Thermodynamic analysis of sugarcane bagasse plasma gasification

Jorge Jadid Tamayo-Pacheco, José Ramón Copa-Rey, Manuel Cantos-Macías, Angel Luis Brito-Sauvanell, José Luz Silveira

Article ID: 1502
Vol 3, Issue 2, 2020

VIEWS - 462 (Abstract) 442 (pdf)

Abstract


Plasma thermal gasification can be one of the most relevant and environmentally friendly technologies for waste treatment and has gained interest for its use in thethermos-conversion of biomass. In this perspective, the objective of this study is to evaluate the gasification of sugarcane bagasse by studying the effective areas of operation of this process and to establish a comparison with conventional autothermal gasification. A thermochemical equilibrium model was used to calculate the indicators that characterize the performance of the process on its own and integrated with a combined cycle. As a result, it was obtained that plasma and gasification of bagasse is technically feasible for the specific net electrical production of 4 MJ with 30 % electrical efficiency, producing a gas with higher calorific value than autothermal gasification. The operating points where the electrical energy production and the cold gas efficiency reach their highest values were determined; then the effects of the operational parameters on these performance indicators were analyzed.


Keywords


Plasma Gasification; Equilibrium Model; Thermodynamic Analysis; Sugar Cane Bagasse Gasification

Full Text:

pdf


References


1. Dahlquist E (editor). Technologies for converting biomass to useful energy: combustion, gasification, pyrolysis, torrefaction and fermentation. CRC Press; 2013.

2. Deshmukh R, Jacobson A, Chamberlin C, et al. Thermal gasification or direct combustion? Comparison of advanced cogeneration systems in the sugarcane industry. Biomass and Bioenergy 2013; 55: 163–174. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.01.033.

3. Agon N, Hrabovský M, Chumak O, et al. Plasma gasification of refuse derived fuel in a single-stage system using different gasifying agents. Waste Management 2016; 47: 246–255.

4. Messerle VE, Ustimenko AB, Lavrichshev OA. Comparative study of coal plasma gasification: Simulation and experiment. Fuel 2016; 164: 172–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.09.095.

5. Hrabovsky M. Thermal plasma gasification of biomass. Rijeka, Croatia: Intech Open: Progress in Biomass and Bioenergy Production; 2011.

6. Fabry F, Rehmet C, Rohani V, et al. Waste gasification by thermal plasma: a review. Waste and Biomass Valorization 2013; 4(3): 421–439. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-013-9201-7.

7. Sikarwar VS, Zhao M, Clough P, et al. An overview of advances in biomass gasification. Energy & Environmental Science 2016; 9(10): 2939–2977. DOI: 10.10.103939/C6EE00935B.

8. Mikulandrić R, Lončar D, Böhning D, et al. Biomass gasification process modelling approaches. 8th Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems–SDEWES Conference; 2013 Sept 22–27; Dubrov-nik, Croatia (Hrvatska). 2013. p. 1–13.

9. Mountouris A, Voutsas E, Tassios D. Solid waste plasma gasification: Equilibrium model development and exergy analysis. Energy Conversion and Management 2006; 47(13–14): 1723–1737. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.10.015.

10. Zainal ZA, Ali R, Lean C H, et al. Prediction of performance of a downdraft gasifier using equilibrium modeling for different biomass materials. Energy Conversion and Management 2001; 42(12): 1499–1515.

11.

12. Mavukwana A, Jalama K, Ntuli F, et al. Simulation of sugarcane bagasse gasification using aspen plus. International Conference on Chemical and Environmental Engineering (ICCEE); 2013 Apr 15–16; Johannesburg, South Africa. 2013. P. 70–74.

13. Jayah TH, Aye L, Fuller R J, et al. Computer simulation of a downdraft wood gasifier for tea drying. Biomass and Bioenergy 2003; 25(4): 459–469. DOI: 10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00037-0.

14. Rutberg PG, Bratsev AN, Kuznetsov VA, et al. On efficiency of plasma gasification of wood residues. Biomass and Bioenergy 2011; 35(1): 495–504.

15. Georgiev IB, Mihailov BI. Some general conclusions from the results of studies on solid fuel steam plasma gasification. Fuel 1992; 71(8): 895–901. DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(92)90239-K.

16. Zhang Q, Wu Y, Dor L, et al. A thermodynamic analysis of solid waste gasification in the Plasma Gasification Melting process. Applied Energy 2013; 112: 405–413. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.054.

17. de Souza-Santos ML. A feasibility study of an alternative power generation system based on biomass gasification/gas turbine concept. Fuel 1999; 78(5): 529–538. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-2361(98)00181-1.

18. Pellegrini LF, de Oliveira Jr S. Exergy analysis of sugarcane bagasse gasification. Energy 2007; 32(4): 314–327. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.07.028.

19. Mourao R, Marquesi AR, Gorbunov AV, et al. Thermochemical assessment of gasification process efficiency of biofuels industry waste with different plasma oxidants. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 2015; 43(10): 3760–3767. DOI:10.1109/TPS.2015.2416129.

20. Zhang Q, Dor L, Biswas AK, et al. Modeling of steam plasma gasification for municipal solid waste. Fuel Processing Technology 2013; 106: 546–554.

21. Stanmore BR. Generation of energy from sugarcane bagasse by thermal treatment. Waste and Biomass Valorization 2010; 1(1): 77–89. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-009-9000-3.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/tse.v3i2.1502

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jorge Jadid Tamayo-Pacheco, José Ramón Copa-Rey, Manuel Cantos-Macías, Angel Luis Brito-Sauvanell, José Luz Silveira

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.