Conversion of the ocean’s vertical thermal energy gradient to electricity via OTEC has been demonstrated at small scales over the past century. It represents one of the planet’s most significant (and growing) potential energy sources. As described here, all living organisms need to derive energy from their environment, which heretofore has been given scant serious consideration. A 7th Law of Thermodynamics would complete the suite of thermodynamic laws, unifying them into a universal solution for climate change. 90% of the warming heat going into the oceans is a reasonably recoverable reserve accessible with existing technology and existing economic circumstances. The stratified heat of the ocean’s tropical surface invites work production in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics with minimal environmental disruption. TG is the OTEC improvement that allows for producing two and a half times more energy. It is an endothermic energy reserve that obtains energy from the environment, thereby negating the production of waste heat. This likewise reduces the cost of energy and everything that relies on its consumption. The oceans have a wealth of dissolved minerals and metals that can be sourced for a renewable energy transition and for energy carriers that can deliver ocean-derived power to the land. At scale, 31,000 one-gigawatt (1-GW) TG plants are estimated to displace about 0.9 W/m² of average global surface heat into deep water, from where, at a depth of 1000 m, unconverted heat diffuses back to the surface and is available for recycling.

1. Tilley DR. Howard T. Odum’s contribution to the laws of energy. Ecological Modelling. 2004; 178(1-2): 121-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.12.032

2. Odum HT. Scales of Ecological Engineering. Ecological Engineering. 1996; 6 (1–3): 7–19.

3. Demirmen F. Reserves Estimation: The Challenge for the Industry. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 2007; 59(05): 80-89. doi: 10.2118/103434-jpt

4. Perez M, Perez R. Update 2022—A fundamental look at supply side energy reserves for the planet. Solar Energy Advances. 2022; 2: 100014. doi: 10.1016/j.seja.2022.100014

5. von Schuckmann K, Minière A, Gues F, et al. Heat stored in the Earth system 1960–2020: where does the energy go? Earth System Science Data. 2023; 15(4): 1675-1709. doi: 10.5194/essd-15-1675-2023

6. Forster PM, Smith C, Walsh T, et al. Indicators of Global Climate Change 2023: annual update of key indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence. Earth System Science Data. 2024; 16(6): 2625-2658. doi: 10.5194/essd-16-2625-2024

7. Loeb NG, Johnson GC, Thorsen TJ, et al. Satellite and Ocean Data Reveal Marked Increase in Earth’s Heating Rate. Geophysical Research Letters. 2021; 48(13). doi: 10.1029/2021gl093047

8. Rate and impact of climate change surges dramatically in 2011-2020. Available online: https://wmo.int/news/media-centre/rate-and-impact-of-climate-change-surges-dramatically-2011-2020 (accessed on 16 July 2024).

9. von Schuckmann K, Cheng L, Palmer MD, et al. Heat stored in the Earth system: where does the energy go? Earth System Science Data. 2020; 12(3): 2013-2041. doi: 10.5194/essd-12-2013-2020

10. Forman C, Muritala IK, Pardemann R, et al. Estimating the global waste heat potential. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016; 57: 1568-1579. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.192

11. Haider Q. Nuclear Fusion: Holy Grail of Energy. In: Nuclear Fusion—One Noble Goal and a Variety of Scientific and Technological Challenges. IntechOpen; 2019. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.82335

12. About the secretariat. Available online: https://unfccc.int/about-us/about-the-secretariat#:~:text=The%20ultimate%20objective%20of%20all,naturally%20and%20enables%20sustainable%20development (accessed on 17 July 2024).

13. Status of Ratification of the Convention. Available online: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-convention/status-of-ratification-of-the-convention (accessed on 17 July 2024).

14. Carbon Dioxide and Climate. National Academies Press; 1979. doi: 10.17226/12181

15. Marechal K, Lazaric N. Overcoming inertia: insights from evolutionary economics into improved energy and climate policies. Climate Policy. 2010; 10(1): 103-119. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2008.0601

16. Hajer MA, Pelzer P. 2050—An Energetic Odyssey: Understanding ‘Techniques of Futuring’ in the transition towards renewable energy. Energy Research & Social Science. 2018; 44: 222-231. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.013

17. Lelieveld J, Haines A, Burnett R, et al. Air pollution deaths attributable to fossil fuels: observational and modelling study. BMJ. Published online November 29, 2023: e077784. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077784

18. Renewable Energy to Support Energy Security. Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/74617.pdf (accessed on 25 July 2024).

19. World Energy Transitions Outlook 2023. Available online: https://www.irena.org/Digital-Report/World-Energy-Transitions-Outlook-2023 (accessed on 25 July 2024).

20. Holden E, Linnerud K, Banister D. The Imperatives of Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development. 2016; 25(3): 213-226. doi: 10.1002/sd.1647

21. GESAMP. High level review of a wide range of proposed marine geoengineering techniques. Available online: http://www.gesamp.org/site/assets/files/1723/rs98e.pdf (accessed on 23 August 2021).

22. Hoffert MI, Caldeira K, Benford G, et al. Advanced Technology Paths to Global Climate Stability: Energy for a Greenhouse Planet. Science. 2002; 298(5595): 981-987. doi: 10.1126/science.1072357

23. Smalley RE. Future Global Energy Prosperity: The Terawatt Challenge. MRS Bulletin. 2005; 30(6): 412-417. doi: 10.1557/mrs2005.124

24. Nihous GC. An Order-of-Magnitude Estimate of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Resources. Journal of Energy Resources Technology. 2005; 127(4): 328-333. doi: 10.1115/1.1949624

25. Baird J. Global warming, a global energy resource. Thermal Science and Engineering. 2024; 6(2): 5268. doi: 10.24294/tse.v6i2.5268

26. Jia Y, Nihous G, Rajagopalan K. An Evaluation of the Large-Scale Implementation of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) Using an Ocean General Circulation Model with Low-Complexity Atmospheric Feedback Effects. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2018; 6(1): 12. doi: 10.3390/jmse6010012

27. Kwiatkowski L, Ricke KL, Caldeira K. Atmospheric consequences of disruption of the ocean thermocline. Environmental Research Letters. 2015; 10(3): 034016. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/034016

28. Baiman R, Clarke S, Elsworth C, et al. Addressing the Urgent Need for Direct Climate Cooling: Rationale and Options. Oxford Open Climate Change. Published online August 12, 2024. doi: 10.1093/oxfclm/kgae014

29. Rau GH, Baird JR. Negative-CO2-emissions ocean thermal energy conversion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018; 95: 265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.027

30. Baird J. Thermodynamic Geoengineering: The Solution to Global Warming! Available online: https://www.amazon.ca/Thermodynamic-Geoengineering-solution-global-warming/dp/1777079608 (accessed on 23 August 2021).

31. Rajagopalan K, Nihous GC. An Assessment of Global Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Resources with a High-Resolution Ocean General Circulation Model. Journal of Energy Resources Technology. 2013; 135(4). doi: 10.1115/1.4023868

32. Hausfather Z. Factcheck: Why the recent ‘acceleration’ in global warming is what scientists expect. Available online: https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck-why-the-recent-acceleration-in-global-warming-is-what-scientists-expect/ (accessed on 20 May 2024).

33. Hansen JE, Sato M, Simons L, et al. Global warming in the pipeline. Oxford Open Climate Change. 2023; 3(1). doi: 10.1093/oxfclm/kgad008

34. Prueitt ML. Heat Transfer for Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion; US 200702893 03A1, 20 December 2007.

35. Liang X, Spall M, Wunsch C. Global Ocean Vertical Velocity from a Dynamically Consistent Ocean State Estimate. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 2017; 122(10): 8208-8224. doi: 10.1002/2017jc012985

36. UCSUSA. Ten Signs of Global Warming. Available online: https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/ten-signs-global-warming (accessed on 2 July 2022).

37. Cheng L, Zhu J, Abraham J, et al. 2018 Continues Record Global Ocean Warming. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences. 2019; 36(3): 249-252. doi: 10.1007/s00376-019-8276-x

38. Resplandy L, Keeling RF, Eddebbar Y, et al. Quantification of ocean heat uptake from changes in atmospheric O2 and CO2 composition. Scientific Reports. 2019; 9(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56490-z

39. December 1840: Joule’s Abstract on Converting Mechanical Power Into Heat. Available online: https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200912/physicshistory.cfm (accessed on 22 April 2024).

40. An Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Marine and Hydrokinetic Resource Assessments. National Academies Press; 2013. doi: 10.17226/18278

41. Nihous GC. A Preliminary Assessment of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Resources. Journal of Energy Resources Technology. 2006; 129(1): 10-17. doi: 10.1115/1.2424965

42. Yeh RH, Su TZ, Yang MS. Maximum output of an OTEC power plant. Ocean Engineering. 2005; 32(5-6): 685-700. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.08.011

43. Curto P. American Energy Policy V—Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion. Available online: https://www.opednews.com/populum/page.php?p=1&f=American-Energy-Policy-V--by-Paul-from-Potomac-101214-315.html (accessed on 5 April 2024).

44. Dhanak MR, Xiros NI. Springer Handbook of Ocean Engineering. Springer International Publishing; 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16649-0

45. Rocheleau R. Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) Heat Exchanger Development. Available online: https://www.hnei.hawaii.edu/wp-content/uploads/OTEC-Heat-Exchanger-Development-2018-2020.pdf (accessed on 26 September 2024).

46. Toggweiler JR, Key RM. Thermohaline Circulation. In: Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences. Academic Press; 2001. pp. 2941-2947. doi: 10.1006/rwos.2001.0111

47. Rantanen M, Karpechko AYu, Lipponen A, et al. The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979. Communications Earth & Environment. 2022; 3(1). doi: 10.1038/s43247-022-00498-3

48. Michaelis D. Energy Island. In: Proceedings of the Oceans 2003. Celebrating the Past ... Teaming Toward the Future (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37492); 22-26 September 2003; San Diego, CA, USA. pp. 2294-2302. doi: 10.1109/OCEANS.2003.178267

49. Denholm P, Hand M, Jackson M, et al. Land Use Requirements of Modern Wind Power Plants in the United States. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI); 2009. doi: 10.2172/964608

50. Imhan N. Area Required for Solar PV Power Plants - Suncyclopedia. Available online: http://www.suncyclopedia.com/en/area-required-for-solar-pv-power-plants/ (accessed on 20 August 2021).

51. Herrera J, Sierra S, Ibeas A. Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion and Other Uses of Deep Sea Water: A Review. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2021; 9(4): 356. doi: 10.3390/jmse9040356

52. Sanderson C. The 80 trillion-watt shot: “Holy Grail” fusion energy pioneer claims record at world’s most powerful machine. Available online: https://www.rechargenews.com/energy-transition/the-80-trillion-watt-shot-holy-grail-fusion-energy-pioneer-claims-record-at-world-s-most-powerful-machine/2-1-1609341 (accessed on 4 July 2024).

53. What is ITER? Available online: http://www.iter.org/proj/inafewlines (accessed on 28 June 2024).

54. Arnoux R. Tritium: Changing lead into gold. Available online: http://www.iter.org/mag/8/56 (accessed on 5 July 2024).

55. Murphy TW. Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet. eScholarship, University of California; 2021. doi: 10.21221/S2978-0-578-86717-5

56. Staff CB. Analysis: Fossil fuels fall to record-low 2.4% of British electricity. Available online: https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-fossil-fuels-fall-to-record-low-2-4-of-british-electricity/ (accessed on 28 June 2024).

57. Verzijlbergh RA, De Vries LJ, Dijkema GPJ, et al. Institutional challenges caused by the integration of renewable energy sources in the European electricity sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017; 75: 660-667. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.039

58. Abdullah MA, Agalgaonkar AP, Muttaqi KM. Climate change mitigation with integration of renewable energy resources in the electricity grid of New South Wales, Australia. Renewable Energy. 2014; 66: 305-313. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.12.014

59. Hao C. Texas Power Company Warns of Catastrophic Failure if Storage Issues Go Unresolved. Available online: https://www.governing.com/infrastructure/texas-power-company-warns-of-catastrophic-failure-if-storage-issues-go-unresolved (accessed on 23 July 2024).

60. California Power Outage Map. Available online: https://www.bloomenergy.com/bloom-energy-outage-map/ (accessed on 23 July 2024).

61. Abdallah L, El-Shennawy T. Reducing Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Electricity Sector Using Smart Electric Grid Applications. Journal of Engineering. 2013; 2013: 1-8. doi: 10.1155/2013/845051

62. Tong D, Farnham DJ, Duan L, et al. Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power worldwide. Nature Communications. 2021; 12(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26355-z

63. Materials and Resource Requirements for the Energy Transition. Available online: https://www.energy-transitions.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ETC-Materials-Report_highres-1.pdf (accessed on 11 July 2024).

64. Heun MK, Brockway PE. Meeting 2030 primary energy and economic growth goals: Mission impossible? Applied Energy. 2019; 251: 112697. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.255

65. Gielen D, Papa C. Materials for the Energy Transition. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundance_of_elements_in_Earth%27s_crust (accessed on 26 September 2024).

66. Concentrations and estimated amounts of dissolved metal ions in the sea, compared with the estimated land resources. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Concentrations-and-estimated-amounts-of-dissolved-metal-ions-in-the-sea-compared-with_tbl1_43336400 (accessed on 23 July 2024).

67. Bhutada G. All the Metals We Mined in 2021: Visualized. Available online: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/all-the-metals-we-mined-in-2021-visualized/ (accessed on 23 July 2024).

68. How many liters of water are there in the ocean? Available online: https://www.quora.com/How-many-liters-of-water-are-there-in-the-ocean (accessed on 23 July 2024).

69. What is the total mass of the Earth’s crust? Available online: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-total-mass-of-the-Earths-crust (accessed on 23 July 2024).

70. Abundance of Elements in Earth’s Crust. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundance_of_elements_in_Earth%27s_crust (accessed on 26 September 2024).

71. International Copper Association. Copper Demand and Long-Term Availability. Available online: https://internationalcopper.org/sustainable-copper/about-copper/cu-demand-long-term-availability/ (accessed on 25 July 2024).

72. Goreau TJ. Marine Electrolysis for Building Materials and Environmental Restoration. In: Electrolysis. Intechopen; 2012. doi: 10.5772/48783

73. U. S. Department of Energy. Powering the Blue Economy: Exploring Opportunities for Marine Renewable Energy in Maritime Markets. Available online: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/03/f61/73355.pdf (accessed on 26 September 2024).

74. United Nations. 5 global actions needed to build a sustainable ocean economy. Available online: https://unctad.org/news/5-global-actions-needed-build-sustainable-ocean-economy (accessed on 22 April 2024).

75. Ardelean M, Minnebo P. HVDC Submarine Power Cables in the World. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/78682e63-9fd2-11e5-8781-01aa75ed71a1/language-en (accessed on 22 April 2024).

76. Nikolaidis P. Sustainable routes for renewable energy carriers in modern energy systems. Bioenergy research: commercial opportunities & challenges. 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-1190-2_8

77. U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen Program Plan. Available online: https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/docs/hydrogenprogramlibraries/pdfs/hydrogen-program-plan-2020.pdf?Status=Master (accessed on 26 September 2024)

78. van Renssen S. The hydrogen solution? Nature Climate Change. 2020; 10(9): 799-801. doi: 10.1038/s41558-020-0891-0

79. Ammonia: Zero-Carbon Fertiliser, Fuel and Energy Store. Available online: https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/green-ammonia/green-ammonia-policy-briefing.pdf (accessed on 26 September 2024).

80. Huie MM, Bock DC, Takeuchi ES, et al. Cathode materials for magnesium and magnesium-ion based batteries. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2015; 287: 15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.11.005

81. Gummow RJ, Vamvounis G, Kannan MB, et al. Calcium‐Ion Batteries: Current State‐of‐the‐Art and Future Perspectives. Advanced Materials. 2018; 30(39). doi: 10.1002/adma.201801702