Modeling of performance and thermodynamic study of a gas turbine power plant

Mohamed Elwardany, A. M. Nassib, Hany A. Mohamed, M. R. Abdelaal

Article ID: 8016
Vol 7, Issue 4, 2024

VIEWS - 493 (Abstract)

Abstract


The efficiencies and performance of gas turbine cycles are highly dependent on parameters such as the turbine inlet temperature (TIT), compressor inlet temperature (T1), and pressure ratio (Rc). This study analyzed the effects of these parameters on the energy efficiency, exergy efficiency, and specific fuel consumption (SFC) of a simple gas turbine cycle. The analysis found that increasing the TIT leads to higher efficiencies and lower SFC, while increasing the To or Rc results in lower efficiencies and higher SFC. For a TIT of 1400 ℃, T1 of 20 ℃, and Rc of 8, the energy and exergy efficiencies were 32.75% and 30.9%, respectively, with an SFC of 187.9 g/kWh. However, for a TIT of 900 ℃, T1 of 30 ℃, and Rc of 30, the energy and exergy efficiencies dropped to 13.18% and 12.44%, respectively, while the SFC increased to 570.3 g/kWh. The results show that there are optimal combinations of TIT, To, and Rc that maximize performance for a given application. Designers must consider trade-offs between efficiency, emissions, cost, and other factors to optimize gas turbine cycles. Overall, this study provides data and insights to improve the design and operation of simple gas turbine cycles.


Keywords


gas turbine; thermal analysis; energy; exergy; efficiency

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Liu X, Zeng Z, Hu G, Asgari A. Thermodynamic, environmental, and economic analysis of a novel power and water production system driven by gas turbine cycle. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2022; 61: 9529–9551. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.03.038

2. Sinha AA, Sanjay, Ansari MZ, et al. Thermodynamic assessment of biomass-fueled solid oxide fuel cell integrated gas turbine hybrid configuration. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2023; 57: 103242. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2023.103242

3. Shabruhi Mishamandani A, Mojaddam M, Mohseni A. Integrating machine learning and thermodynamic modeling for performance prediction and optimization of supercritical CO2 and gas turbine combined power systems. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress. 2024; 54: 102820. doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102820

4. da Silva JAM, Ávila Filho S, Carvalho M. Assessment of energy and exergy efficiencies in steam generators. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering. 2017; 39: 3217–3226. doi: 10.1007/s40430-016-0704-6

5. Ibrahim TK, Mohammed MK, Awad OI, et al. A comprehensive review on the exergy analysis of combined cycle power plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018; 90: 835–50. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.072

6. Elwardany M, Nassib AM, Mohamed HA, Abdelaal M. Energy and exergy assessment of 750 MW combined cycle power plant: A case study. Energy Nexus. 2023; 12: 100251. doi: 10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100251

7. Elwardany M. Enhancing steam boiler efficiency through comprehensive energy and exergy analysis: A review. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2024; 184: 1222–50. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2024.01.102

8. Pashchenko D, Mustafin R, Karpilov I. Ammonia-fired chemically recuperated gas turbine: Thermodynamic analysis of cycle and recuperation system. Energy. 2022; 252. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124081

9. Bartnik R, Hnydiuk-Stefan A, Buryn Z. Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a gas turbine set coupled with a turboexpander in a hierarchical gas-gas system. Energy. 2020; 190. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116394

10. Kim JS, Kim DY, Kim YT. Thermodynamic analysis of a dual loop cycle coupled with a marine gas turbine for waste heat recovery system using low global warming potential working fluids. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2019; 33: 3531–41. doi: 10.1007/s12206-019-0647-9

11. Shakib SE, Amidpour M, Esmaieli A, et al. Various approaches to thermodynamic optimization of a hybrid multi-effect evaporation with thermal vapour compression and reverse osmosis desalination system integrated to a gas turbine power plant. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications. 2019; 32: 777–89. doi: 10.5829/ije.2019.32.05b.20

12. Khosravi H, Salehi G, Azad MT. Optimization and advance thermodynamic analysis of dual stage Co2 power cycle combined to gas turbine. Heat and Mass Transfer/Waerme-Und Stoffuebertragung. 2020; 56: 75–94. doi: 10.1007/s00231-019-02688-w

13. Balku S. Analysis of combined cycle efficiency by simulation and optimization. Energy Conversion and Management. 2017; 148: 174–83. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.05.032

14. Elwardany M, Nassib AM, Mohamed HA. Analyzing global research trends in combined cycle power plants: A bibliometric study. Energy Nexus. 2024; 13: 100265. doi: 10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100265

15. Park Y, Choi M, Choi G. Thermodynamic performance study of large-scale industrial gas turbine with methane/ammonia/hydrogen blended fuels. Energy. 2023; 282: 128731. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128731

16. Abdalla MSM, Balli O, Adali OH, et al. Thermodynamic, sustainability, environmental and damage cost analyses of jet fuel starter gas turbine engine. Energy. 2023; 267: 126487. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126487

17. Tianliang W, Hong T. Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of an innovative cogeneration of power and freshwater based on gas turbine cycle. Energy. 2023; 285: 129454. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129454

18. Jaszczur M, Dudek M, Kolenda Z. Thermodynamic analysis of advanced gas turbine combined cycle integration with a high-temperature nuclear reactor and cogeneration unit. Energies. 2020; 13. doi: 10.3390/en13020400

19. Golchoobian H, Taheri MH, Saedodin S. Thermodynamic analysis of turboexpander and gas turbine hybrid system for gas pressure reduction station of a power plant. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2019; 14. doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2019.100488

20. Arsalis A. Thermodynamic modeling and parametric study of a small-scale natural gas/hydrogen-fueled gas turbine system for decentralized applications. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2019; 36. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2019.100560

21. Xie M, Xie Y, He Y, et al. Thermodynamic analysis and system design of the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle for waste heat recovery of gas turbine. Heat Transfer Research. 2020; 51: 129–46. doi: 10.1615/HeatTransRes.2019028447

22. Stathopoulos P, Rähse T, Vinkeloe J, Djordjevic N. First law thermodynamic analysis of the recuperated humphrey cycle for gas turbines with pressure gain combustion. Energy. 2020; 200. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117492

23. Pirkandi J, Penhani H, Maroufi A. Thermodynamic analysis of the performance of a hybrid system consisting of steam turbine, gas turbine and solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC-GT-ST). Energy Conversion and Management. 2020; 213. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112816

24. Elwardany M, Nassib AM, Mohamed HA. Case Study: Exergy Analysis of a Gas Turbine Cycle Power Plant in Hot Weather Conditions. In: Proceedings of the 2023 5th Novel Intelligent and Leading Emerging Sciences Conference (NILES). pp. 291–294. doi: 10.1109/NILES59815.2023.10296731

25. Mrzljak V, Poljak I, Jelić M, Prpić-Oršić J. Thermodynamic Analysis and Improvement Potential of Helium Closed Cycle Gas Turbine Power Plant at Four Loads. Energies. 2023; 16. doi: 10.3390/en16155589

26. Ren J, Xu C, Qian Z, et al. Exergoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of a Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Based on Externally Fired Gas Turbine, Steam Rankine Cycle, Organic Rankine Cycle, and Absorption Refrigeration Cycle. Entropy. 2024; 26. doi: 10.3390/e26060511

27. Elwardany M, Nassib AM, Mohamed HA. Exergy analysis of a gas turbine cycle power plant: a case study of power plant in Egypt. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2024. doi: 10.1007/s10973-024-13324-z

28. Aygun H, Caliskan H. Evaluating and modelling of thermodynamic and environmental parameters of a gas turbine engine and its components. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022; 365: 132762. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132762

29. Skabelund BB, Jenkins CD, Stechel EB, Milcarek RJ. Thermodynamic and emission analysis of a hydrogen/methane fueled gas turbine. Energy Conversion and Management: X. 2023; 19: 100394. doi: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2023.100394

30. Jiang Z, Wang X, Yang S, Zhu M. A Deterministic Calibration Method for the Thermodynamic Model of Gas Turbines. Symmetry. 2024; 16. doi: 10.3390/sym16050522

31. Brahimi F, Madani B, Ghemmadi M. Comparative Thermodynamic Environmental and Economic Analyses of Combined Cycles Using Air and Supercritical CO2 in the Bottoming Cycles for Power Generation by Gas Turbine Waste Heat Recovery. Energies. 2022; 15. doi: 10.3390/en15239066

32. Elwardany M, Nassib AEM, Mohamed HA. Comparative Evaluation for Selected Gas Turbine Cycles. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2023; 26: 57–67. doi: 10.5541/ijot.1268823

33. Sammour AA, Komarov OV, Qasim MA, Saleh AY. Investigation of the Influence of Ambient Conditions on the Thermodynamic Characteristics of Air as a Working Fluid for Gas Turbines. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences. 2023; 106: 182–96. doi: 10.37934/arfmts.106.1.182196

34. Abed AM, Chauhan BS, Ayed H, et al. Thermodynamic, exergetic and environmental evaluation and optimization of a bio-fuel fired gas turbine incorporated with wind energy derived hydrogen injection. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2024; 56: 104238. doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2024.104238

35. Almatrafi E, Khaliq A, Abuhabaya A. Thermodynamic and exergetic assessment of a biomass derived syngas fueled gas turbine powered trigeneration system. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2022; 35: 102099. doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2022.102099

36. Al-Tameemi MRJ, Yahya SG, Hafedh SA, Azzawi IDJ. Thermodynamic optimization of an integrated gas turbine cycle, heat exchanger and organic Rankine cycle for co-generation of mechanical power and heating load. Journal of Computational and Applied Research in Mechanical Engineering. 2023; 13: 75–88. doi: 10.22061/jcarme.2023.9366.2253

37. Sasmoko, Lee SW, Bhavanari M, et al. Thermodynamic Analysis of Three Internal Reforming Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cell-Gas Turbine Hybrid Systems. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 2022; 12. doi: 10.3390/app122111140

38. Alklaibi AM, Khan MN, Khan WA. Thermodynamic analysis of gas turbine with air bottoming cycle. Energy. 2016; 107: 603–11. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.04.055

39. Elwardany M, Nassib AM, Mohamed HA, Abdelaal. Performance Assessment of Combined Cycle Power Plant. In: Proceedings of the 2023 5th Novel Intelligent and Leading Emerging Sciences Conference (NILES). pp. 80–84. doi: 10.1109/NILES59815.2023.10296617

40. Ibrahim TK, Basrawi F, Awad OI, et al. Thermal performance of gas turbine power plant based on exergy analysis. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2017; 115: 977–85. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.01.032

41. Kurt H, Recebli Z, Gedik E. Performance analysis of open cycle gas turbines. International Journal of Energy Research. 2009; 33: 285–294. doi: 10.1002/er.1472

42. De Sa A, Al Zubaidy S. Gas turbine performance at varying ambient temperature. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2011; 31: 2735–9. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.04.045

43. Abou Al-Sood MM, Matrawy KK, Abdel-Rahim YM. Optimum Operating Parameters of an Irreversible Gas Turbine Cycle. JES Journal of Engineering Sciences. 2012; 40: 1695–714. doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2012.114611

44. Salah SA, Abbas EF, Ali OM, et al. Evaluation of the gas turbine unit in the Kirkuk gas power plant to analyse the energy and exergy using ChemCad simulation. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies. 2022; 17: 603–10. doi: 10.1093/ijlct/ctac034

45. Ahmadi GR, Toghraie D. Energy and exergy analysis of Montazeri Steam Power Plant in Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016; 56: 454–63. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.074

46. Çengel Y, Boles M. Thermodynamics: an engineering approach, 5th ed. McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math; 2005.

47. Ersayin E, Ozgener L. Performance analysis of combined cycle power plants: A case study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015; 43: 832–42. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.082

48. Dincer I, Rosen MA. Chemical exergy. Exergy. 2021: 37–60. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-824372-5.00003-8




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/tse.v7i4.8016

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Mohamed Elwardany, A. M. Nassib, Hany A. Mohamed, M. R. Abdelaal

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.