2 at T = 800 ℃.


Keywords


wood pellet; pyrolysis; combustion; alkalis; surface ionisation detector; random pore model; alkali deprivation

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Struis RPWJ, von Scala C, Stucki S, Prins R. Gasification reactivity of char coal with CO2. Part I: Conversion and structural phenomena. Chemical Engineering Science. 2002; 57(17): 3581-3592. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00254-3

2. Struis RPWJ, von Scala C, Stucki S, Prins R. Gasification reactivity of char coal with CO2. Part II: Metal catalysis as a function of conversion. Chemical Engineering Science. 2002; 57(17): 3593-3602. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00255-5

3. Struis RPWJ, von Scala C, Stucki S, Prins R. In: Bridgwater AV (editor). Progress in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion. Blackwell Science Ltd.; 2001. Volume 1, pp. 73-91.

4. Higman C, van der Burgt M. Gasification Processes. Gasification. Published online 2008: 91-191. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-7506-8528-3.00005-5

5. Kaltschmitt M, Thrän D, Smith KR. Renewable Energy from Biomass. Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology. Published online 2003: 203-228. doi: 10.1016/b0-12-227410-5/00059-4

6. Ecological product from native forests—Pellet production. Available online: http://www.buerli-pellets.ch/herstellung (accessed on 20 August 2024).

7. Wellinger M. Development and Application of Devices for Online Trace Element Analysis of Thermal Process Gases from Woody Feedstocks [PhD thesis]. École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne EPFL; 2012.

8. Judex, Johannes W. Grass for power generation: extending the fuel flexibility for IGCC power plants. Published online 2010. doi: 10.3929/ETHZ-A-006032252

9. Wellinger M, Biollaz S, Wochele J, et al. Sampling and Online Analysis of Alkalis in Thermal Process Gases with a Novel Surface Ionization Detector. Energy & Fuels. 2011; 25(9): 4163-4171. doi: 10.1021/ef200811q

10. Jäglid U, Olsson JG, Pettersson JBC. Detection of sodium and potassium salt particles using surface ionization at atmospheric pressure. Journal of Aerosol Science. 1996; 27(6): 967977. doi: 10.1016/0021-8502(96)00025-0

11. Svane M, Hagström M, Davidsson KO, et al. Cesium as a Tracer for Alkali Processes in a Circulating Fluidized Bed Reactor. Energy & Fuels. 2006; 20(3): 979-985. doi: 10.1021/ef050273l

12. Thy P, Lesher CE, Jenkins BM, et al. Trace Metal Mobilization During Combustion of Biomass Fuels. UC Berkeley; 2007.

13. Kowalski T, Judex J, Schildhauer TJ, et al. Transmission of Alkali Aerosols through Sampling Systems. Chemical Engineering & Technology. 2010; 34(1): 42-48. doi: 10.1002/ceat.201000366

14. Bhatia SK, Perlmutter DD. A random pore model for fluid‐solid reactions: I. Isothermal, kinetic control. AIChE Journal. 1980; 26(3): 379-386. doi: 10.1002/aic.690260308

15. Figueiredo JL, Moulijn JA. Carbon and Coal Gasification. Springer Netherlands; 1986. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-4382-7

16. van Heek KH, Mühlen HJ. Fundamental Issues in Control of Carbon Gasification Reactivity. In: Lahaye L, Ehrburger P (editors). Fundamental Issues in Control of Carbon Gasification Reactivity. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991. pp. 1-34.

17. Kaufman Rechulski MD, Schneebeli J, Geiger S, et al. Liquid-Quench Sampling System for the Analysis of Gas Streams from Biomass Gasification Processes. Part 1: Sampling Noncondensable Compounds. Energy & Fuels. 2012; 26(12): 7308-7315. doi: 10.1021/ef3008147

18. Kaufman Rechulski MD, Schneebeli J, Geiger S, et al. Liquid-Quench Sampling System for the Analysis of Gas Streams from Biomass Gasification Processes. Part 2: Sampling Condensable Compounds. Energy & Fuels. 2012; 26(10): 6358-6365. doi: 10.1021/ef300274p




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/tse.v7i3.8671

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Rudolf P. W. J. Struis, Marco Wellinger, Christian Ludwig

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.