On the possible impacts of a regulatory change on resource conservation: The case of the plumpox virus in France
Vol 6, Issue 2, 2023
VIEWS - 173 (Abstract) 115 (PDF)
Abstract
Preserving natural resources in the context of global change includes looking at how to protect trees, whether in forests or for fruit production, from various epidemic diseases. A change in European regulation presently underway (EU 2016/2031; currently, in 2023, transitional measures are being implemented in France) transfers, from the public authorities to the profession (all the tree growers susceptible to be concerned), the responsibility for detecting plum pox virus, which has the potential to damage virtually all stone fruit orchards, and for eliminating the affected trees. Yet the disease is a viral one, transmitted by a vector (aphids) from tree to tree and from orchard to orchard. Within a few years, fruit from contaminated trees can no longer be marketed. We show here that, in the context of this new regulation, the heterogeneity of the tree growers (due to the size of the orchards, the diversification of the crops, the future of the farm...) can lead to a recrudescence of the disease throughout the stone fruit orchards. This would also imply all kind of negative effects on the economic (employment in the agricultural sector, national trade balance, processing and marketing sector activities...), social and environmental (landscapes...) levels. The results can easily be generalised to any problem of conservation of natural resources whose management is delegated to private stakeholders.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Borisova A, Sotirov D. The response of newly introduced plum cultivars to natural infection with Plum pox virus. Acta Horticulturae 2021; 1322: 289–294. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1322.40
2. Pleydell DRJ, Soubeyrand S, Dallot S, et al. Estimation of the dispersal distances of an aphid-borne virus in a patchy landscape. PloS Computational Biology 2018; 14(4): e1006085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006085
3. Dallot S, Thébaud G. Improved knowledge on key epidemiological paramaters to optimise Sharka management strategies. IDHS Acta Horticulturae 2021; 1322: 277–288. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1322.39
4. Coşkan S, Morca AF, Akbaş B, et al. Comprehensive surveillance and population study on plum pox virus in Ankara Province of Turkey. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 2022; 129: 981–991. doi: 10.1007/s41348-022-00597-5
5. Sochor J, Babula P, Adam V, et al. The past, the present and the future. Viruses 2012; 4(11): 2853–2901. doi: 10.3390/v4112853
6. Jones RAC. Global plant virus disease pandemics and epidemics. Plants 2021; 10(2): 233. doi: 10.3390/plants10020233
7. Mellin AM. Attitudes and Expectations of Stakeholders and Arboriculturists Faced with the Change in the Regulation of the Sharka Risk (French) [Master’s thesis]. Université de Montpellier; 2022.
8. Picard C, Rimbaud L, Hendrikx P, et al. PESO: A modelling framework to help improve management strategies for epidemics—Application to sharka. Bulletin EPPO, European and Mediterranean Plant Protection 2017; 47(2): 231–236. doi: 10.1111/epp.12375
9. Rimbaud L, Dallot S, Gottwald T, et al. Sharka epidemiology and worldwide management strategies: Learning lessons to optimize disease control in perennial plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology 2015; 53: 357–378. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080614-120140
10. Terreaux JP. Let’s not forget the future—Values, justice and discount rates (French). Ethique et économique/Ethics and Economics 2018; 15(1): 66–80.
11. Terreaux JP. The Future of Natural Resources—La Graufesenque: The Lights of History. EGD Editions; 2022. 188p.
12. Rapaport A, Sraidi S, Terreaux JP. Optimality of greedy and sustainable policies in the management of renewable resources. Optimal Control Applications and Methods 2003; 24(1): 23–44. doi: 10.1002/oca.718
13. Rapaport A, Terreaux JP, Doyen L. Viability analysis for the sustainable management of renewable resources. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2006; 43(5–6): 466–484. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2005.12.014
14. Delaygue O, Meyruey S. Plum Pox, Plant Health Surveillance, 2019 Health Report (French). Ministère de l’agriculture et de l’alimentation; 2021. p. 9.
15. European Union. Regulation 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 on Protective Measures against Organisms Harmful to Plants (French). European Union; 2016. p. 101.
16. République Française. Order of 31 July 2000 establishing the list of organisms harmful to plants, plant products and other objects subject to compulsory control measures (French). Journal Officiel de la République Française 2000; 13502–13506.
17. Commission Européenne. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 of 28 November 2019 establishing uniform conditions for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards protective measures against organisms harmful to plants (French). Commission Européenne; 2019. p. 279.
18. OCDE. Strengthening Agricultural Resilience in the Face of Multiple Risks. OCDE; 2020. p. 144.
19. Zinsstag J, Schelling E, Waltner-Toews D, et al. (editors). One Health, Theory and Practice of Integrated Approaches to Health (French). Quae; 2020. p. 585.
20. Samuelson PA, Nordhaus WD. Economics (French), 18th ed. Economica; 2005. p. 782.
21. Terreaux JP. Epizootics and the effectiveness of decision-making processes: An example from beekeeping (French). Revue Française d’Economie 2017; 32(2): 160–197.
22. Savary S, Ficke A, Aubertot JN, Hollier C. Crop losses due to diseases and their implications for global food production losses and food security. Food Security 2012; 4: 519–537. doi: 10.1007/s12571-012-0200-5
23. FranceAgriMer. Fruit and Vegetable Studies (French). FranceAgriMer; 2020. p. 8.
24. Baliga S, Maskin E. Mechanism design for the environment. Handbook of Environmental Economics 2003; 1: 305–324.doi: 10.1016/S1574-0099(03)01012-X
25. Laffont JJ, Martimort D. The Theory of Incentives—The Principal Agent Model. Princeton University Press; 2022. p. 421.
26. Kakhbod A. Resource Allocation in Decentralized Systems with Strategic Agents—An Implementation Theory Approach. Springer; 2013. p. 88.
27. Green JR, Laffont JJ. Partially verifiable information and mechanism design. Review of Economic Studies 1986; 53(3): 447–456. doi: 10.2307/2297639
28. Rimbaud L, Bruchou C, Dallot S, et al. Using sensitivity analysis to identify key factors for the propagation of a plant epidemic. Royal Society Open Science 2018; 5(1): 171435. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171435
29. Rimbaud L, Dallot S, Bruchou C, et al. Improving management strategies of plant diseases using sequential sensitivity analysis. Phytopathology 2019; 109(7): 1184–1197. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-06-18-0196-R
30. Picard C, Soubeyrand S, Jacquot E, Thébaud G. Analyzing the influence of landscape aggregation on disease spread to improve management strategies. Phytopathology 2019; 109(7): 1198–1207. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-05-18-0165-R
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/nrcr.v6i2.2986
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jean-Philippe Terreaux
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.