Natura 2000 network sites in Calabria coastal regions (southern Italy): The case study of Crati River

Nicola Cantasano

Article ID: 11556
Vol 8, Issue 1, 2025


Abstract


The Natura 2000 network is the main tool established by the European Union for biodiversity conservation. The cornerstones of this natural infrastructure are, actually, represented by the Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and the Zones of Special Protection (ZPS). In the Calabria coastal region, this network is formed by 44 ZSCs widespread along the regional coastline. In this way, most of the Natura 2000 sites are located in continental areas, as 75% of the whole, and every key area includes some natural habitat types. In particular, the greater number of habitats is concentrated in transitional environments, as the case study located in the mouth of the Crati River, including 17 habitat types. However, the geographic distribution of Natura 2000 sites is quite unbalanced because most of the SACs are located in continental landscapes, 75% of the whole, while only 25% are concentrated in coastal regions. This irregular distribution of the network leads to a loss of biodiversity levels from continental to coastal areas. So, the implementation of the Natura 2000 network could be the main tool to connect terrestrial and coastal regions not only for biodiversity conservation but also to improve the social and economic conditions of local people.


Keywords


Natura 2000; Calabria; coastal regions; Crati River; habitats; biodiversity

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis. Word Resources Institute; 2005.

2. Ellis EC, Gauthier N, Goldewijk KK. et al. People have shaped most of terrestrial nature for at least 12,000 years. PNAS 2021; 118(17): e2023483118.

3. Tong S, Bambrick H, Beggs PJ. Current and future threats to human health in the Anthropocene. Environment International 2022; 158: 106892.

4. Kleidon A. Sustaining the Terrestrial Biosphere in the Anthropocene: A thermodynamic Earth System Perspective. Ecology, Economy and Society-the INSEE Journal. 2023; 6(1): 53–80.

5. Yang L, Xu H, Pan S. et al. Identifying the impact of global human activities expansion on natural habitats. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024; 484: 140247.

6. Wilson EO. The diversity of Life. Penguin Books; 1992.

7. Algeo TJ, Shen J. Theory and classification of mass extinction causation. Natural Science Review. 2024; 11(1): mwad237.

8. Barnosky A, Matzke N, Tomiya S. et al. Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature. 2011; 471: 51–57.

9. Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Barnosky A. Accelerated modern-induced species loss: Entering he sixth mass extinction. Science Advances. 2015; 1: e1400253.

10. Carlett RT. The ecology of plant extinction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution .2025; 40(3): 286–295.

11. Soulè ME. Conservation: Tactics for a constant crisis. Science. 1991; 253: 744–750.

12. Simberloff D. Do species-area curves predict extinction in fragmented forests? In: Whitmore TC, Sayer JA (editors). Tropical Deforestation and Species Extinction. Chapman and Hall Publishing; 1992.

13. Li W, Kang J, Wang Y. Effects of habitat fragmentation on ecosystem services and their trade-offs in Southwest China: A multi-perspective analysis. Ecological Indicators. 2024; 167: 112699.

14. Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED. Beyond “hotspots”: How to prioritize investments to conserve biodiversity in the Indo-Pacific region. Conservation Biology. 1993; 7: 53–65.

15. Myers NR, Mittermeier C, Mittermeier G, et al. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000; 403: 853–858.

16. Bennett AF. Habitat corridors at the conservation of small mammals in a fragmented forest environment. Landscape Ecology. 1990; 4; 109–122.

17. Gambino R. The dimension of the large area in land-use planning practice. In: Proceedings of town planning, Dossier 6/96, Lecce, 10–12 Ottobre 1996, Lecce, Italy, pp. 82-90.

18. Beunen R, Hagens JE. The use of the Concept of Ecological Networks in Nature Conservation policies and Planning Practices. Landscape Research. 2009; 34(5): 563–580.

19. Hilthy J, Worboys GL, Keeley A. et al. Guidelines for conserving connectivity through ecological networks and corridors. Best Practice Protected Area, IUCN Guidelines Series. 2020.

20. Hebblewhite M, Hilthy JA, Williams S et al. Can a large-landscape conservation vision contribute to acheving biodiversity targets? Conservation Science and Practice. 2021; 22(4): e588.

21. Biondi E, Casavecchia S, Pesaresi S. Habitats Directive and Conservation of Forest Biodiversity. Proceedings of the Third National Congress of Silviculture for the Improvement and Conservation of Italian Forests (Italian). In: Proceedings of the Terzo Congresso Nazionale di Selvicoltura; 16–18 October 2008; Taormina, Messina, Italy.

22. Blasi C. Bioitaly: Nature 2000 in Italy. Environmental Science, Biology. 1996; 54: 31–38.

23. Fan S, Axmacher JC, Shu H, et al. Ecological network design based on optimizing ecosystem services: Case study in the Huang-Huai region, China. Ecological Indicators. 2023; 150: 110264.

24. Gambino, R. Conservation and planning of wide area systems (Italian). In: Edicomprint (editor). Atti Convegno Nazionale WWF Italia ONG ONLUS. Ecoregioni e reti ecologiche, Roma, 27–28 Maggio. 2004; pp. 24–36.

25. Blasi C, Carranza M, Frondoni R, et al. Ecosystem classification and mapping: A proposal for Italian landscapes. Applied Vegetation Science; 2000; 4: 233–242.

26. Coastal studies. Coastal dynamics and defense, integrated coastal zone management. N. 10 (Italian). In: Nuova Grafica Fiorentina (editor). lo stato dei litorali italiani. 2006; pp. 113.

27. Caloiero D. Hydrology of the Crati Basin (Italian). In: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, IRPI, Geodata 4, Cosenza, Italia. 1975.

28. Bulgarini F. Ferroni F, Petrella S, Teofili C. Identifying strategic areas for biodiversity conservation: Application of the ecoregional methodology (Italia). Biogeographia. 2006; 27; 255–273.

29. Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. Global Wetland Outlook: State of the World’s Wetlands and their Services to People. Ramsar Convention Secretariat; 2018.

30. Beck MW. The sea around: Conservation planning in marine regions. In: Groves C (editor). Drafting a Conservation Blueprint: A Practitioner’s Guide for Biodiversity. Island Press; 2003; pp. 319–344.

31. Wood LJ, Fish L, Laughren J, et al. Assessing progress towards global marine protection targets: Shortfalls in information and action. Oryx. 2008; 42: 340–351.

32. Stoms DM, Davis FW, Andelman SJ, et al. Integrated coastal reserve planning: Making the land-sea connection. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2005; 3(8): 429–436.

33. Gantioler S, Rayment M, ten Brink P, et al. The costs and socio-economic benefits associated with the Natura 2000 network. International Journal Sustainable Society. 2014; 6(1/2): 135–157.

34. Alvarez-Romero J, Pressey RL, Ban NC, et al. Integrated Land-Sea Conservation Planning: The Missing Links. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics. 2011; 42: 381–409.

35. Lukambagire I, Matovu B, Manianga A, et al. Towards a collabrative stakeholder engagement pathway to increase ocean sustainability related to marine spatial planning in developing coastal states. Environmental Challenges. 2024; 15: 100954.

36. Wilson KA, Auerbach NA, Sam K, et al. Conservation Research Is Not Happening Where It is Most Needed. PLoS Biology. 2016; 14(3): e1002413.

37. Wilson MC, Chen XY, Corlett RT, et al. Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity conservation: Key findings and future challenges. Landscape Ecology. 2016; 31: 219–227.

38. Fahrig L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics. 2003; 34: 487–515.

39. Mullu D. A Review on the Effect of Habitat Fragmentation on Ecosystem. Journal of Natural Sciences Research. 2016; 6(15): 1–15.

40. Tomaselli G, Russo P, Ruccio L, et al. Assessment of landscape regeneration of a Natura 2000 site hosting greenhouse farming by using a dashboard of indicators. A case in Sicily through the territorial implementation of a “pilot project” at farm level. Land Use Policy. 2020; 92: 104444.

41. Cardinale B, Duffy J, Gonzalez A, et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature. 2012; 486(401): 59–67.

42. Elisha OD, Felix MJ. The loss of biodiversity and ecosystems: A threat to the functioning of our planet, economy and human society. International Journal of Economics, Environmental Development and Society. 2020; 1(1): 30–44.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/nrcr11556

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.