Nothofagus pumilio forests constitute the most economically important forest stand in southern Argentina and Chile. Total volume stocking and volumetric yield vary according to site quality, degree of occupation, growth stage and forest history of the stand. The objective of this work was to evaluate the stocking and the productive potential in quantity and quality of products for the sawmilling industry, using three harvesting systems (short logs, long logs and complete shafts) in the protection cut of a N. pumilio forest of site quality III in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina). The trials were conducted in an irregular mature forest with two strata and abundant regeneration (3.0 ha; RDI 93.8–113.4%). Total volumes varied between 726.5 and 850.3 m³∙ha^-1, with a volume/basal area ratio of 11.8 to 12.1 m³∙m^-2. The harvesting rates obtained were: 45.5% for complete logs, 21.3% for long logs and 22.4% for short logs. A model was used to estimate the timber volume for each system, where full shafts resulted in a significant increase in timber volume. Considering new alternatives in the planning of harvesting in forest management for N. pumilio forests, such as the system of complete shafts, allows obtaining higher harvesting rates, increasing the benefits for the forestry company and minimizing the damage to the forest, due to the shorter distance of the machinery in the forest harvesting.

1. Collado L. The forests of Tierra del Fuego. Analysis of their stratification using satellite images for the forest inventory of the province. Multequina 2001; 10: 1–16.

2. Martínez PG, Lencinas MV. Forest management in Nothofagus pumilio forests in Tierra del Fuego. IDIA-XXI 2005; 5(8): 107–110.

3. Martínez PG, Cellini JM, Lencinas MV, et al. Environmental variables influencing regeneration of Nothofagus pumilio in a system with combined aggregated and dispersed retention. Forest Ecology and Management 2011; 261: 178–186.

4. Martínez PG, Lencinas MV, Peri PL, et al. Photosynthetic plasticity of Nothofagus pumilio seedlings to light intensity and soil moisture. Forest Ecology and Management 2007; 243(2): 274–282.

5. Schmidt H, Urzúa A. Transformation and management of Lenga forests in Magallanes. Santiago, Chile. Universidad de Chile; 1982. p. 62 (Ciencias Agrícolas N°11).

6. Martínez PG, Cellini JM, Peri PL, et al. Timber production of Nothofagus pumilio forests by a shelterwood system in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina). Forest Ecology and Management 2000; 134(1–3): 153–162.

7. Martínez PG, Peri PL, Vukasovic R, et al. Site index equation for Nothofagus pumilio Patagonian forest. Phyton 1997; 61(1/2): 55–60.

8. Gea-Izquierdo G, Pastur GM, Cellini JM, et al. Forty years of silvicultural management in southern Nothofagus pumilio (Poepp. et Endl) Krasser primary forests. Forest Ecology and Management 2004; 201(2–3): 335–347. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.015.

9. Mosqueda C. Volumetric yields in the thinning of a lenga (Nothofaguspumilio) forest in the XII Region. Forestry Engineering Thesis. Santiago, Chile. Universidad de Chile; 1995. p. 68.

10. Cordone VJ, Bava J. Application of Lenga roundwood grading. Esquel, Argentina. CIEFAP; 1997. p. 32 (Technical Publication No.26).

11. Cremer KW, Borough CJ, Mckinnell FH, et al. Effects of stocking and thinning on wind damage in plantations. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 1982; 12(2): 244–268.

12. Wilson JS, Oliver CD. Stability and density management in Douglas-fir plantations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2000; 30: 910–920.

13. Cailliez F. Estimación del volumen forestal y prediccion del rendimiento, con referencia especial a los trópicos. V. 1: Estimación del volume (Spanish) [Forest volume estimation and yield prediction with special reference to the tropics. V. 1: Volume estimation]. Roma: FAO; 1980. p. 80.

14. Clutter JL, Fortson JC, Pienaar LV, et al. Timber management: A quantitative approach. New York: John Wiley; 1983. p. 333.

15. Husch B, Beers TW, Kershaw JA. Forest Mensuration, Fourth edition. Malabar, USA. Krieger Publishing; 2003. p. 443.

16. Martínez PG. Biometry and forest production for natural forests of Nothofagus pumilio in Tierra del Fuego [PhD thesis]. Bahía Blanca, Argentina: Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad Nacional del Sur; 2006. p. 242.

17. Martínez PG, Cellini JM, Lencinas MV, et al. Standing and sawlog volumetric yield functions for lenga (Nothofagus pumilio). Ciencias Forestales 2001–2002; 15(1–2): 32–45.

18. Marquardt DW. An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 1963; 11(2): 431–441.

19. Martínez PG, Lencinas MV, Cellini JM, et al. Timber management with variable retention in Nothofagus pumilio forests of Southern Patagonia. Forest Ecology and Management 2009; 258(4): 436–443.

20. Chauchard LM. Management plan of Lomadas de Cholila, Chubut Province. Proyecto de desarrollo forestal del Área Cordillerana. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Federal Investment Council; 1990. p. 50.

21. Ferrando M. Structure and volumetric yields under protection cutting of a lenga forest in Aysén, XI Region [Forest Engineer Thesis]. Santiago, Chile: Universidad de Chile; 1994. p. 53.

22. Bava J, Hlopec R. The sustainable management of Lenga in Tierra del Fuego. Actas IV Jornadas Forestales Patagónicas; 1995 Oct 24–27; San Martín de Los Andes; 1995. p. 81–96.

23. González SA. Volumetric yields in the protection cutting of a lenga forest in Monte Alto, XII Region. Forest Engineer Thesis. Santiago, Chile: Universidad de Chile; 1995. p. 51.

24. Garib IA. Volumetric yields in lenga (Nothofagus pumilio) forest subjected to protection logging. Province of Tierra del Fuego, XII Region. Forestry Engineering Thesis. Santiago, Chile: Universidad de Chile; 1996. p. 55.

25. Daffunchio I, Villena P. Final report of the Lenga Patagonia SA Pilot Yield Areas. Río Grande, Argentina: Lenga Patagonia S.A; 1997. p. 34.

26. Martínez PG, Cellini JM, Vukasovic RF. Performance report of the Kareken Sawmill. Secretaría de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable de la Nación, Dirección de Bosques ed. Informe Final: Subproyecto “Aplicación a gran escala en un aserradero medio”; 2004. p. 319–352.

27. Vergara PM, Schlatter RP. Aggregate retention in two Tierra del Fuego Nothofagus forests: short-term effect on bird abundance. Forest Ecology and Management 2006; 225: 213–224.

28. Martínez PG, Lencinas MV, Peri P, et al. Harvesting adaptation to biodiversity conservation in sawmill industry: technology innovation and monitoring program. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 2007b; 2(3): 58–70.

29. Lencinas MV, Martínez PG, Gallo EA, et al. Mitigation of biodiversity loss in Nothofagus pumilio managed forests of South Patagonia. In: Pacha MJ, Luque S, Galetto L, Iverson L (editors). Understanding biodiversity loss: An overview of forest fragmentation in South America. Part III. Landscape Ecology for Conservation, Management and Restoration. IALE Landscape Research and Management Papers; 2007. p. 112–120.

30. Lencinas MV, Martínez PG, Solan R, et al. Forest management with variable retention impact over bryophyte communities of Nothofagus pumilio understory. Forstarchiv 2008; 79: 77–82.

31. Cellini JM, Martínez PG, Vukasovic R, et al. Sustainability guidelines in forest management of Nothofagus pumilio (Poepp. et Endl.) Krasser forests. Yvyraretá 2005; 13: 77–82.

32. Saveneh A, Dignan P. The use of shelterwood in Eucalyptus regnans forest: the effect of overwood removal at three years on regeneration stocking and health. Australian Forestry 1997; 60(4): 251–259.

33. Martínez PG, Peri PL, Fernández MC, et al. Regeneration development along the forest management cycle of a Nothofagus pumilio forest: Incidence of cover and harvesting Bosque 1999; 20(2): 39–46.

34. Rosenfeld JM, Navarro Cerrillo RM, Guzman Alvarez JR. Regeneration of Nothofagus pumilio (Poepp. et Endl) Krasser forests after five years of seed tree cutting. Journal of Environmental Management 2006; 78: 44–51.

35. Hickey JE, Neyland MG, Bassett OD. Rationale and design for the Warra silvicultural systems trial in wet Eucalyptus obliqua forests in Tasmania. Tasforests 2001; 13(2): 155–182.

36. Wang JR, Zhong AL, Simard SW, et al. Aboveground biomass and nutrient accumulation in an age sequence of paper birch (Betula papyrifera) in the Interior Cedar Hemlock zone, British Columbia. Forest Ecology and Management 1996; 83: 27–38.

37. Goya JF, Pérez C, Frangi JL, et al. Impact of harvest and residue fate on nutrient capital stability in Pinus taeda L. plantations. Southern Ecology 2003;13: 139–150.

38. Gargaglione V, Peri PL, Rubio G. Differential nutrient partitioning in Nothofagus antarctica trees growing in a gradient of site qualities in Southern Patagonia. Forest 2013; 34(3): 291–302. doi: 10.4067/S0717/S0717-92002012013000300005.

39. Lencinas MV, Martínez PG, Gallo EA, et al. Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention improve bird conservation in managed South Patagonian forests. Forest Ecology and Management 2009; 258: 472–480. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.012.

40. Lencinas MV, Martínez PG, Gallo EA, et al. Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention to improve understory plant diversity conservation in southern Patagonian forests. Forest Ecology and Management 2011; 262: 1236–1250.

41. Lencinas MV, Martínez PG, Gallo E, et al. Decreasing negative impacts of harvesting over insect communities using variable retention in southern Patagonian forests. Journal of Insect Conservation 2014; 18: 479–495. doi: 10.1007/s10841-014-9661-5.