Spatial and temporal characteristics of China’s water footprint of energy and its matching relationship with water resources

Wei Guan, Xiangning Zhao, Shuting Xu

Article ID: 1564
Vol 4, Issue 2, 2021

VIEWS - 988 (Abstract) 232 (pdf)

Abstract


Energy and water resources are very important for human survival and social development. Energy and water footprint can reflect the real occupation of water resources in the process of energy production. Based on the energy and water footprint evaluation model, this paper calculates the life cycle water footprint of fossil energy and power production in 30 provinces (cities and autonomous regions) in China, studies the temporal and spatial pattern evolution characteristics of China’s raw coal, crude oil, natural gas, hydropower and thermal power from 2004 to 2016, and analyzes the spatial matching relationship between China’s energy and water footprint and water resources. The results show that: (1): during the study period, the water footprint of fossil energy increases first and then decreases with 2012 as the boundary. The rapid growth of hydropower water footprint promotes the continuous growth of power water footprint. (2): In terms of spatial pattern, the water footprint of fossil energy increases in the West and decreases in the East with the Huhuanyong line as the boundary, and the Inner Mongolia, Shanxi and Shaanxi region as the high-value concentration area; in the power water footprint, there is a significant spatial boundary between hydropower water footprint and thermal power water footprint. The rapid growth of hydropower water footprint has gradually formed a high-value concentration area of power water footprint in the Yangtze River Basin, the Pearl River Basin and the southeast coast. (3): The spatial matching degree of energy and water footprint and water resources fluctuates and declines in the pattern of high in the south and low in the north. The spatial matching degree of fossil energy and water footprint is lower than that of electric power and water resources. The energy water contradiction between raw coal production and thermal power generation is the most prominent. One third of the country has the problem of energy water mismatch. North China with high energy and water footprint has great pressure on energy water matching. The contradiction between energy production and water resources allocation still exists. Truly reflect the matching relationship between energy and water footprint and water resources, help to optimize the comprehensive management of energy and water resources, and provide a quantitative basis for maximizing the energy water synergy.


Keywords


Energy Water Correlation; Energy and Water Footprint; Life Cycle Assessment; Water Resources; Spatial Matching; Green Development

Full Text:

pdf


References


1. Chen Q, An T, Lu S, et al. The water footprint of coal-fired electricity production and the virtual water flows associated with coal and electricity transportation in China. Energy Procedia 2019; 158: 3519–3527.

2. Ali B, Kumar A. Development of life cycle water footprints for oil sands-based transportation fuel production. Energy 2017; 131: 41–49.

3. Ma X, Yang D, Shen X, et al. How much water is required for coal power generation: An analysis of gray and blue water foot-prints. Science of the Total Environment 2018; 636: 547–557.

4. Okadera T, Geng Y, Fujita T, et al. Evaluating the water footprint of the energy supply of Liaoning Province, China: A regional input–output analysis approach. Energy Policy 2015; 78(3): 148–157.

5. Zhang C, Anadon LD. Life cycle water use of energy production and its environmental impacts in China. Environmental Science & Technology 2013; 47(24): 14459–14467.

6. Liao X, Zhao X, Jiang Y, et al. Water footprint of the energy sector in China’s two megalopolises. Ecological Modelling 2019; 391: 9–15.

7. Xiao Z, Yao M, Tang X, et al. Identifying critical supply chains: An input–output analysis for Food–Energy Water Nexus in China. Ecological Modelling 2019; 392: 31–37.

8. Okadera T, Chontanawat J, Gheewala SH. Water footprint for energy production and supply in Thailand. Energy 2014; 77: 49–56.

9. Scherer L, Pfister S. Global water footprint assessment of hydropower. Renewable Energy 2016; 99: 711–720.

10. Ghani HU, Silalertruksa T, Gheewala SH. Water–energy–food nexus of bioethanol in Pakistan: A life cycle approach evaluating footprint indicators and energy performance. Science of the Total Environment 2019; 687: 867–876.

11. Ma X, Zhai Y, Zhang R, et al. Energy and carbon coupled water footprint analysis for straw pulp paper production. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019; 233: 23–32.

12. Ding N, Liu J, Yang J, et al. Water footprints of energy sources in China: Exploring options to improve water efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 174: 1021–1031.

13. ISO. ISO 14046: 2014 environmental management–water, footprint–principles, requirements and guidelines. Switzerland: ISO; 2014.

14. Sun C, Bai T, Wu Y, et al. Driving effect of per capita grey water footprint in China from the perspective of factor and efficiency coupling. Journal of Natural Resources 2018; 33(9): 1490–1502.

15. Han Q, Sun C, Zou W. Grey water footprint efficiency measure and its driving pattern analysis on provincial scale in China from 1998 to 2012. Resources Science 2016; 38(6): 1179–1191.

16. Li Y, Guo X, Guo D. An evaluation method of water resources carrying capacity and application. Progress in Geography 2017; 36(3): 342–349.

17. Chen J, Zhang S, Hua D, et al. A study on water resources guarantee in Beijing City based on water footprint evaluation. Resources Science 2010; 32(3): 528–534.

18. Bai J, Zhang H. Spatio-temporal variation and driving force of water–energy–food pressure in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica 2018; 38(10): 1653–1660.

19. National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. China Energy Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press; 2005–2017.

20. National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press; 2005–2017.

21.

22. State Environmental Protection Administration (inventor). Cleaner Production Standard–Coal Mining and Processing Industry. Chinese patent. HJ 4462008. 2008 Nov 21.

23. State Environmental Protection Administration (inventor). Emission Standard for Pollutants from Coal Industry. Chinese patent. GB 20246-2006. 2006 Oct 1.

24. Li H. The study on cleaner production index system for oil & natural gas exploitation (thick oil). Environmental Protection of Oil & Gas Fields 2003; 13(1): 16–18.

25. State Environmental Protection Administration (inventor). Emission Standards for Pollutants in Petroleum Refining Industry. Chinese patent. GB 31570-2015. 2015 Jul 1.

26. National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. China Environmental Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press; 2016.

27. Wang W. Ecological analysis and optimized utilization of water resources in petrochemical industry [PhD thesis]. Shanghai: Tongji University; 2007.

28. Sichuan Academy of Water Conservancy. Water Consumption Quota in Sichuan (Revised Manuscript). Chengdu: Sichuan Academy of Water Conservancy; 2010.

29. State Environmental Protection Administration, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine. Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water. Chinese patent. GB 3838-2002. 2002 Jun 1.

30. Lei Y, Liu Q, Tang W, et al. Promoting role of energy saving and emission reduction of natural gas treating plant on low carbon economy. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas 2011; 40(4): 358–361.

31. Liu J, Zhao D, Gerbens-Leenes PW, et al. China’s rising hydropower demand challenges water sector. Scientific Reports 2015; 5(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.1038/srep11446.

32. Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Water Resources, National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China, et al. The guidance of water efficiency in main industry sectors [Internet]. Available from: http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/att/att/site1/20131022/001e3741a2cc13d062f701.pdf.

33. Zhu F, Zhong L, Wang Q, et al. Huodian hangye zhuyao wuran chanwu paifang xishu (Chinese) [Emission coefficient of main pollution products in thermal power industry]. Beijing: China Statistics Press; 2009.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/nrcr.v4i2.1564

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Wei Guan, Xiangning Zhao, Shuting Xu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.