The performance evaluation of monocrystalline PV module by using water-channel cooling technique with forced convection

Ehtsham Ul Haq, Zain Ali, Muhammad Tuoqeer Anwar, Muhammad Ahmad Ali, Muhammad Rizwan Ameer, Naveed Husnain, Mohamed Kchaou, Tahir Rasheed, Syed Khawar Hussain Shah, Muhammad Salman Nawaz

Article ID: 10925
Vol 8, Issue 1, 2025

VIEWS - 425 (Abstract)

Abstract


The power and efficiency of the monocrystalline PV module increase by reducing its panel temperature. It depends on the solar irradiance and the operating temperature of the PV module. Due to an increase in the operating temperature of the PV module, the efficiency decreases. As the temperature rises, the power output of the PV module also decreases. To improve the efficiency of the PV module, two different cooling techniques are investigated in this paper, i.e., the water channel cooling technique and the water-channel cooling technique accompanied with forced convection. In the water-channel cooling technique, copper pipes with serpentine and multi-inlet outlet arrangements are utilized at the backside of the mono-crystalline PV module, and the water is passed through pipes, while in water-channel cooling along with forced convection, the copper pipes with serpentine and multi-inlet outlet arrangements along with fans are employed. It is observed that the multi-inlet-outlet arrangement is more efficient as compared to the serpentine arrangement owing to the better heat transfer between the cooling media and the PV module. The experimental results demonstrate an increase in power output and efficiency realized through the reduction in operating temperature of the PV module and thus improving the open circuit voltage.

Keywords


mono-crystalline PV module; back surface cooling; photovoltaic system; forced convection; solar energy

Full Text:

PDF


References


El-Sebaey MS, Ellman A, Hegazy A, et al. Experimental study with thermal and economical analysis for some modifications on cylindrical sector and double slope, single basin solar still. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 2023; 49. doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2023.103310 El-Sebaey MS, Ellman A, Hegazy A, et al. Experimental analysis and CFD modeling for conventional basin-type solar still. Energies. 2020; 13(21). doi: 10.3390/en13215734 Sathyamurthy R, Ali HM, Said Z, et al. Enhancing solar still thermal performance: The role of surface coating and thermal energy storage in repurposed soda cans. Journal of Energy Storage. 2024; 77. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.109807 Nag SK, Gangopadhyay TK, Paserba J. Solar Photovoltaics: A Brief History of Technologies [History]. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine. 2022; 20(3): 77–85. doi: 10.1109/MPE.2022.3150814 Wilson GM, Al-Jassim M, Metzger WK, et al. The 2020 photovoltaic technologies roadmap. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2020; 53: 493001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab9c6a Dambhare MV, Butey B, Moharil SV. Solar photovoltaic technology: A review of different types of solar cells and its future trends. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021; 1913: 12053. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1913/1/012053 Al-Ezzi AS, Ansari MNM. Photovoltaic Solar Cells: A Review. Applied System Innovation. 2022; 5. doi: 10.3390/asi5040067 Enaganti PK, Dwivedi PK, Srivastava AK, et al. Study of solar irradiance and performance analysis of submerged monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications. 2020; 28(7): 725–735. doi: 10.1002/pip.3264 Jiang L, Cui S, Sun P, et al. Comparison of Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Modules. In: Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 5th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC); 12–14 June 2020; Chongqing, China. pp. 341–344. Siecker J, Kusakana K, Numbi BP. A review of solar photovoltaic systems cooling technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017; 79: 192–203. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.053 Bashir MA, Ali HM, Amber KP, et al. Performance investigation of photovoltaic modules by back surface water cooling. Thermal Science. 2018; 22(6): 2401–2411. doi: 10.2298/TSCI160215290B Bashir MA, Ali HM, Khalil S, et al. Comparison of Performance Measurements of Photovoltaic Modules during Winter Months in Taxila, Pakistan. International Journal of Photoenergy. 2014; 2014: 898414. doi: 10.1155/2014/898414 Adar M, Najih Y, Gouskir M, et al. Three PV plants performance analysis using the principal component analysis method. Energy. 2020; 207: 118315. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118315 Sainthiya H, Beniwal NS. Comparative analysis of electrical performance parameters under combined water cooling technique of photovoltaic module: An experimental investigation. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 2020; 42(15): 1902–1913. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2019.1604894 Nabil T, Mansour TM. Augmenting the performance of photovoltaic panel by decreasing its temperature using various cooling techniques. Results in Engineering. 2022; 15: 100564. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100564 Shukla A, Kant K, Sharma A, et al. Cooling methodologies of photovoltaic module for enhancing electrical efficiency: A review. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2017; 160: 275–286. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.10.047 Almuwailhi A, Zeitoun O. Investigating the cooling of solar photovoltaic modules under the conditions of Riyadh. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences. 2023; 35(2): 123–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jksues.2021.03.007 Eid AF, Lee S, Hong SG, et al. Hybrid cooling techniques to improve the performance of solar photovoltaic modules. Solar Energy. 2022; 245: 254–264. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2022.09.026 Shaker LM, Al-Amiery AA, Hanoon MM, et al. Examining the influence of thermal effects on solar cells: A comprehensive review. Sustainable Energy Research. 2024; 11. doi: 10.1186/s40807-024-00100-8



DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/tse10925

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.