Reduction of carbon footprint by using recyclable bottles—A case study on Austrian wine

Franz G. Rosner, Werner Pölz

Article ID: 6027
Vol 7, Issue 1, 2024

VIEWS - 21 (Abstract) 14 (PDF)

Abstract


A decarbonized society can only become reality if all potential greenhouse gas is leveraged. In order to achieve this, it is necessary to scrutinize all processes, to assess whether a high level of energy and material efficiency has been achieved and whether renewable energy sources are used to the maximum extent. In this investigation, we were investigating the corporate carbon footprint of a winery in Austria. All data, energy and material inputs were taken within the framework of a scenario analysis for one hectare of vineyard with a yield of a 5-year average of 5380 L. The energy and material input in a winery in Austria under the system limit considered in these calculations results in a GHG emission of about 1.04 kg per L of bottled wine (or 0.78 kg per 0.75-L bottle). On the other hand one kg of grapes would therefore cause 0.24 kg of CO2e.The GHG emissions for the production of a wine bottle in Austria causes 0.328 kg CO2 equivalent emissions. The GHG emissions for washing (0.011 kg CO2 equivalent emissions per bottle), on the other hand, amount to only 3.4% measured against a new bottle in Austria. The bag-in-box system can only be used once. This system leads to 59% higher GHG emissions per L compared to reusable bottles on the basis of 12 filling cycles (system sustainability – lightweight bottles). At a refill rate of 50% in a winery, GHG emissions are reduced to 4367 kg per ha (−32% compared to normal and new glass in the winery). The calculations show that refilling the wine bottle has the highest savings potential. Measures to achieve this multiple use should be implemented as soon as possible in the wine industry.

Keywords


GHG emission; carbon footprint; lightweight bottles; reuseable bottles; refilling wine bottles

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Wolf S, Teitge J, Mielke J, et al. The European Green Deal—More Than Climate Neutrality. Intereconomics. 2021.

2. UN. Enhance solidarity to fight COVID-19, Chinese President urges, also pledges carbon neutrality by 2060. Available online: https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/09/1073052 (accessed on 25 May 2024).

3. Renewable Energy. Official Journal of the World Renewable Energy Network. 2023; 203: 407-420.

4. ISO. Greenhouse gases—Carbon footprint of products—Requirements and guidelines for quantification. ISO; 2018

5. IPPC—Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. In: Proceedings of the 5th Assessment Report of the IPCC.

6. WRI—WBCSD. Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development; 2011.

7. WRI—WBCSD. GHG Protocol Agricultural Guidance—Interpreting the Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. WRI; 2014.

8. WRI—WBCSD. The GHG Protocol—A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition). WRI; 2015.

9. WRI—WBCSD. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: a corporate accounting and reporting standard (revised edition). WRI; 2004.

10. WRI—WBCSD. The Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard. WRI; 2011.

11. ISO. Greenhouse gases—Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. ISO; 2018.

12. IPPC—Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2022. Sixth Assessment Report Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press; 2022.

13. OIV—International organization of vine and wine 2017. Methodological recommendations for accounting for GHG balance in the vitivinicultural sector. OIV; 2017.

14. Jungbluth N, Itten R, Stucki M. Environmental impact of private consumption and potential for reduction (German). Available online: http://esu-services.ch/fileadmin/download/jungbluth-2012-Reduktionspotenziale-BAFU.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2024).

15. Podzorski U. Wine and its climate footprint (German). Schweizer Zeitschrift für Obst- und Weinbau. 2019; 14: 8-10.

16. Benedetto G. The environmental impact of a Sardinian wine by partial Life Cycle Assessment. Wine Economics and Policy. 2013; 2(1): 33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.wep.2013.05.003

17. Gazulla C, Raugei M, Fullana-Palmer P. Taking a life cycle look at crianza wine production in Spain: Where are the bottlenecks? The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2010; 15(4): 330-337. doi: 10.1007/s11367-010-0173-6

18. Soja G, Rodriguez-Pacual R, Zehetner F, et al. Viticulture in climate change: adaptation and mitigation options using the example of the model region Traisental (Weinklim) (German). AIT Seibersdorf; 2010.

19. Palmes D, Friedrich C. Determining a product carbon footprint in the wine industry (German). Südwestdeutscher Verlag für Hochschulschriften; 2013.

20. Poelz W, Rosner FG. Sustainable strategy against climate change based on greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and use of material resources in Austrian wine production. Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg. 2020; 70: 233-246.

21. Emberger-Klein A, Ergül R, Mempel H, Menrad K. Carbon footprint analyses along the value chains of fruit and vegetables using selected examples and development of a corresponding certification and labeling system (German). BMBF; 2015.

22. EIP European Investment Bank. Carbon Footprint Report 2020—Greenhouse gas emissions resulting from EIB Group internal operations. Available online: https://www.eib.org/de/publications/carbon-footprint-report-2020 (accessed on 25 May 2024).

23. Poelz W, Rosner FG. Calculation of the CO2 footprint using the example of Austrian wine. Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg. 2023; 73: 152-167.

24. GEMIS—Gesamt Emissionsmodell Integrierter Systeme. Available online: www.iinas.org (accessed on 25 May 2024).

25. NIR. National Inventory. Available online: https://www.umweltbundesamt.at/fileadmin/site/publikationen/rep0761.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2024).

26. StatistikAustria. Available online: www.oesterreichwein.at (accessed on 25 May 2024).

27. Vetropack. Available online: www.vetropack.com/de/produkte-leistungen/nachhaltigkeit/recycling/ (accessed on 25 May 2024).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/tse.v7i1.6027

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Creative Commons License

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.