Experimental study on co-pyrolysis of sludge and biomass straw
Vol 5, Issue 2, 2022
VIEWS - 271 (Abstract) 269 (pdf)
Abstract
In order to maximize the potential energy utilization of agricultural and forestry waste and sludge, the experimental research on co-pyrolysis was carried out for two kinds of sludge (urban industrial sludge, paper sludge) and a typical biomass straw. The results show that adding biomass can effectively improve sludge pyrolysis characteristics; biomass straw and sludge, there are complex interactive effects between components in the co-pyrolysis process, and the characteristic parameters show nonlinear changes. When industrial sludge is mixed with straw, with the increase of straw content, the initial temperature of pyrolysis gradually decreases, the termination temperature increases, the peak of pyrolysis reaction rate and the corresponding temperature gradually increase, and the pyrolysis index gradually increases; when paper sludge is mixed with straw, with the increase of straw content, the initial temperature of pyrolysis gradually decreases, the termination temperature increases, the peak of pyrolysis reaction rate gradually increases, while the peak corresponding temperature gradually decreases, and the pyrolysis index gradually decreases. Combined with characteristic parameters and reaction kinetics analysis, it is suggested that the straw mixing proportion should be controlled at about 25% during the co-pyrolysis of industrial sludge and straw. During the co-pyrolysis of paper sludge and straw, it is suggested to control the straw blending ratio at about 75%.
Keywords
Full Text:
pdfReferences
1. Wei L, Ma T, Yang T, et al. Slagging characteristics and minerals conversion of co-firing ash of coal and sludge at high temperature. Proceedings of the CSEE 2015; 35(18): 46974702.
2. Yin L, Deng C, Zhang C, et al. Fusion characteristics in co-combustion of coal with industrial and municipal sludge. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology 2014; 42(9): 10681076.
3. Yin H, Cai J, Chen J, et al. Mineral components evolution and thermogravimetric analysis of municipal sludge ash. Journal of Thermal Science and Technology 2016; 15(4): 312319.
4. Zhu J, Yang Y, Yang L, et al. High-quality syngas produced from the co-pyrolysis of wet sewage sludge with sawdust. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2018; 3(11): 54635472.
5. Jin L, Zhang G, Tian H. Current state of sewage treatment in China. Water Research: A Journal of the International Water Association 2014; 66: 8598.
6. Soria-Verdugo A, Goos E, Morato-Godino A, et al. Pyrolysis of biofuels of the future: Sewage sludge and microalgae-thermogravimetric analysis and modelling of the pyrolysis under different temperature conditions. Energy Conversion & Management 2017; 138: 261272.
7. Bach Q, Chen W. A comprehensive study on pyrolysis kinetics of microalgal biomass. Energy Conversion & Management 2017; 131: 109116.
8. Ruiz-Gomez Nadia, Quispe Violeta, Abrego Javier, et al. Copyrolysis of sewage sludge and manure. Waste Management 2017; 59: 221.
9. Tang S, Zheng C, Zhang Z. Effect of inherent minerals on sewage sludge pyrolysis: Product characteristics, kinetics and thermodynamics. Waste Management 2018; 80: 175185.
10. Yin L, Zhou X, Wu J, et al. The combustion characteristics and application of sludge mixed with straw. Renewable Energy Resources 2013; (1): 7175.
11. Jin P, Li B. The study of co-pyrolysis characteristics of the biomass and sewage sludge. Renewable Energy 2014; 32(2): 234239.
12. Demirbas A, Arin G. An overview of biomass pyrolysis. Energy Sources 2002; 24(5): 471482.
13. Bernhard P. Prediction of pyrolysis of pistachio shells based on its components hemicellulose，cellulose and lignin. Fuel Processing Technology 2011; 92(10): 19931998.
14. Ding H, Jiang H. Self-heating co-pyrolysis of excessive activated sludge with waste biomass: Energy balance and sludge reduction. Bioresource Technology: Biomass, Bioenergy, Biowastes, Conversion Technologies, Biotransformations, Production Technologies 2013; 133: 1622.
15. Que J. Study on synergetic pyrolysis and gasification of sludge and biomass [PhD thesis]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University; 2020.
16. Deng S, Tan H, Wang X, et al. Investigation on the fast co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge with biomass and the combustion reactivity of residual char. Bioresource Technology: Biomass, Bioenergy, Biowastes, Conversion Technologies, Biotransformations, Production Technologies 2017; 239: 302310.
17. Wang T, Chen Y, Li J, et al. Co-pyrolysis behavior of sewage sludge and rice husk by TG-MS and residue analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020; 250: 19.
18. Lin B, Huang Q, Chi Y. Co-pyrolysis of oily sludge and rice husk for improving pyrolysis oil quality. Fuel Processing Technology 2018; 177: 275282.
19. Huang H, Yang T, Lai F, et al. Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and sawdust/rice straw for the production of biochar. Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis 2017; 125: 6168.
20. Wang X, Deng S, Tan H, et al. Synergetic effect of sewage sludge and biomass co-pyrolysis: A combined study in thermogravimetric analyzer and a fixed bed reactor. Energy Conversion & Management 2016; 118: 399405.
21. Wang C, Bi H, Lin Q, et al. Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and rice husk by TG—FTIR—MS: Pyrolysis behavior, kinetics, and condensable/non-condensable gases characteristics. Renewable Energy 2020; 160: 10481066.
22. Ma L, Wang T, Liu J, et al. Effect of different conditions on the combustion interactions of blended coals in O2/CO2 mixtures. Journal of the Energy Institute 2019; 92: 413427.
23. Cheoreon M, Yonmo S, Seongyool A, et al. Thermochemical and combustion behaviors of coals of different ranks and their blends for pulverized-coal combustion. Applied Thermal Engineering: Design, Processes, Equipment, Economics 2013; 54(1): 111119.
24. Li Q, Zhao C, Chen X, et al. Comparison of pulverized coal combustion in air and in O2/CO2 mixtures by thermo-gravimetric analysis. Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis 2009; 85: 521528.
25. Wei X, Ma X, Peng X, et al. Comparative investigation between co-pyrolysis characteristics of protein and carbohydrate by TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS. Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis 2018; 135: 209218.
26. Anal J. Co-pyrolysis behavior of sewage sludge and rice husk by TG-MS and residue analysis. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2018; 135: 209218.
27. Tong C, Yang X, Chen G, et al. Experimental investigation for the combustion characteristics of blends of three kinds of coal. Fuel 2021; 300: 120937.
28. Hale S, Sabriye P. Characterization and combustion kinetics of chars obtained from loquat stones. Combustion Science and Technology 2009; 181(2): 264273.
29. Yorulmaz SY, Atimtay AT. Investigation of combustion kinetics of treated and untreated waste wood samples with thermogravimetric analysis. Fuel Processing Technology 2009; 90: 939946.
30. Wang C, Liu Y, Zhang X. et al. A study on coal properties and combustion characteristics of blended coals in northwestern China. Energy & Fuels 2011; 25: 36343645.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/tse.v5i2.1536
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Lun Ma, Ji Xia, Yongjia Hu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.